ObjectiveTo establish and validate a predictive nomogram for predicting the risk of distant metastasis in colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical and pathological data of patients diagnosed with colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma in the SEER database from 2004 to 2015, and they were randomly divided into training and validation sets at a ratio of 7∶3. Independent risk factors for distant metastasis (DM) in colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma were screened out in the training set through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram was constructed. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the nomogram model. ResultsA total of 2 595 patients with colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma were included, of whom 1 022 (39.4%) had DM. According to the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, gender, age, T stage, N stage, surgical treatment, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for DM of colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma (P<0.05). Based on the above independent risk factors, a nomogram for DM of colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma was constructed. The nomogram AUC of the ROC was 0.78 [ 95%CI (0.76, 0.80) ] and 0.77 [ 95%CI (0.74,0.81) ] in the training and validation sets, respectively. The calibration curves showed a good fit in the training and validation sets, with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test results being χ2=9.43, P=0.31 and χ2=12.47, P=0.13, respectively. The DCA curves showed that the model had a net benefit when the threshold probabilities of the training and validation sets were in the range of 10%–95% and 11%–990%, respectively. ConclusionThe nomogram constructed in this study exhibits higher accuracy and reliability, and can be used for early intervention and risk prediction of DM in colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors associated with prognosis of appendiceal adenocarcinoma using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. MethodsThe patients pathologically diagnosed with appendiceal adenocarcinoma from 2005 to 2015 were extracted from the SEER database and then randomly divided into a training cohort and validation cohort in a 7∶3 ratio. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed in the training cohort to identify the independent risk factors for overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Based on these factors, a nomogram prediction model was constructed and subsequently internally validated. The statistical significance was defined as α=0.05. ResultsA total of 749 patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma were enrolled, with 524 in the training cohort and 225 in the validation cohort. The multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that the T, N, M stages, and surgery as the independent prognostic factors for both overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Additionally, the age was identified as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, and tumor size for cancer-specific survival. Based on these factors, the nomogram prediction models for the overall survival rate and cancer-specific survival rate were developed. The nomogram of overall survival rate achieved a C-index of 0.716 [95%CI=(0.689, 0.743)] in the training cohort and 0.695 [95%CI=(0.649, 0.740)] in the validation cohort, while the nomogram of cancer-specific survival rate showed C-index values of 0.749 [95%CI=(0.716,0.782)] and 0.746 [95%CI=(0.699, 0.793)], respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 0.780 [95%CI=(0.739, 0.821)] and 0.773 [95%CI=(0.732, 0.814)] respectively in the training cohort, were 0.789 [95%CI=(0.726, 0.852)] and 0.776 [95%CI=(0.715, 0.837)] respectively in the validation cohort, which for 3- and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 0.813 [95%CI=(0.768, 0.858)] and 0.796 [95%CI=(0.753, 0.839)] respectively in the training cohort, were 0.813 [95%CI=(0.750, 0.876)] and 0.811 [95%CI=(0.750, 0.872)] respectively in the validation cohort. The calibration curves demonstrated good agreements between predicted and observed outcomes for both overall survival rate and cancer-specific survival rate. ConclusionsThrough analysis results of appendiceal adenocarcinoma patients from the SEER database reveal that advanced T, N, and M stages, as well as lack of surgery are significant risk factors for both overall survival and cancer-specific survival. The constructed nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates, which incorporate these risk factors, demonstrate strong predictive accuracy.