Objective To summarize the experience of open heart operation on neonates with critical and complex congenital heart diseases and evaluate the methods of perioperative management. Methods From May 2001 to January 2003, 12 patients of neonates with congenital heart diseases underwent emergency operation. Their operating ages ranged from 6 to 30 days, the body weights were 2.8 to 4.5 kg. Their diagnoses included D-transposition of the great arteries in 4 cases, ventricular septal defect with atrial septal defect in 5 cases, complete atrioventricular septal defect, obstructed supracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage and cardiac rhabdomyomas in 1 case respectively. 12 cases were operated under moderate or deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Results All cases were observed in ICU for 2-11 days and discharged 7-19 days after operation. The postoperative complications included low cardiac output, mediastinal infection, respiratory distress syndrome, systemic capillary leak syndrome and acute renal failure. All cases were cured and the follow-up (from 6 months to 2 years) showed satisfactory outcome. Conclusion A particular cardiopulmonary bypass and proper perioperative management is very important to ensure the successful outcome. Peritoneal dialysis is an effective and safe method for treating acute renal failure after cardiac operation in neonates.
目的:调查我院腹膜透析患者死亡和转HD治疗的原因及相关影响因素。方法: 收集腹膜透析患者在我院死亡14例,转HD治疗 2 6例;查阅40例患者在我院的完整病历资料,调查其死亡及转HD治疗的原因及感染病原菌、营养等指标。结果: 14例腹膜透析死亡患者主要原因为肺部感染合并心脑血管疾病及消化道出血,均占(29%,4/14)。643%(9 / 14)的死亡患者HBlt;90 g/L,ALBlt;30 g/l;71.4%(10 / 14)的腹膜透析死亡患者合并钙磷失调。 26例腹膜透析患者转HD的首要原因和次要原因分别为腹透相关性腹膜炎(50%,13/26)和透析液引流不畅(42%,11/26)。72.7%透析液引流不畅的腹透患者经影像学诊断漂管,27.3%患者为拔管手术证实网膜堵塞管口。结论: 1.肺部感染性疾病合并合并心脑血管系统及消化系统,为腹膜透析患者死亡的主要原因,与全身营养状况不良,钙磷失调有关。 2. 腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎仍为腹膜透析患者退出转HD治疗的主要原因。 3.因透析液引流不畅而拔管为转HD治疗的第二位原因,漂管和网膜阻塞管口为透析液引流不畅的原因。
Venous pressure monitoring is an important indicator for the arteriovenous fistula evaluation. Direct static venous pressure monitoring is recognized as the most accurate way of venous pressure monitoring, which is widely used in the functional monitoring, functional evaluation of arteriovenous fistula, the diagnosis of complications and the evaluation of surgical efficacy. Venous pressure monitoring has obvious advantages and disadvantages, so it is necessary to improve relevant knowledge to correctly guide clinical diagnosis and treatment. In this paper, the study of static venous pressure monitoring of arteriovenous fistula was summarized, in order to improve the understanding of the significance and clinical application of static venous pressure monitoring of arteriovenous fistula.
ObjectiveTo investigate the status of exit-site care in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, and analyze the relationship between exit-site care practice and exit-site infection.MethodsThe patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis in Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University between January and October 2019 were recruited by convenience sampling method. The Exit-site Schaefer Scale was used to diagnose the occurrence of exit-site infection. According to the guidelines of the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis and relevant research, a questionnaire was developed to investigate the status of exit-site care in all peritoneal dialysis patients. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influence of care practice on exit-site infection.ResultsA total of 208 peritoneal dialysis patients were recruited. There were 39 patients with (totally 43 times of) exit-site infections, with an exit-site infection incidence of 0.06 episodes per patient-year. The main bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (30.2%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.3%). Of the 39 infected patients, 8 (20.5%) had peritonitis and 3 (7.7%) had been infected more than once. The exit-site Schaefer score of the 208 patients was 3.14±2.75. Of the 208 patients, 204 (98.1%) had received training of exit-site care from nurses, 166 (79.8%) could wash their hands and wear masks as required, 196 (94.2%) covered dressings on the exit site, and 184 (88.5%) fixed catheters, but the application of antibiotic ointment did not follow the latest guidelines. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the history of redness and swelling at the exit site [odds ratio (OR)=7.926, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.367, 26.535), P=0.001] and the history of traction-associated bleeding [OR=5.750, 95%CI (1.878, 17.610), P=0.002] were risk factors of exit-site infection.ConclusionsExit-site infection is common in peritonealdialysis patients. Most patients can perform the exit-site care as required, but the care content is yet to be updated. Nursing staff should improve the training content according to the latest guidelines, strengthen the exit-site assessment, follow-up, and retraining, treat the redness and swelling at the exit site timely, and tell the patients to pay attention to catheter fixation and avoiding excessive traction, to prevent the exit-site infection and the further development of peritonitis.
Objective To evaluate the effect of Fogarty balloon catheter embolectomy on arteriovenous graft thrombosis in hemodialysis patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 11 patients who underwent maintaining hemodialysis and arteriovenous graft thrombosis through Fogarty balloon catheter embolectomy between March 2010 and November 2014. The thrombosed graft was incised, and a 4 or 6 French catheter was placed in the venous and arterial limbs of the graft respectively. The Fogarty balloon was passed beyond the thrombus and pulled out after saline was infused into the balloon, and the thrombus was taken out. The procedure was considered unsuccessful if the blood flow was not re-established or if the graft re-thrombosed within hours. Results The treatment was successfully performed in all the patients. Of the 11 patients, 3 received balloon dilation due to stenosis of venous anastomosis, and 2 received angioplasty due to underlying arterial anastomosis lesion. After corresponding measures were taken, the thrombus of all the 11 patients were taken out, and blood flow was recovered. Two to seven days after surgery, low molecular weight heparin was used for anti-coagulation. The blood flow of all arteriovenous grafts reached over 250 mL/min. All the patients were followed up for 4 to 30 months. During the follow-up, the arteriovenous graft remained functional in 5 patients; 4 patients had re-thrombosis on day 2, 3, 25, and 71 after surgery respectively; one changed to undergo peritoneal dialysis due to rupture and infection of the graft, and one patient was transferred to another hospital in another area and was not followed up any longer. The therapy was successful in 81.8% of this group of patients. Conclusion Fogarty balloon catheter embolectomy is effective in restoring patency of thrombosed arteriovenous graft in hemodialysis patients, and more studies are needed.
Hemodialysis, serving as a crucial renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease, has consistently prioritized the optimization of dialysate composition in clinical practice. The application of glucose-containing dialysate has undergone a conceptual evolution from its initial role in osmotic regulation to its current recognition as a multifunctional systemic modulator. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that glucose-containing dialysate exhibits distinctive clinical advantages in maintaining glycemic and hemodynamic stability while reducing heart rate variability among hemodialysis patients. Nevertheless, existing studies present certain limitations, including relatively small sample sizes and insufficient evaluation of long-term prognostic indicators. Consequently, future investigations should emphasize large-scale, multicenter clinical trials with extended follow-up periods to further substantiate the therapeutic benefits of glucose-containing dialysate in clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo compare the quality of life in the early stage of treatment in patients who accepted renal transplantation with those who still were undergoing long-term hemodialysis. MethodsPatients undergoing long-term hemodialysis in December 2011 and adult patients who planned to accept renal transplantation within 6 months were chosen to be our study subjects. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) was used for the study. After 6 months of following up, they were assessed with the same questionnaire again. Those hemodialysis patients who accepted renal transplantation within this period were divided into the intervention group. The quality of life between the two groups was compared then. ResultsA total of 124 end-stage renal failure patients were involved in our study, in which 79 patients successfully accepted renal transplantation (intervention group) and the other 45 patients who still underwent hemodialysis (control group). No other complications were observed during this period. There was no significant difference in life quality between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). Six months after the treatment, SF-36 total score and each of the 8 dimension scores for the intervention group were all significantly higher than those for the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionRenal transplantation recipients have a totally better life quality than those who depend on hemodialysis.
目的:探讨腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的治疗。方法:回顾性分析的89例腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎患者,初期使用头孢菌素和或氨基糖甙类抗生素治疗,严重者使用头孢唑林和头孢他啶治疗。结果:89例腹膜炎患者透析液培养阳性33例(37.1%),其中19例1～4d治愈(21.3%),56例4～14 d治愈(62.9%),复发11例(12.4%),2例因尿毒症而全身衰竭死亡(2.2%)。结论:虽然腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的发病率有降低趋势,但其仍然是腹膜透析最常见并发症之一,我们在强调对腹膜炎治疗的同时,更要强调对腹膜炎的预防。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of PDCA cycle on the overall nursing care of patients in the hemodialysis center. MethodsTwenty hemodialysis patients between June and July 2014 were randomly selected as the intervention group, and another 20 hemodialysis patients between March and April 2014 were chosen as the control group. We compared the two groups of patients in terms of patients' satisfaction and the overall care quality of the nurses. ResultsOne month after the intervention, patients in the intervention group had a significantly higher satisfaction rate than the control group (P<0.05); Nurses in the intervention group achieved significantly higher scores in basic requirements, basic items and effect evaluation than those in the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionPDCA cycle can effectively improve the overall quality of nursing care in hemodialysis center and improve patients' satisfaction.