ObjectiveTo explore the progresses of diagnosis and treatment for endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). MethodsThe literatures on studying the classification, diagnosis and management, risk factor, and treatment for the endoleaks after EVAR were reviewed and analyzed. ResultsEndoleak was a common and particular complication after EVAR and its represented persistence meant failure of the EVAR treatment. Accurate detection and classification were essential for the proper management and the treatment method for the endoleak was determined by the different source. Type Ⅰ and type Ⅲ endoleak required urgent treatment， type Ⅱ and type Ⅴ were considered less urgently but may be observed continuously. A variety of techniques including extension endografts or cuff, balloon angioplasty, bare stents, and a combination of transvascular and direct sac puncture embolization techniques were allowed to treat the vast majority of these endoleaks. ConclusionsEndoleak after EVAR is still the main clinical problem to be solved. The characters of endoleak still are not fully revealed. The diagnosis and treatment remained equivocal, which requires further study.
Objective To review the progress of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics in the study of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Method The literatures related to AI, radiomics and AAA research in recent years were collected and summarized in detail. Results AI and radiomics influenced AAA research and clinical decisions in terms of feature extraction, risk prediction, patient management, simulation of stent-graft deployment, and data mining. Conclusion The application of AI and radiomics provides new ideas for AAA research and clinical decisions, and is expected to suggest personalized treatment and follow-up protocols to guide clinical practice, aiming to achieve precision medicine of AAA.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current advancement of peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) participating in formation of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and to find out the potential treatment strategy of AAA. MethodsRelevant literatures about PPARs and formation of AAA were reviewed. ResultsAAA involved inflammation of all the layers of aorta, and the formation of AAA needed many kinds of inflammatory cells and cytokines. Many researches in vitro or in vivo had shown that PPARs could reduce the expression of inflammatory cytokines, to reduce formation of AAA. However, PPARγ was also confirmed to participate in the formation of AAA and the mechanism might be the transformation of macrophage from type 1 macrophage (M1) to type 2 macrophage (M2). According to the existing studies, the assumption could be that PPARγ can suppress the inflammatory function of M1 to reduce formation of AAA at the initiating stage, and promote formation of AAA by inducing the transform of macrophage to M2 at the late stage. ConclusionPPARs may be a potential targeting point for the prevention of AAA. More studies are needed to show the feasibility and to decide the application timing.
This paper interprets clinical practice guideline for abdominal aortic aneurysm of American Society for Vascular Surgery in 2018.
ObjectiveTo discuss the risk factors of type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair(EVAR). MethodsThe clinical data of 197 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent EVAR in our hospital from Jan. 2006 to Mar. 2011 were analyzed retrospectively, and risk factors of type Ⅱ endoleak were explored by logistic regression. ResultsOf the 197 cases, 18 cases suffered from type Ⅱ endoleak. Result of logistic regression showed that the risk of type Ⅱ endoleak increased per 1 of the increase of lumbar artery number(OR=1.822, P=0.010) and per 1 mm of the increase of lumbar artery diameter(OR=1.256, P=0.040). All of the cases were followed up for 1-36 months(median value of 16.8 months). Only 1 case was intervened by inferior mesenteric artery embolism for the growth rate larger than 5 mm during half a year, who was not found growth of diameter after the embolism. The type Ⅱ endoleaks of other 17 cases closed ultimately or keeping stable. ConclusionsType Ⅱ endoleak after EVAR is affected by the number and diameter of lumbar artery. Persistent type Ⅱ endoleak without enlargement of diameter of aneurysm sac needs to beclosely followed-up instead of re-intervention.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of relationship between distal landing zone geometric and outcomes of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. MethodsThe domestic and foreign literature on the accumulation of the impact of proximal and distal landing zone geometric morphology on clinical outcomes, the evaluation methods for related complications of proximal and distal landing zones, preventive measures for adverse outcomes related to the geometric morphology of the distal landing zone, and the pathophysiological mechanisms of complications related to the distal landing zone were retrieved to make an review. ResultsThe irregular geometric morphology of the proximal landing zone was closely associated with adverse events following EVAR. The morphology of the distal landing zone was actually more complex than that of the proximal zone, and the measurement methods for its parameters were also more complicated. Common methods used in the literature for studying landing zones included the centerline distance method, the minimum distance method, and the landing area method. Primary preventive measures for adverse outcomes related to the geometry of the distal landing zone included increasing radial support force and contact area, using endostaples, and extending the landing zone. In addition to anatomical factors, the distal landing zone was also influenced by various pathophysiological factors. ConclusionsThe morphology and related pathological changes of the distal landing zone significantly impact the clinical outcomes following EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm. However, current research on the distal landing zone is limited. Future studies should focus on developing new technologies and methods to improve the evaluation and management of the distal landing zone, thereby reducing the complications after EVAR, enhancing the success rate of the surgery, and improving patient survival quality.
Objective To explore the diagnosis and treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm （RAAA）. Methods The clinical data of 20 patients with RAAA from January 2000 to December 2010 were analyzed retrospectively．Results There were 18 males and 2 females．The age was 31-82 years with an average 65.4 years．All the patients were abdominal pain and （or） back pain．Eleven cases had low blood pressure or shock．Seven cases had a history of abdominal aortic aneurysm．All the cases were accurately diagnosed by CTA，Doppler ultrasonography or operation．Nineteen cases were treated by conventional operation，1 by endovascular aortic repair．Survival of 16 cases recovered smoothly. Perioperative death occurred in 4 cases，mortality rate was 20% in 20 patients with RAAA．The causes of death included circulatory failure in 1 case and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in 3 cases．Conclusions Surgery treatment is an effective treatment for RAAA．Early diagnosis and urgent surgical repair are crucial to reduce the mortality of RAAA．
Objective To review and compare the literatures on studying endoleak via intra-sac pressure (Psac) measurement in order to reveal the characters of all types of endoleak. Methods Measured the intra-sac pressure with miscellaneous pressure transducers in vitro and in vivo endoleak models or patients afflicted with endoleak. Compared the difference of Psac among no endoleak and all types of endoleak. Results Psac＞0 but was obviously lower than Psys in no endoleak. Psac approached Psys in type Ⅰ and type Ⅳ endoleaks. Some researches showed that Psac in type Ⅱ endoleak was higher than that in no endoleak and even approached Psys, however the other researches showed that Psac in type Ⅱ endoleak was lower than that in no endoleak. Conclusion Postoperative Psac dropping greatly eliminated the risk of aneurysm rupture, which symbolized the success of endovascular therapy. Even if the type Ⅰ endoleak of small size might lead to obvious elevation of Psac, which necessitates management. The impairment and management tactics of type Ⅱ endoleak remained equivocal, which required further study.
Objective To study the major postoperative complications of abdominal aortic aneurysm （AAA） repair in high-risk patients， analyze its causes， and suggest the prevention methods. Methods From January 2009 to September 2011， 57 cases of high-risk AAA patients underwent AAA repair in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. High-risk patients were defined as age≥60 years，the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade three or four，and at least one of complications about heart， lung， and kidney. Major postoperative complications were rated， and preoperative cardiac，pulmonary， and renal condition，anesthesia and surgical impact were taken into account while evaluating the risk factors of major postoperative complications. Results Forty-one of 57 high-risk patients with AAA were repaired by endovascular repair，16 of 57 high-risk patients with AAA were repaired by traditional open surgery. The early mortality （within 30d） was 1.8% （1/57）. The major postoperative complications rate of AAA repair was 19.3% （11/57） in total，and 8.8% （5/57），8.8% （5/57），and 1.8% （1/57） for cardiac complication，pulmonary complication， and acute renal failure，respectively. The patients with coronary heart disease had a higher cardiac complication rate 〔19.0% （4/21） versus 2.8% （1/36），χ2=4.387，P＜0.05〕 ， while with hypertension had no such effect for that〔10.3% （4/39） versus 5.6% （1/18），χ2=0.340，P＞0.05〕. Patients with abnormal pulmonary function was responsible for postoperative respiratory complications 〔20.0% （4/20） versus 5.6% （1/18）， χ2=4.387， P＜0.05〕 ， while with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease history was not responsible for that 〔13.2% （5/38） versus 0 （0/19），χ2=2.740，P＞0.05〕．Patients with preoperative renal function was not related to postoperative acute renal failure 〔0 （0/4） versus 1.9% （1/53）， χ2=0.077，P＞0.05〕. Compared with traditional open surgery，endovascular repair could effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative complications 〔12.2% （5/41） versus 37.5% （6/16）， χ2=3.980，P＜0.05〕. The incidence of postoperative respiratory complications in the local anesthesia patients was less than that in the general anesthesia patients 〔0（0/20）versus 19.0% （4/21），χ2=4.221，P＜0.05〕. Conclusions Cardiac and pulmonary complications are commonly seen after AAA repair in high-risk patients．Preoperative cardiac，pulmonary condition，anesthesia and surgical aspects greatly influence the major postoperative complications. Exhaustively assessment of each system before surgery，appropriate anesthesia and surgical options，postoperative active and effective symptomatic，and supportive treatment are the key to reducing the incidence of postoperative complications.
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy and safety of hybrid surgery in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). MethodsTwenty patients who were diagnosed with TAAA (including chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissection aneurysm) and underwent hybrid surgery in Vascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University were enrolled between January 2015 and December 2022. All the patients underwent retrograde reconstruction for visceral arteries in the open surgery. Additionally, one-stage or two-stage endovascular aortic repair with covered stents was performed. The patients’ clinical baseline information was collected. Moreover, the patients received clinical follow-up and imaging examinations postoperatively, whose informationwas collected. ResultsOne patient developed paraplegia and acute renal failure 16 days postoperatively in the hospital, and subsequently died in the hospital due to septic shock. Another patient underwent exploratory laparotomy for hemostasis due to anastomotic bleeding in the hospital. The other patients did not experience serious complications perioperatively. Nineteen patients were discharged from the hospital with long-term follow-up ranging from 10 to 144 months (median time: 48 months), and all of them had a long-term survival. No patients were observed with paraplegia, myocardial infarction, stroke, or rupture of aneurysm. None of the patients received reintervention during the follow-up, except for one patient who underwent ultrasound-guided puncture and suctionin the aneurysmallumen. ConclusionHybrid surgery is an effective treatment for TAAA with favorable short- and long-term safety and efficacy.