Objective To comment the diagnosis and treatment the bile leakage from the injuried abnormal minute biliary in our laparosicopic cholecystectomy (LC) practice. Methods Fourteen cases of minute biliary duct injury in 2 050 cases of LC were studied retrospectively. Among them, 6 cases had been found the points of leakage during operation, and the points were treated by titanium nips. In 4 cases even though the bile leakage could be seen, but the points of leakage could not found, and were treated by drainage. Four cases with peritonitis, 1 needed to be explored, and treated with suture ligature, 1 was explored by laparoscopy again, another two cases were treated with multiple hole catheters to drainage of the abdominal cavities through stab wounds. Results All 14 cases recovered. Conclusion Small bile leakage in LC is almost inevitable. It is the best that the bile leakage can be discovered during operation and to be treated. If it is discovered after operation, an open or laparoscopic exploratory laparotomy and adequate drainage would be needed. In the case of small amount of leakage, catheter drainage through stab wound is feasible.
Objective To investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy through the transumbilical approach. MethodsThe clinical data of 18 patients underwent endoscopic cholecystectomy through only one transumbilical incision at West China Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Results All of the operations were successfully completed without conversion to routine laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. The operation time was 40-130 （58±10） min. There was no intraoperative complication. The patients did well postoperatively and were discharged 1 day after operation. There was no postoperative complications and without visible abdominal scar on 1 month follow-up. Conclusions Laparoscopic cholecystectomy through the transumbilical approach is technically feasible and safe. But this technique is difficult, the patients should be selected carefully.
Objective To investigate the method of single umbilical port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its feasibility. Methods The clinical data of 46 patients receiving single port umbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy in this hospital from December 2008 to February 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. Results Fourty-six cases were operated successfully with ordinary laparoscopic instruments by single umbilical port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, all without drainage placed. Operative time was from 40 to 130 min, average 52.3 min; bleeding was from 10 to 150 ml, average 40.6 ml. No complications, such as biliary leakage, hemorrhage, umbilical hernia and infection of incisional wound happened. Postoperative abdominal wall scar was not obvious, 1-4 d hospitalization, from 2 weeks to 3 months following-up without disconnecting of incision. Conclusions The single umbilical port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible, with little abdominal wall scar, but difficult to perform, so it can be applied in hospitals with related conditions as improvements of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
【Abstract】Objective To investigate prophylactic measures for nontraumatic complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).Methods The data of 13 000 patients who underwent LC in Kunming general hospital of PLA over 13 years(1991-2004) were retrospectively reviewed. Results Nine malignant tumors and 47 common bile duct stones were missed at LC. The 9 malignant tumors included hepatic cancer (n=1), gastric cancer (n=1), gallbladder cancer (n=2), pancreatic cancer (n=2) and right colon cancer (n=3). Of all the carcinomas, 3 patients with right colon cancer underwent colectomy, the other 6 patients couldn’t be cured radically. All the 47 patients with choledocholithiasis were cured successfully, among them 31 patients were performed with ERCP and 16 were reoperated on with cholangiotomy. Conclusion This study emphasizes the necessity to analyze carefully patients’ symptoms before operation and pay attention to pathological changes of gallbladder and intraabdominal situation intraoperatively. If necessary, laparoscopic ultrosonography can be used to avoid missing malignant tumors and biliary stones.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to patients with calculous cholecystitis in acute inflammation stage. Methods The clinical data of 169 patients with calculous cholecystitis in acute inflammation stage who underwent clipless LC from December 2008 to July 2010 were analyzed. ResultsAll patients were successfully operated by LC except one case who suffered from gallbladder perforation and a conversion to open surgery was performed. The operation time ranged from 25-70 min (mean 38 min). The blood loss ranged from 10-200 ml (mean 22 ml). Peritoneal drainage was done in 38 patients, and the drainage time ranged from 1-6 d (mean 1.8 d). The time to out-of-bed activity was at 2 h after operation and the hospitalization time was 3-7 d (mean 3.5 d). There was no complication such as bile duct injury, hemorrhage, billiary leakage, and intra-abdominal infection. ConclusionWith improvement of operator’s experiences and skills, the clipless LC becomes feasible and safe for patients with calculous cholecystitis in acute inflammation stage.
Objective To prevent bile duct injury, a new anatomy marker, named “common bile duct window” is created. Methods From November 2005 to March 2006, 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were researched in this hospital. All data were collected, including: age, gender, course of disease, body mass index (BMI), blood lipid level (triglyceride and cholesterol), the thickness of gallbladder wall and the degree of cholecystitis. The frequency, location and mean size of “common bile duct window” were recorded and calculated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of “common bile duct window”, and the diference of data between two groups was analyzed by using χ2 test or t test. Results “Common bile duct window” was found at the end of hepatoduoduenal ligament with oval-shaped, the mean longitude of “common bile duct window” was (1.20±0.60) cm, and mean width was (0.45±0.30) cm. “Common bile duct window” were found in 81.6% (49/60) of patients. Age, gender, course of disease, BMI, triglyceride and cholesterol were proved to have no relationship with the presence of “common bile duct window” （Pgt;0.05）, but the thickness of gallbladder wall and the degree of cholecystitis affected the presence （P＜0.05）. Conclusion An oval-shaped “common bile duct window” can be found in almost all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. During the operation, the common bile duct can be located easily by the surgeon through “common bile duct window”, thereby to avoid common bile duct injury when the cyst duct was dissected. It is believed that during laparoscopic cholecystectomy the chances of bile duct injuries can be effectively decreased by the presence of “common bile duct window”.
ObjectiveTo explore the causes of bile duct injury due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and the preventive methods. MethodsA total of 18 patients with bile duct injury (with the occurrence rate of 0.4%) after LC between January 2003 and December 2012 were included. The patients included 5 males and 13 females with the age of 29-63 years old[averaging (42.3±3.6) years old]. The clinical data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsIn the 18 cases of bile duct injury, 5 cases occur in emergency operation, 13 cases in selective operation. The operators were attending physician in 13 cases, and senior position in the other 5 cases. The reasons of the injury included misjudgment of the cystic duct in 9, duct aberrance in 3, excessive stretch of cystic duct in 2, 2 Mirizzi syndrome withⅠ-type surgical injury in 2, and right liver duct injury because of inappropriate stripping of gallbladder in 1. ConclusionThe operator's experience, severe conglutination and the bile duct aberrance are the chief causes. Preventive methods include strict system of operation accession, careful selection of candidates, timely laparotomy, and paying attention to the accumulation of operation experience and skills.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis in elderly patients and non-elderly patients. MethodsThe clinical data of 185 cases of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who treated in our hospital from September 2010 to November 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Then the 185 cases of holecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis were divided into elderly patients group (n=74) and the non-elderly patients group (n=111). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative activity time, abdominal drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, hospitalization cost, incidence of complications, unplanned analgesia, stone-free rate, rate of conversion to laparotomy, recurrence of stone, and mortality were compared between the two groups. Results① Intraoperative and postoperative indexes. No significant difference was noted in operative time and intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.050), but the postoperative exhaust time, postoperative activity time, abdominal drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and ratio of indwelling T tube of elderly patients group were all higher or longer than corresponding index of non-elderly patients group (P < 0.050). ② Postoperative complications and unplanned analgesia. There was no striking discrepancy in incidence of complications (including biliary leakage, peritonitis, haemorrhage, vomit, ectoralgia, and fever), and Clavien-Dindo grade (P > 0.050), except unplanned analgesia (P=0.007), the rate of unplanned analgesia in elderly patients group was higher than that of non-elderly patients group. ③Surgical effect. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rate, rate of conversion to laparotomy, and rate of recurrence of stone between the 2 groups (P > 0.050). ConclusionLC+LCBDE is also safe and effective in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis in elderly patients, it's worthy to be expanded and be used broadly.
Objective To observe the effects of epidural anaesthesia (EA) and general anaesthesia (GA) on the changes of plasma epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods Thirty patients undergoing elective LC were randomly divided into GA group (n＝15) and EA group (n＝15). The concentrations of plasma NE and E were measured at the following phases: before anaesthesia, before introducing pneumoperitoneum, during pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of operation. Results In EA group, the concentrations of NE weren′t significantly different at each phase, the concentrations of E significantly increased before and during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05) and returned to the baseline at the end of operation (Ｐ＞0.05). In GA group, the concentrations of NE and E didn′t change significantly before pneumoperitoneum, but increased during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05) and E didn′t return to the baseline at the end of operation (Ｐ＜0.05). The E concentrations of EA group was higher than that of GA group before pneumoperitoneum, but the NE concentration of EA group was lower than that of GA group during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05). Conclusion Both groups has significant stress reaction, but the stress reaction of EA group is weaker than that of GA group during LC.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility, safety, cost, and patient satisfaction of ambulatory laparo-scopic cholecystectomy(ALC). MethodsThe clinical data of patients who divided into ALC group(678 cases) and in-patient laparoscopic cholecystectomy(IPLC) group(1 534 cases) in our hospital from April 2011 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, conversion rate, complication rate, hospitalization time, cost of hospi-talization, rehospitalization rate, and patient satisfaction were analyzed and evaluated. ResultsThere were no significant differences of the operative time, postoperative complication rate, and rehospitalization rate between the 2 groups(P > 0.05). The conversion rate(0.44%), and hospitalization time[(1.2±0.5)d] of the ALC group were significantly lower or shorter than those of IPLC group[3.19%, (4.8±1.3) d], P < 0.05. The direct, indirect health care costs, and the total costs of the ALC group were (6 555.6±738.7), (230.0±48.0), and (8 856.0±636.0) yuan, respec-tively; and lower than those of the IPLC group[(7 863.71, 014.6), (973.0±136.5), and(8 856.0±636.0)yuan], P < 0.05. ConclusionALC is safe and feasible, and could shorten the hospitalization time, lower the medical cost, speed up the bed turnover, and increase the efficiency in the use of health resource.