【摘要】目的 探讨腹部手术后功能性胃排空障碍的营养支持。方法 对我院1997年1月至2004年2月收治的27例腹部手术后胃排空障碍患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 单纯肠内营养支持8例（29.6%），肠内、肠外联合营养支持10例（37.0%），单纯肠外营养支持9例（33.3%），分别于术后平均15、20及23 d恢复胃动力。结论 肠内营养在功能性胃排空障碍的治疗中具有重要作用。
Objective To compare the effect of intravenous and epidural analgesia on postoperative complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery. Methods A literature search was conducted by using computerized database on PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, and CNKI from 1985 to Jan 2009. Further searches for articles were conducted by checking all references describing postoperative complications with intravenous and epidural anesthesia after abdominal and thoracic surgery. All included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed and data were extracted by the standard of Cochrane systematic review. The homogeneous studies were pooled using RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results Thirteen RCTs involving 3 055 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of meta-analyses showed that, a) pulmonary complications and lung function: patient-controlled epidural analgesia can significantly decrease the incidence of pneumonia (RR=0.66, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.83) and improve the FEV1 (WMD=0.17, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.29) and FVC (WMD=0.21, 95%CI 0.1 to 0.32) of lung function after abdominal and thoracic surgery, but no differences in decreasing postoperative respiratory failure (RR=0.77, 95%CI 0.58 to 1.02) and prolonged ventilation (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.51 to 1.13) compared with intravenous analgesia; b) cardiovascular event: epidural analgesia could significantly decrease the incidence of myocardial infarction (RR=0.58, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.95) and arrhythmia (RR=0.64, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.88) than the control group, but could not better reduce the risk of heart failure (RR=0.79, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.34) and hypotension (RR=1.21, 95%CI 0.63 to 2.29); and c) Other complications: epidural and intravenous analgesia had no difference in decreasing the risk of postoperative renal insufficient (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.53 to 1.14), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.49 to 1.23), infection (RR=0.89, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.12) and nausea (RR=1.03, 95%CI 0.38 to 2.81). Conclusions Epidural analgesia can obviously decrease the risk of pneumonia, myocardial infarction and severe arrhythmia, and can improve the lung function after abdominal or thoracic surgery.
Objective To evaluate whether to defer abdomen surgery in patients having poorly controlled or untreated hypertension before operation. MethodsThe perioperative clinical data of 531 patients with hypertension in our hospital from January 1997 to December 1998 was retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe modility of perioperative hypertensive events was not significantly different, between controlled and uncontrolled patients with grade one and grade two（Pgt;0.05）. In grade three and systolic hypertension, certain complications in patients with poorly controlled hypertension were higher than in those with wellcontrolled hypertension（P＜0.05）. Conclusion The patients with grade one and grade two hypertension are not at increased operative risk. In patients with grade three and systolic hypertension, perioperative complications are increased and elective surgery should be postponed until their blood pressure is brought under 24/14.7 kPa （180/110 mm Hg） over 1 to 2 weeks.
目的 探讨上腹部手术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的可能性及手术方法与技巧。方法 回顾性分析我院2005～2009年期间对有上腹部手术史行LC的23例患者的临床资料。结果 23例患者中慢性结石性胆囊炎18例，胆囊息肉5例。既往均有上腹部手术史，其中胃大部切除术后19例,胃平滑肌瘤切除术后2例,脾破裂修补术后2例。采用闭合法穿刺建立气腹，分离粘连，暴露胆囊全貌及Calot三角，顺行或逆行切除胆囊。23例中LC成功21例; 因粘连致密，胆囊管无法辨认，中转开腹2例。手术时间45～140 min，平均67 min。全组无明显出血、内脏损伤、胆管损伤、胆汁漏等并发症发生。结论 部分上腹部手术后胆囊良性疾病行LC术可行。
Objective To evaluate the effects of a preoperative pain education program on patients’ knowledge of postoperative pain management, measures taken for such pain management and the actual postoperative pain. Methods A total of 84 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were non-randomly divided into two groups, 42 in each group. Patients in group A received routine preoperative care and 30 minutes of education about pain management, while patients in group B received routine preoperative care only. All patients completed the Postoperative Pain Management Questionnaire on the second postoperative day. Results Patients in group A achieved higher scores for their knowledge about postoperative pain management than those in group B (Plt;0.05). More patients in group A took non-medical pain relief methods after surgery (Plt;0.05); and patients in group A were able to use the PCA pump more correctly than those in group B (Plt;0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the frequency of asking for analgesics or their pain score when they requested analgesics (Pgt;0.05). The average score for postoperative pain was lower for group A compared to group B (Plt;0.05). Conclusions A program of preoperative pain education can improve patients’ knowledge of postoperative pain management and encourage them to participate actively in such pain management, so as to further relieve the postoperative pain.
ObjectiveTo research the effect of different surgical sutures on abdominal surgical incision healing quality, and provide a novel theory basis for promoting the healing of incision of abdominal wall. MethodsTotally 341 patients who underwent laparotomy were collected from general surgery of Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, and they were randomly divided into three groups: the including polydioxanoneⅡ(PDSⅡ) suture group, abdominal wall incision except the skin was successively sutured with PDSⅡsuture; the Vicryl group, abdominal wall incision except the skin was successively suture with antibacterial Vicryl; and the common silk thread group, abdominal wall incision was performed layering intermittent silk suture. ResultsIn terms of suture time, the PDSⅡsuture group [(11.23±1.62) min〕was significantly lower than the Vicryl group [(14.04±1.20) min〕, P < 0.05, and also both were significantly lower than the ordinary silk thread group [(21.95±1.95) min〕, P < 0.05. In respect of rejection reaction, incision infection and incision split, the PDSⅡsuture group and the Vicryl group were significantly lower than the ordinary silk thread group (P < 0.05), but compared the PDSⅡsuture group with the Vicryl group, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Regarding post operation hospitalization duration, fat liquefaction and effusion, compared the differences between the three groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ConclusionFull fascia is successively suture with PDSⅡsutures and antibacterial Vicryl suture that can significantly shorten the suture time, reduce the incidence of rejection incision, wound infection and wound dehiscence and promote the postoperative recovery of the patients.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect of perioperative supplemental oxygen administration on surgical site infection (SSI) in patients underwent abdominal surgery with general anesthesia. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 2,2015), CBM, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about perioperative supplemental oxygen administration versus normal FiO2 in patients underwent abdominal surgery with general anesthesia from inception to March, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 13 RCTs involving 3 532 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that: the incidence of SSI in the perioperative supplemental oxygen administration group was lower than that in the control group (OR=0.68, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.99, P=0.04). There were no significiant differences between both groups in incidence of atelectasis, incidence of infection requiring reoperation and 30-day mortality after surgery (all P values >0.05). ConclusionPerioperative supplemental oxygen administration could further decrease the risk of SSI in patients underwent abdominal surgery with general anesthesia, and does not increase the risk of other adverse events. Due to the limitations of quality of included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo summarize the methods to prevent pulmonary complications in patients underwent abdominal surgery during perioperative period and provide reference for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications.MethodLiteratures on the prevention of pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery were searched and reviewed.ResultsThe prevention of pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery included preoperative measures, intraoperative measures, and postoperative measures. Preoperative measures included preoperative education, patient risk assessment, smoking cessation, and so on. Intraoperative measures included anesthetic measures and surgical measures. Postoperative measures included atomization treatment, elimination of bad feelings, early postoperative activities, and so on. In view of the different basic conditions of patients underwent abdominal surgery, the selection and emphasis of preventive measures were also different.ConclusionThe prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications after general abdominal surgery should not only take preventive measures in perioperative period, but also should carry out individual management according to the patient’s condition and general conditions.