ObjectiveTo further explore and discuss the value of laparoscopic appendectomy. MethodsThe clinical data of 200 patients underwent appendectomy in this hospital from April 2009 to December 2010 were collected. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative pain score, and surgical complications were compared between laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy. ResultsThere were 8 cases conversion to the open approach in this series. The cost of laparoscopic appendectomy was higher than that of open appendectomy (Plt;0.05); the cases of chronic appendicitis, acute simple appendicitis, acute suppurative appendicitis within 36 h of onset treated by laparoscopic appendectomy had shorter operation time, shorter postoperative hospital stay, earlier postoperative anal exhaust time, and slighter postoperative pain than those treated by open appendectomy (Plt;0.05); the differences in postoperative hospital stay, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative pain of acute suppurative appendicitis more than 36 h of onset and acute gangrenous appendicitis treated by two types of surgery had no statistical significances (Pgt;0.05); the operation time of acute gangrenous appendicitis operated by laparoscopic surgery was longer than that by open appendectomy (Plt;0.05); incision infection rate of laparoscopic appendectomy was lower than that of open appendectomy (Plt;0.05). ConclusionsFor chronic appendicitis, acute simple appendicitis, and acute suppurative appendicitis within 36 h of onset, the outcome and advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy are outstanding, the value of application is clear; and for acute suppurative appendicitis more than 36 h of onset and acute gangrenous appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy is difficult and with high rate of conversion, no obvious advantages in recovery after surgery but an increase of medical costs, and the application value is not great.
Objective To comment the diagnosis and treatment the bile leakage from the injuried abnormal minute biliary in our laparosicopic cholecystectomy (LC) practice. Methods Fourteen cases of minute biliary duct injury in 2 050 cases of LC were studied retrospectively. Among them, 6 cases had been found the points of leakage during operation, and the points were treated by titanium nips. In 4 cases even though the bile leakage could be seen, but the points of leakage could not found, and were treated by drainage. Four cases with peritonitis, 1 needed to be explored, and treated with suture ligature, 1 was explored by laparoscopy again, another two cases were treated with multiple hole catheters to drainage of the abdominal cavities through stab wounds. Results All 14 cases recovered. Conclusion Small bile leakage in LC is almost inevitable. It is the best that the bile leakage can be discovered during operation and to be treated. If it is discovered after operation, an open or laparoscopic exploratory laparotomy and adequate drainage would be needed. In the case of small amount of leakage, catheter drainage through stab wound is feasible.
目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）中因胆囊破裂致腹腔残留胆石对术后机体的影响。方法 2001年3月至2009年8月期间广西桂东人民医院对750例胆囊结石患者进行了LC，术中穿破胆囊30例（4.0%），其中术后发现腹腔内残留胆石者10例（1.3%）。回顾性分析该10例患者的临床和随访资料。结果 本组患者住院时间2～7 d，平均4 d。随访2～36个月（平均10个月），CT、X线或B超检查8例患者腹腔仍残存明显胆石，其中1例合并有腹腔脓肿，给予抗炎治疗后症状消失（脓肿较小）； 另2例腹腔残存胆石消失。10例患者均无慢性腹痛、表皮窦道形成、肠梗阻、腹腔肿瘤等并发症。随访期间10例患者肝功能及T细胞水平与术后第2天比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），WBC水平则明显降低（P＜0.05）。结论 LC中如果无法寻找到遗留于腹腔的微小胆石时，只要常规腹腔冲洗，术后预防性应用抗生素，少数残留于腹腔的小胆石对术后机体无严重不良影响。
目的探讨嵌顿性胆囊结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的经验。方法回顾性分析我院1998年1月至2004年12月期间用LC治疗嵌顿性胆囊结石365例的临床资料。结果358例成功施行LC,7例中转开腹,2例术后发生胆瘘,无胃肠道、胆管损伤等并发症,无死亡病例,全部患者均痊愈出院。结论随着腹腔镜技术日臻完善，嵌顿性胆囊结石选择LC，一次性切除病灶，术后恢复快，并发症少。
Objective To investigate the technique and feasibility of hepatic pedicle vascular control in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Methods From May 2005 to June 2011, 95 cases of hepatectomies were performed by laparoscopy in the Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University.The characteristics of these cases were analyzed. Results Left lateral segmentectomy were required in 21 patients, left hepatectomy in 13 patients, right hepatectomy in 4 patients, segmentectomy in 17 patients, tumor resection in 24 patients,hemangioma resection in 5 patients, and conversions to laparotomy in 11 patients. The intermittent Pringle maneuver were performed in 39 patients. The mean vascular clamping time in Pringle maneuver was （30.84±9.51） min. The selective vascular control of inflow were performed in 56 patients， the technique included intrahepatic Glisson approach in 14 patients and controlling hepatic artery and portal vein separately in 42 patients. Pre-parenchymal transection control of hepatic outflow were performed in 12 patients, included the left hepatic vein were controlled by suturing or separating in 11 patients and right hepatic vein was controlled by separating in 1 patient. Others were controlled intraparenchymally during transection. The mean operative time was （236.80±95.97） min，mean operative blood loss was（ 551.55±497.41） ml， concentrate red blood cells transfusion volume was（ 2.60±2.23） U， and plasma transfusion volume was （211.90±179.29） ml. The postoperative complications included bleeding in 4 patients, pleural effusion in 4 patients, pneumonia in 3 patients, ascites in 7 patients, and biliary fistula in 2 patients, and dead in 1 patient. The mean hospitalization time was（ 12.47±4.18） days. At the deadline（ February 2012）, 72 cases with liver cancer were followup. The follow-up time ranged from 5 to 81 months and the mean time was（ 24.14±16.62） months， where survival rate was 68.4%（ 54/79） of 1-year and 21.5%（ 17/79） of 3-year. Conclusions The application of hepatic pedicle vascular control in laparoscopic hepatectomy is feasible.
Objective To investigate feasibility and clinical efficacy of exploration and stone removal through choledochoscope via hepatic cross-section during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. Methods The patients who had left extrahepatic bile duct stones with choledocholithiasis from January 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively collected. Among these patients, 29 cases underwent an exploration and stone removal through choledochoscope via hepatic cross-section during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy (observation group) and 26 cases underwent an exploration and stone removal through choledochoscope via incision of common bile duct during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy (control group). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative nutritional, and complications rate were compared between these two groups. Results The operations were performed successfully and no perioperative death happened in both groups. There were no significant differences in the operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). Moreover, the postoperative hospital stay of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in the complications of the bile leakage, subphrenic infection, and biliary residual stones between the two groups (P>0.05). Also, the levels of prealbumin and the lymphocytes in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group on the 3rd and 6th day after the operation (P<0.05). Conclusions Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that exploration and removal of stones through choledochoscope via hepatic cross-section during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis is relatively safe and reliable, its procedure is simplified, could avoid relevant complications due to biliary incision and T tube drainage.
Objective To study the clinical effects of laparoscope combined with choledochoscope in patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Methods Clinical data of 74 patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis between Mar. 2009 and Feb. 2011 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them， 37 cases underwent the laparoscope combined with choledochoscope operation （referred to as the double mirror operation group） and 37 cases underwent the conventional open operation （open operation group）. The intraoperative conditions， therapeutic effect， and complications of patients in 2 groups were compared. Results The stone clearance rates of the two groups were 100%. The recurrence rate of 2 groups in the follow-up process was no significantly difference （P＞0.05）. In the double mirror operation group， the operative time was significantly longer than that open operation group （P＜0.01）；the intraoperative bleeding was significantly less than that open operation group （P＜0.01）；the anal exhaust time after operation， get out of bed time after operation， and total duration of hospitalization were significantly shorter than that open operation group （P＜0.01）；and the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than that open oper-ation group（P＜0.01）. Conclusion Laparoscope combined with choledochoscope in treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis patients has exact effects， with minor trauma， quicker recovery， and fewer complications， and it’s worthy of promotion.