【摘要】 目的 探讨125I粒子植入治疗中晚期胰腺癌的临床并发症及相关护理措施。 方法 回顾分析2006年10月-2010年4月121例行125I粒子植入治疗的胰腺癌患者的临床治疗及护理，采取积极有效的护理措施，预防及处理并发症，促进患者康复。 结果 121例患者接受放射性125I粒子植入治疗后，7例出现胰瘘，13例出现胃肠道反应，经对症处理和精心护理后均治愈。 结论 125I粒子组织间植入近距离治疗中晚期胰腺癌近期疗效好、安全、副反应少，良好的护理对改善中晚期胰腺癌患者预后具有重要意义。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the complications in patients with middle and advanced pancreatic carcinoma due to treatment of 125I particle implantation, and the investigate the proper nursing methods. Methods The clinical data including the therapy and nursing methods for the complications in 121 patients with middle and advanced pancreatic carcinoma due to treatment of 125I particle implantation from October 2006 to October 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The treatment and care for complication were analyzed. Results In the 121 patients who had been treated by 125I particle, pancreatic fistula occurred in seven, and severe gastrointestinal upset was found in 13. The patients with the complications recovered after postoperative treatment and nursing. Conclusion 125I particle implantation for patients with middle and advanced pancreatic carcinoma is effective and safe with a few side reactions; proper nursing is important to improve the prognosis.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.MethodsStudies about the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism were collected by searching PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases from inception to August, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 studies involving 2 448 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in the recurrent VTE rate (OR=0.74, 95%CI 0.49 to 1.11, P=0.15) or bleeding rate (OR=0.80, 95%CI 0.57 to 1.13, P=0.21) between NOACs group and VKAs group. The major bleeding rate was significantly higher in the VKAs group than in the NOACs group (OR=0.47, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.84, P=0.01). The incidences of recurrent VTE (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.16 to 4.14, P=0.83), bleeding (OR=0.46, 95%CI 0.18 to 1.20, P=0.11), major bleeding (OR=0.45, 95%CI 0.12 to 1.60, P=0.21) were similar between NOACs group and LMWHs group.ConclusionsThe current evidence indicates that for cancer patients with VTE, NOACs are superior to warfarin and comparable to LMWHs. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of intravenous glutamine on patients with severe acute pancreatitis. MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI and CBM databases were searched up to January 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared non-glutamine nutrition with intravenous glutamine supplemented nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis were included. A method recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration was used to perform a meta-analysis of those RCTs. ResultsFour RCTs involving a total of 190 participants were included. Analysis of these RCTs revealed the presence of statistical homogeneity among them. Results showed that glutamine dipeptide had a positive effect on reducing the mortality rate[OR=0.26, 95%CI (0.09, 0.73), P=0.01], length of hospital stay[WMD=-4.85 d, 95%CI (-6.67, -3.03) d, P<0.001], and the rate of complications[OR=0.41, 95%CI (0.22, 0.78), P=0.006]. No serious adverse effects were found. ConclusionCurrent best evidence demonstrates that glutamine is effective for severe acute pancreatitis. Further high quality trials are required and parameters of nutritional condition and hospital cost should be considered in future RCTs with sufficient size and rigorous design.