Objective To investigate the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCT) on laparoscopic surgery for treating colorectal disease in three SCI indexed. Methods We electronically retrieved the Ovid MEDLINE(R) from 1950 to present with Daily Updates for RCTs on laparoscopic surgery published in Diseases of the Colon amp; Rectum, International Journal of Colorectal Disease, or Colorectal Disease. The revised CONSORT statement and additional surgical items were adopted to assess the reporting quality. One point was assigned for each full description of an item, 0 for no description, and 0.5 for a partial description. Results A total of 20 RCTs were included and 8 RCTs were excluded. Their reporting quality was low. The average scores for the following items were relatively lower, 0.150 for settings where data collected; 0.250 for sample size estimation; 0.500 for sequence generation of randomization; 0.325 for allocation concealment; 0.150 for implementation; 0.475 for measurement of outcome; 0.150 for participant flow chart; 0.450 for adverse events; 0.450 for external validity; 0.400 for financial conflicts of interest; 0.250 for perioperative pharmacological treatment; 0.075 for perioperative nonphamacological treatment; 0.000 for participation of a trial methodologist; 0.350 for surgeon’s experience (years or position). Items with the lower scores were mainly in the methods and results section and surgical items. Conclusions The reporting quality of laparoscopic RCTs in these journals is low. Colorectal surgeons should rigorously evaluate reports in these journals before they apply to them in clinical practice.
Until Issue 2 in 2008, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews had included 23 systematic reviews concerning colorectal tumors by the colorectal cancer group. These reviews involved prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and follow-up. The preventive ability of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, accuracy of chromoscopy, shortterm outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection and outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision were confirmed. Meanwhile, the effect of dietary fibre in prevention, mechanical preoperative preparation, and prophylactic anastomotic drainage was questioned. Because of the low quality of trials, no firm conclusions were revealed in some reviews, such as traditional Chinese medicine in chemotherapy. Through the study of Cochrane systematic reviews, medical practitioners and researchers can obtain high-quality evidence, and identify future research direction in the field of colorectal cancer.
Objective To investigate the relationship of serum amyloid A protein (SAA) and surgical choice in low locally advanced rectal cancer (LLARC). Methods Fifty-two patients with LLARC at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed. According to operative methods the patients were divided into 2 groups: curative surgery group (n=35) and palliative surgery group (n=17). Then, venous blood specimens were taken to measure preoperative serum SAA level. Results The analysis showed the option of surgical procedures was associated with preoperative SAA concentration (P=0.004) in LLARC, but irrelative with pathological characteristics and preoperative imaginologic staging (Pgt;0.05). High concentration of serum SAA (≥10.5 mg/L) significantly increased the odds of palliative surgery 〔OR=7.47, 95% CI (1.62-34.40), P＝0.010〕.Conclusion High level of SAA is a useful marker to predict the possibility of palliative surgery in LLARC, which is helpful to screen the patients for the surgical decision and adjuvant therapy.
Objective To determine the influence and significance of combinative assessment of 64 multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) with serum amyloid A protein (SAA) or C-reactive protein (CRP) on the selection of operative procedures of rectal cancer under the multi-disciplinary team. Methods Prospectively enrolled patients diagnosed definitely as rectal cancer at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from February to August 2009 were randomly assigned into two groups. In one group named MSCT+SAA group, both 64 MSCT and SAA combinative assessment were made for the preoperative evaluation. In another group named MSCT+CRP group, both MSCT and CRP combinative assessment were made for preoperative evaluation. Furthermore, the preoperative staging and predicted operation procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical operation procedures, respectively, and the relationship between the choice of operation procedures and clinicopathologic factors was analyzed. Results All 165 patients were randomly assigned into MSCT+SAA group (n=83) and MSCT+CRP group (n=82). The baseline characteristics of two groups were statistically similar (Pgt;0.05). For MSCT+SAA group, the accuracies of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 74.7%， 68.7%, 100% and 66.3%, respectively. For MSCT+CRP group, the accuracies of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 72.0%, 86.6%, 100% and 81.7%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the accuracies of N staging and TNM staging between two groups (P＜0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference of the accuracy of prediction to operative procedures between two groups (90.4% vs. 95.1%, Pgt;0.05). The pathological T staging (P＜0.001), N staging (P＜0.001), TNM staging (P＜0.001), preoperative serum level of SAA (P=0.010), serum level of CRP (P=0.042), and distance of tumor to the dentate line (P=0.011) were associated with the operative procedures. Conclusion Combinative assessment of MSCT+CRP could improve the accuracy of preoperative staging and operative procedures prediction, which may be superior to MSCT+SAA.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy, side effects, influence on viral nucleic acid conversion and prognosis of glucocorticoid used in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.MethodsEighty-seven patients with severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 were included to observe respiratory symptoms, blood oxygen saturation, pulmonary imaging absorption, weaning status, complicated bacterial infection and double infection, and prognosis after glucocorticoid use. Whether glucocorticoid use affects the patient's viral nucleic acid was analyzed.ResultsOf the 87 patients included, 55 were severe, 32 were critical, and 38 died, which included 30 critical patients. Seventy-seven patients accepted short-term glucocorticoid, and 10 patients accepted long-term glucocorticoid due to diffuse lung lesions and poor absorption. Eleven patients had bacterial infection and 4 cases had double infection. In 10 patients with long-term use of glucocorticoids, the lung lesions relieved, no double infection was found, but 1 patient maintained nucleic acid positive even after 5 weeks’ treatment.ConclusionsThe use of appropriate glucocorticoids is beneficial to the improvement of disease status and disease absorption in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Long-term oral administration of glucocorticoids in patients with diffuse lung lesions may be beneficial to disease absorption.