Health technological innovation has helped to improve health care delivery and patient outcomes. However, the proliferation of health care technology has accompanied burgeoning health care costs and evoked social, ethical, legal, and political concerns. Health technology assessment (HTA) is the systematic evaluation of properties, effects and/or other impacts of health care technology. The main purpose of HTA is to inform persons of technology-related policy making in health care. There is great variation in the scope, selection of methods and level of detail in the practice of HTA. This paper will introduce the basic concepts and methods of HTA in order to help those who are interested in conducting HTA.
Objective According to health technology assessment (HTA) methodology, to assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of metoprolol in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Based on the principles of HTA, we searched some important medical databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CMCC, as well as several national special heart disease databases and side effect centers. We selected eligible studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and critically assessed their quality. Results Intravenous metoprolol 10 mg - 15 mg could control rapid ventricular rate in patients with chronic AF. On either rest or exercise, oral metoprolol 150 mg/d had a better control of rapid ventricular rate than 50 mg/d in patients with chronic AF. For preventing postoperative AF (POAF), the intravenous metoprolol 20 mg group and the 30 mg group could decrease the incidence of POAF compared to the 10 mg group. Oral metoprolol 150 mg/d was more effective than 100 mg/d in preventing POAF. In addition, intravenous metoprolol therapy was well-tolerated and more effective than oral metoprolol therapy in preventing atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Results from several national side effect centers demonstrated that the incidence of adverse reactions associated with metoprolol was low. Conclusion Present evidence showed that high dose of metoprolol was superior to low dose in treating AF, however, the evidence available is insufficient. It is suggested that adequate evidence through further studies are needed. The safety profile of different doses of metoprolol is similar.
Objective To comprehensively summarize and analyze the status quo, assessing contents and problems of the assessment studies on appropriate health technology in China. Methods With the search terms and strategies predefined by repeated discussion and pre-retrieval, all literature on appropriate health technology assessment in China published from October 1949 to March 2012 were searched in the following databases: CBM, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, and extracted and cross-checked data. Disagreements were resolved by discussion or by involving a third researcher. The qualitative synthesis method was used to analyze the studies. Results Among total 174 included studies, 117 were cross-sectional. Targeted populations were patients and community residents who had received the service or treatment of appropriate health technology, as well as the grassroots medical staffs and workers from marketing organization who had used or carried out the appropriate health technologies. Appropriate health technologies mainly contained four fields of appropriate health technology: traditional Chinese medicine, western medicine, family planning services and community health services. Most types of diseases involved in those technologies were circulatory system diseases, and high blood pressure was highly concerned. The contents of appropriate health technology assessment mainly included 6 aspects: effectiveness, acceptability, economic characteristics, requirements, safety and technical specific property. The results of the included studies indicated that, most assessments focused on just one aspect, and were lack of comprehensive evaluation. The indexes used in each assessment covered a far too wide range, and was lack of unified index and standards. Conclusion Current studies show that the fields of appropriate health technology assessment distribute widely; the assessment content is simple and lack of comprehensive evaluation; the assessment index system has no unified standard; and the study design methods are different and lack of high quality study design. So it is necessary to conduct high quality assessment studies, establish scientific assessment index system, and systematically assess appropriate health technology, so as to provide more scientific basis for health decision makers.
The reporting checklist of health technology assessment (HTA) was a tool developed by the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) to be used to guide the reporting of HTA. Experiential evidence showed that the tool was effective to improve the reporting quality of HTA and also could be used as a reference in performing HTA and translating the research evidence into decision-making. This paper introduced the background, developing process and main contents of the checklist, so as to improve the reporting quality of HTA in China.
ObjectiveTo construct rapid health technology assessment (RHTA) reporting norms, with a view to providing methodological references for RHTA research and reporting. MethodsBased on the preliminary pool of entries constructed by the literature research results, and taking into account the characteristics of RHTA, a Delphi expert correspondence questionnaire was designed, and 25 experts in the field of HTA were selected to conduct multiple rounds of expert correspondence. By calculating the expert authority coefficient and opinion coordination coefficient, combined with the average value of the entry score, coefficient of variation and full score ratio, the entries were selected to form the list of RHTA report specifications. ResultsThe positive coefficient of experts in both rounds of investigation was 100%, the expert authority coefficient in the first round was 0.858, and the expert authority coefficient in the second round was 0.838. The Kendall coordination coefficient in the first round was 0.169, and in the second round it was 0.081. According to the correspondence of 2 rounds of investigation, the final formation included 8 aspects, 26 first-level entries and 18 second-level entries in the list of RHTA report specifications. ConclusionThis study constructed the RHTA report specification, which is both scientific and operable, providing a reference for RHTA report writing.
Objective To systematically review published methodological guidelines for health technology assessment (HTA) at home and abroad. Methods Common electronic databases, guideline databases, international networks of HTA agencies/organizations, representative national HTA networks and official websites of governmental health departments were extensively searched and screened to identify guidelines for conducting or reporting HTA from inception to April 24, 2023. Basic information on guidelines, HTA processes, assessment indicators, reporting checklists and other information was extracted, analyzed and described using a systematic review methodology. Results A total of 41 guidelines were included in this study, published from January 2002 to January 2023; the publishing institutions involved 23 countries/international organizations, and 6 languages; the assessments were mainly for all health technologies (n=23), pharmaceuticals (n=4), diagnostic/testing technologies (n=4), non-pharmaceutical health technologies (n=3), medical devices/equipment (n=3), hospital health technologies (n=2), medical and surgical interventions (n=1), and screening technologies (n=1); the assessment perspectives were mainly health system perspectives (n=16), societal perspectives (n=12), and hospital perspectives (n=3), while the rest did not provide information on the perspectives; 28 guidelines described the detailed HTA assessment process, involving 11 steps; there were 39 guidelines described the assessment domains and related assessment indicators in detail, ranging from 2 to 9 assessment domains and involving 10 first-level assessment indicators; a checklist for HTA reports listed in 10 guidelines, involving 18 report entries; 17 guidelines reported conflicts of interest, mostly no conflicts of interest (n=10), and 3 of the remaining 7 guidelines did not indicate a specific conflict of interest, while 4 guidelines in which possible sources of conflict of interest were indicated. Conclusion The development of HTA has formed a relatively perfect assessment system, but there is a need to unify the criteria for classification of health technologies and reporting checklist, improve the specificity indicators for different types of health technologies, and clarify the assessment perspectives. Combined with the current situation of HTA development in China, contextualized guidelines for HTA implementation and reporting should be formulated to provide scientific information and methodological basis for decision-making on rational allocation of health resources.
Objectives About 12.9-50% patients of SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), require brief mechanical ventilation (MV) to save life. All the reported principles and guidelines for therapy SARS were based on experiences from clinical treatments and facts of inadequacy. Neither prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) nor other high quality evidences were in dealing with SARS. Our objective is to seek safe and rational non-drugs interventions for patients with severe SARS by retrospectively reviewing clinical studies about MV all over the world, which include clinical guidelines, systematic reviews (SR), Meta-analysis, economic researches and adverse events. Methods To search MEDLINE and Cochrane Library with computer. According to the standards of inclucion or exclusion, the quality of the article which as assessed, and relevant data which were extracted double checked. The Meta-analysis was conducted if the studies had no heterogeneity. Results 14 papers were eligible. Due to the significant heterogeneity between these studies, further Meta-analysis could not be conducted, and the authors’ conclusions were described only. Conclusions The outcome of PPV is better than that of VPV. Patients who underwent PPV had a significantly lower mortality than that of VPV. Of course, the volutrauma should be watched. With low tidal volume and proper PEEP, or decreased FiO2, even permissive hypercapnia, the mortality and length of stay were cut down. Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) was effective in treating haemodynamical stable patients, minimizing complications and reducing medical staff infection. Patients with serious dyspnea with PaO2/FiO2lt;200, no profit of NIMV, or couldn’t tolerance hypoxaemia were unlikely to benefit from this technique and needed ventilation with endotracheal intubation. Prone position could improve PaO2/FiO2, NO maybe increased pulmonary perfusion, improved V/Q, and raised oxygenation. Furthermore, Inhaled NO sequentially (SQA) was better than Inhaled NO continuouly (CTA). Some studies implied that practice of protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation implemented by nurses excelled that of traditional physician-directed weaning.
Objective To investigate the health technology assessment reports, analyze publication characteristics and report quality, and explore hot topics in health technology assessment. Methods Web of Science and CNKI databases were searched to collect complete health technology assessment reports from inception to January 2023. SPSS 26.0 software was used to analyze the publication journals, countries, number of authors, assessment types and assessment contents of the assessment reports. The report quality was assessed based on International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) report criteria (2007 edition). VOSviewer 1.6.11 was used to analyze keywords clustering. Results A total of 216 papers were included, with 158 published by Chinese authors, and a rapid growth trend in the number of reports over past four years. The rate of reports on health technology social adaptability assessment was only 17.13%. Among the Chinese reports, 25 were general health technology assessments, 35 were rapid assessments, and 3 were mini assessments. Among the English reports, 4 were rapid assessments, and 54 were regular healthcare technology assessments. For the 14 items in the INAHTA reporting criteria, the reporting rates were high for the brief summary (98.61%), problem description (94.91%), and results discussion entries (97.69%). However, the reporting rates were low for criteria such as personnel responsibilities, conflict of interest statements, and peer review statements, at 31.94%, 19.44%, and 3.24% respectively. English literature generally exhibited higher report quality. Conclusion In recent years, the volume of health technology assessment reports in China has been increasing, with developments in assessment types and application fields. However, there are also problems with standardization of reporting.
ObjectiveTo investigate the health technologies on diabetes prevention and management used in rural China and the assessment results of these health technologies, and to provide references for the selection and using of health technologies on diabetes prevention and management in rural China. MethodsWe searched VIP, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data to collect survey studies and assessment reports of health technologies on diabetes prevention and management in rural China. The search date was up to July 15th, 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature, and then the qualitative analysis was performed for the included studies. ResultsA total of 15 studies were included. The results of qualitative analysis showed that:the targeted populations were patients and ordinary villagers who had received the service or treatment of diabetes health technology in rural, as well as the grassroots medical technical personnel and promotion staffs who had developed the health technologies. Diabetes health technology studies in rural mainly included medical personnel health technology related knowledge training. The contents of health technology assessment involved effectiveness, acceptability, economic characteristics, requirements and technical specific property. ConclusionThere was limited researches on the investigation and analysis of health technologies on diabetes prevention and management in rural China, and evaluation content remains insufficient.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness of eight angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in order to provide evidence for adjustment of Essential Drug List in China. Method Collecting all clinical trials by searching Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Chinese Biomedical Database and conducting critical appraisal. High quality randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were included to assess the effectiveness of ACEIs. Non-randomized controlled trials were also included to evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness. Results New generation of ACEIs are better than enalapril and captopril in antihypertension and endurance. Meta-analysis showed that T/P ratio was less than 50% in prindopril, benazepril and captopril. Enalapril and captopril had the most adequate evidence in the treatment of chronic heart failure. The effects of lisinopril, prindopril, benazepril and cilazapril positive influence on heart failure were assessed by surrogates. Captopril, lisinopril could reduce the total death rate of acute period (during 36 hours of AMI). Enalapril, captopril, ramipril and prindopril had the effect of heart protection in late period of AMI (3 days after AMI). Only ramipril, lisinopril and prindopril had evidence to support the protective effect on cerebral vessels. The available evidence, though not adequate, showed all the ACEIs except benazepril could diminish proteinuria and delay the renal failure. The new generations of ACEIs were similar in adverse reactions to enalapril and captopril, while incidences were lower than enalapril and captopril. Few evidence on cost-effectiveness of ACEIs were identified. The available evidence showed enalapril was cost-effective in treating heart failure. However, it compromised to lisinopril. The studies on ethics were not available. Conclusions It was difficult to generally rank the eight ACEIs according to available evidence. Not all eight ACEIs had adequate evidence in organs protection. It was suggested that clinicians should select ACEIs with adequate evidence to treat patients on states.