Objective To understand the incidence and severity of postoperative acute pain in patients undergoing day surgery, and to explore the influencing factors of moderate to severe pain after surgery, so as to provide a reference for pain management in day surgery. Methods Convenience sampling method was used to select patients undergoing day surgery under multi-modal pain management in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between April and August 2020, and the general conditions, surgical conditions, and postoperative pain of the patients were investigated. According to the degree of postoperative pain, patients were divided into mild pain group and moderate to severe pain group. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors of postoperative pain in the two groups. Results A total of 509 patients were finally included, of which 69 patients presented with moderate to severe pain. Logistic regression analysis showed that patient age [odds ratio (OR)=0.970, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.946, 0.993), P=0.012], pain threshold [OR=1.348, 95%CI (1.048, 1.734), P=0.020] and postoperative drainage tube [OR=2.752, 95%CI (1.090, 6.938), P=0.017] were the influencing factors of moderate to severe pain after surgery. Conclusion Under multimodal pain management, the incidence of moderate to severe pain in day surgery patients is low, and medical staff should further strengthen pain management from the factors affecting pain to reduce the incidence of moderate to severe pain after surgery.
As the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has promoted the revolution of day surgery, more complicated surgery such as radical resection of early cancer and other fourth-level surgery can be performed in day surgery mode. Since 2010, West China Hospital of Sichuan University has introduced ERAS program and gradually performed fourth-level surgery in day surgery center. With the measures of reasonable inclusion criteria, team construction, and optimization of treatment and nursing procedures, the quality and safety of day surgery are guaranteed. Between January 2019 and August 2023, a total of 2531 patients underwent 24-hour fourth-level day surgery for early cancer, with a delayed discharge rate of 2.09%, a readmission rate of 2.57%, and a readmission rate of 1.11%, without death case, and the patient satisfaction was above 98%. The perioperative management scheme of fourth-level day surgery provides a reference for the management of day surgery for more diseases.
Objective To understand the current situation of ambulatory surgery cancellation rates and the reasons for cancellation. Methods China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang data, VIP database, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for literature reporting cancellation of ambulatory surgery and published between January 1st, 2000 and September 1st, 2023. Data extraction and meta-analysis were conducted after literature screening, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on the type of the ward, reasons for cancellation, and study sites. Results A total of 19 studies were included, with a total of 270528 cases of ambulatory surgeries, among which 12250 cases were cancelled. The ambulatory surgery cancellation rate was 5.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) (4.5%, 7.1%)]. Subgroup analyses showed that the cancellation rates of general wards, pediatric wards, and ophthalmic wards were 4.0% [95%CI (2.9%, 5.1%)], 9.9% [95%CI (5.2%, 14.5%)], and 8.1% [95%CI (2.7%, 13.4%)], respectively, and the difference in the cancellation rate among different types of wards was statistically significant (P=0.02); there was a significant difference in the surgery cancellation rate among different reasons for cancellation (P<0.01), the highest cancellation rate of surgery was due to disease factors, which was 2.5% [95%CI (1.2%, 3.9%)]; there was no statistically significant difference in the cancellation rate among different study sites (P=0.43). Conclusions The issue of cancellation of ambulatory surgery is prominent in clinical practice. Optimized management is therefore suggested in urgent.
Objective To explore the effect of multimodal pain management in the perioperative period of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Non-randomized historical control method was adopted. Patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University were included. The patients who received single modal pain management between January and May 2020 were taken as the control group, and the patients who received multimodal pain management between January and May 2021 were taken as the trial group. The postoperative pain and pain-related indicators of the two groups were compared. Results A total of 731 patients were included, including 496 in the trial group and 235 in the control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, nationality, education level, diagnosis, marriage and occupation between the two groups (P>0.05). There were 41 patients with moderate or above pain after surgery in the trial group, of which 3 patients were accompanied by severe nausea and vomiting. There were 41 patients with moderate or above pain after surgery in the control group, of which 4 patients were accompanied by severe nausea and vomiting. The incidence of moderate or above postoperative pain (8.3% vs. 17.4%) and post-discharge pain (0.0% vs. 1.3%) in the trial group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative severe nausea and vomiting and delayed discharge due to postoperative pain between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups patients with moderate or above pain in gender, age, body mass index, education level, diagnosis, time from the onset of pain to the end of surgery, pain location, pain nature, use rate of antiemetic drugs, and score after treatment (P>0.05). The majority of pain sites were surgical incision pain, and the nature of pain was mostly swelling pain. The pain score of patients with moderate or above pain in the trial group was lower than that of the control group (4.4±0.6 vs. 4.9±1.1, P<0.05). Conclusion Multimodal pain management reduces postoperative pain of patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy by means of assessment, medication, procedure improvement, health education, which can provide guarantee for perioperative quality management of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Day surgery is flourishing in public hospitals in China with the advantages of strong planning, short stay and high efficiency. Under the background of “diversification of surgeons, diversification of disease structure and precision of scheduling needs”, higher requirements are put forward for refined scheduling strategies of day surgery. The research of scientific and precise surgical scheduling strategy is of great significance to realize efficient coordination and optimal allocation of day surgical resources. This article reviews the necessity of precise scheduling of day surgery, the current situation of scheduling of day surgery, the key dimensions affecting the scheduling of day surgery, and the evaluation system for precise scheduling of day surgery.
Objective To describe the situation of postoperative pain management in colorectal cancer patient in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) mode, and explore its influenceing factors. Methods From March to December 2017, colorectal cancer patients in ERAS mode in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University were selected. On the third day after surgery, a total of 74 patients with acute pain completed a questionnaire, which was composed of a demographic form, the Houston Pain Outcome Instrument (HPOI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, and Social Support Rating Scale. Mean±standard deviation and percentage were used to describe the total score of pain experience, t test, analysis of variance, Spearman correlation analysis were used for single-factor analysis, and multiple linear regression was used for multi-factor analysis. Results The mean total score of pain experience was 15.1±3.8. Single-factor analysis results showed that the affection of pain on daily life (rs=0.270, P=0.020), satisfaction of pain controlling education (rs=–0.283, P=0.015), subjective support (rs=–0.326, P=0.005), and social support utilization (rs=–0.253, P=0.029) were correlated with the total score of pain experience. Multi-factor analysis results showed that satisfaction of pain controlling education (P<0.001) and subjective support (P=0.005) were negative influencing factors of postoperative pain experience score, and severe anxiety (P=0.001) and pain expectation after surgery (P=0.016) were positive influencing factors of postoperative pain experience score. Conclusions Pain management situation is not so bad in these patients. High satisfaction of pain controlling education and high subjective social support are helpful to decrease pain. The medical staff should pay more attention to patients with severe anxiety, and help patients to establish reasonable pain expectation after surgery.