摘要:目的:探讨联合应用激光汽化减压(percutaneous laser disc discompression,PLDD)、射频热凝靶点消融、臭氧注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症的的个体化选择。方法: 自2006年6月,在CT引导下选择性联合应用PLDD、射频和臭氧治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者267例,突出椎间盘的特点个体化选择穿刺路径和治疗方法;其中PLDD联合臭氧治疗92例(A组),射频联合臭氧治疗67例(B组),PLDD、射频和臭氧三者联合治疗108例(C组)。结果:所有患者均顺利完成手术,于术后1周、1个月,3个月及6个月随访记录VAS评分和Macanab优良率。三组患者VAS评分经方差分析,手术前、后有显著性差异(Plt;0.05),术后1周至6个月的VAS评分统计无显著性差异(Pgt;0.05);术后三组间VAS评分、Macanab优良率比较无显著性差异(Pgt;0.05)。结论: 选择性联合应用微创技术进行个体化的立体治疗,具有扩大微创手术适应症、提高手术疗效的优势,值得推广和利用。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the selectivity and individualization of using percutaneous laser disc discompression(PLDD) and ozone injection combined with radiofrequency thermocoagulation and target ablation curing lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. Methods: From June 2006, 267 lumbar disc herniation cases were operated that guided by CT, the characteristic of the liable disc was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and CT before the procedure. 92 cases (A group) were treated by PLDD combined with ozone injection,67 case were treated by radiofrequency thermocoagulation and target ablation combined with ozone injection, 108 cases were treated by PLDD and ozone injection combined with radiofrequency thermocoagulation and target ablation. Results: All case been successfully operated, the theraptic effect was evaluated by comparing the value of VAS and excellent and good rate of therapy at preoperation and at 1 week, 1month,3 months, 6 months after operation. The value of VAS in three groups at postoperation were remarkably lower than preoperation (Plt;0.05). The excellent and good rate of therapy at 6 months was respectively 94.5％ in group A,94.0％ in group B and 95.4％ in group C,no significant difference was observed between the three groups(Pgt;0.05).Conclusion: The selectivity and individualization of using PLDD and ozone injection combined with radiofrequency thermocoagulation and target ablation curing lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion can enlarge the indication and improve the clinical curative effect, it should be spreaded in clinic.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for upper lumbar disc herniation. MethodsRetrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 26 patients with upper lumbar disc herniation, who were in line with the selection criteria and underwent MIS-TLIF in 14 patients (MIS-TLIF group) and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) in 12 patients (OTLIF group) between December 2007 and May 2012. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, level of disc herniation, side of disc herniation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and complications were compared between 2 groups. The clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores. The fusion rate was determined by using CT three-dimensional reconstruction and dynamic lumbar radiography at last follow-up. ResultsPrimary healing of incisions was obtained in both groups. No difference was found in operation time between 2 groups (t=0.858, P=0.399), but MIS-TLIF group had less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume than OTLIF group (P<0.05). The average follow-up duration was 34.1 months with a range of 12-50 months. No complication of dural tear, infection, spinal nerve trauma, and implant failure occurred. The VAS scores of lower back pain and radicular pain and ODI scores at preoperation showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). The VAS score of lower back pain and ODI score at 1 day after operation in MIS-TLIF group were significantly lower than those in the OTLIF group (P<0.05), but no difference was found in VAS scores of radicular pain between 2 groups (P>0.05). Difference in all scores was not significant at last follow-up between 2 groups (P>0.05). The fusion rate was 92.8% (13/14) in MIS-TLIF group, and was 100% (12/12) in OTLIF group at last follow-up. ConclusionMIS-TLIF is a safe and effective procedure for upper lumbar disc herniation as an alternative to other techniques.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique with the interlaminar uniportal endoscopy (IUE) technique for the treatment of L5, S1 lumbar disc herniation. MethodsThe clinical data of 69 patients with L5, S1 lumbar disc herniation who met the selection criteria between January 2020 and December 2020 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into UBE group (30 cases) and IUE group (39 cases) according to endoscopic surgical technique. The general data, such as gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of low back/leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI), was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Perioperative outcomes [estimated blood loss (EBL), total operation time, extracanal operation time, intracanal decompression time, intraoperative radiation exposure dose, incision length, operative related complications, and postoperative hospitalization stay] and clinical outcomes (VAS score of low back/leg pain before operation and at 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation as well as the ODI before operation and at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation) were recorded and compared between the two groups. ResultsAll patients completed the surgery successfully. The incision length, EBL, and extracanal operation time in UBE group were significantly longer than those in IUE group (P<0.05), and the intracanal decompression time in UBE group was significantly shorter than that in IUE group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total operation time, intraoperative radiation exposure dose, and postoperative hospitalization stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-15 months (mean, 13.3 months). Dural tear ocurred in 1 patient of the UBE group, and recurrence ocurred in 1 patient of the IUE group, the others of both groups had no surgery-related complications and recovered well after operation. The VAS scores of low back/leg pain and ODI in both groups at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in VAS scores and ODI at each time point after operation between two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe effectiveness of UBE technique in the treatment of L5, S1 lumbar disc herniation is similar to that of IUE technique, and the efficiency of intraspinal operation is better than that of IUE technique. Although UBE technique is inferior to IUE technique in terms of surgical trauma, there is no significant difference in postoperative recovery between the two techniques.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of resorption of lumbar disc herniation (RLDH). Methods The literature on RLDH at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed to summarize its influencing factors, pathogenesis, imaging findings, and predictive effect, as well as its influence on the treatment selection of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). ResultsThe main mechanism of RLDH is the combined effect of inflammatory response and neovascularization. Age, smoking, body mass index, and clinical manifestations are the influencing factors. Studies have shown that the annular enhancement around the nucleus pulposus on enhanced MRI images is the characteristic imaging manifestation of RLDH, which is a predictor of whether RLDH occurs. In the treatment of LDH, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors may have a negative impact on RLDH. ConclusionThe occurrence of RLDH suggests that strict conservative treatment is the first choice for LDH treatment, but surgery is still an important treatment method when the patient’s symptoms and imaging symptoms don’t significantly improved after conservative treatment.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in treatment of buttock pain associated with lumbar disc herniation.MethodsBetween June 2015 and May 2016, 36 patients with buttock pain associated with lumbar disc herniation were treated with PELD. Of 36 cases, 26 were male and 10 were female, aged from 18 to 76 years (mean, 35.6 years). The disease duration ranged from 3 months to 10 years (mean, 14 months). The location of the pain was buttock in 2 cases, buttock and thigh in 6 cases, buttock and the ipsilateral lower extremity in 28 cases. Thirty-four patients had single-level lumbar disc herniation, and the involved segments were L4, 5 in 15 cases and L5, S1 in 19 cases; 2 cases had lumbar disc herniation at both L4, 5 and L5, S1. The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of buttock pain was 6.1±1.3. VAS score was used to evaluate the degree of buttock pain at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up postoperatively. The clinical outcome was assessed by the modified MacNab criteria at last follow-up.ResultsAll patients were successfully operated and the operation time was 27-91 minutes (mean, 51 minutes). There was no nerve root injury, dural tear, hematoma formation, or other serious complications. The hospitalization time was 3-8 days (mean, 5.3 days). All incisions healed well and no infection occurred. Patients were followed up 12-24 months (median, 16 months). MRI examination results showed that the dural sac and nerve root compression were sufficiently relieved at 3 months after operation. Patients obtained pain relief after operation. The postoperative VAS scores of buttock pain at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up were 1.1±0.6, 0.9±0.3, 1.0±0.3, and 0.9±0.4 respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative VAS scores (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in VAS score between the different time points after operation (P>0.05). At last follow-up, according to the modifed MacNab criteria, the results were excellent in 27 cases, good in 9 cases, and fair in 2 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 94.4%.ConclusionPELD can achieve satisfactory short-term results in the treatment of buttock pain associated with lumbar disc herniation and it is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical technique.
Objective To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and security of percutaneous endoscopic spine surgery for treatment of lumbar spine disorders with intraspinal ossification. Methods Between July 2008 and June 2016, 96 patients with lumbar spine disorders (lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis) with intraspinal ossification were treated with percutaneous endoscopic spine surgery. There were 59 males and 37 females, aged from 13 to 57 years (mean, 29.5 years). The disease duration was 3-51 months (mean, 18.2 months). Fifty-one cases had trauma history. Ninety-two cases were single segmental unilateral symptom, 4 cases were bilateral symptom. The ossification property was posterior ring apophysis separation in 89 cases, and ossification of the fibrous ring or posterior longitudinal ligament in 7 cases. There were 32 cases of lateral type, 13 cases of central type, and 51 cases of mixed type. The pressure factors, such as nucleus pulposus, hyperplasia of the yellow ligament, joint capsule, or articular osteophyma, were removed under the microscope. Local anesthesia or continuous epidural anesthesia was performed in the transforaminal approach with 50 cases, and continuous epidural anesthesia or general anesthesia was performed in the interlaminar approach with 46 cases. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the degree of leg pain preoperatively and at last follow-up. The effectiveness was evaluated at last follow-up according to the modified Macnab criteria. Results All patients were successfully operated. Via transforaminal approach, the mean operation time was 53 minutes and the mean intraoperative fluoroscopy times was 8 times; and via interlaminar approach was 58 minutes and 3 times, respectively. The mean bed rest time after operation was 6.5 hours and the mean hospitalization time was 4.7 days. All patients were followed up 6-18 months (median, 11 months). Postoperative lumbar CT scan and three-dimensional reconstruction after 3 days of operation showed that ossification tissues of 26 cases were not resected, 12 cases were resected partly, and 49 cases were resected completely. Postoperative lumbar MRI after 3 months of operation showed that spinal cord and nerve root were not compressed. At last follow-up, VAS score of leg pain was 0.7±1.1, which was significantly lower than preoperative score (5.8±1.1) (t=1.987, P=0.025). At last follow-up, according to modified Macnab criteria, the results were excellent in 87 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 4 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 95.8%. Conclusion Percutaneous endoscopic spine surgery for treatment of lumbar spine disorders with intraspinal ossification is an effective, safe, and minimal invasive alternative, and the short-term effectiveness is reliable. Accounting for the treatment of intraspinal ossification, comprehensive analysis should be made by combining clinical symptoms, imaging characteristics, and risk assessment.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus suture in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH). Methods The clinical data of patients with RLDH who underwent biportal endoscopic discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus suture using a single-use suture device at Mianyang Orthopaedic Hospital between May 2020 and July 2022 were retrospectively collected. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for low back and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores on postoperative Day 3 and at the last follow-up were used to assess pain and functional status. Postoperative lumbar CT, MRI, and dynamic X-rays were obtained to evaluate the extent of decompression, disc removal, and spinal stability. Clinical efficacy during follow-up was assessed using the MacNab criteria since postoperative 3 months. Results Twenty-one RLDH patients (16 males, 5 females) with a mean age of (45.14±15.26) years (range: 17-62 years) were included. The involved segments were L3-L4 in 1 case, L4-L5 in 9 cases, and L5-S1 in 11 cases. All surgeries were successfully completed without complications such as nerve injury, symptomatic epidural hypertension, dural tear, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or infection. All patients were followed up for a mean duration of (11.38±3.51) months (range: 4-17 months). No recurrence of disc herniation or segmental instability was observed during follow-up. Significant improvements were seen in VAS scores for low back pain (2.90±0.70, 1.38±0.81), leg pain (2.33±0.58, 1.29±0.46), and ODI scores [(24.12±5.05)%, (11.29±1.86)%] on postoperative Day 3 and at the last follow-up compared to the preoperative values [5.90±1.09, 6.10±0.77, (57.08±9.72)%; all P<0.05]. According to the MacNab criteria, the clinical efficacy was rated as excellent in 16 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 2 cases, yielding an excellent-good rate of 90.5%. Conclusion Biportal endoscopic discectomy with annulus fibrosus suture is a safe and effective treatment for RLDH, demonstrating favourable clinical outcomes and warranting further research and application.
Objective To investigate diagnosis and treatment of farlateral lumbar disc herniations. Methods The clinical data from 16 patients with far-lateral lumbar disc herniations from January 1999 to January 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. The CT scanning showed that the shadow density of the CT scanning values in the corresponding intra-foramen, extraforamen and all-foramen was as the same as that of the intervertebral disc. Of the 16 patients, 10 were operated on by the interlaminar approach, 3 were operatedon by the laterolaminar approach, 3 were operated on by the combined interlaminal and laterolaminal approach.Results According to the follow-up for 6 monthsto 5 years, excellent results were obtained in 8 patients, good results in 5, and fair results in 3. The postoperative CT examination showed that the space occupying in the foramen or extraforamen of the corresponding segment vanished and the nerve root compression of the identical segment also vanished. Conclusion The lamellar highresolution CT is a better way to diagnose lumbar disc herniation. The operative approach should be chosen according to the position of the intervertebral disc protrusion, pathologic type, and presence or absence of the lesions in the vertebral canal.