Objective To compare the curative effect of dynamic hi p screw (DHS) combined with anti-rotation screw and cannulated screw in treating patients with Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture and to provide the basis for the choice of surgical procedure. Methods Between March 2008 and September 2009, 51 patients with fresh Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture were treated with DHS combined with anti-rotation screw (DHS group) and three cannulated screws (cannulated screw group). The DHS group included 23 patients, 13 males and 10 females, aging 27-59 years (mean, 43.2 years); fracture was caused by fall ing in 1 case, by traffic accident in 17, by fall ing from height in 5 with a mean time of 27 hoursfrom injury to hospital ization (range, 12-70 hours); and 23 fractures included 9 Pauwels type II and 14 Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. The cannulated screw group included 28 patients, 12 males and 16 females, aging 20-60 years (mean, 40.7 years); fracture was caused by fall ing in 1 case, by traffic accident in 22, by fall ing from height in 5 with a mean time of 25 hours from injury to hospital ization (range, 9-38 hours); and 28 fractures included 12 Pauwels type II and 16 Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. There was no significant difference in the basel ine characteristics between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The incision heal ing of both groups by first intention was achieved. There were significant differences in operation time, incision size, operation blood loss, the cases of blood transfusion, the amount of blood transfusion, C reaction protein level on the 2nd postoperative day, and hospital ization days between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). In DHS group, anatomic reduction was observed in 20 cases (86.96%) and satisfactory reduction in 3 cases (13.04%), while in cannulated screw group, anatomic reduction was observed in 25 cases (89.29%) and satisfactory reduction in 3 cases (10.71%) ; there was no significant difference (χ2=0.660, P=1.000). The patients were followed up 12-30 months with an average of 14.8 months. There was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) in the rate of nonunion (10.71% vs. 0), the implant failure (3.57% vs. 0), and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (10.71% vs. 0) between the DHS group and the cannulated screw group. The union time was (94.5 ± 2.0) days in the DHS group and (106.0 ± 33.5) days in the cannulated screw group, showing no significant difference (t=—1.641, P=0.107). The re-opereation rates and the overall success rates were 25% and 75% in the cannulated group and were 0 and 100% in the DHS group, showing significant differences (χ2=6.650, P=0.012). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score and visualanalogue scale (VAS) score between DHS group and cannulated screw group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The optimal treatment of young adults Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture is DHS combined with anti-rotation screw with an high overall success and less compl ications.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the safety and efficacy of intraoperative local application of platelet-rich plasma in patients with femoral neck fracture.MethodsDatabases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, WanFang Data, CBM, EMbase and CNKI were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on operation versus operation combined with platelet-rich plasma for patients with femoral neck fracture from inception to April 30th, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 RCTs, including 916 patients with femoral neck fracture were enrolled in the analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the group of internal fixation, the group of internal fixation combined with platelet-rich plasma could significantly shorten healing duration of fracture (MD=−2.18, 95%CI −3.37 to −0.99, P=0.000 3), improve the fracture healing rate (RR=1.14, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.25, P<0.000 01) and hip function score (MD=10.18, 95%CI 5.99 to 14.37, P<0.000 01), and effectively reduce the femoral head necrosis rate after operation (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.57, P<0.000 1).ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the method of internal fixation combined with platelet-rich plasma could effectively shorten healing duration, improve healing rate and hip function score, and reduce the rate of femoral head necrosis. Due to the limited quality of the included studies, more large scale, high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of spring hook plate for posterior malleolus fracture by comparing with cannulated screw. MethodsBetween March 2012 and September 2013, 100 cases of posterior malleolus fracture were treated. Fracture was fixed with spring hook plate in 50 cases (research group) or with cannulated screw in 50 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, associated injury, and injury to operation time between 2 groups P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, union time of fracture, ankle range of motion (ROM), and complications were recorded and compared. The ankle joint function was evaluated by the ankle hindfoot scale of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS). ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between 2 groups P>0.05). The patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 9.8 months) in the control group and 6-12 months (mean, 9.2 months) in the research group. The X-ray films showed that fracture union was achieved in 2 groups; the union time of the research group[(9.5±1.4) weeks] was significantly shorter than that of the control group[(10.5±1.3) weeks] (t=2.029, P=0.017). The ROM was (25.1±3.2)° for dorsal extension and was (45.3±2.3)° for plantar flexion in the research group at 6 months after operation, which were significantly better than those of the control group[(22.2±2.3)° and (41.2±2.5)°] (t=-3.950, P=0.001; t=-5.212, P=0.000). The ankle hindfoot scale of AOFAS was 85.1±8.6 in the control group at 6 months; the results were excellent in 15 cases, good in 20 cases, and moderate in 15 cases with an excellent and good rate of 70%. The ankle hindfoot scale of AOFAS was 89.4±7.9 in the research group; the results were excellent in 20 cases, good in 22 cases, and moderate in 8 cases with an excellent and good rate of 84%; there was significant difference between 2 groups (t=-2.191, P=0.042; χ2=0.413, P=0.018). Incision infection occurred in 3 cases of the control group and in 2 cases of the research group, which was cured after dressing change; screw loosening and fracture displacement occurred in 3 and 4 cases of the control group, but did not in the research group. The complication rate of the control group and the research group was 20% and 4% respectively, showing significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=6.061, P=0.028). ConclusionSpring hook plate can shorten the time of union, increase the ROM of the ankle after operation, get good functional restoration, and decrease the rate of complication compared with cannulated screw fixation.
ObjectiveTo summarize the progress in treatment of pubic symphysis diastasis. MethodsRelated literature concerning treatment of pubic symphysis diastasis was extensively reviewed and comprehensively analyzed in terms of anatomy, biomechanics, and treatment. ResultsThere are many fixation methods for treatment of pubic symphysis diastasis, which aims at restoring the stability of the anterior pelvic ring. External fixator is often used as a temporary fixation; tension band wire has been abandoned due to its poor biomechanical stability; screw loosening and plate breakage often appears when a single reconstruction plate is used; box plate significantly increases the biomechanical stability of anterior pelvic ring but it leads to a considerable surgical trauma; locking plate has been used for pubic symphysis diastasis recently, especially for osteoporotic fractures; percutaneous cannulated screw has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, and good stability, so it is good choice for treatment of pubic symphysis diastasis. ConclusionThere is no uniform standards about the treatment of pubic symphysis diastasis, but the minimally invasive treatment is an undeniable trend. Percutaneous cannulated screw has achieved satisfactory effectiveness, however, its biomechanical stability and anatomic channels need to be further studied.
ObjectiveTo study intraoperative reduction strategy in treatment of femoral neck fracture using cannulated screw fixation and the relationship between excellent and good rate of reduction and postoperative effectiveness. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 174 cases of femoral neck fracture treated between August 2005 and March 2015. There were 78 males and 96 females with an average age of 53.8 years (range, 23-75 years). The injury causes were falling in 85 cases, traffic accident in 61 cases, and falling from height in 28 cases. According to Garden typing, there were 35 cases of type I, 56 cases of typeⅡ, 47 cases of typeⅢ, and 36 cases of typeⅣ. The time from injury to operation was 1-7 days (mean, 2.74 days). Based on reduction strategy, closed 3 hollow compression screws were used; evaluating standards for fracture reduction effect were also established. Harris score was used for effectiveness evaluation. ResultsAll the cases received follow-up of 12-42 months (mean, 36.5 months). Bone healing was obtained in 152 cases at 6-12 months (mean, 9 months). Non-union and internal fixation failure occurred in 9 and 3 patients respectively, who underwent hemiarthroplasty; femoral head necrosis occurred in 6 patients after removing internal fixator at 15-26 months (mean, 18.5 months) after operation, who underwent total hip arthroplasty; 4 patients with non-union received vascular pedicle iliac flap transplantation. No other serious complications were observed. At last follow-up, the excellent and good rate of reduction was 94.29% for Garden type I, 91.07% for typeⅡ, 87.23% for typeⅢ, and 75.00% for typeⅣ, with a total excellent and good rate of 87.36%; the excellent and good rate of Harris score was 97.14% for Garden type I, 78.57% for typeⅡ, 68.09% for typeⅢ, and 50.00% for typeⅣ, with a total excellent and good rate of 73.56%. ConclusionTo obtain high Harris score in fixation of femoral neck fractures by using hollow screws, surgeons not only need reasonable technology, but also follow correct and good reduction strategy and assessment, fracture complexity is inversely proportional to excellent and good rate of reduction. Higher excellent and good reduction rate of complexity fracture should be obtained as much as possible in order to achieve good prognosis.
Objective To compare the clinical effects of traditional manual and robot-assisted implantation of cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Methods The medical records of patients with femoral neck fracture in Department of Orthopaedics, People’s Hospital of Deyang City were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, including the traditional manual implantation group from January to December 2018 and the robot-assisted implantation group from May 2019 to May 2020. The clinical therapeutic efficacy of the two groups were compared. Harris hip function score was used to evaluate hip function. Results A total of 85 patients were included. All patients had closed fractures. There were 45 cases in the traditional manual implantation group and 40 cases in the robot-assisted implantation group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in preoperative waiting time, operation time, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, complications within one year after operation, or Harris hip function score one year after operation (P>0.05). The placement nail time [(11.1±2.0) vs. (23.8±2.3) min; t=27.142, P<0.001], frequency of guide pin insertion [(4.7±1.2) vs. (11.4±1.7) times; t=20.640, P<0.001], frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy [(10.8±1.7) vs. (21.0±1.8) times; t=26.990, P<0.001] and intraoperative blood loss [(8.1±2.0) vs. (12.0±1.7) mL; t=9.711, P<0.001] in the robot-assisted implantation group were less than those in the traditional manual implantation group. No wound infection or neurovascular injury was found in the two groups. Conclusion Robot-assisted implantation of cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture has the advantages of less fluoroscopy, fewer guide pin insertion, less blood loss, more accurate screw placement than the traditional manual implantation of cannulated screws.