【摘要】目的 探讨经胆囊管行术中胆道镜胆道探查的临床应用价值。 方法 对1997年9月至2004年12月期间60例开腹胆囊切除术患者经胆囊管行术中胆道镜胆道探查术，8例腹腔镜下经胆囊管行胆道镜胆道探查术的资料进行回顾性分析。结果 所有患者结石清除率为100%，术后平均住院7.2 d。结论 在无禁忌证的前提下，无论是开腹还是腹腔镜手术，应首先考虑经胆囊管途径行胆道镜胆道探查取石术。
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) in the treatment of recurrent type Ⅱa hepatolithiasis.MethodsAll of 293 patients with recurrent type Ⅱa hepatolithiasis admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from December 2010 to December 2017 were collected retrospectively, 82 of whom were treated with the PTCSL (PTCSL group), 211 of whom were treated with traditional open surgery (open group). The patients were matched according to the ratio of 1∶1 by using the method of propensity score matching, then the patients were compared after matching.ResultsA total of 59 pairs were successfully matched, that was, there were 59 patients in the PTCSL group and open group, respectively. Compared with the open group, the PTCSL group had the similar conditions such as the gender, age, preoperative Child-Pugh classification, and times of previous biliary operations, etc. (P>0.050). There was no perioperative death in both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the success rate, operation time, times of operations, time of T tube removal after operation, stone residual rate, and stone recurrence rate (P>0.050). Although the hospital costs of the PTCSL group was higher than that of the open group (P<0.050), the PTCSL group had various advantages, such as less intraoperative bleeding, smaller incisional scar, shorter hospital stay and postoperative ventilation time, and lower rate of total postoperative complications (P<0.050).ConclusionsAfter learning curve, PTCSL has many advantages over traditional open surgery in treatment of recurrent type Ⅱa hepatolithiasis. PTCSL is a minimally invasive surgery, which is safe and effective.
From December 1981 to October 1997, we had performed 1559 cases of intrahepatobiliary tract stones by surgery alone/or with cholangioscopy, of which 332 cases were left intrahepatobiliary tract stones (accounted for 33.9%), 111 right intrahepatobiliary tract stones (accounted for 11.3%) and 545 cases in both sides (54.7%). 324 patients complicated with stricture of biliary tract (32.3%), of which 156 cases (48.2%) were stricture of left intrahepatobiliary tract, 107 cases (33.0%) stricture of right intrahepatobiliary tract, 61 cases (18.8%) stricture of hepatic hilus biliary tract. The operative procedure were: ①hapatic lobe or segment resection, ②high cholangiotomy and palstic repair, ③choledochojejunostomy and ④T-tube or U-tube drainage with removal of stones by cholangioscopy later. The operative procedure should be based on different types of intrahepatobiliary tract stones and patholigical features. The result indicates that cholangioscopy may play an important role in the treatment of intrahepatobiliary tract stones.
Objective To explore the effect of gallbladder preserving surgery with laparoscope and choledochoscope.Methods The data of 60 cases of gallbladder preserving surgery with laparoscope and choledochoscope （observation group） and carried out with the same period 61 cases of small incision gallbladder preserving surgery （control group） between June 2008 to January 2013 were retrospective analyzed. Results All patients were followed up for （18±2.4）months （6-36 months）. The intraoperative blood loss， postoperative gallbladder hemorrhage rate， gallbladder dysfunctionrate， postoperative hospitalization time， stone recurrence rate， and reoperation rate in observation group were less orlower or shorter than the control group （P＜0.05）. The operative time and hospital costs in observation group were longeror higher than that of the control group （P＜0.05）. The rest of the observation index of two groups were no significant differences （P＞0.05）. Conclusions The gallbladder preserving surgery with laparoscope and choledochoscope is safeand feasible in technique level， and the short-term effect after operation is better. But the operation indications must be controlled strictly. The long-term efficacy needs further accumulation of cases and collect enough evidence to verify.
Objective To study the clinical effects of laparoscope combined with choledochoscope in patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Methods Clinical data of 74 patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis between Mar. 2009 and Feb. 2011 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them， 37 cases underwent the laparoscope combined with choledochoscope operation （referred to as the double mirror operation group） and 37 cases underwent the conventional open operation （open operation group）. The intraoperative conditions， therapeutic effect， and complications of patients in 2 groups were compared. Results The stone clearance rates of the two groups were 100%. The recurrence rate of 2 groups in the follow-up process was no significantly difference （P＞0.05）. In the double mirror operation group， the operative time was significantly longer than that open operation group （P＜0.01）；the intraoperative bleeding was significantly less than that open operation group （P＜0.01）；the anal exhaust time after operation， get out of bed time after operation， and total duration of hospitalization were significantly shorter than that open operation group （P＜0.01）；and the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than that open oper-ation group（P＜0.01）. Conclusion Laparoscope combined with choledochoscope in treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis patients has exact effects， with minor trauma， quicker recovery， and fewer complications， and it’s worthy of promotion.
Objective To investigate the effect of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy on common bile duct (CBD) stones with primary suture of the CBD. Methods Totally 523 patients of gallbladder stone companied with CBD stones or choledochectasia (diameter ≥0.8 cm) from September 1998 to December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. Results The primary suture of the CBD incision was successfully performed in 487 patients. The CBD stones were completely removed during the operation in 400 patients. Nothing was found in 87 cases. In 10 cases conversion to open surgery were performed and in 26 cases the T tube drainage was put into the CBD in choledocholithotomy. Average operative time was 90 min and average bleeding volume was 50 ml. All patients took food at 24 h, returned general activity on 2-3 d and discharged on 5 d after operation. Postoperative biliary leakage occurred in 29 cases with drainage average volume of 35 ml/d and continued 1-6 d, which were cured by non-operation therapy. Conclusions The primary suture of the CBD during the laparosocopy combined with choledochosopy in choledocholithotomy is a safe and effective operation with less invasion, less pain and quicker recovery. CBD incision suture without T tube drainage can be done when CBD stones are cleared completely and no stenosis is found in extrahepatic bile duct.
目的 探讨腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术的临床价值。方法 回顾性分析我院2009年2月至2010年2月期间95例腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术患者的临床资料。结果 95例患者均顺利完成保胆取石术，平均手术时间49 min，术中平均出血量9 ml，除8例发生切口脂肪液化外无其他手术并发症发生，1年内随访无复发。结论 在严格掌握适应证的前提下，对胆囊结石患者有选择性地采用腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术，是一种可供选择的安全的微创治疗方法。
目的探讨胆管残余和复发结石的原因、特点和处理经验。方法回顾性分析128例胆管残余和复发结石再手术临床资料。 结果残余或复发结石位于肝外胆管68例，肝内胆管48例，肝内、外胆管12例。再手术行残株胆囊切除术2例（1.5%）， 胆总管探查、T管引流术64例（50.0%），肝左外叶切除或肝左叶切除术+胆总管切开取石29例（22.7%），肝右叶、段切除加胆总管切开取石6例（4.7%），同时行狭窄胆管切开整形胆管空肠吻合术13例（10.2%），单独或联合行胆管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术14例（10.9%）。术后痊愈出院124例，自动出院2例，死亡2例。 术后出现并发症18例（14.1%），其中切口感染 10例，胸腔积液3例，胆肠瘘3例，上消化道出血2例，均经保守治疗治愈。出院的124例中117例获随访1～2年，89例（76.1%）恢复满意，18例（15.4%）恢复较好， 10例（8.5%）经B超、CT、MRCP等检查证实再次复发胆管结石，其中6例经再次手术治愈，4例经中西医结合药物治疗好转。 结论术前全面了解病情，选择合适的手术时机，术中认真仔细的探查确认，并结合术中造影、胆道镜以及术者的经验技术，术后有效的治疗，是降低残石、结石复发及再手术的关键因素。
Objective To investigate the clinical significance of routine application of choledochoscope during operation of biliary duct. Methods The clinical data of 136 patients with the routine application of intraoperative choledochoscope dealing with bile duct diseases in this hospital from October 2003 to July 2009 were analyzed and summarized. Results Intraoperative choledochoscope inspection, taking stones and targeted surgery were performed in 116 cases with extrahepatic and (or) intrahepatic bile duct stones. The taking out rate of extrahepatic bile duct stones was 100% (85/85), the residual stone rates of extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile duct were 0 (0/85) and 22.6% (7/31), respectively, with the total residual stone rate was 6.0% (7/116). By using intraoperative choledochoscope, benign intrahepatic bile duct stricture was found in 13 cases, malignant extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile duct stricture in 8 cases. Four cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and 4 cases of common bile duct cancer, 2 cases of lower segment of common bile duct polyp, 3 cases of hepatolithiasis with the left hepatic bile duct carcinoma were diagnosed by biopsy via choledochoscope. Causes were confirmed by applying choledochoscope in 16 patients with obstructive jaundice. The use of choledochoscope with surgical treatment enabled benign and malignant bile duct stricture to achieve good results, without serious complications such as bile duct dilaceration, subphrenic abscess or acute cholangitis. Conclusions Using choledochoscope can tremendously reduce the residual rate of stone in biliary duct surgery, increase the definite diagnosis rate of biliary duct diseases and play a role of reasonable instruction in its treatment options. It has unique advantages in identifying causes of jaundice. It is remarkable that the role of applying choledochoscope to diagnose and cure biliary duct diseases. It should be widely used.