Objective To study the effect of indirect calorimetry-guided nutritional support on energy metabolism, cellular immunity and oxidative stress in patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopic surgery. Methods A total of 96 patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopic surgery in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the control group (used the formula prediction method to guide enteral nutrition support, n=48) and the observation group (used indirect calorimetry to guide enteral nutrition support, n=48). The target resting energy expenditure (REE) value and nutritional support energy intake were compared between the two groups. The cellular immune indexes (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+) and oxidative stress indexes [serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), the changes of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px)], and the changes of REE at different time points (1 day before operation and 1, 2 and 3 days after operation) of the two groups were compared. The incidence of complications in the two groups were observed. Results The target REE value of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P＜0.05), and there was no significant difference in the enteral energy intake and parenteral energy intake compared with the control group (P＞0.05). After treatment, CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the two groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and CD8+ was higher than before treatment (P<0.05). The levels of CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the observation group after treatment were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05) , while the level of CD8+ in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of SOD and GSH-Px in the two groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the levels of MDA were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05). The levels of GSH-Px and SOD in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), while the level of MDA in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the REE value between the two groups at 1 day before operation (P>0.05); compared with the 1 day before operation, the REE values of the two groups at 1, 2, and 3 days after operation were significantly increased, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups at each time point (P<0.05), but the REE value at 3 days after operation was significantly lower than that at 1 and 2 days after operation (P<0.05). The REE values in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 1, 2 and 3 days after operation (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 6.25%, which was lower than 20.83% in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Enteral nutrition support guided by indirect calorimetry in colorectal cancer patients after laparoscopic surgery can help reduce postoperative energy consumption, improve cellular immune function and oxidative stress response, and reduce the risk of postoperative complications, which is worthy of promotion.
Objective To study the clinical value and surgical procedure of laparoscopic operation for interstitial tubal pregnancy. Methods Clinical data of 36 patients of interstitial tubal pregnancy treated by laparoscopic operation were retrospectively analyzed. Results All 36 patients were operated successfully, without conversions to laparotomy and intra- or post- operative complications. The operation time was 28-85 min(mean, 41min), and the length of stay in hospital postoperative was 3-6 d (mean, 4-5 d). Conclusion Laparoscopic operation for interstitial tubal pregnancy is safe and feasible.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery from inception to April, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 593 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in the success rate of the first insertion (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.02, P=0.55). The airway pressure of patients whose position were head higher than foot was significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group than in the tracheal intubation group (MD=–1.20, 95%CI –1.81 to –0.59, P=0.000 1), but there was no significant difference between two groups in reverse position patients (MD=0.48, 95%CI –0.90 to 1.87, P=0.49). The incidence of sore throat (RR=0.58, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.74, P<0.000 01), the incidence of blood stain (RR=0.48, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.77, P=0.002), the incidence of laryngeal spasm/bronchial spasm (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.80, P=0.02) and the incidence of cough/hiccup (RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.15, P<0.000 01) in the laryngeal mask group were significantly lower than those in the tracheal intubation group.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with tracheal intubation, laryngeal mask can effectively reduce airway pressure of patients whose position are head higher than foot. The risks of various complications are significant higher in tracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery. Laryngeal mask can maintain patients' normal respiratory functions while reduce damage and do not increase the occurrence of reflux aspiration. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and clinical effect of laparoscopic Miles and perineal anal recon-struction operation for patients with low rectal cancer. MethodsOne hundred and two patients underwent Mile's and perineal anal reconstruction operation for rectal cancer in this hospital from April 2006 to February 2010 were analyzed retrospectively, in which 58 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (laparoscope group) and 44 patients underwent open surgery (laparotomy group).All these data such as the survival time, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, the first anal exhaust time and liquid diet recovery time after operation, postoperative hospitalization, and postoperative complications were collected and compared between the laparoscope group and laparotomy group. ResultsThe demography and clinicopathologic characteristics were similar between these two groups (P > 0.05).The operation was successfully performed in all the patients.There was no death associated with the operation.Compared with the laparotomy group, the intraoperative blood loss was less (P < 0.05), the first anal exhaust time and liquid diet recovery time after operation, postoperative hospitalization were shorter (P < 0.05), the harvested lymph node was more (P < 0.05) in the laparoscope group.There were no significant differences in the operative time, postoperative complications, and the survival curves between the two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe clinical effects of laparoscopic and open Miles and perineal anal reconstruction operation are similar for patients with low rectal cancer.But laparoscopic operation is a safe, feasible choice with quicker recover after the operation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) from a societal perspective. MethodsA decision-tree model was constructed to conduct cost-utility analysis, simulating the short-term intraoperative to postoperative clinical progression of patients. Primary evaluation metrics included cumulative costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at three times the 2024 per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of China. The sensitivity analyses were performed to assess robustness of the model. ResultsThe base-case analysis revealed that patients in the RALS group gained 0.09 more QALYs at an additional cost of ¥39 079.52 compared with CLS group, the derived ICER was ¥437 157.36/QALYs, exceeding the predefined WTP threshold. The results suggested that RALS does not demonstrate superior cost-effectiveness compared with CLS in the management of early-stage EC. Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated that, when the annual surgical volume per robotic device reaches 809 cases, or the cost of Endowrist consumables per robotic surgery drops below ¥6 568.46, RALS will emerge as a more cost-effective surgical strategy. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that that RALS becomes more cost-effective when the WTP threshold exceeds ¥402 145.80. Conclusion From a Chinese societal perspective, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer is not cost-effective compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery at the current WTP threshold of three times per capita GDP.
目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）中因胆囊破裂致腹腔残留胆石对术后机体的影响。方法 2001年3月至2009年8月期间广西桂东人民医院对750例胆囊结石患者进行了LC，术中穿破胆囊30例（4.0%），其中术后发现腹腔内残留胆石者10例（1.3%）。回顾性分析该10例患者的临床和随访资料。结果 本组患者住院时间2～7 d，平均4 d。随访2～36个月（平均10个月），CT、X线或B超检查8例患者腹腔仍残存明显胆石，其中1例合并有腹腔脓肿，给予抗炎治疗后症状消失（脓肿较小）； 另2例腹腔残存胆石消失。10例患者均无慢性腹痛、表皮窦道形成、肠梗阻、腹腔肿瘤等并发症。随访期间10例患者肝功能及T细胞水平与术后第2天比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），WBC水平则明显降低（P＜0.05）。结论 LC中如果无法寻找到遗留于腹腔的微小胆石时，只要常规腹腔冲洗，术后预防性应用抗生素，少数残留于腹腔的小胆石对术后机体无严重不良影响。
Objective The survival data of patients with colon cancer who were treated by laparoscopic-assisted surgery and open surgery three years after operation were analyzed and contrasted, which provided data to support the future treatment. Methods The 217 patients who were cured by laparoscopic-assisted surgery and 193 patients who were cured by open surgery were followed up, and the rates of local recurrence, metastasis, implantative, and survival were contrasted and analyzed. Results Three years after laparoscopic-assisted surgery and open surgery, the disease-free survival rate was 86.2% （187/217） and 85.5% （165/193）, respectively, and the overall survival rate was 91.2% （198/217） and 92.7% （179/193）, respectively, the difference between the two groups was not statistic significance（P＞0.05）. The differences of the rates of local recurrence, metastasis, and implantative between the two groups were not statistic significance（P＞0.05）. Conclusions Laparoscopic-assisted surgery is similar with open surgery in the rates of local recurrence, forward metastasis, and overall survival. So laparoscopic-assisted surgery is a safe and radical curative surgery.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of robotic intersphincteric resection (ISR) for rectal cancer.MethodsA literature search was performed using the China biomedical literature database, Chinese CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library. The retrieval time was from the establishment of databases to April 1, 2019. Related interest indicators were brought into meta-analysis by Review Manager 5.2 software.ResultsA total of 510 patients were included in 5 studies, including 273 patients in the robot group and 237 patients in the laparoscopic group. As compared to the laparoscopic group, the robot group had significantly longer operative time [MD=43.27, 95%CI (16.48, 70.07), P=0.002], less blood loss [MD=–19.98.27, 95%CI (–33.14, –6.81), P=0.003], lower conversion rate [MD=0.20, 95%CI (0.04, –0.95), P=0.04], less lymph node harvest [MD=–1.71, 95%CI (–3.21, –0.21), P=0.03] and shorter hospital stay [MD=–1.61, 95%CI (–2.26, –0.97), P<0.000 01]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the first flatus [MD=–0.01, 95%CI (–0.48, 0.46), P=0.96], time to diet [MD=–0.20, 95%CI (–0.67, 0.27), P=0.41], incidence of complications [OR=0.76, 95%CI (0.50, 1.14), P=0.18], distal resection margin [MD=0.00, 95%CI (–0.17, 0.17), P=0.98] and positive rate of circumferential resection margin [OR=0.61, 95%CI (0.27, 1.37), P=0.23].ConclusionsRobotic and laparoscopic ISR for rectal cancer shows comparable perioperative outcomes. Compared with laparoscopic ISR, robotic ISR has the advantages of less blood loss, lower conversion rate, and longer operation times. These findings suggest that robotic ISR is a safe and effective technique for treating low rectal cancer.