A comprehensive evaluation system of Chinese patent medicine (CPM) is considered as a critical tool to measure the value of CPM. The "guideline for multi-dimensional and multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation for Chinese patent medicine" (abbreviated as guideline) has been released, proposing a comprehensive evaluation system of CPM (1st) comprising six aspects: safety, effectiveness, economy, applicability, scientificity and standardization. This paper elaborated the development method and explained the evaluation dimensions and criteria, so as to help the researchers understand and use the comprehensive evaluation system in the future when evaluating CPM.
ObjectiveTo construct a scientific, standardized, and consistent nursing service quality evaluation system for hemodialysis centers, and to provide scientific basis for the evaluation, improvement, and promotion of nursing service quality in hemodialysis centers.MethodsFrom October to December 2018, based on the Servqual model, combined with the particularity of hemodialysis center and relevant national policies and regulations, the indexes of nursing service quality were determined by Delphi method and precedence chart method, and the nursing service quality evaluation scale of hemodialysis center was established.ResultsThe established nursing service quality evaluation system for hemodialysis center was consisted of 7 items of first-level, 15 items of second-level, and 38 items of third-level. The effective recovery rate of expert letters was 93.75%, and the expert authority coefficient was 0.914. The Kendall coordination coefficients for the three levels of indicators were 0.570, 0.583, and 0.496 (P<0.01), and the variation coefficients for each level of indicators were between 0.000 and 0.179. Among the first-level indicators, the largest weight was security, and the smallest weight was effectiveness.ConclusionsThe evaluation system of nursing service quality for hemodialysis centers is scientific, reliable, and feasible. In view of the particularity of nursing service in hemodialysis centers, clear evaluation criteria are put forward, which can evaluate the service quality more comprehensively, scientifically, objectively, and directly, and improve and enhance the service level of hemodialysis centers according to the evaluation system.
Clinical practice guidelines are decision-making tools for bridging the gap between current best evidence and clinical practice. Studies have shown poor clinical applicability of existing guidelines, which may not be solved by improving the quality of guidelines alone. National medical management service guidance center is developing clinical practice guidelines of clinical evaluation system of construction projects, based on evidence-based method formulated by the target users of clinical guidelines evaluators’ applicability evaluation system of clinical practice guidelines. It aims to identify guidelines with high clinical applicability and provide the evaluation results of clinical applicability to developers and revisers of clinical guidelines, and then optimize the development and update, eventually improving the clinical applicability of guides and promote Chinese clinical guidelines in clinical application.
ObjectiveTo explore the comprehensive hospital administrative management system for urban and rural cooperation in the process of medical reform. MethodsBy reviewing literature and interviewing directors of the administrative departments and hospital medical staff, we gradually established and improved the administrative management system for urban and rural hospital counterpart support. ResultsBetween 2010 and 2013, 123 medical workers were dispatched to support eight county-level hospitals, after which the comprehensive capacity, and technology and quality control in those hospitals were largely improved. Till the end of 2013, two of those hospitals were promoted to be grade-three class-B comprehensive hospitals; two were promoted as grade-two class-A comprehensive hospitals; three passed the reassessment to be grade-two class-A comprehensive hospitals; and another three county-level medical centers were promoted to be city-level key disciplines. ConclusionThe comprehensive administrative management system improves the management level of grass-roots hospitals at the county level; promotes the social public welfare of tertiary public hospital counterpart support; facilitates the process of medical system reform at the county level; establishes a series of administrative management modes such as unified support, personnel management, assessment standards and evaluation system; and promotes the sustainability of long-term counterpart support system.