ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for postoperative overall and severe complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of the elderly (65 years old or more) patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD were retrospectively collected, who were admitted to the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2017 to October 2021. The incidences of postoperative overall and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ–Ⅴ was defined as severe complications) were summarized. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze whether GNRI was a risk factor for overall and severe complications after PD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the ability of GNRI to distinguish whether overall or severe complications occurred after PD and to confirm the optimal threshold. Then the patients were assigned into a high nutritional risk group (greater than the optimal threshold) and low nutritional risk group (the optimal threshold or less) based on this. Simultaneously, the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. ResultsIn this study, 190 elderly patients with pancreatic cancer were enrolled, 95(50.0%) of whom developed complications, including 28(29.5%) cases of serious complications. The results of multivariate logistic regression model analysis showed that the decreased GNRI was a risk factor for the occurrence of overall and severe complications after PD for the elderly patients [OR(95%CI)=0.361(0.154, 0.848), P=0.019; OR(95%CI)=0.906(0.834, 0.983), P=0.018]. The AUC of GNRI for assessing the occurrence of overall and severe complications was 0.765 and 0.715, respectively, with the optimal critical values of 98 and 96, respectively. Compared with the low nutritional risk group, the high nutritional risk group had higher postoperative total hospitalization costs (Z=–2.37, P=0.019), higher occurrences of overall complications (χ2=44.61, P<0.001) and severe complications (χ2=29.39, P＜0.001). ConclusionsIn elderly patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD, incidence of serious complications is not lower. GNRI has a good discriminative value in terms of postoperative overall and severe complications. When preoperative GNRI is 98 or less and GNRI is 96 or less, patients should be given early preoperative nutritional support treatment in time.
目的 了解糖尿病患者院外自行注射胰岛素存在的风险。 方法 2010年1月－12月，通过随访调查老年组83例，中青年组69例糖尿病患者院外自行注射胰岛素的实施情况，对存在的问题进行归类、统计。调查的内容主要包括3个方面：胰岛素装置的正确使用、胰岛素的规范注射、血糖监测及低血糖处理。分析两组患者院外注射胰岛素的风险，并对存在的问题进行原因分析、提出解决方法。 结果 发放调查表152份，有效回收131份，其中老年组73份，中青年组58份。在胰岛素装置使用方面，老年组存在问题48项，中青年组27项，两者间差异无统计学意义（χ2=2.432，P＞0.05）。在胰岛素的规范注射方面，老年组存在问题176项，中青年组77项，老年组在胰岛素注射方面存在的问题明显高于中青年组（χ2=25.009，P＜0.001）。在低血糖的认识及正确处理上，老年组存在问题115项，中青年组33项，两组差异具有统计学意义（χ2=40.383，P＜0.001）。 结论 糖尿病患者院外自行注射胰岛素存在诸多风险。老年糖尿病患者院外胰岛素注射需在他人协助、监督下进行。
目的 探讨围手术期患者静脉血栓预防的分级护理方法，为静脉血栓的预防提供实证依据。 方法 2009年5月－2012年1月，以某市级乙等综合性医院各科室手术患者为对象，引入量化工具评估患者围手术期静脉血栓发生的危险，并根据评估结果采取分级护理方法进行防治，并在患者出院时用彩色多普勒超声判断是否存在静脉血栓，以验证分级护理防治效果。 结果 纳入的318患者经评估均存在发生静脉血栓的风险，其中低度危险患者65例，中度182例，高度危险71例。经分级护理治疗，出院时均未发生静脉血栓症状、肺栓塞。 结论 分级护理方法安全、简便，可操作性强，便于围手术期患者静脉血栓的早期、普遍预防，值得推广。
Objective To explore the impact of hospital staff’s risk perception on their emergency responses, and provide reference for future responses to public health emergencies. Methods Based on participatory observation and in-depth interviews, the staff of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University who participated in the prevention and control of the coronavirus disease 2019 from April to September 2020 were selected. The information on risk perception and emergency responses of hospital staff was collected. Results A total of 61 hospital staff were included. The positions of hospital staff were involved including hospital leading group, hospital office, medical department, logistics support department and outpatient isolation area. The interview results showed that both individual and organizational factors of hospital staff would affect the risk perception of hospital staff, thus affecting the emergency responses of hospital staff, mainly reflected in the psychological and behavioral aspects. Among them, their psychological reactions were manifested as more confidence, sensitivity, and sense of responsibility and mission; The behavior aspects was mainly reflected in the initiation time, execution ability, and standardization level of emergency responses actions. Conclusion Therefore, relevant departments should pay attention to the risk perception of hospital staff, improve the risk perception and emergency responses of hospital staff by influencing the individual and organizational factors of hospital staff, so as to respond more effectively to future public health emergencies and reduce the adverse impact of public health emergencies on the work of hospital staff.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a common theraputic option for aortic stenosis, but the evidence for precise anatomy for TAVR is accumulating. This paper presents the case of an 71-year-old female patient who had an extremely high risk of coronary obstruction due to both coronary ostia lying too low. The patient underwent TAVR with the help of coronary protection successfully. During the procedure, the patient was protected with wires only for both coronaries. After deployment, angiofluoroscopy suggested that chimney stenting should be applied for left coronary. The whole procedure was unenventful and both coronaries were seen.
This study introduced the construction of individualized risk assessment model based on Bayesian networks, comparing with traditional regression-based logistic models using practical examples. It evaluates the model's performance and demonstrates its implementation in the R software, serving as a valuable reference for researchers seeking to understand and utilize Bayesian network models.
ObjectiveTo understand the impact of preoperative nutritional status on the postoperative complications for patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer undergoing extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. MethodsThe patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected using the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA), and then who were assigned into a nutritional risk group (the score was low than 3 by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002) and non-nutritional risk group (the score was 3 or more by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002). The postoperative complications and survival were analyzed for the patients with or without nutritional risk. The postoperative complications were defined as early-term (complications occurring within 30 d after surgery), middle-term (complications occurring during 30–180 d after surgery), and long-term (complications occurring at 180 d and more after surgery). The survival indicators included overall survival and disease-specific survival. ResultsA total of 680 patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study were retrieved from the DACCA database. Among them, there were 500 (73.5%) patients without nutritional risk and 180 (26.5%) patients with nutritional risk. The postoperative follow-up time was 0–152 months (with average 48.9 months). Five hundreds and forty-three survived, including 471 (86.7%) patients with free-tumors survival and 72 (13.3%) patients with tumors survival. There were 137 deaths, including 122 (89.1%) patients with cancer related deaths and 15 (10.9%) patients with non-cancer related deaths. There were 48 (7.1%) cases of early-term postoperative complications, 51 (7.5%) cases of middle-term complications, and 17 (2.5%) cases of long-term complications. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of overall complications between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.749, P=0.053; χ2=2.205, P=0.138; χ2=310, P=0.578). The specific complications at different stages after surgery (excluding the anastomotic leakage complications in the patients with nutritional risk was higher in patients without nutritional risk, P=0.034) had no statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The survival curves (overall survival and disease-specific survival) using the Kaplan-Meier method had no statistical differences between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.316, P=0.069; χ2=3.712, P=0.054). ConclusionsFrom the analysis results of this study, for the rectal cancer patients who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy, the patients with preoperative nutritional risk are more prone to anastomotic leakage within 30 d after surgery. Although other postoperative complications and long-term survival outcomes have no statistical differences between patients with and without nutritional risk, preoperative nutritional management for them cannot be ignored.
ObjectiveTo investigate the association between the preoperative nutritional risk and anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for the rectal cancer. MethodsA total of 321 patients with rectal cancer underwent anterior resection in our hospital between January 2008 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative nutritional status was evaluated using NRS 2002. Correlation of clinicopathologic characteristics with postoperative anastomotic leakage was evaluated using single factor analysis and Logistic regression model. ResultsAmong the 321 patients, the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage was 5.6% (18/321). Single factor analysis showed that the NRS2002 score≥3, clinicalpathologic stage (Ⅲ-Ⅳstage) and distance of tumor from the anal verge were the risk factors of anastomotic leakage after anterior leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the NRS2002 score (OR=4.125, 95% CI=2.062-7.004), clinicalpathologic stage (OR=3.334, 95% CI=2.062-7.004) and the distance of tumor from the anal verge (OR=2.341, 95% CI=2.559-15.838) were the independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer. Conciusions Preoperative NRS2002 score is helpful to predict the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Nutrition education should be strengthened to decrease the morbidity of the anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for the patients who's NRS2002 score≥3.