ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of decompression without gastric tube after minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery.MethodsSeventy-two patients who underwent minimally invasive esophageal cancer resection at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from 2016 to 2018 were selected as a trial group including 68 males and 4 females with an average age of 58.5±7.9 years, who did not use gastric tube for gastrointestinal decompression after surgery. Seventy patients who underwent the same operation from 2013 to 2015 were selected as the control group, including 68 males and 2 females, with an average age of 59.1±6.9 years, who were indwelled with gastric tube for decompression after surgery. We observed and compared the intraoperative and postoperative indicators and complications of the two groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative level of serum albumin, postoperative nasal jejunal nutrition, whether to enter the ICU postoperatively, death within 30 days after surgery, anastomotic leakage, lung infection, vomiting, bloating or hoarseness (P>0.05). No gastroparesis occurred in either group. Compared with the control group, the recovery time of the bowel sounds and the first exhaust time after the indwelling in the trial group were significantly shorter, and the total hospitalization cost, the incidence of nausea, sore throat, cough, foreign body sensation and sputum difficulty were significantly lower (P<0.05).ConclusionIt is feasible to remove the gastric tube for gastrointestinal decompression after minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery, which will not increase the incidence of postoperative complications, instead, accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients.
目的：比较常规鼻胃管置入法与鼻咽部局部喷雾麻醉后置胃管法对喉癌患者的影响。方法：将需要安置胃管的100例患者随机分成两组，每组50例。实验组行鼻咽部喷雾麻醉，对照组按常规操作，比较两组患者流泪、恶心、呕吐、咳嗽反应，一次成功率及插管所需要时间、插入中暂停次数。结果：实验组一次成功率高，患者反应轻，插管所需时间有显著差异。结论：常规置胃管常因病员难受而中途暂停置管，实验组置胃管前先作鼻咽部局部喷雾麻醉，可明显减轻患者的痛苦，提高插胃管的一次成功率，插管过程中因病员难受暂停次数也明显减少，使临床护理工作时间缩短，对临床护理工作有积极意义。
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and comfort of patients with or without postoperative gastric tube placement after esophageal cancer surgery, and analyze the cost and nursing time of gastric tube placement. Methods The patients with esophageal cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery in West China Hospital of Sichuan University in 2021 were enrolled. The patients were divided into a gastric tube indwelling group and a non gastric tube indwelling group according to whether the gastric tube was indwelled after the operation. The safety and comfort indicators of the two groups were compared. Results A total of 130 patients were enrolled. There were 66 patients in the gastric tube indwelling group, including 53 males and 13 females, aged 61.80±9.05 years and 64 patients in the non gastric tube indwelling group, including 55 males and 9 females, aged 64.47±8.00 years. Six patients in the non gastric tube indwelling group needed to place gastric tube 1 to 3 days after the operation due to their condition. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The subjective comfort of patients in the gastric tube indwelling group was significantly lower than that in the non gastric tube indwelling group (P<0.001), and the incidence of foreign body sensation in the throat of patients in the gastric tube indwelling group was higher than that in the non gastric tube indwelling group (P<0.001). The average nursing time in the gastric tube indwelling group was about 59.58 minutes, and the average cost of gastric tube materials and nursing was 378.24 yuan per patient. Conclusion No gastric tube used after operation for appropriate esophageal cancer patients will not increase the incidence of postoperative complications (pulmonary infection, anastomotic leakage, chylothorax), but can increase the comfort of patients, save cost and reduce nursing workload, which is safe, feasible and economical.
Objective To explore the effect of 16F gastric tube on pain relief in postoperative lung cancer patients. Methods A total of 118 lung cancer patients were treated with radical resection of lung cancer in our hospital between January 2015 and May 2016. The patients were assigned into two groups: a 16F gastric tube group (16F group, 60 patients, 30 males and 30 females at age of 41-73 (52.13±7.83) years and a 28F drainage tube group (28F group, 58 patients, 25 males and 33 females at age of 45-75 (55.62±4.27) years. Clinical effects were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in drainage time (4.47±1.03 dvs. 4.24±1.16 d, P=0.473), drainage amount (560.37±125.00 mlvs. 656.03±132.45 ml, P=0.478), incidences of pneumothorax (5/60 vs. 2/58, P=0.439), pleural effusion (6/60 vs. 3/58, P=0.522), and subcutaneous emphysema (3/60 vs. 1/58, P=0.635) between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain caused by the drainage tube in the16F group was less than that in the 28F drainage tube group with a statistical difference (F=4 242.996, P<0.001). The frequency of taking analgesics in the 16F group was significantly less than that in the 28F group (12/60vs. 26/58, P<0.001). Conclusion The effects of draining pleural effusions and promoting lung recruitment are similar between the 16F group and the 28F group. However, the wound pain caused by 16F gastric tube is significantly less than that by 28F drainage tube.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of intranasal lidocaine spray before nasogastric tube insertion. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM and CNKI databases concerning randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the efficacy and safety of intranasal lidocaine spray before nasogastric tube insertion from their inception to January 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was then conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsSix RCTs involving 384 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the lidocaine group and the saline group in pain and discomfort scores (MD=-25.35, 95%CI -30.37 to -24.33) and first successful insertion rate (RR=1.38, 95%CI 1.21 to 1.57). ConclusionIntranasal lidocaine spray before nasogastric tube insertion could reduce patient pain and discomforts related to the procedure, and improve the first successful insertion rate.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and feasibility of non-nasogastric tube throughout the perioperative period of classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 63 patients who underwent Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2020 to August 2023. According to whether nasogastric tube was placed throughout the perioperative period, the patients were divided into nasogastric tube group (NGT group, n=32) and no nasogastric tube group (no NGT group, n=31). The intraoperative indicators such as gastrointestinal anastomosis mode and outcome measures such as postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results① Preoperative baseline data: the proportion of benign diseases (P=0.005) and preoperative pancreatitis (P=0.003) of the no NGT group were higher than those of the NGT group, and other preoperative baseline data, such as age and sex, were not statistically significant (P>0.05). ② Intraoperative index: the proportion of circular stapler (P=0.009) was smaller and the operation time was shorter (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in the anastomosis, intraoperative blood transfusion and intraoperative bleeding (P>0.05). ③ Postoperative outcome measures: the postoperative length of hospital stay (P<0.001) and the incidence of delayed gastric emptying (P<0.001) of the no NGT group were lower than those in the NGT group, but the postoperative time of food intake, incidence of pancreatic fistula, incidence of postoperative bleeding, and Clavien-Dindo grade of complications were not significant (P>0.05), and on one died within 30 d after operation. ConclusionsThe results of this study preliminarily show that, it is safe and feasible not to place nasogastric tubes throughout the perioperativeperiod in patients undergoing classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. Compared with placing nasogastric tube, it can shorten the postoperative hospital stay, reduce the incidence of postoperative delayed gastric emptying.