ObjectiveTo observe and analyze the risk factors related to vitreous re-hemorrhage (PVH) after anti-VEGF drugs combined with vitrectomy (PPV) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).MethodsRetrospective analysis study. From April 2017 to July 2018, 100 eyes of 87 PDR patients who were diagnosed in Jiaxing Eye Hospital and received anti-VEGF drugs combined with 25G PPV were included in the study. Among them, there were 44 eyes in 38 males and 56 eyes in 49 females. The age ranged from 26 to 83 years, with an average age of 57.72±8.82 years. All patients were type 2 diabetes, with an average duration of diabetes 10.84±6.03 years. All affected eyes were assisted by the same doctor with a non-contact wide-angle lens under the standard three-channel 25G PPV of the flat part of the ciliary body. Five to 7 days before the operation, intravitreal injection of ranibizumab or conbercept 0.05 ml (10 mg/ml) was performed. The incidence of PVH was observed. The age of PVH patients, duration of diabetes, vision before operation, average fasting blood glucose and average postprandial blood glucose before operation, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure before surgery, laser treatment before surgery, lens removal during operation, intraocular filling during operation, retinal laser points during operation, and fundus lesions during operation (hyperplasia film, Retinal hemorrhage, vascular occlusion, proliferative retinal traction, retinal hiatus, retinal detachment, exudation, neovascularization) were analyzed to find out the cause of PVH. Spearman bivariate correlation analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were performed on the data.ResultsOf the 100 eyes of 87 patients, PVH occurred in 17 eyes (17%). There were statistically significant differences in the number of eyes with vascular occlusion and proliferative traction during surgery in patients with and without PVH (χ2=5.741, 8.103; P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in age (t=－1.364), duration of diabetes (t=0.538), preoperative vision (t=1.897), preoperative fasting blood glucose level (t=1.938), preoperative postprandial blood glucose level (t=1.508), preoperative systolic blood pressure (t=－0.571), preoperative diastolic blood pressure (t=0.275), whether received laser treatment (χ2=2.678), the number of laser points during operation (t=0.565), whether received lens removal during operation (χ2=0.331), whether found new blood vessels during operation (χ2=2.741) and whether received intraocular filling during operation (χ2=0.060) between the patients with and without PVH (P＞0.05). Spearman's bivariate correlation analysis showed that patients with low vision, poor control of fasting blood glucose levels, vascular occlusion and proliferative retinal traction during the operation were related risk factors for PVH (rs=0.208, 0.229, 0.240, 0.285; P＜0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that fundus vascular occlusion and hyperplastic retinal traction may be independent risk factors for PVH during surgery (OR=5.175, 13.915; P＜0.05).ConclusionFundus vascular occlusion and retinal traction caused by fibrovascular membrane hyperplasia in PPV may be independent risk factors for PVH in patients with PDR after anti-VEGF drugs combined with PPV.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of intravitreal injection of conbercept in the treatment of retinopathy of premature (ROP) and to analyze the factors related to the therapy.MethodsA retrospective study. A total of 57 patients (57 eyes) with pre-threshold type 1 (30 patients, 30 eyes), threshold ROP (21 patients, 21 eyes) and acute aggressive posterior ROP (APROP, 6 patients, 6 eyes)) from premature infants by retinal screening in Henan Provincial People’s Hospital during October 2017 and June 2018 were enrolled in this study. All children were received routinely intravitreal injected 10 mg/ml conbercept 0.025 ml (0.25 mg) within 24 hours after diagnosis. Fundus examination was performed 7 days after injection. The interval of examination was 1−3 weeks according to fundus conditions. The mean follow-up was 30.1±4.6 weeks. For patients with relapse or no response to treatment, repeated intravitreal injection of conbercept or laser photocoagulation therapy was given. The retinal blood vessels of the affected eyes were observed. Logistic stepwise regression analysis was used for the correlation test of multiple factors.ResultsAmong 57 eyes, 49 eyes and 8 eyes were treated with 1 or 2 times of intravitreal injection of conbercept. After 24 weeks of treatment, in 57 eyes, 26 eyes were cured (45.6%), 22 eyes improved (38.6%), 8 eyes relapsed (14.0%), and 1 eye aggravated (1.8%). The recurrence time was 12.9±4.5 weeks after the first injection, and the corrected gestational age was 49.0±6.7 weeks. There were significant differences in initial injection time, lesion range among the cure, improved and recurrence eyes (F=5.124, 7.122; P＜0.01, ＜0.01). Parameters of ROP condition, including ROP diagnosis (pre-threshold type 1, threshold and APROP), zone (zone 1 and 2), stage (stage 2 and 3) and plus lesions, were significant different among the cure, improved and recurrence eyes (χ2=11.784, 14.100, 6.896, 9.935; P＜0.01, ＜0.01, ＜0.05, ＜0.01). Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that the recurrence rate was correlated with ROP zone, more likely recurrence at zone 1 than zone 2 (Wald=9.879, OR=27.333, P=0.002). No injection-related complications such as endophthalmitis, cataract and glaucoma were found during treatment and follow-up period.ConclusionsIntravitreal injection of conbercept is effective in the treatment of ROP without obvious adverse reactions. Lesion zoning is associated with recurrence after treatment.
The therapeutic response of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) differs among individuals. According to the changes of central retinal thickness, intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid, best corrected visual acuity and other morphological or functional manifestations after treatment, the performance of the treated eyes can be classified as optimal response, poor response and non-response. A variety of factors could account for poor or non-response to anti-VEGF, such as genomic polymorphism and specific genomic risk alleles, lesion characteristics, vitreous and macular structural abnormalities, resistance to anti-VEGF drug, and the role of pericytes and others. The common counter measures include increasing the dosage, shortening the injection interval and replacing with another alternative drug, inhibition of pericytes, relieving vitreomacular anatomical abnormalities. It is still worthy of further exploration that how to assess individual reasons for non-response, so that we can give proper treatment to reduce the excessive use of anti-VEGF drugs and improve the clinical management of ocular neovascularization diseases.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of prolonged photodynamic therapy (PDT) irradiation time combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in the treatment of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma (CCH).MethodsA retrospective clinical study. From March 2012 to March 2018, 51 eyes of 51 patients diagnosed in Shenzhen Eye Hospital were included in the study. Among the patients, the tumor of 36 eyes were located in macular area, of 15 eyes were located outside macular area (near center or around optic disc). All patients underwent BCVA, color fundus photography, FFA, ocular B-scan ultrasonography and OCT examinations. The BCVA examination was performed using the international standard visual acuity chart, which was converted into logMAR visual acuity. OCT showed 48 eyes with macular serous retinal detachment. of 36 eyes with tumor located in macular area, the logMAR BCVA was 0.05±0.05, the tumor thickness was 4.5±2.2 mm, the diameter of tumor was 9.7±3.6 mm. Of 15 eyes with tumor located outside macular area, the logMAR BCVA was 0.32±0.15, the tumor thickness was 3.8±1.4 mm, the diameter of tumor was 7.7±1.9 mm. PDT was performed for all eyes with the irradiation time of 123 s. After 48 h, all patients received intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab (0.05 ml). At 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment, the same equipment and methods before treatment were used for related examination. BCVA, subretinal effusion (SRF), tumor leakage and size changes were observed. BCVA, tumor thickness and diameter before and after treatment were compared by t test.ResultsAt 6 months after treatment, the tumor was becoming smaller without scar formation. FFA showed that the blood vessels in the tumor were sparse compared with those before treatment, and the fluorescence leakage domain was reduced. OCT showed 43 eyes of macular serous detachment were treated after the combined treatment. The logMAR BCVA were 0.16±0.15 and 0.55±0.21 of the eyes with tumor located in or outside macular area, respectively. The difference of logMAR BCVA between before and after treatment was significant (t=－2.511, －2.676; P=0.036, 0.040). Both the tumor thickness (t=3.416, 3.055; P=0.011, 0.028) and diameter (t=4.385, 4.171; P=0.002, 0.009) of CCH patients were significantly reduced compared with that before treatment.ConclusionThe tumor of CCH can be reduced by prolonged PDT irradiation time combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of laser photocoagulation and intravitreal ranibizumab treatment of retinopathy of premature(ROP). MethodsThis study included 49 ROP infants (96 eyes), including type 1 pre-threshold ROP (7 infants, 14 eyes), threshold ROP (38 infants, 44 eyes) and aggressive posterior ROP (AP-ROP, 4 infants, 8 eyes). According to the treatments received, all patients were divided into laser photocoagulation (LP) group (40 infants, 78 eyes) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) treatment group (9 infants, 18 eyes). Generally, zoneⅡand stage 3 ROP with clear refractive media received laser photocoagulation, zoneⅠROP and AP-ROP, or eyes with unclear refractive media or infants with poor general condition received IVR. The infant gestational age, birth weight, corrected gestational age at first treatment and the cure rate of the first treatment were analyzed between the two groups, and between three disease types (type 1 pre-threshold, threshold and AP-ROP). ResultsThe gestational age and birth weight was no difference between the LP group and IVR group (t=0.827, 1.911; P > 0.05). The corrected gestational age at first treatment of LP group was significantly smaller than that in the IVR group (t=3.041, P < 0.05). In the LP group, 75 of 78 eyes (96.15%) was cured by the first treatment, 3 of 78 eyes (3.85%) progressed to stage 4A after the first treatment and was controlled by vitrectomy. In the IVR group, 8 of 18 eyes (44.44%) was cured by the first treatment, 10 of 18 eyes (55.56%) progressed to next stage after the first treatment and was controlled by additional laser photocoagulation or repeated IVR. The gestational age and birth weight was no difference between type 1 pre-threshold, threshold and AP-ROP infants (t=2.071, 0.664; P > 0.05). The corrected gestational age at first treatment of type 1 pre-threshold infants was the same of the threshold lesion infants (t=2.054, P > 0.05). The corrected gestational age at first treatment of AP-ROP infants was significantly smaller than that of type 1 pre-threshold and threshold lesion infants (t=3.250, P < 0.05). The cure rate was statistically significant (χ2=24.787, P < 0.05) between there three ROP lesions. ConclusionIVR treatment is suitable for zoneⅠlesions, AP-ROP and Plus lesions, while laser photocoagulation is appropriate for zoneⅡlesions with fibrosis and less vascular proliferation.
Objective To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and bevacizumab in the treatment of pathological myopia choroidal neovascularization (PM-CNV). Methods It is a retrospective case study. Seventy-nine patients (79 eyes) with PM-CNV were enrolled in this study. There were 26 males (26 eyes) and 53 females (53 eyes), with the mean age of (30.77±5.53) years. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit lamp microscope, fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. BCVA was recorded as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). The central retinal thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT (Cirrus HD-OCT). The eyes were divided into bevacizumab treatment group (38 eyes) and ranibizumab treatment group (41 eyes). There was no difference of the mean logMAR BCVA, intraocular pressure and CMT between two groups (t=−0.467, −1.983, 1.293;P=0.642, 0.051, 0.200). The eyes in bevacizumab treatment group were treated with bevacizumab 0.05 ml (1.25 mg), and the eyes in ranibizumab treatment group were treated with ranibizumab 0.05 ml (0.5 mg). Times of injection between two groups were compared. The changes of intraocular pressure were observed at 1, 7 days and 1 month after treatment. The changes of logMAR BCVA and CMT at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment and systemic adverse reactions occur were compared. Results At the 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment, the mean logMAR BCVA of the bevacizumab treatment group and the ranibizumab treatment group was significantly improved than that before treatment (F=132.374,P＜0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean logMAR BCVA at different time points between the two groups (F=0.095,P=0.759). The mean CMT of the two groups was lower than that before treatment (F=151.653,P＜0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean CMT between the two groups (F=0.332,P=0.566). No retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, cataract and persistent high intraocular pressure were associated with drug, injection-related eye and systemic adverse events during follow-up. Seven eyes had conjunctiva bleeding after treatment, 11 patients (11 eyes) complained of shadow floaters after treatment. Conclusion Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab or ranibizumab can equally effectively improve the visual acuity and reduce the CMT of PM-CNV patients.
Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs, including monoclonal antibodies (such as bevacizumab and ranibizumab) and fusion protein agents (such as aflibercept and conbercept) have been proven to be effective in the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD). However, there are still some patients with poor efficacy, such as no response to initial treatment or poor response, and even relapse during the course of treatment. In view of the different targets and molecular characteristics of anti-VEGF drugs, the switch of anti-VEGF drugs and the adjustment of delivery pattern, dosages and intervals have been the strategies to cope with the poor efficacy in clinic. However, there are some differences in the results of current studies. Overall, the recovery of retinal anatomical outcome achieves more benefits, and it is relatively difficult to improve visual acuity. To determine which regimen would get the biggest benefits, a large number of randomized controlled clinical trials and long study period will be needed.
Diabetic macular ischemia (DMI) is one of the manifestation of diabetic retinopathy (DR). It could be associated with diabetic macular edema (DME), which may affect the vision of DR patients. FFA is the gold standard for the diagnosis of DMI, but with the advent of OCT angiography, a more convenient and diversified method for the evaluation of DMI has been developed, which makes more and more researchers start to study DMI. Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF has become the preferred treatment for DME. When treating with DME patients, ophthalmologists usually avoid DMI patients. But if intravitreal anti-VEGF should be the contradiction of DME is still unclear. To provide references to the research, this article summarized the risk factors, assessment methods and influence of DMI. This article also analyzed the existing studies, aiming to offer evidences to a more reasonable and effective treatment decision for DME individual.
Objective To observe the inhibitory effects and characteristics of intravitreal injection with bevacizumab on laser induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV).Methods Twelve male brown norway（BN）rats were divided into the bevacizumab group and control group with six rats in each group. One eye of rats were received a series of 8 diode laser esions around optic disc to induce CNV,then the rats in bevacizumab group and control group underwent intravitreal injection with 2 mu;l bevacizumab and ringer's lactate.On days 7,14,and 21，the morphology and leakage of CNV were observed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA).On day 21 after photocoagulation,the photocoagulated eyes were enucleated and processed for histopathologic examination, including hematoxylin and eosin (Hamp;E) staining and immunohistochemistry staining for vascular endothelial growth factor（VEGF）.Results On day 7 after photocoagulation,ICGA showed that CNV developed in the bevacizumab group and the control group. FFA showed that leakage intensity in the bevacizumab group was significantly lower than that in the control group，but the bevacizumab group gradually increased over time. The mean thickness of CNV significantly decreased in the bevacizumab group.The CNV in the bevacizumab group were negative for VEGF according to the result of immmuohistochemistry staining.Conclusions Early intravitreal injection with 2 mu;l bevacizumab can reduce the thickness of CNV and inhibit the leakage of CNV. However, bevacizumab could neither block the formation of CNV, nor suppress the permeability permanently. Combined other therapies with bevacizumab may be more potential to treat CNV effectively.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) alone or in combined with ranibizumab versus ranibizumab monotherapy (intravitreal injection, IVR) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods80 eyes of 72 patients with PCV were enrolled into this retrospective and comparative study according to their therapeutic plan. 30 eyes of 28 patients, 28 eyes of 30 patients and 22 eyes of 21 patients were divided into PDT group, ranibizumab 0.5 mg group (IVR group) or the combination group, respectively. The patients with PCV were diagnosed according to clinical symptoms, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescent indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). The baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before treatment was more than 0.05, and there was no retinal fibrosis and scar for all patients. There was no statistical difference of age (F=0.187), gender (χ2=0.423), average BCVA (F=1.120) and central retinal thickness (CRT) (F=0.431) among three groups (P > 0.05). They had not received any treatment before. Patients received verteporfin PDT in PDT group, 3 consecutive monthly IVRs starting day 1 in IVR group, and 3 IVRs after 3 days, 1 month, 2 months of PDT starting day 1 in combination group. Re-treatment was considered 3 months later if the follow up shown no changes in fundus photography, OCT and ICGA. The average follow-up time was 19 months. BCVA at baseline and follow-up visit at 1, 3, 6, 12 months was measured, and the proportion of patients with ICGA-assessed complete regression of polyps at month 6 was recorded as primary outcome. The CRT was measured at baseline and 6 months as secondary outcome. ResultsThere were significant difference of BCVA at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months among three groups(F=5.480, 5.249, 3.222, 4.711; P < 0.05). The average BCVA was significantly better at 1, 3, 6, 12 month than that at baseline(t=-6.632, -4.127, -3.904, -4.494; P < 0.05) in combination group, and was significantly better at 3, 6, 12 months than that at baseline (t=-5.636, -3.039, -3.833; P < 0.05) in IVR group. However there was no significant difference of the average BCVA in PDT group between follow-up at 1, 3, 6, l 2 months and baseline (t=1.973, 0.102, -0.100, -0.761; P > 0.05). The proportion of patients with complete regression of polyps at 6 months was higher in PDT (76.7%) or combination group (68.2%) than IVR group (35.7%) (χ2=0.003, 0.025; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference of CRT among 3 groups at baseline (P=0.651). The mean CRT decreased in all 3 treatment groups over 6 months (t=5.120, 3.635, 5.253; P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference of CRT among 3 groups (F=1.293, P > 0.05). ConclusionsThree therapies could effectively decrease CRT. IVR or IVR combined with PDT are both more effective than PDT therapy to improve vision of PCV patients. PDT or PDT combined with IVR was superior to IVR pnly in achieving complete regression of polyps in 6 months in PCV patients.