The incidence of perioperative sleep disorders in patients with cervical spondylosis is high, which affects the physiological and psychological rehabilitation effect of patients after surgery. The expert consensus (preliminary draft) was prepared by summarizing expert experience and recommendations. After expert review and revision, the consensus was formed. The consensus was developed based on existing evidence-based medical evidence and expert clinical experience, which is scientific and practical and can provide a basis for clinical medical personnel to prevent and treat perioperative sleep disorders in patients with cervical spondylosis.
In the context of accelerated rehabilitation, nutritional support for patients with orthopedic cervical spondylosis is an important condition for lessening postoperative stress response, reducing postoperative complications, shortening patient’s length of hospital stay, lowering medical expenses, and promoting early recovery of patients. Based on this, West China Hospital of Sichuan University explored and established the West China Hospital program for nutritional management in cervical spondylosis from the aspects of team building, nutritional assessment and monitoring, and nutritional intervention.
ObjectiveTo explore the surgical indication and summarize the experiences of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical spondylosis. MethodsSeventy-five cases of cervical spondylosis were treated with ACDF from January 2010 to October 2013, including 34 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and 41 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The pre/post-operative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and imaging data were observed. ResultsThirty-six patients were followed up for 6 to 25 months, with an average of 16 months. The mean JOA score before surgery was 10.67±2.66, and 3 months later, the score was 13.47±2.06. Six months later the score was 14.11±1.56, and after 12 months the score was 14.97±1.78. No spinal cord injury or esophagus, trachea injury occurred, and there was no superior laryngeal nerve and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during the operation. Eight cases of postoperative dysphagia obviously decreased within 3-5 days, 6 cases decreased within 5-7 days, and 10 cases decreased within 3 weeks. And all 36 patients recovered within one month. There was no titanium mesh subsidence, displacement or titanium plate failure after operation. ConclusionACDF is suitable for the decompression of spinal cord or nerve root which is compressed by the degenerated intervertebral disc, especially without rigid kyphosis, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament extending across multiple segments, and the compression located at the level of intervertebral disc. The appropriate approach can achieve a stable efficacy, less interference on the stability of the spine, and the incision heals fast. It is a kind of classic anterior cervical operation for it can reduce the complication effectively.
Objective To investigate the effect difference between the Solis fixation fusion and the titanium plate fixation by the cervical anterior approach after decompression and bone graft implantation. Methods Of the 104 patients with cervical disease from September 2001 to March 2004, 36 were treated with the Solis implantation after decompression by the cervical anterior approach, and 68 were treated with the titanium plate fixation after decompression and bone graft implantation. The recovery of the neurological function in all the patients were assessed with the JOA Scoring at 6 weeks,3,6,12,24 and 36 months. The fragment fusion and its stability as well as the changes in the intervertebral height were assessed with X-ray examination. Results According to the JOA Scoring, the excellent and good outcomes accounted for 94.4% in the Solis group and 94.1% in the titanium plate group. In allthe patients, the fragment fusion was achieved in 3 months. The change in the Cobb angle of the fused fragment was less than 5° at the flexionextension posture, 3.6±0.8° in the Solis group, 2.4±0.7° in the titanium plate group. There was significant differences between the two groups(P＜0.05). The intervertebral height of the operation fragment in the Solis group increased 1.6±0.7mm, which was higher than that in the titanium plate group(P＜0.05). Conclusion Clinical effects of the two internalfixation operations are good; however, the Solis fixation has more advantages because of its simpler performance,less trauma, and fewer complications.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Fugui ostealgia particles for cervical spondylosis (Yang-asthenia and cold-damp type). MethodsFrom December 2010 to July 2011, we carried out a multi-centered, randomized, double-blind and double-simulation clinical observation study based on the Guiding Principles for the Clinical Research on New Chinese Traditional Medicine (TCM). A total of 240 patients were divided into experimental group and control group with the number of patients at a ratio of 3:1. The treatment group (n=180) was treated by Fugui ostealgia particles, while patients in the control group (n=60) received Kangguzengsheng capsules. The treatment course lasted for 90 days. ResultsThe total effective rate in the experimental group was 92.44%, and was 75.47% in the control group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The total effective rate for TCM syndromes was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). The effect on main symptoms such as nuchal pain, aversion to cold, and cold hands and feet, was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). Laboratory test results showed no abnormality before and after treatment, and no drug-related adverse reactions occurred. ConclusionFugui ostealgia particles are safe and effective for the treatment of Yang-asthenia and cold-damp type cervical spondylosis, especially for the treatment of nuchal pain, aversion to cold, and cold hands and feet.
To compare and evaluate the whole effect of anterior decompression approach to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy by using cervical retractor systems and the traditional surgical approach. Methods From April 2001 to August 2004, group A included 30 males and 23 females aging from 31 to 69 years, and the involved time was from 7 months to 15 years. Involved segments included 22 one-segments, 24 two-segments and 7 three-segments. In all 53 cases, anterior windowing decompression and fusion with autograft and titanium plate internal fixation by using traditionalcircular saw were performed. Group B included 48 males and 20 females aging from 33 to 74 years, and the involved time was from 5 months to 18 years. Involved segments included 23 one-segments, 34 two-segments and 11 three-segments. In all 68 cases, anterior undermined far-reaching decompression and fusion with autograft and titanium plate internal fixation by using removing disc merely in the single-level or separately in the multilevels employing self-retractor and Caspar cervical retractor systems via interspinal approach were performed. X-rays and MRI showed cervical disc degeneration, herniation and spinal cord compression. The surgery time, loss of blood, vertebral body fusion time, difference in height of involved segments preor postoperatively and compl ications were counted up and compared between the two groups. Improvement rate of spinal function pre- or postoperatively were valued by using JOA score. Results A total of 92 cases including 42 of group A and 50 of group B were followed up for 3 to 5 years, mean 3.5 years. In group A, surgery time, loss of blood, time of vertebral body fusion, difference in height of involved segments pre- or postoperatively, and improvement ratio of spinal function were(76.80 ± 28.41) min,(564.00 ± 181.96) mL,(12.10 ± 3.58) weeks, (1.30 ± 0.67) mm and 0.49% ± 0.14%, respectively. In group B, they were(57.90 ± 15.01) min,(317.50 ± 136.92) mL,(9.75 ± 1.36) weeks, (3.00 ± 0.56) mm and 0.71% ± 0.17% , respectively. The differences between the two groups were significant in all measured values(P lt; 0.05). Compl ications occurred in 7 cases ofgroup A including 1 spinal cord injury, 1 plate displacement, 1 bonegraft displacement and 4 disfunctions of il iac region. No compl ication happened in group B. Conclusion Anterior decompression approach using cervical retractor systems is significantly superior to the traditional approach as to the whole effect to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and furtherperfects the traditional anterior decompression approach. The modified approach is scientific, safe and easily spread.
Objective To explore the neck axial symptom (AS) after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and to make contrastive analysis. Methods From October 2004 to April 2006, 22 patients, 13 males and 9 females, aged 33-54 years old (43.3 on average), underwent Bryan cervical disc placement (groupA). Among them, there were 16 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 6 of nerve root cervical syndrome, with 20of single segment replacement and 2 of two segments replacement. The courses of disease were 1-21 months (6 months on average). Meanwhile, 30 patients, 17 males and 13 females, aged 35-64 years old (50.3 on average) underwent traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (group B). Among them, there were 19 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 11 of nerve root cervical syndrome, with 26 of single segments replacement and 4 of two segments replacement. The course of disease was 1-23 months (7 months on average). In both groups, the neurologic recovery rate, the change of cervical curvature of the operated segments and total range of motion (ROM), and incidence of neck axial symptoms were recorded and compared. Results All the patients were followed up for 24-42 months (30.6 months on average). There was no graveness compl ication happening during and after operation in both groups. There were no compl ications of prosthesis bit shifting and amotio in group A, and group B exhibited a bony fusion on X-ray films 6 months after operation, without plate and bolt loose or broken. The patients’ cl inical symptoms of radiculopathy were obviously rel ieved and the curative effect was satisfactory in two groups of nerve root cervical syndrome. In both groups of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, the patients’ JOA scores at the postoperative follow-up increased obviously than preoperative (Plt; 0.01), and there was no significant difference between the two groups before the operation and at the end of the follow-up (P gt; 0.05). The rate of sagittal al ignment of the operated segment with kyphosis increased obviously in group B, higher than in group A (P lt; 0.05).The total ROM of group B was obviously lower than preoperative (Plt; 0.01), and the pre- and postoperative difference of group A was not statistically significant (P gt; 0.05). The rate of postoperative neck AS was 18.18% in group A and 46.67% in group B, and the difference was statistically significant(Plt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, the use of Byran disc arthroplasty for cervical syndrome is associated with good outcomes. At the same time, it can maintain the cervical motion and curvature of operated segments, avoid the decrease of total ROM and lower the incidence of the postoperative neck AS.
Objective To investigate the cl inical effect of cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) on twosegment cervical spondylosis and to research its influences on the range of motion (ROM) of the diseased segments and theadjacent superior and inferior segments. Methods From September 2004 to February 2007, 7 cases with cervical spondylosis at C4,5 and C5,6 were treated with CADR using Bryan artificial disc prosthesis, including 4 males and 3 females aged 30-45 years old (average 38.5 years old). All the patients had cervicodynia in various degrees, pain and numbness of l imbs and decreased muscle strength, including 3 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, 3 of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 1 of mixed cervical spondylosis. The course of disease was 12-54 months (average 27 months). Preoperatively, X-ray films revealed the intervertebral space of C4, 5 and C5,6 was narrowed and the cervical curve became straight, CT or MRI showed the intervertebral disk hernia of C4, 5 and C5,6, and the hyperostosis of vertebral margin compressed nerve root or spinal cord. All the patients had no response to the preopratively conservative treatment. JOA score and ROM of the diseased segments and the adjacent superior and inferior segments were compared before and after operation. Results All the patients survived the perioperative period, without hoarse voice, muscle spasm, dysphagia and cervicodynia. X-ray films showed the implanted prosthesis was well located, the height of intervertebral space was normal, and no prosthesis loosening, prosthesis migration and infection occurred 12 months after operation. All the 7 cases were followed up for 12-41 months (average 26.7 months). Cervicodynia and l imbs’pain and numbness disappeared, and muscle strength was improved obviously. The JOA score before and during the followup period was (8.35 ± 1.27) and (14.65 ± 1.61) points, respectively, indicating there was a significant difference (P lt; 0.05). For the ROM of C4,5 and C5,6, it was (8.38 ± 0.48)° and (9.16 ± 0.54)° before operation, respectively, and it increased to (11.15 ± 0.65)° and (12.75 ± 0.73)° after operation, respectively, showing there was a significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The ROM at C3,4 and C6,7 before operation was (9.71 ± 0.76)° and (12.39 ± 0.58)°, espectively, while it was improved to (10.26 ± 0.47)° and (13.67 ± 0.71)° after operation, respectively, indicating there were no significant differences between before and after operation (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The appl ication of Bryan Disc CADR for two-segment cervical spondylosis has satisfying therapeutic effects, can improve the ROM of diseased segments obviously, and has minor influences on the ROM of adjacent superior and inferior segment.
Objective To evaluate the early outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a Zero-profile implant system (Zero-P) for interbody fusion in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. Methods Between March 2010 and June 2011, 25 patients with cervical spondylosis underwent ACDF with Zero-P. There were 13 males and 12 females with an average age of 44.2 years (range, 26-67 years), including 14 cases of nerve root cervical spondylosis, 6 cases of spinal cervical spondylosis, and 5 cases of mixed cervical spondylosis. The disease duration was 3-120 months (median, 25 months). Single segment was involved in 20 cases, 2 segments in 4 cases, and 3 segments in 1 case. A total of 31 Zero-P were implanted (3 at C3, 4, 8 at C4, 5, 12 at C5, 6, and 8 at C6, 7). Primary cervical operation was performed in 23 cases and re-operation in 2 cases. Before and after operation, the height of intervertebral space and the cervical Cobb angle were measured; clinical outcome was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain in the neck and upper limb, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for myelopathy; and intervertebral fusion and the incidence of dysphagia were also observed. Results All incisions healed by first intention. All the patients were followed up 12-16 months (mean, 13.9 months). Interbody bone fusion was obtained, and the fusion time was 2.7-6.0 months (mean, 3.8 months). Three patients had dysphagia after operation; symptom disappeared at 1 week and 3 months after operation in 2 cases and 1 case, respectively. No fixation loosening, subsidence, or breakage occurred. The height of intervertebral space was significantly improved (P lt; 0.05) from (4.5 ± 0.5) mm at preoperation to (6.0 ± 0.7) mm at 1 week and (5.7 ± 0.6) mm at 12 months after operation; the cervical Cobb angle was significantly improved (P lt; 0.05) from (11.9 ± 6.1)° at preoperation to (21.2 ± 4.1)° at 1 week and (20.2 ± 3.7)° at 12 months after operation; and there was no significant difference between at 1 week and 12 months after operation (P gt; 0.05). The VAS score was significantly reduced (P lt; 0.05) from 7.1 ± 0.8 at preoperation to 1.9 ± 0.8 at 3 months and 1.0 ± 0.5 at 12 months after operation; the JOA score was significantly increased (P lt; 0.05) from 9.6 ± 1.3 at preoperation to 13.5 ± 1.0 at 3 months and 14.9 ± 1.0 at 12 months after operation; and there was significant difference between at 3 months and at 12 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The early outcome of ACDF using a Zero-P in the treatment of cervical spondylosis is satisfactory and reliable, and it can restore and maintain the cervical alignment and disc height, and disc has low incidence of postoperative dysphagia.
Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using zero-profile anchored cage (ZAC) in treatment of consecutive three-level cervical spondylosis, by comparing with plate-cage construct (PCC). Methods A clinical data of 65 patients with cervical spondylosis admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. During consecutive three-level ACDF, 35 patients were fixed with ZAC (ZAC group) and 30 patients with PCC (PCC group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, body mass index, surgical segment, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, prevertebral soft tissue thickness (PSTT), cervical lordosis, and surgical segmental angle. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, clinical indicators (JOA score, NDI, VAS score), and radiological indicators (cervical lordosis, surgical segmental angle, implant subsidence, surgical segment fusion, and adjacent segment degeneration), and the postoperative complications [swelling of the neck (PSTT), dysphagia] were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Patients in both groups were followed up 24-39 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up duration between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were lower in ZAC group than in PCC group, and the length of hospital stay was longer, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). At each time point after operation, both groups showed significant improvements in JOA score, VAS score, and NDI compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). Both groups showed an increase in PSTT at 3 days and 3, 6 months after operation compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but returned to preoperative levels at last follow-up (P>0.05). The PSTT at 3 days and 3 months after operation were significantly lower in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 6 months and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The incidences of dysphagia at 3 days and 3 months were significantly lower in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05), while no significant difference was observed at 6 months and last follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no postoperative complication in both groups including hoarseness, esophageal injury, cough, or hematoma. Both groups showed improvement in cervical lordosis and surgical segmental angle compared to preoperative levels, with a trend of loss during follow-up. The cervical lordosis loss and surgical segmental angle loss were significantly more in the ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05). The incidence of implante subsidence was significantly higher in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the ZAC group and PCC group in the incidences of surgical segment fusion and adjacent segment degeneration (P>0.05). ConclusionIn consecutive three-level ACDF, both ZAC and PCC can achieve satisfactory effectiveness. The former can reduce the incidence of postoperative dysphagia, while the latter can better maintain cervical curvature and reduce the incidence of implant subsidence.