ObjectiveTo review and evaluate the research progress of the robot-assisted joint arthroplasty.MethodsThe domestic and foreign related research literature on robot-assisted joint arthroplasty was extensively consulted. The advantages, disadvantages, effectiveness, and future prospects were mainly reviewed and summarized.ResultsThe widely recognized advantages of robot-assisted joint arthroplasty are digital and intelligent preoperative planning, accurate intraoperative prosthesis implantation, and quantitative soft tissue balance, as well as good postoperative imaging prosthesis position and alignment. However, the advantages of effectiveness are still controversial. The main disadvantages of robot-assisted joint arthroplasty are the high price of the robot system, the prolonged operation time, and the increased radioactive damage of the imaging-dependent system.ConclusionCompared to traditional arthroplasty, robot-assisted joint arthroplasty can improve the accuracy of the prosthesis position and assist in the quantitative assessment of soft tissue tension, and the repeatability rate is high. In the future, further research is needed to evaluate the clinical function and survival rate of the prosthesis, as well as to optimize the robot system.
We reported a 59-year-old male with exertional angina pectoris, and the coronary angiography showed multiple vessel lesions. The initial strategy was coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The measurement of quantitative flow ration (QFR) before operation indicated that the posterior descending branch (PD) did not need to be treated. The left circumflex branch (LCX) was small, and the QFR of the left anterior descending branch (LAD) and the first diagonal branch (D1) was<0.8. Therefore, the LAD and D1 were re-vascularized. The operation strategy was changed to on-pump CABG through a small incision, and the final strategy was LIMA-D1-LAD (sequential), fractional flow reserve (FFR) of distal LAD and D1 after CABG were>0.8 by computed tomography FFR. SYNTAX scores after CABG were 20 and the functional SYNTAX scores after CABG were 3, indicating a good prognosis.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of restrictive bare stent released on the distal end of the trunk of Stanford type A aortic dissection. Methods The clinical data of 22 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection requiring aortic arch replacement and trunk surgery and selected for restrictive bare stent placement from November 2016 to February 2018 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 19 males and 3 females, aged 34-68 (49.72±8.05) years. The bare stent was released in the descending thoracic aorta, and the stented elephant trunk was placed in the bare stent. The aortic computerized tomography angiography was reviewed before discharge and the stent position and complications were observed. ResultsOne patient failed to be implanted with bare stents due to a greater resistance and prolapse during implantation. Bare stents were successfully implanted in the remaining 21 patients. One patient died of large-area cerebral infarction after surgery and one patient suffered paraplegia. Twenty patients who survived and successfully implanted bare stents were followed up at regular intervals for 4-21 (13.00±6.14) months. No stroke or death occurred during the follow-up. The computerized tomography angiography showed good stent morphology and position, and no displacement or type Ⅲ endoleak. No stent graft-induced new entry was found. ConclusionAs an adjunct to stented elephant trunk, the use of restrictive bare stents can reduce the possibility of recurrence of a distal stent fracture, significantly expand the narrowest segment and true lumen caliber near the endoluminal graft. Aortic remodeling works well.
Abstract： Objective To evaluate surgical outcomes of patients with Marfan syndrome （MFS） complicated by type A aortic dissection （AAD） during follow-up. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 44 patients with MFS complicated by AAD who were admitted to Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital from January 2006 to January 2012. There were 31 male patients and 13 female patients with their age of 12-54 （33.0±9.8） years. Twenty-three patients underwent Bentall procedure at different time after the onset of AAD， while the other 21 patients received conservative treatment in stead of surgery because of economical or other reasons. COX regression with time-varying covariates was performed to analyze related factors， using primary end point， primary end point＋secondary end point as the outcome variables respectively， to compare postoperative outcomes and quality of life between the surgical treatment patients and conservative treatment patients. Results Postoperatively 1 patient died of multiple organ failure， and the other 22 patients survived the surgery. All the 43 patients were followed up from 1 to 75 months. The 3-year survival rate of the 22 surgical treatment patients was 95.7%， and they all had a good quality of life during follow-up. The survival condition and quality of life of the 21 conservative treatment patients was poor， and 13 patients （61.9%） died with the 3-year survival rate of only 31.7%. The main causes of their death included acute cardiac tamponade， aortic dissection rupture， acute myocardial infarction andcardiogenic shock. COX regression with time-varying covariates showed that the treatment outcomes of the surgical treatment patients were statistically different from those of the conservative treatment patients after modifying the influence caused by different operating time （OR of T_COV_ =0.088， P=0.028） . The risk of death of surgical treatment was only 8.8% of that of conservative treatment. Conclusion The prognosis of patients with MFS complicated by AAD is very poor. Therefore， all these patient， both in acute stage and chronic stage， should undergo surgical treatment as early as possible. The short-term and follow-up outcomes of surgical treatment are satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without patellar resurfacing.MethodsBetween March 2013 and August 2015, 30 patients (60 knees) with osteoarthritis who met the inclusion criteria were recruited in the study. Of 30 cases, 24 were male and 6 were female with an average age of 57.2 years (range, 37-65 years). The body mass index ranged from 19.5 to 40.3 kg/m2 (mean, 28.2 kg/m2). According to Kellgren-Lawrence grading, there were 8 cases at grand Ⅲ and 22 cases at grand Ⅳ. All patients underwent primary bilateral TKA. The patellar resurfacing was done at the unilateral knee randomly (resurfacing side); the opposite treatment was done at the other side (non-resurfacing side). The indexes of 2 groups were recorded and compared, including the intraoperative blood loss, operation time, knee society score (KSS), " Forgotten Joint” scale (FJS), anterior knee pain, anterior patellar spirant, knee constraint feeling, anterior patellar clunk, muscle power of knee extension, and ability of up and down stairs, weight-bearing flexion, squatting down, cross-legged, knee down, knee extension, and patient satisfaction. Radiographic examination was used to analyze the prosthesis position.ResultsThe operation time were (126±14) minutes and (112±11) minutes in resurfacing side and non-resurfacing side, respectively, showing significant difference between two sides (t=5.103, P=0.030); and there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between two sides (t=3.431, P=0.800). All patients were followed up 2-4 years (mean, 2.6 years). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between two sides in KSS clinical and functional scores at preoperation and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after operation; in visual analogue scale (VAS) score of anterior knee pain at preoperation and 6 weeks after operation; in incidences of anterior patellar spirant, knee constraint feeling, anterior patellar clunk, and muscle power of knee extension at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after operation; in incidences of disability of up and down stairs, weight-bearing flexion, squatting down, cross-legged, knee down, and knee extension at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after operation; in ratio of FJS score at 2 years after operation. The VAS scores at 6 months and 2 years after operation in resurfacing group were significantly lower than those in non-resurfacing group (Z=–1.997,P=0.046; Z=–2.197,P=0.028). Patient satisfaction of resurfacing side was superior to the non-resurfacing side at 6 weeks after operation (χ2=4.271, P=0.039). Radiographic examination showed no prosthesis loosing occurred.ConclusionThe effectiveness of TKA with patellar resurfacing is better than that with non-resurfacing in patients satisfaction.
Objective To compare the mid- and long-term effectiveness of patellar resurfacing versus non-resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Twenty-six patients who underwent bilateral TKA between March 2013 and September 2015 were selected as the study subjects. One side was randomly chosen for patellar resurfacing (resurfacing group), and the other side was not (control group). There were 4 males and 22 females, the age ranged from 51 to 65 years, with an average of 59 years. According to Kellgren-Lawrence classification, there were 21 cases of grade Ⅳ and 5 cases of grade Ⅲ in both knees. There was no significant difference in the surgical side, and preoperative clinical and functional scores of the Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the composition ratio of anterior knee pain localization points between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative abnormal signs such as patellar clunk, feeling of constraint, patellar tendon weakness, crepitus, or snow-on-glass sensation, and the occurrence of complications were recorded and compared. Patient subjective evaluations included Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and the degree of difficulty in high-level knee activities (including flexion with load bearing, going upstairs, going downstairs, squatting and standing up, kneeling, knee extension, and crossing legs for 7 items); KSS clinical/functional scores and VAS scores were used to evaluate the recovery of knee joint function, and the location of anterior knee pain was determined by a localization diagram. Results The operation time of the resurfacing group was significantly longer than that of the control group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients’ incisions healed by first intention; the hospital stay ranged from 8 to 23 days, with an average of 12.6 days. All patients were followed up 9-11 years, with an average of 9.7 years. Except for 1 case who died of multiple organ failure due to internal diseases at 9 years after operation and 5 cases with incomplete radiological data, the rest 20 patients were assessed radiologically and found that 1 side of the knee joint in the control group had patellar dislocation; the remaining patients had no prosthetic failure (fracture, loosening, displacement, etc.), patellar fracture, patellar necrosis, patellar instability, patellar tendon rupture, prosthetic revision, etc. No patients had reoperations due to patellar-related complications or anterior knee pain in both knee joints. At 2 years postoperatively and at last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the incidence of abnormal signs such as patellar clunk, feeling of constraint, patellar tendon weakness, crepitus, or snow-on-glass sensation, the incidence of high-level knee activity difficulty, and the composition ratio of anterior knee pain localization between the two groups (P>0.05). The KSS clinical scores, functional scores, and VAS scores of both groups significantly improved compared to preoperative ones (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the comparison between the two groups at the two time points postoperatively (P>0.05). At 2 years postoperatively and at last follow-up, there was no significant difference in FJS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionPatellar resurfacing or not has similar mid- and long-term effectiveness in primary TKA.