Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and open hepatectomy (OH) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect the case-control studies about LH vs. OH for patients with HCC from inception to December, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 28 studies involving 1 908 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the LH group was superior to OH group on complications (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.48, P<0.000 01), hospital stay (MD=–4.18, 95%CI (–5.08, –3.29),P<0.000 01), and five years overall survival rate (OR=1.65, 95%CI 1.23 to 2.19,P=0.000 7) and disease-free survival rate (OR=1.51, 95%CI 1.12 to 2.03, P=0.006). However, no significant differences were found in one year and three years overall survival rate, disease-free survival rate, and postoperative recurrence rate. Conclusion Current evidence shows that the LH is superior to OH for the treatment of HCC, and may be amenable to surgery because of its safety and longtime efficacy. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
Objective To explore the hepatic artery variations encountered in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) surgery and its significance. Methods The clinical datas of 26 patients who underwent LPD from January 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected. Preoperative evaluation of hepatic artery variability and its types based on relevant clinical and imaging data, as well as targeted measures taken during surgery, and patients’ prognosis were analyzed. Results According to preoperative abdominal enhanced CT, arterial computer tomography angiography imaging and intraoperative skeletonization of the hepatoduodenal ligament, hepatic artery variation was found in 9 of 26 patients undergoing LPD. The left hepatic artery was substituted in 1 case, the right hepatic artery was substituted in 2 cases, 2 cases were the left accessory hepatic artery, and the common hepatic artery originated from the superior mesenteric artery in 3 cases. There was 1 case, right hepatic artery coming from the abdominal aorta, whose arterial variation was not included in the traditional typing. The variant hepatic artery from superior mesenteric artery was separated by posterior approach during operation, and the variant hepatic artery from left gastric artery was separated by anterior approach during operation. Nine patients with hepatic artery variation recovered well after operation, and no serious complications occurred. Conclusions Various hepatic artery variations during LPD need to be carefully evaluated before surgery. During surgery, it should be determined whether to retain the mutated blood vessel based on its diameter and changes in liver blood flow after occlusion, so that reasonable operation can be performed during the operation to avoid hepatic artery damage.
目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊大部切除术手术方法及临床价值。方法:回顾性分析2002年12月至2008年5月我科施行218例胆囊大部切除术患者的临床资料。结果:218例在腹腔镜下完成手术,本组病例中无死亡,无术后出血,无肝外胆道损伤,手术时间20至60分钟,平均35分钟,无中转开腹,未发现远期并发症。结论:在妥善处理残余胆囊并留置引流管的情况下,腹腔镜胆囊大部切除术是一种安全可行、创伤小、并发症少、术后恢复快的手术,具有较强的临床价值。
目的探讨腹腔镜在胆瘘或肠瘘诊治中的应用价值。 方法回顾性分析2008年11月至2013年4月期间广西壮族自治区桂东人民医院和广西壮族自治区民族医院收治的应用腹腔镜诊治的12例胆瘘或肠瘘患者的临床资料。 结果12例患者中胆瘘7例，肠瘘5例，均在手术后发生，均经腹腔镜探查后确诊。12例患者均在腹腔镜下行再次置管引流、缝闭迷走胆管或肠瘘管等处理。手术时间60～170 min、（90±19）min，住院时间3～7 d、（4±1）d，术中出血量20～150 mL、（70±12）mL，术后均顺利康复出院。术后12例患者均获访，随访时间为1个月～5年，平均随访时间为36个月，未发现胆瘘或肠瘘复发者。 结论腹腔镜探查有助于胆瘘或肠瘘的诊断，并可达到微创手术治疗的目的。
目的 探讨手助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的技术路线。方法 笔者所在科室于2011年10月17日完成1例手助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术。术中采用术者双侧站位、左右侧对称戳孔的策略，站立于患者右侧，游离胃网膜左血管和胃左血管，包括清扫No.7、No.8和No.9淋巴结；站立于患者左侧，游离十二指肠环和清扫下腔静脉旁淋巴结。经手助切口直视下完成消化道重建。结果 上腹部正中手术切口长7cm；手术时间为420min；术中出血量约600ml。术后病理报告：送检胃、十二指肠和胰腺标本，十二指肠球部低级别神经内分泌癌，浸润至深肌层，胃及胰腺未受累；两端切缘未见癌细胞，肝十二指肠韧带淋巴结未见癌转移（0/2）；慢性胆囊炎。手术后患者生命体征平稳，术后第5天肛门排气，第7天排便。术后发生腹腔积液并感染，经保守治疗治愈。术后28d出院。结论 术者双侧站位、左右对称戳孔是手助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的新模式，安全、可行、微创，值得进一步探索。
Objective To study the effect of indirect calorimetry-guided nutritional support on energy metabolism, cellular immunity and oxidative stress in patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopic surgery. Methods A total of 96 patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopic surgery in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the control group (used the formula prediction method to guide enteral nutrition support, n=48) and the observation group (used indirect calorimetry to guide enteral nutrition support, n=48). The target resting energy expenditure (REE) value and nutritional support energy intake were compared between the two groups. The cellular immune indexes (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+) and oxidative stress indexes [serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), the changes of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px)], and the changes of REE at different time points (1 day before operation and 1, 2 and 3 days after operation) of the two groups were compared. The incidence of complications in the two groups were observed. Results The target REE value of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P＜0.05), and there was no significant difference in the enteral energy intake and parenteral energy intake compared with the control group (P＞0.05). After treatment, CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the two groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and CD8+ was higher than before treatment (P<0.05). The levels of CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the observation group after treatment were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05) , while the level of CD8+ in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of SOD and GSH-Px in the two groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the levels of MDA were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05). The levels of GSH-Px and SOD in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), while the level of MDA in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the REE value between the two groups at 1 day before operation (P>0.05); compared with the 1 day before operation, the REE values of the two groups at 1, 2, and 3 days after operation were significantly increased, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups at each time point (P<0.05), but the REE value at 3 days after operation was significantly lower than that at 1 and 2 days after operation (P<0.05). The REE values in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 1, 2 and 3 days after operation (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 6.25%, which was lower than 20.83% in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Enteral nutrition support guided by indirect calorimetry in colorectal cancer patients after laparoscopic surgery can help reduce postoperative energy consumption, improve cellular immune function and oxidative stress response, and reduce the risk of postoperative complications, which is worthy of promotion.