Objective To investigate the quantity and distribution of motor fiber of rat’s C7 nerve root. Methods Motor fiber quantity and section area in the main nerves of the upper extremity and the fascicles of C7 in 30 SD rats were analyzed.Results Fascicles and certain amount (207) of motor fibers from the anterior division of C7 were distributed to musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve, the orientation of these fibers were not clear. The ones (323) from posterior division were to the axillary, radial, and dorsal thoracic nerves, thus the orientation of these fascicles was relatively definite. Conclusion Thedistribution of the motor fibers and fascicles in the divisions of C7 in rat is similar to human beings, so rat is a relatively good model for the study of selective C7 nerve root transfer.
Objective To review the recent development of extraplexal neurotization as a treatment for brachial plexus injuries. Methods Relevant literature was extensively reviewed.The new development, the advantages and disadvantages of extraplexal neurotization were comprehensively evaluated and analyzed. Results After many years of clinical research, great improvement in treatment of brachial plexus injuries was achieved. There were more donor nerves and better use of every donor nerve was made.Conclusion Extraplexal neurotization is an effective treatment for brachial plexus injuries.
The results of nerve transposition for root avulsion of brachial plexas in 21 cases were reported. The methods of the nerve transposition were divided into four groups as followings: By transfer of phrenic nerve, accesory nerve, the motor branches of cervical plexus and intercostal nerves in cease; By transfer of phrenic nerve, accessory nerve and the motor branches of cervical plexus in 6 cases; By transfer of phrenic nerve and accessory nerve in 9 cases, and by transfer of phrenic nerve or the motor branches of cervical plexus or intercostal nerve in 5 cases. During operation, in 1 cases variation of the brachial plexus was found. Injury to the subclavian artery occurred in 4 cases and they were repaired, which is good for the blood circulation of the upper arm and nerve regeneration. Nineteen cases were followed up with good results. The overall excellent and good rate was 73.7%. It was considered that transposition of nerve should be a routine operation for the treatment of root avulsion of brachial plexus and the accompanied arterial injury should be repaired at the same time during operation, and the latter would be advantageous to enhance functional recovery of nerve.
Objective To investigate the sensation of the fingers innervated by the brachial plexus roots and provide the theoretic basis for diagnosis of a brachial plexus injury. Methods From June 2003 to January 2005，10 patients (8 males, 2 females; age,18-47 years) with complete brachial plexus avulsion were involved in this study, who underwent thecontralateral C7 nerve root transfer. The latency and amplitude of the sensory nerve actiopotential(SNAP) were record at the C5 T1 nerve roots when stimulation was given at the fingers.Results When the thumb and the index finger were stimulated and SNAP was recorded at all the roots of the brachial plexus in all the patients, we found that there was a higher amplitude and a shorter latency at the C5-7 roots than at the C8 and T1 roots(P＜0.05). When the middle finger was stimulated and SNAP was recorded at the C7,8 and T1 roots, we found that there was the highest amplitude and the shortest laency at the C7 root(P＜0.01). When the ring finger was stimulated and SNAP was recorded at the C7,8and T1 roots, we found that there was a higher amplitude and a shorter latency at the C8 and T1 roots than at the C7 root(P＜0.01). When the little finger was stimulated and SNAP was recorded at the C7,8and T1 roots, we found that there was the highest amplitude and the shortest latency at the T1 root(P＜0.01). ConclusionThe sense of the thumband the index finger is mainly nnervated by the C5-7 roots, the middle finger sense is mainly innervated by the C7 root, the ring finger sense is mainly innervated by the C8 and T1 roots, and the little finger sense is mainly innervated by the T1 root.
ObjectiveTo investigate the management strategies of clavicular fracture combined with brachial plexus injury and its effectiveness. MethodsBetween January 2006 and January 2012, 27 cases of clavicular fracture combined with brachial plexus injury were treated. There were 18 males and 9 females, aged 18-42 years (mean, 25.3 years). The causes of injury were traffic accident in 12 cases, falling from height in 10 cases, bruise in 3 cases, machinery injury in 2 cases. According to the Robinson classification, the clavicular fractures were rated as type Ⅰ in 2 cases, as typeⅡin 20 cases, and as type Ⅲ in 5 cases; there were 12 cases of total brachial plexus root avulsion injury, 10 cases of bundle branch injury, and 5 cases of hematoma formation and local nerve compression or injury. The injury to operation time was 6 hours to 14 days (mean, 4 days). Brachial plexus injury was repaired by epineurium neurolysis, nerve anastomosis, or nerve transposition after the exploration of the plexus; and fracture was fixed after open reduction. Sensory grading standard (S0-S4) by UK Medical Research Council (MRC) was used to evaluate the recovery of sensory function, and muscle strength grading standard (M0-M5) by MRC to evaluate the innervating muscle strength. ResultsThe incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 18-36 months (mean, 26.3 months). All fracture achieved cl inical healing at 12-17 weeks (mean, 15 weeks). No complication of loosening or breakage of internal fixation occurred. The patients had no pain of shoulder in abduction. At 18 months after operation, the shoulder abduction was more than or equal to 60° in 8 cases, 30-60° in 8 cases, and less than 30° in 11 cases. The recovery of biceps muscle strength was more than or equal to M3 in 18 cases and less than M3 in 9 cases; the recovery of wrist flexion or flexor muscle strength was more than or equal to M3 in 13 cases and less than M3 in 14 cases. The sensory function recovery of median nerve was S3 in 14 cases, S1-S2 in 9 cases, and S0 in 4 cases. The shoulder abduction, elbow and wrist flexor motor function did not recover in 2 patients with total brachial plexus root avulsion injury. ConclusionIt is beneficial to the recovery of nerve function to early repair of the brachial plexus injury by exploration of the plexus combined with open reduction and fixation of clavicular fractures, the short-term effectiveness is good.
The report of brachial plexus injuries following radical mastectomy in patients with breast cancer was rare even though the operation was a main measure in treating with breast cancer. Nine patients treated from Oct. 1989 to Feb.1991 were summarized. The results were not ideal.
Objective To observe the recovery of the sensory and motor function of the repaired l imb and the impact on the healthy l imb function after contralateral C7 nerve root transposition for treating brachial plexus root avulsion injury. Methods Between August 2008 and November 2010, 22 patients with brachial plexus root avulsion injuries were treated with contralateral C7 nerve root transposition. All patients were male, aged 14 to 47 years (mean, 33.3 years). Total brachialplexus root avulsion was confirmed by preoperative cl inical examination and electrophysiological tests. In 22 cases, median nerve was repaired in 16 cases, radial nerve in 3 cases, and musculocutaneous nerve in 3 cases; primary operation was performed in 2 patients, and two-stage operation was performed in 20 patients. The sensory and motor functional recovery of the repaired limb was observed after operation. Results Twenty-one patients were followed up 7-25 months (mean, 18.4 months). In 16 cases of contralateral C7 nerve root transposition to the median nerve, wrist flexors reached more than M3 in 10 cases, while finger flexors reached more than M3 in 7 cases; sensation reached more than S3 in 11 cases. In 3 cases of contralateral C7 nerve root transposition to the musculocutaneous nerve, elbow flexors reached more than M3 in 2 cases; sensation reached more than S3 in 2 cases. In 3 cases of contralateral C7 nerve root transposition to the radial nerve, wrist extensor reached more than M3 in 1 case; sensation reached more than S3 in 1 case. Conclusion Contralateral C7 nerve root transposition is a good procedure for the treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion injury. Staged operation is one of important factors influencing treatment outcome.
Objective〓〖WTBZ〗To assess treating results of functional reconstruction of irrecoverable partial injury of brachial plexus and to improve the function ofinjured upper extremity. Methods Seventiy-nine cases with irrecoverable partial injury of brachial plexus were treated in transfer of muscle (tendon) or by fuctional anthrodesis (fixation of tendon) from January 1984 to June 2003. According to the evaluation criterion by American Shoulder and Elbow, Hand Association,all patients were followed up in motion of reconstructive joint and daily activities after operation for 1 year to 19 years. The effect of the operation was comprehensively scored and evaluated. Results Final results in 54 caseswere as follows: 30 patients with good results, 19 patients with fair results, and 5 with poor results. The results demonstrated some points as follow: ①if the shoulder was instable, athroedesis of shoulder would be a better choice;②the flexion of the elbow joint should be only reconstructed with the dynamic reconstructive methods. The reconstruction of flexion of elbow by transfer of pectoral major muscle was more effective than that by transfer of flexor carpi ulnaris muscle; ③the dynamic reconstruction of extension of digital and carpi was better than that of flexion of digital and opposition function of the thumb; ④the supination of the forearm was effectively reconstructed by transfer of flexorcarpi ulnaris muscle. Pronation teres muscle should be studied more in reconstruction of supination function of the forearm.
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the feasibil ity of contralateral C7 nerve transfer via posterior spinal route fortreatment of brachial plexus root avulsion injury by anatomical study. Methods Ten cadaveric specimens of 7 men and3 women were selected, who had no obvious deformity and no tissue defect in neck neutral position. By simulating surgical exploration of brachial plexus injury, the length of contralateral C7 nerve root was elongated by dissecting its anterior and posterior divisions to the distal end, while the length of C7 nerve from the intervertebral foramen to the branching point and the length of the anterior and posterior divisions were measured. By simulating cervical posterior approach, the C7 vertebral plate and T1 spinous process were fully exposed; the hole was made near vertebral body; and the C7 nerve root lengths by posterior vertebra path to the contralateral upper trunk and lower trunk were measured. Results C7 nerve root length was (58.62 ± 8.70) mm; the length of C7 nerve root plus posterior or anterior division was (65.15 ± 9.11) mm and (70.03 ± 10.79) mm, respectively. By posterior spinal route, the distance was (72.12 ± 10.22) mm from the end of C7 nerve to the contralateral upper trunk of brachial plexus, and was (95.21 ± 12.50) mm to the contralateral lower trunk of brachial plexus. Conclusion Contralateral C7 nerve can be transferred to the contralateral side through posterior spinal route and it only needs short bridge nerve or no. The posterior spinal route can effectively prevent from neurovascular injury, so it might be the best surgery approach for the treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion injury.
Objective To investigate the results of two stage multiple nerves transfer for treatment of complete brachial plexus root avulsion. Methods Eight patients with complete brachial plexus avulsion, aging 18-38 years andwith a mean 6 months interval of injury and repair, were surgically treated with the following procedures. One stage surgical procedure was that the contralateral C7 never root was transferred to the ulnar nerve, the phrenic nerve to theanterior division of upper trunci plexus brachialis and the accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve. Two stage surgical procedure was that the ulnar nerve was transferredto the median nerve , the intercostal nerves to the radial nerve and the thoracodorsal nerve. Results All patients were followed upfrom 13 months to 25 months(21 months on average), muscle reinnervation was observed in all patients. Return of muscle power of M3 or better are regarded as effective. The effective recovery results were 75% in musculocutaneous nerve, 37.5% in suprascapular nerve, 37.5% in radial nerve, 75% in thoracodorsal nerve and 62.5% in median nerve. In sensory recovery of the median nerve, 4 patients obtained S3, 3 patients S2 and 1 patient S1. Conclusion Two stage multiple nerves transfer for treatment of root avulsion of brachial plexus can achieve better motor function results and is safe and effective. The procedure should be recommended for treatmentof root avulsion of brachial plexus in selected patients with complete brachial plexus root avulsion, especially in young patients with a short interval between injury and repair. It isone of the alternative options.