The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure". The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with heart failure. Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to manage patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients’ interests. New recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses. This article summarized and interpreted the new concept of heart failure in 2022 guidelines, especially the new evidence and suggestions related to cardiac surgery.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effect of the timing of left ventricular (LV) unloading on the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed, and the VIP databases from their inception to February 2025. Literature screening was conducted according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two researchers independently assessed the study quality and extracted the data. Patients were divided into an early unloading group and a late unloading group based on the timing of LV unloading. RevMan 5.4 software was used to perform the heterogeneity test and meta-analysis. Results A total of 8 studies involving 2 117 patients were included (1 338 in the early unloading group and 779 in the late unloading group). The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the rates of successful ECMO weaning, in-hospital mortality, or 30-day all-cause mortality (all P>0.05). Compared with the late unloading group, the early unloading group had a lower risk of sepsis [RR=0.79, 95% CI (0.64, 0.96), P=0.02] and abdominal complications [RR=0.67, 95% CI (0.46, 0.96), P=0.03]. ConclusionCompared with late LV unloading, early LV unloading does not significantly improve the successful ECMO weaning rate or early survival. However, early LV unloading is associated with a reduced risk of sepsis and abdominal complications.