ObjectiveTo summarize the progress in treatment of unstable atlas fracture, the existing problems, and the research direction.MethodsRelated literature at home and abroad was reviewed. The stability evaluation of atlas fracture and treatment methods were introduced, and the selection of surgical approach and fixation instruments in treatment of unstable atlas fracture were summarized and analyzed.ResultsAt present, atlas fractures are considered as unstable fractures except single anterior arch fractures with complete transverse ligament or simple posterior arch fractures. The treatment of unstable atlas fracture has been developed from nonsurgical treatment and traditional fusion surgery to single-segment fixation. Nonsurgical treatment is less effective, while traditional fusion surgery has a disadvantage of limited the motion of the upper cervical spine. Single-segment fixation can not only restore and fix the fracture, but also preserve the upper cervical motion function. Single-segment fixation approaches include posterior and transoral approaches, and the fixation instruments are being constantly improved, mainly including screw-rod system, screw-plate system, and plate system.ConclusionFor unstable atlas fracture, single-segment fixation is an ideal surgical method, and has more advantages when compared with nonsurgical treatment and traditional fusion surgery. Single-segment fixation via transoral approach is more direct for atlas anterior arch fracture reduction, but there is a high risk of infection; and single-segment fixation via posterior approach is less effective for the reduction of atlas anterior arch fracture. Therefore, a better reduction method should be explored.
ObjectiveTo summarize the treatment effects and success rate of spleen-preserving treatments for patients with splenic injury, and to explore the ideal spleen-preserving treatment for different types of splenic injury. MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 136 patients with splenic injury who underwent spleen-preserving treatment in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery between July 1998 and December 2010. And the treatment effects of different combined treatment methods were compared and studied. ResultsTwenty-seven patients were treated without surgery; 23 underwent vascular suture combined with fibrin glue treatment; 26 accepted splenic artery ligation, partial suture and fibrin glue treatment; 20 underwent ultrasonic scalpel partial splenectomy and wound spray fibrin glue treatment; 17 accepted splenic artery ligation and RF hemostatic cutter row spleen resection; and 23 accepted laparoscopic ultrasonic scalpel with partial splenectomy and wound spray fibrin glue treatment. Spleen-preserving succeeded in 131 cases (95.58%) and failed in 5 cases (4.42%) without any deaths. ConclusionsIn the treatment of splenic injury, the success rate of different methods of spleen-preserving is close. The success rate of combined use of several spleen-preserving methods together is higher. Under the principle of "Save lives first, and preserve spleen second", we should carry out individualized treatment plan for the patients based on patients' general condition, the extent and grade of splenic rupture, and medical equipment and technical conditions. For those medical units with good treatment conditions, combined spleen-preserving treatment can be performed.
目的 探讨非手术治疗外伤性脾破裂的可行性及适应证。 方法 回顾分析1998年以来山东省聊城市第二人民医院非手术治疗88例外伤性脾破裂的临床资料及其治疗效果。结果 88例均经B超检查确诊脾破裂，Ⅰ级损伤19例，Ⅱ级损伤57例，Ⅲ级损伤12例，其中16例患者合并肋骨骨折，11例合并肝外伤，9例合并肾挫伤，4例合并颅脑损伤，3例中转手术。结论 有选择地采用非手术治疗外伤性脾破裂安全、有效，轻度的肝肾损伤、腹腔外器官合并伤及患者的年龄并不影响非手术治疗的疗效。
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, and CQVIP databases were searched for controlled studies about operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment for ASD published up till June 2019. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for grey literatures informally published up till June 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literatures, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0 softwares.ResultsA total of 10 non-randomized controlled studies were included, including 1 601 patients. The pooled results indicated that the operative group was superior to the nonoperative group in ability improvement [the increment of Scoliosis Research Society-22 score: weighted mean difference (WMD)=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.69, 0.70), P<0.000 01; the decrement of Oswestry Disability Index score: WMD=11.12, 95%CI (10.74, 11.50), P<0.000 01], pain relief [the decrement of Numeric Rating Scale score: WMD=3.25, 95%CI (3.16, 3.35), P<0.000 01], and Cobb correction [WMD=14.06°, 95%CI (13.60, 14.53)°, P<0.000 01]. The incidence of complications was higher in the operative group than that in the nonoperative group [relative risk=5.38, 95%CI (3.67, 7.88), P<0.000 01].ConclusionsSurgery shows superior efficacy on ability improvement, pain relief, and Cobb correction compared with nonoperative treatment in ASD patients, though its incidence of complications is high. Nonoperative treatment is also an effective treatment for patients with poor physical condition and intolerance to surgery. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
目的 观察内给氧治疗重症急性胰腺炎的临床效果。方法 对2005年2月至2009年3月期间收治的55例重症急性胰腺炎患者采用非手术治疗，在给予奥曲肽或施他宁、抗生素及基础性支持治疗的基础上，按入院时间先后分为2组，试验组(n=28)给予注射用内给氧治疗1周，对照组(n=27)未用内给氧。结果 试验组动脉血氧分压在应用内给氧治疗前为(53.8±8.1) mm Hg，治疗后为(87.9±9.5) mm Hg； 血氧饱和度治疗前为（81.1±7.4）%，治疗后为（93.2±6.7）%； 治愈病例中血淀粉酶降至正常的时间，试验组平均为(29.4±7.2) h，对照组平均为(162.1±46.8) h； 死于急性呼吸窘迫综合征者试验组为0（0/28），对照组为14.8%（4/27）; 上述指标差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 内给氧配合基础性治疗对重症急性胰腺炎有较好疗效，实用性较强。
目的 探讨外伤性脾破裂非手术治疗的可行性、适应证及其治疗效果。 方法 回顾性分析我院1990年1月至2005年1月收治的外伤性脾破裂非手术治疗46例临床资料。结果 非手术治愈43例，3例因提前下床活动致大出血而中转手术，其中1例并发膈下脓肿，仍经保守治疗痊愈。无死亡病例。结论 在严格掌握适应证前提下非手术治疗外伤性脾破裂安全可行，年龄及腹腔外合并伤不是影响非手术治疗的主要因素。
ObjectiveTo discuss the indications of the nonoperative management for perforated peptic ulcer. MethodsClinical data of 145 patients with perforated peptic ulcer, aged below 70 years old, with first attack and onset timelt;12 h , admitted to our hospital between January 2002 and December 2009, were analyzed respectively. Patients who were negative for fluid of abdominopelvic cavity in ultrasound examination and leakage in watersoluble contrast examination received nonoperative management, otherwise underwent operation directly (If the patients were being on medication for the ulcer, they should also go directly to surgery). Non-operative patients were converted to operation if the symptom had not relieved during the first 12 h. When admitted , the APACHE Ⅱ score was calculated for all patients. ResultsSeventy-four and 71 patients underwent non-operative management and operation directly respectively. Sex, age, onset time, perforation site and so on were comparable between the two groups （Pgt;0.05）, while APACHE Ⅱ score over 8 was 25.7% and 76.1% respectively with significant difference (P=0000). In nonoperative group, 11 (149%) patients were converted to operation. The mortality (4.1% vs 9.8%, P=0.203), mobility (16.2% vs 25.3%, P=0.175), hospital stay 〔(11.4±2.5) d vs (11.3±1.3) d, P=0.447〕, and cost 〔(11 657.3±2 826.4) yuan vs (10 013.0±1 877.4) yuan, P=0.212〕 between two groups had also no significant difference. The mean APACHE Ⅱ score was significant different between the survivors and the dead (9.3 vs 20.2, P=0.000). APACHE Ⅱ score was positively related to mortality and morbility （r=0.98, P=0.000； r=0.52, P=0.000）. ConclusionsNon-operative management is a safe and effective way in selected patients with perforated peptic ulcer, such as APACHE Ⅱ score ≤8, negative for fluid of abdominopelvic cavity in ultrasound examination, and leakage in water-soluble contrast examination. APACHE Ⅱ score is an important factor in prognosis of these patients.
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of TINAVI robotic system-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for thoracolumbar fracture with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) of 4. Methods A total of 38 patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fracture treated between January 2019 and January 2021 who met the selection criteria of Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of doctor-patient communication, 18 cases were treated with robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (robot group), and 20 cases were treated with traditional conservative treatment (non-surgical group). Complications during hospitalization were observed. After discharge, the patients in the two groups were followed up by telephone and outpatient clinic. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at admission, at discharge, and 3 and 6 months after discharge, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score 3 and 6 months after discharge were compared between the two groups. Results There were no statistically significant difference in age, sex, body mass index or distribution of injured vertebrae segment between the two groups (P>0.05). No serious complication occurred in any group during hospitalization. The difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The bed rest in the robot group was shorter than that in the non-surgical group [(4.83±0.92) vs. (43.05±2.70) d, P<0.05]. The VAS scores at discharge (2.50±0.51 vs. 5.05±1.00), 3 months after discharge (1.83±0.71 vs. 3.10±0.72) and 6 months after discharge (1.50±0.51 vs. 1.90±0.79) in the robot group were lower than those in the non-surgical group (P<0.05). The ODI scores 3 months after discharge (21.89±1.41 vs. 30.40±3.00) and 6 months after discharge (10.72±2.37 vs. 12.10±2.29) in the robot group were significantly lower than those in the non-surgical group (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fracture, the early clinical effect of robot-assisted surgical treatment is better than that of non-surgical treatment.
ObjectiveTo study the application value of mixed formulations consisting of paraffin oil, dimethyl silicone oil, and senna preparations in treatment for incomplete adhesive intestinal obstruction after laparotomy. MethodsOne hundred and twentyeight patients diagnosed incomplete adhesive intestinal obstruction admitted to this hospital from March 2005 to May 2008 were randomly divided into trial group and control group. For the control group, the tradition therapy including fasting, gastrointestinal decompression, fluid replacement therapy, and enema with soap and water were used for treatment. For the trial group, the mixed formulations consisting of paraffin oil, dimethyl silicone oil, and senna preparations were injected into stomach by the nasogastric tube on the basis of traditional treatment used for the control group. Some indicators including the successful rate of nonoperative treatment, the time that obstructive symptoms resolved and returned to normal exhaust and defecation and normal diet, and recurrence rate were compared between two groups. ResultsThe successful rate of nonoperative treatmentin in the trial group were significantly higher than that in the control group 〔92.1% (70/76) versus 69.2% (36/52), Plt;0.01〕. The average time that recovered to normal exhaust and defecation in the trial group and the control group was 32.5 d and 47.8 d, respectively. The average time that recovered to normal diet in the trial group and the control group was 3.2 d and 5.3 d, respectively. The time that recovered to normal exhaust and defecation, and diet in the trial group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (Plt;0.01). The recurrence rate had no significant difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionThe mixed formulations consisting of paraffin oil, dimethyl silicone oil, and senna preparations improve recovery of intestinal function and reduce surgical intervention rate.