ObjectiveTo study the value of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in the evaluation of antiviral efficacy and its influencing factors under a complex population background resulting from various nationalities in Xinjiang. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) admitted and administrated with nucleot(s)ide analogues (NAs) for the first time in Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from January 2012 to August 2013. The biological, virological, and serological responses were analyzed as well as the possible factors related to HBsAg levels and its reduction levels. ResultsThere were 63 CHB patients enrolled. After 48 weeks' treatment, all patients achieved biological response, and 59 of them achieved complete virological response in spite of 4 patients with partial response. In all the 30 hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg) positive patients, 5 achieved HBeAg seroconversion. After correlation and regression analysis, it turned out that the history (P=0.033) and HBeAg levels at week 48 (P<0.001) were independent impact factors for HBsAg level at week 48. And the reduction degree of HBsAg at week 48 was influenced by HBsAg at week 48. In 21 patients counting to week 72 maintaining biological response, 18 achieved complete virological response. Unfortunately, all 8 HBeAg positive patients encountered no HBeAg loss or seroconversion. After correlation and regression analysis, it turned out that HBsAg level at week 72 was influenced by HBsAg at week 48 (r=0.700, P<0.001). And the decline degree of HBsAg at week 72 was related to baseline HBsAg level. ConclusionSatisfactory efficacy can be achieved via NAs treatment in CHB patients. But when HBsAg is used separately as an indicator for therapeutic efficacy, we should be aware that intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is not only the impact factor of HBsAg variation, the history, the variations of HBeAg and HBsAg itself during the treatment should also be considered.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir (ADV) versus entecavir (ETV) monotherapy for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data from their inception to December 2013, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies of LAM+ADV versus ETV for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 13 RCTs and 5 cohort studies involving 1 336 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses of RCTs showed that:there were no significant differences between the LAM+ADV group and the ETV group in the negative rates of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.10, P=0.94), HBeAg (RR=0.90, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.17, P=0.43), serum ALT recovery rate (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.05, P=0.45) and serum HBeAg conversion rate (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.24, P=0.22) at the 48th week. The results of meta-analyses of cohort studies showed that:there were no significant differences between the two groups in the negative rates of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.37, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.06, P=0.13) and serum ALT recovery rate (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.12, P=0.87), but the ETV group had higher serum HBeAg conversion rate (RR=0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.79, P=0.02). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy of LAM+ADV is similar to ETV at the 48th week for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo observe the impact of antiviral therapy on prognosis in patients after curative resection for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsThe data of 50 patients who had undergone liver resection for HBV-related HCC in our department from August 2008 to June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups:21 patients who had not antiviral therapy (untreated group) and 29 patients who received antiviral therapy using nucleotide analogues (antiviral therapy group). ResultsAfter radical resection of HCC, the disease-free survival rate of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 72.4%, 58.6%, and 31.0% in antiviral therapy group and 61.9%, 38.1%, and 14.3% in untreated group, respectively. The overall survival rate of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 86.2%, 68.9%, and 55.2% in antiviral therapy group and 71.4%, 47.6%, and 28.6% in untreated group, respectively. The cumulative disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate of antiviral therapy group were significantly higher than those in the untreated group (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis revealed that the number of tumor, antiviral therapy, and TNM staging were risk factor for tumor-free survival rate, The tumor size, the number of tumor, antiviral therapy, and TNM staging were risk factor for overall survival rate. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of tumor and TNM staging were independent risk factor for tumor-free survival rate (OR:2.95, 95% CI:1.502-6.114, P < 0.05; OR:4.12, 95% CI:1.972-8.960, P < 0.05), the antiviral therapy and TNM staging were independent risk factor for overall survival rate (OR:3.86, 95% CI:1.745-7.028, P < 0.05; OR:5.17, 95% CI:2.356-11.479, P < 0.05). ConclusionUsing nucleotide analogs antiviral therapy may improve the prognosis after resection of patients with HBV-related HCC.
Objective To assess the efficacy between Peginterferon α-2a and common Interferon in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B. Methods MEDLINE, EBSCO, PubMed, CNKI, WangFang were searched from the beginning to May 2009, and the references of eligible studies were manually screened. Randomized controlled trials comparing Peginterferon-alpha2a with common interferon in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B were eligible for inclusion. Jadad score method was adopted to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. Meta analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.0 software supplied by the Cochrane Collaboration. Subgroup analyses were used in treatment and observation course. Results Six randomized controlled trials were included (n=688). The treatment duration of 48 weeks and 24 weeks were reported in four and two studies, respectively. We carried out subgroup analysis according to treatment. Meta-analysis showed that Peginterferon-alpha2a (180 ug/d, 48 W) could significantly clear HBeAg, clear HBVDNA, normalize ALT and HBeAg seroconversion compared with common Interferon (Plt;0.05). Peginterferon-alpha2a (180 ug/d, 24 W) could effectively clear HBV DNA [P=0.04, RR=1.44, 95%CI (1.01, 2.05)], but was not effective in loss of HBeAg, HBeAg seroconversion and ALT normalization (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of 48 weeks treatment with Peginterferon α-2a is better than common Interferon. The efficacy of 24 weeks treatment with Peginterferon α-2a is only better in HBV-DNA negative rate than common Interferon. However, because the methodological quality of included studies is not high, this conclusion should be carefully considered in clinical use.
ObjectiveTo investigate the needs for health education in chronic hepatitis B patients, in order to provide a theoretical basis for taking pertinent nursing intervention. MethodsBetween July and December 2011, self-made questionnaires on the needs for health education were used to investigate 70 in-patients with chronic hepatitis B. Meanwhile, factors associated with the needs of health education such as age, education, and the course of the disease were also analyzed. ResultsThe differences in the needs of health education were statistically significant among patients with different cultures, ages, and courses of disease (P<0.01). The needs of health education were correlated with culture, age and courses of disease. ConclusionThere are some deficiencies in the health education for chronic hepatitis B patients. In clinical practice, health education should be multidimensional and continuous based on the age, education degree and the course of the disease.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of combined therapy of Gankang Granule and Entecavir for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Methods A total of 118 patients with chronic hepatitis B treated between January 2012 and January 2013 were randomly divided into treatment group (n=59) and control group (n=59). Patients in the treatment group were treated with Gankang Granule and Entecavir, while those in the control group were treated with Entecavir alone. Results Before treatment, there was no significant difference between the two groups in such liver fibrosis evaluation indexes as hyaluronic acid (HA), laminin (LN), procollagenⅢ(PCⅢ), and collegen typeⅣ(CⅣ) (P > 0.05). After treatment, the two groups had significant differences in HA, LN, PCⅢ, and CⅣ(P < 0.05). After 48 weeks of treatment, the alanine aminotransferase recovery rate was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05); but there was no significant difference in hepatitis B virus DNA negative conversion rate, hepatitis B e antigen negative conversion rate and hepatitis B e antibody seroconversion rate (P > 0.05). Forty-eight weeks after treatment began, 45 patients underwent liver biopsy which showed that liver fibrosis alleviation was significantly better in the treatment group than the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusions Gankang granule combined with antiviral drug Entecavir for chronic hepatitis B is better in protecting the liver and alleviating hepatic fibrosis than the sole Entecavir. The combined method is worthy of being promoted.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Gansu for chronic hepatitis B. Methods We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases up to Dce. 2009. The methodological quality assessment and data extraction of the included studies were conducted by two reviewers independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed for homogeneous studies using RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results A total of 14 studies involving 1 755 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of which, 12 studies did not report randomization method, and the other two studies reported inadequate methods of randomization. None of the studies enforced allocation concealment and performed blinding. We conducted subgroup analyses based on the outcome measures and interventions. The results of meta-analyses showed: (1) In terms of reducing ALT, Gansu + conventional therapy was superior to conventional therapy alone. (2) In terms of the HBsAg seroconversion rate, no significant difference was found between the two groups. (3) In terms of the HBeAg, no significant difference was found between the two groups at 3 months’ follow-up. (4) In terms of the HBV-DNA, Gansu + conventional therapy was superior to conventional therapy alone at 3 and 6 months’ follow-up, but theses differences were not found between Gansu + Lamivudine/ Adefovir and Lamivudine/ Adefovir alone. In terms of reducing the index of hepatic fibrosis, Gansu + conventional therapy was superior to conventional therapy alone. Conclusion Gansu might be effective in normalizing ALT levels, clearing HBV DNA, achieving virus seroconversion and improving hepatic fibrosis, without any serious adverse effects. However, because the overall effects cannot be pooled for analysis, more evidence is needed to support this finding.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of telbivudine (TEV) combined with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), so as to provide references for clinical practice and research. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data from inception to August 21st, 2013, for the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Other sources were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA Total of 11 RCTs involving 1 010 patients were included. The trial group were given TEV combined with ADV, while the control group were given TEV alone or ADV alone. The results of metaanalysis showed that, the combined use was superior to TEV alone or ADV alone in improving HBV-DNA negative rates at 12-, 24-, 48-weeks, HBeAg negative rates at 12-, 24-, 48-weeks, and ALT recovery rates at 12-, 24-weeks (P < 0.05). The results of qualitative analysis showed that, the trial group had a lower drug resistance rate, and both were alike in the incidence of adverse reaction. ConclusionCompared with TEV alone or ADV alone, TEV combined with ADV could improve the clinical efficacy of treating CHB which is also fairly safe. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the aforementioned conclusion still needs to be further verified by conducting more large-scale and high quality RCTs.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon α-2a (Peg-IFNα-2a) combined with entecavir (ETV) versus Peg-IFNα-2a alone in treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Peg-IFNα-2a combined with ETV for HBeAg-positive CHB from inception to March, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs involving 1 130 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with Peg-IFNα-2a monotherapy, Peg-IFNα-2a combined with ETV could improve the rate of serum HBV-DNA clearance (RR=2.55, 95%CI 1.83 to 3.55, P<0.000 01), ALT normalization (RR=2.37, 95%CI 1.76 to 3.20, P<0.000 01) and HBeAg seroconversion (RR=2.88, 95%CI 1.18 to 7.03, P=0.02) after 12 weeks of treatment. Additionally, it could improve the rate of serum HBV-DNA clearance (RR=2.10, 95%CI 1.74 to 2.53, P<0.000 01), AST normalization (RR=1.87, 95%CI 1.15 to 3.04, P=0.01), ALT normalization (RR=1.70, 95%CI 1.46 to 1.99, P<0.000 01), serum HBeAg clearance (RR=2.14, 95%CI 1.62 to 2.83, P<0.000 01), HBeAg seroconversion (RR=2.51, 95%CI 1.65 to 3.82, P<0.000 01) and serum HBsAg clearance (RR=2.78, 95%CI 1.06 to 7.31, P=0.04) after 24 weeks of treatment. It could also improve the rate of serum HBV-DNA clearance (RR=1.63, 95%CI 1.32 to 2.02, P<0.000 01), AST normalization (RR=2.75, 95%CI 1.82 to 4.16, P<0.000 01), ALT normalization (RR=1.47, 95%CI 1.33 to 1.63, P<0.000 01), serum HBeAg clearance (RR=1.65, 95%CI 1.42 to 1.91, P<0.000 01), HBeAg seroconversion (RR=1.91, 95%CI 1.51 to 2.41, P<0.000 01) and serum HBsAg clearance (RR=1.57, 95%CI 1.07 to 2.31, P=0.02) after 48 weeks of treatment. There was no statistically significance of adverse reactions in groups.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that Peg-IFNα-2a combined with ETV is superior to Peg-IFNα-2a monotherapy in the treatment of HBeAg-positive CHB, and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To explore the relationship between the level of serum ferritin (SF) and liver damage in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods The concentration of serum ferritin of 98 patients with CHB from July to October 2014 was measured, and then correlation analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between SF and such indexes as serum tumor marker α-fetoprotein, biochemical markers [alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), total protein (TP), albumin and total bilirubin (TBIL)], and hepatitis B serum markers (hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B surface antibody, hepatitis B e antigen, hepatitis B e antibody, and hepatitis B core antigen). Serum hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV-DNA) viral load was also tested, and then the discrepancy of SF levels in the high and low viral load groups was analyzed. Results The average concentration of the abnormally elevated SF was (878.69±837.98) ng/mL. The SF mean difference between low-load HBV-DNA and high-load HBV-DNA was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Serum ferritin levels were independently and positively correlated with ALT, AST, and TBIL (P < 0.01) and inversely correlated with TP and albumin (P < 0.01). Conclusion The rise of SF is associated with liver damage, which can reflect the state of inflammation of patients with CHB.