Objective To compare proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) for both the prevention of bleeding and the healing of ulcer after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), so as to provide best evidence for treating ESD-induced ulcer in clinic. Methods Databases including PubMed, CENTRAL, EMbase, ISI Web of Knowledge, VIP, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data were searched from the date of their establishment to October 26, 2012 to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about comparison of PPI and H2RA on the prevention of bleeding and the healing of ulcer after ESD. Meanwhile the references of the included studies were also retrieved manually. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by four reviewers independently, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 6 studies involving 616 patients were included finally. The results of meta-analysis showed that: for the prevention of ulcer bleeding after ESD, PPI preceded H2RA apparently (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.89, P=0.02), especially when the treatment course was 8-week (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.82, P=0.01); but among the merged, 8-week and 4-week groups, there were no significant differences between PPI and H2RA in the healing of ESD-induced ulcer (OR=0.85, 95%CI 0.39 to 1.86, P=0.69; OR=1.33, 95%CI 0.28 to 6.27, P=0.72; OR=0.75, 95%CI 0.31 to 1.79, P=0.52). Conclusion PPI is superior to H2RA for the prevention of ulcer bleeding induced by ESD, but there is no significant difference between them in the healing of ulcer, so PPI is recommended to prevent ESD-induced ulcer bleeding in clinic. Due to the limitation of quantity and quality of the included studies, the safety of PPI has to be further proved by conducting more high quality, large scale and multicenter RCTs.
Objective To evaluate the effects of neuromuscular blocking agents( NMBAs) in acute respiratory distress syndrome( ARDS) . Methods Randomized controlled trials( RCTs) and non-RCTs were recruited fromPubMed( 1966. 1-2012. 3) , EMBASE( all the years) , Cochrane Library( all the years) and CNKI Database( 1979-2012) . Related published studies and attached references were hand searched. All the RCTs and non-RCTs ( including prospective and retrospective studies) about NMBAs for the patients with ARDS were included. Then a meta-analysis and statistic descriptions for RCTs( using RevMan5. 0 software) and non-RCTs were performed. Jadad and NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA QUALITY ASSESSMENT SCALE were used to assess the methodological quality of the included RCTs and non-RCTs. Results Three eligible RCTs and four non-RCTs were enrolled. The quality of the included trials was high. Pooled analysis for three RCTs showed that NMBAs significantly reduced 28-day mortality [ OR 0. 58, 95% CI( 0. 39, 0. 86) , P = 0. 007] and increased ventilator-free days within 28 days [ WMD 1. 91 d, 95% CI( 0. 28,3. 55) , P =0. 02] in ARDS compared with the control group. Conclusion The present meta-analysis indicates that NMBAs reduce the 28-day mortality and increase ventilator-free days within 28 days in ARDS.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of different rennin-angiotensin system blockers in prevention of stroke recurrence and reduction of major vascular events in patients with prior stroke.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, CBM and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of ACEIs and ARBs for stroke secondary prevention from inception to November 1st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 15.1 software.ResultsA total of 6 RCTs involving 25 620 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that: in prevention of stroke recurrence, candesartan (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.99) and valsartan (RR=0.22, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.76) were significantly lower than placebo; valsartan was lower than telmisartan (RR=0.24, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.81), ramipril (RR=0.26, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.93) and perindopril (RR=0.23, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.81). For reducing the major vascular events after stroke, candesartan (RR=0.39, 95%CI 0.21 to 0.74), valsartan (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.64) and ramipril (RR=0.76, 95%CI 0.60 to 0.95) were significantly lower than placebo; valsartan was lower than telmisartan (RR=0.29, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.69), ramipril (RR=0.36, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.88) and perindopril (RR=0.28, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.68); candesartan was lower than telmisartan (RR=0.42, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.79) and perindopril (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.21 to 0.79).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that valsartan and candesartan can reduce the stroke recurrence and major vascular events after stroke. Ramipril can reduce the major vascular event in patients with prior stroke. Valsartan might be the best option in both outcomes. Due to limited quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome (VKH) is an autoimmune disorder primarily characterized by bilateral granulomatous uveitis, which can lead to severe visual impairment and related complications. Traditional treatment typically involves glucocorticoid combined with immunosuppressants, but these therapies are associated with significant side effects, limited efficacy, and poor long-term prognosis. In recent years, biologic agents have emerged as a promising treatment for refractory VKH due to their targeted action, high efficacy, and low toxicity. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, such as infliximab and adalimumab, have shown significant benefits in controlling inflammation, improving vision, and reducing steroid dependence, making them a key option for difficult-to-treat VKH. Among interleukin (IL) blockers, tocilizumab has demonstrated potential in patients who do not respond to traditional treatments. Rituximab, a B-cell targeting agent, has shown good efficacy and safety in patients resistant to TNF-α inhibitors. Additionally, research into novel biologics targeting the IL-23/IL-17 axis and IL-33 offers new directions for VKH therapy. While biologics provide clear advantages in VKH treatment, further research is needed to explore their long-term safety, cost-effectiveness, and optimal treatment regimens. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to validate their efficacy and identify personalized treatment strategies to improve long-term patient outcomes.