Objective To investigate clinical application and safety evaluation of sedative demulcent anesthesia in therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Methods Totally 1660 patients underwent ERCP at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University were prospectively divided into two groups: venous sedative demulcent group (n=800, using sufentanil and midazolam and propofol continuing infusion) and conventional sedative demulcent group (n=860, using common medicine). The heart rate (HR), respiration (R), blood pressure (BP) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) of pre-anesthesia, post-anesthesia, during operation and after analepsia in every group were detected. The narcotism was evaluated by Ramsaymin grading method and the related adverse reactions such as cough, restlessness, harmful memory, and abdominal pain after operation were recorded. Results Compared with conventional sedative demulcent group, vital signs of patients in venous sedative demulcent group were more stable. For postoperative adverse reactions, abdominal pain, abdominal distension and nausea and vomiting were respectively 4.4%(35/800), 2.6%(21/800) and 3.6%(29/800) in venous sedative demulcent group, which were respectively higher of the incidence of 36.3%(312/860), 49.0%(421/860) and 53.0%(456/860) in conventional sedative demulcent group (P＜0.01). The postoperative satisfaction and adverse reactions recall between venous sedative demulcent group and conventional sedative demulcent group was respectively significant different (96.9% vs. 2.9%, 4.8% vs. 97.9%, P＜0.01). Conclusion Sufentanil and midazolam and propofol continuing infusion have good effect of sedative demulcent anesthesia, which can be widely used.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is one of the main methods for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract and pancreatic diseases. Compared with other digestive endoscopes, duodenoscopy has a special structure. Since the outbreaks of nosocomial infections caused by the transmission of multidrug-resistant organism through duodenoscopy in 2010, the reprocessing and design of digestive endoscopes represented by duodenoscopy have faced new challenges. This article reviews the international advances in duodenoscopy reprocessing in the past 10 years including the structural characteristics of duodenoscope, related infection outbreak cases, outbreak control measures, and the use of disposable duodenoscopy, so as to provide guidance and reference for the duodenoscopy reprocessing and related nosocomial infections prevention and control work in China.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration （LC＋LCBDE） and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphincterectomy with LC（ERCP/EST＋LC） in treatment for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Methods From January 2008 to July 2011， 127 patients suffered from cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis underwent either LC＋LCBDE（85 cases， LC＋LCBDE group） or ERCP/EST＋LC（42 cases， ERCP/EST＋LC group） were collected retrospectively. The clearance rate of calculus， hospital stay， hospitalization expenses， and the rate of postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Results Eighty-five patients were performed successfully in the LC＋LCBDE group， out of which 54 patients had primary closure of common bile duct （LC＋LCBDE primary closure group）， whereas in 28 patients common bile ducts were closed over T tube （LC＋LCBDE＋T tube group）. Forty-two patients were performed successfully in the ERCP/EST＋LC group. There were no differences in the clearance rate of calculus〔100%（82/82） versus 97.37%（37/38）， P=0.317〕 and postoperative complications rate 〔（4.71% （4/85） versus 4.76%（2/42）， P=1.000〕 between the LC＋LCBDE group and ERCP/EST＋LC group. The median （quartile） hospital stay in the LC＋LCBDE group was shorter than that in the ERCP/EST＋LC group 〔12 （6） d versus 17（9） d， P＜0.001〕. In the LC＋LCBDE primary closure group， both median （quartile）?hospital stay and median（quartile） hospitalization expenses were less than those of ERCP/EST＋LC〔hospital stay：11（5） d versus 17（9） d， P＜0.001；hospitalization expenses：27 054（8 452） yuan versus 31 595（11 743） yuan， P=0.005〕 . Conclusions In the management of patients suffered from cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis， both LC＋LCBDE and ERCP/EST＋LC are safe and effective. LC＋LCBDE， especially primary closure after LCBDE， is associated with significantly less costs as compared with ERCP/EST＋LC. Moreover， patients can be cured by LC＋LCBDE through one-stage treatment with the protection of the papilla function and no limits to the amount or size of the choledocholithiasis. The LC＋LCBDE is a preferable choice for the appropriate cases of cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis.
Objective To evaluate the safety and effect of early therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and interventional treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis. Methods Eighty-seven hospitalized patients with acute biliary pancreatitis were divided into endoscopic therapy group and conservative therapy group according to the treatment methods. ERCP examination and treatment were used in the endoscopic therapy group, medical conservative treatments were used in the conservative therapy group. The efficacy such as blood amylase recovery time, abdominal pain relief time, blood white blood cell recovery time, liver function recovery time, hospital stay, and complications were observed. Results Blood amylase recovery time, abdominal pain relief time, blood white blood cell recovery time, liver function recovery time, and hospital stay in the endoscopic therapy group were significantly shorter than those in the conservative therapy group (Plt;0.05). There were no ERCP related severe complications or aggrevated symptoms. Conclusion Early endoscopic therapy is a safe and effective method for acute biliary pancreatitis and can prevent further progression to severe status.
ObjectiveTo explore how to select the suitable indications of ERCP for clinical diagnosis and treatment. MethodsThe data of patients treated by ERCP between January 2005 and December 2009 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsTotal 221 patients received ERCP, among whom 99 (45%) cases of common bile duct stones, 44 (20%) cases of malignant tumor, 9 (4%) cases of papilla narrow, 45 (20%) cases were negative, and 24 (11%) cases were failed. It had the trend that the number of the patients received ERCP reduced year by year. The postoperative complication rate was 11% (25 cases), including 15 cases of postoperative pancreatitis, 3 cases of bleeding, 5 cases of biliary duct infection, and 2 cases of basket stranded. ConclusionIn the modern medical condition, with the advancement of image and laparoscopy technology, we should select the diagnosis and treatment methods with the principles of no damage or less damage for patients, without unlimitedly broadening the clinical indications of ERCP.
Objective To evaluate the use of fast track surgery （FTS） in the treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of common bile duct （CBD） by combination of laparoscope and duodenoscope. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of CBD underwent laparoscopic cholecyst-ectomy （LC） and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP） were divided into FTS group （n=55） and conventional group （n=65），which were accepted the perioperative therapy of FTS or conventional therapy，respectively. After operation，the incision pain，nausea and vomiting，infusion time，loss of body weight，out-of-bed time，dieting time，postoperative hospitalization，hospital costs，and complications were compared in two groups. Results Compared with the conventional group，the postoperative infusion time，dieting time，out-of-bed time，and postoperative hospitali-zation were shorter，the incidence rates of pulmonary infection，and urinary systems infection，pancreatitis，nausea and vomiting， and incision pain were lower，the loss of body weight was lower in the FTS group （P＜0.05），but the differences of WBC and serum amylase at 24 h after operation were not significant between the FTS group and conventional group（P＞0.05）. Conclusion The FTS is safe，economic，and effective in the treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of CBD by combination of laparoscope and duodenoscope.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is currently the first-line minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases. With the increasing popularity of ERCP, ERCP-related adverse events which include post-ERCP pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, bleeding, perforation, etc., have received more and more attention. In response to the controversy and problems in the management of these adverse events, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy published the guidelines for ERCP-related adverse events in December 2019. The paper interprets the key points in the guideline to provide references for clinical practice.
Objective To study the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and early endoscopic management for acute biliary pancreatitis. Methods Ninety-one patients with acute biliary pancreatitis were divided into ERCP group (46 cases) and control group (45 cases) according to the therapy methods. All patients were given positive conventional treatment, the patients of the ERCP group accepted endoscopic therapy within 48 h after hospitalization. The curative effects of two groups were observed, and the related indexes, such as time of abdominal pain relief, temperature to normal, leukocytes to normal, liver function to normal, average time in hospital, and mortality were compared between two groups. Results Among 46 patients by ERCP diagnosis, there were 27 cases of common duct stone (CDS), 6 cases of cholecystolithiasis, 3 cases of great diverticulum at duodenal papilla side, 4 cases of suppurative cholangitis, 3 cases of stenosis in bile common duct inferior segment and 3 cases of no abnormality. Among 27 cases of CDS, 20 patients had endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), 4 had duodenal papilla artifistulation, 20 had calculus removed by once basket and aerocyst, and 7 patients with suppurative cholangitis and great stone saccepted EST or macadam after stabilization. The cases of great diverticulum at duodenal papilla side and cases of stenosis in bile common duct inferior segment accepted EST, the cases of suppurative cholangitis accepted endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD), and all accepted ENBD. The time of abdominal pain relief, temperature to normal, leukocytes to normal, liver function to normal, and the average time in hospital in the ERCP group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (Plt;0.05). The blood amylase to normal time and mortality had no significant differences between two groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The early endoscopic management for patients with acute biliary pancreatitis can clear etiology, reduce the time in hospital and be minimally invasive, safe, and effective.