目的 了解喉不返神经临床解剖特点，总结甲状腺手术中预防其损伤的经验。方法 分析2例喉不返神经临床资料，结合文献讨论甲状腺手术中预防其损伤的有关问题。结果 本组2例经手术证实，喉不返神经均位于右侧； 右喉返神经缺如，术中未损伤。结论 甲状腺手术中发现横行于颈动脉鞘和喉之间任何索状结构或探查喉返神经缺如，须显露迷走神经(颈段)以避免损伤喉不返神经。
ObjectiveTo investigate the best anatomical classification, surgical timing, procedure and clinical outcomes of congenital vascular ring.MethodsThe clinical data of 58 patients who underwent congenital vascular ring surgery in Pediatric Surgery Center, Fuwai Hospital between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 (55.2%) males and 26 (44.8%) females with a median age of 16.5 (2-73) months. Preoperative symptoms, imaging examinations, anatomical classifications, surgical procedures and postoperative recovery were assessed.ResultsThere were 20 (34.5%) patients of double aortic arch, 22 (37.9%) patients of right aortic arch with left arterial duct or ligament, 15 (25.9%) patients of left aortic arch with aberrant right subclavian artery, and 1 (1.7%) patient of circumflex aorta with cervical aorta arch. The median ventilator supporting time was 6.0 (0-648) h, and the median hospital stay time was 14.5 (7-104) d. One patient with coarctation of aorta died of severe pulmonary infection during perioperative period, and the others survived without symptoms and reoperation after discharge. The median follow-up time was 7.0 (1-62) months.ConclusionFor children with unexplained dyspnea and dysphagia, or with right aortic arch, preoperative imaging examinations such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging are required to confirm the diagnosis of vascular ring. Surgical correction of congenital vascular ring is safe and reliable, and can effectively relieve symptoms. The mortality rate and reoperation rate are low, and the follow-up results are satisfactory.
Objective To investigate the short and medium term results of Castor single branched stent combined with parallel stent technique in the reconstruction of two supra-aortic branches in total endovascular repair of aortic arch lesions. Methods The patients with aortic arch disease who were treated with single-branch stents combined with parallel stents for Z1 anchoring and total endovascular repair from April 2022 to August 2022 in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China were retrospectively included, and the perioperative and follow-up data of the patients were analyzed. ResultsThere were 4 males and 1 female with an average age of (46.2±18.6) years. This study included 1 patient of aortic arch aneurysm and 4 patients of acute non-A non-B aortic dissection. The success rate of surgical technique was 100.0%. The operative time was (132.3±45.1) min, the immediate postoperative isolation of lesions was satisfactory, and there were no adverse events and death in perioperative period. The follow-up time was 12-15 months. During the follow-up period, all patients survived without stent displacement, type Ⅰa endoleak, parallel stent stenosis and occlusion, or re-operation. Conclusion The short and medium term results of single branched stents combined with parallel stents in total endovascular repair of aortic arch diseases requiring Z1 anchoring is satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of subclavian-carotid transposition (SCT) in treating patients with proximal subclavian artery occlusive diseases who were unable to be intervened, such as failure of intervention, congenital malformation and unwillingness to intervention.MethodsA retrospective review of 19 patients with proximal subclavian artery occlusion who underwent SCT from May 2016 to December 2018 was done. There were 14 males and 5 females with an average age of 54.05±17.34 years. The advantages and disadvantages of SCT in the treatment of proximal subclavian artery occlusion were analyzed.ResultsAll patients achieved immediate remission of symptoms after surgery. The stenosis degree of the proximal subclavian artery decreased from 100.0%±0.0% to 12.7%±10.1% after surgery. The average blood pressure difference between the unaffected side and the affected side decreased from 11.95±10.60 mm Hg to 0.89±5.75 mm Hg (P<0.01). Peripheral nerve injury occurred in 7 (36.8%) patients. The in-patient cost of subclavian artery occlusion patients who received subclavian artery interventional therapy in our hospital during the corresponding period was 3 392.12 yuan higher than that of the SCT group in average (if eliminating the patients whose cost was far from the average value, the cost of interventional therapy was 4 812.01 yuan higher than that of the SCT group in average). During 1-3 years' follow-up, 6 patients with neurological complication relieved. One- and three-year patency rates were 100.0%. No perioperative stroke, death or re-operation happened.ConclusionSCT is an ideal process for the patients with subclavian artery occlusion who cannot accept subclavian artery interventional therapy.
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization combined with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection with insufficient proximal landing zone. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection and insufficient proximal landing zone who underwent TEVAR combined with LSA revascularization or TEVAR alone at the Central Hospital of Wuhan from 2017 to 2021. Patients were divided into a revascularization group and a simple stent group based on the surgical approach. Perioperative data of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 144 patients were included. In the simple stent group, there were 113 patients, including 85 males and 28 females, with a median age of 56.0 (48.0, 68.0) years. In the revascularization group, there were 31 patients, including 23 males and 8 females, with a median age of 54.0 (48.2, 59.7) years. There were statistical differences in operation time, hospital stay, preoperative lesion diameter, and preoperative and postoperative right vertebral artery diameter between the two groups (P<0.05). The simple stent group had 12 (10.6%) patients of complications, which was lower than the revascularization group (9 patients, 29.0%) postoperatively. At three months postoperatively, the most common complication in the simple stent group was endoleak (5 patients), while in the revascularization group it was hoarseness (2 patients). There was no death in the two groups within 1 year postoperatively. Conclusion Both different surgical approaches have good effects on the treatment of type B aortic dissection with insufficient proximal landing zone, but further validation is needed through multicenter, large-sample, and long-term follow-up studies.
ObjectiveTo report a simple and safe method for in situ fenestration of left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).MethodsTwenty-eight patients received in situ fenestration of left subclavian artery in TEVAR from June 2018 to May 2019 in our center, including 23 males and 5 females at an average age of 57.7±9.6 years. Among them, 12 patients used adjustable sheath or guiding catheter (a group A) and 16 patients used "J. D"technique (a group B). The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared.ResultsIn the group A, 1 patient failed to receive fenestration and was transferred to the chimney technique. In the group B, 1 patient due to the traction system shift during operation, was completed by traditional adjustable sheath puncture. The group B had shorter alignment-perforation time and trigger time and less complications. There was no significant difference in endoleak during short-term follow-up between the two groups.ConclusionThe "J. D" technique is simple, safe and easy to obtain materials. It effectively reduces the risk caused by difficult sheath alignment during the in situ fenestration of the left subclavian artery. Although the results of recent follow-up are not significantly different from traditional methods, it still needs to accumulate the cases to observe the possible risks and difficulties.
Objective To explore the treatment of traumaticsubclavian artery. Methods From July 1990 to January 2006, 12 cases of traumatic subclavian artery were treated byusing of combined incision of superior-inferior clavian. All patients were male,aging 18-36 years(mean 22.6 years). The locations were section 1 of subclavianartery in 1 case, section 2 in 4 cases and section 3 in 7 cases. All patients had incomplete rupture and defect. Time from injury to operation was 3 hours to 1.5 months. The methods of vascular repair included primary repair, end-to-end anastomosis and artificial vascular prosthesis grafts. Results There was no death. Extremities survived in all cases and got good function in 10cases.All patients were followed up 2 months to 12 years (mean 5 yeras and 2 months). The pulse of radial artery restored to normal in 10 cases and did not be felt in 2 cases. The function of extremities restored to normal in 2 cases withpartial injury of brachial plexus nerve and did not improve in 2 cases with complete injury ofbrachial plexus nerve. 〖WTHZ〗Conclusion The exposure of subclavian artery is difficult because of its particular anatomy region. The repair and reconstruction of subclavian artery should be selected according to the type of vascular injuries. Combined superiorinferior clavian approach can satisfy the exposure and repair for the subclavian artery.
Objective To explore the effective surgical approaches in treating subclavian artery occlusion. Methods Between December 2005 and February 2010, 53 patients with subclavian artery occlusion were treated, including left subclavian artery occlusion (35 cases) and stenosis (5 cases), right subclavian artery occlusion (5 cases) and stenosis (4 cases), and bilateral subclavian artery occlusion (4 cases). There were 40 males and 13 females with an average age of 64 years (range, 22-77 years), including 49 cases of arteriosclerosis obl iterans and 4 cases of aortic arteritis. The disease duration was 15 days to 20 months (6.5 months on average). In 49 patients with unilateral subclavian artery occlusion, 39 cases compl icated by carotid or / and cerebral artery lesion underwent axillo-axillary bypass grafting, and 10 cases without carotid or /and cerebral artery lesion underwent carotid-subclavian bypass grafting. Ascending aorta to bisubclavian bypass graftings were performed on 4 cases with bilateral subclavian artery occlusion. After operation, patients received routine treatment with anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents. Results The operations were successfully performed in 52 cases with a successful rate of 98.11%. Thrombogenesis at anastomotic site occurred in 1 case of aortic arteritis after 48 hours. Two cases had brachial plexus crush injury and 4 had hematoma around the bilateral anastomosis after axillo-axillary bypass grafting, and all recovered with nonoperative therapy. A total of 52 patients were followed up 1-52 months (24.5 months on average). All patients survived and the symptoms of basilar and upper l imb artery ischemia disappeared. Doppler ultrasonography showed that the blood flow was patent through anastomosis and polytetrafluoroethylene graft, and the vertebral artery flow was normal. Pseudoaneurysm at anastomosis was found in 1 case after 18 months and treated by interventional embol ization. The postoperative graft patency rate was 100% at 1 year and at 2 years. Conclusion Both thoracic and extrathoracic surgical approaches are effective for treating subclavianartery occlusion. The reasonable surgical approach should be selected according to the arteriopathy and the patient’s condition. Perioperative treatment and strict intraoperative manipulation are important to guarantee the success of surgery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of in vitro fenestration on reconstruction of left subclavian artery in endovascular treatment of aortic dissection.MethodsA total of 89 patients with aortic dissection involving left subclavian artery were treated by endovascular treatment in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from February 2017 to January 2020. There were 44 patients in the test group, including 36 males and 8 females, with an average age of 58.02±13.58 years. There were 45 patients in the control group, including 35 males and 10 females, with an average age of 54.10±12.32 years. The left subclavian artery was reconstructed by in vitro fenestration in the test group and by chimney technique in the control group. The clinical data were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe operation time of the test group was longer than that of the control group (126.16±7.53 min vs. 96.49±6.52 min, P<0.01). The median follow-up time was 31 (13-48) months. The incidence of endoleak in the test group (4.7%) was lower than that in the control group (18.6%, P=0.04) during the follow-up. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, false lumen thrombosis, retrograde aortic dissection or left subclavian artery occlusion between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion In vitro fenestration for reconstructing left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic dissection is safe and feasible, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the early and mid-term safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement via transfemoral (TF), transapical (TAp) and transsubclavian (TSc) approaches by meta-analysis.MethodsWe systematically searched the clinical comparative trials published from inception to June 2019 from PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase and The Cochrane Library, to evaluate the safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement through TF, TAp or TSc approaches. The information of all-cause mortality at 30 days, 1 year, 2 years and the incidence of common complications at 30 days after operation (including pacemaker-dependent block, major vascular complications, severe bleeding events, acute renal injury and stroke) were exacted, and a meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsThis study included 11 literatures, with a total of 7 833 patients, among whom 5 348 patients were treated by TF TAVR, 1 796 patients by TAp TAVR and 689 patients by TSc TAVR. The results of the meta-analysis were as follows: (1) at 30 days after operation, the mortality of TF and TSc approaches were lower than that of the TAp approach (TF vs. TAp: OR=0.57, 95%CI 0.39-0.84, P=0.004; TSc vs. TAp: OR=4.12, 95%CI 1.93-8.79, P=0.000 3). There was no statistical difference between the TF and TSc approaches (TF vs. TSc: OR=0.98, 95%CI 0.38-2.51, P=0.97); at 1 year, there was no statistical difference in mortality among the three approaches (P>0.05); at 2 years, there was no statistical difference between TSc and TF or TAp approaches (TF vs. TSc: OR=1.21, 95%CI 0.95-1.54, P=0.13; TSc vs. TAp: OR=1.02, 95%CI 0.76-1.36, P=0.91). (2) The incidence of acute kidney injury after TF approach was lower than that of the TAp approach (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.22-0.41, P<0.000 01). (3) There was no statistical difference in major vascular complications between TSc and TF or TAp approaches (TF vs. TSc: OR=0.75, 95%CI 0.38-1.49, P=0.41; TSc vs. TAp: OR=1.37, 95%CI 0.56-3.32, P=0.49). (4) There was no statistical difference in severe bleeding events between TF and TSc (OR=0.97, 95%CI 0.53-1.76, P=0.92). (5) There was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative stroke, pacemaker dependent block among the three approaches (P>0.05).ConclusionTAp and TSc approaches are safe and effective. They are not only an alternative to TF approach, but also the first choice in some patients with poor condition of iliofemoral artery.