ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of Lisfranc ligament reconstruction with autogenous tendon through biomechanical testing. MethodsTwelve fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs were prepared three sequential testing conditions:intact Lisfranc ligament (intact group), disrupted Lisfranc ligament (disrupted group), and Lisfranc ligament reconstruction (reconstruction group). Under fixing on the Bose mechanical test machine, three models were given 0-600 N axial loading in the neutral position and the plantar flexion of 30° according to the speed of 10 N/s, every 100 N load with a 1-minute interval. The medial cuneiform (C1) and the second metatarsal (M2) base displacement and the foot transverse arch height were recorded under different loads. ResultsIn the neutral position and the plantar flexion of 30°, C1-M2 displacement and foot transverse arch height showed an increasing trend with increased load under 0-600 N axial loading. There were significant differences in C1-M2 displacement variation in 2 positions among groups (P＜0.05). In disrupted group, the C1-M2 displacement variation in neutral position was significantly lower than that in plantar flexion of 30° (t=7.392,P=0.000). In the neutral position, the foot transverse arch height variation in the disrupted group and the reconstruction group was significantly higher than that in the intact group (P＜0.05), but there was no significant difference between the disrupted group and reconstruction group (P>0.05). ConclusionLisfranc ligament reconstruction with autogenous tendon can reduce the C1-M2 displacement variation and stabilize Lisfranc joint to a certain degree. Reconstruction of both dorsal ligament and Lisfranc ligament will not improve the buffering capacity. The C1-M2 displacement variation in the plantar flexion of 30° is more obvious than that in neutral position, so it is helpful to improve clinical diagnosis of occult Lisfranc damage.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy between deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) repair and conservative treatment for complete MCL rupture. MethodsBetween August 2009 and December 2013, 36 patients with grade 3 MCL rupture underwent superior MCL (sMCL) reconstruction with tibial Inlay technique. Of 36 cases, 19 received dMCL repair (repair group), and 17 received conservative treatment (conservation group) after sMCL reconstruction. There was no significant difference in gender, age, knee sides, type of injury, disease duration and preoperative medial joint opening, knee Lysholm scores, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The Lysholm and IKDC scores, medial joint opening, range of motion (ROM), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and complications were used to assess the knee joint function. ResultsAll patients achieved primary incision healing without acute postoperative complications of incision infection and deep vein thrombosis in the lower limb. The patients were followed up 28-65 months (mean, 46.3 months) in the repair group, and 26-69 months (mean, 45.9 months) in the conservation group. No knee stiffness, vascular or nerve injury, and knee joint infection occurred in 2 groups. All the patients recovered medial stability at 2 years postoperatively. At 2 years after operation, no significant difference was shown in knee ROM between 2 groups (t=0.26, P=0.80); the VAS score of the repair group was significantly lower than that of the conservation group (t=5.22, P=0.00); medial joint opening, IKDC score, and Lysholm score were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionWhether or not additional dMCL repair is performed can recover medial stability after sMCL reconstruction. However, the additional dMCL repair is better in relieving medial knee pain than the conservative treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of one-stage arthroscopic reconstruction and strict immobilization for 6 weeks for treatment of knee dislocation. MethodBetween August 2010 and May 2013, 22 cases (22 knees) of knee dislocation were treated with one-stage reconstruction and strict immobilization for 6 weeks. There were 15 males and 7 females, aged 21-54 years (mean, 31.5 years). The left knee and right knee were involved in 8 cases and 14 cases respectively. The disease causes were traffic accident in 12 cases, falling from height in 6 cases, and sports injury in 4 cases. The time between injury and operation was less than 2 weeks in 6 cases, 2-3 weeks in 10 cases, and more than 3 weeks in 6 cases. The results of anterior drawer test, posterior drawer test, and Lachman test were positive in all patients. The posterior displacement of the tibia was more than 10 mm. The results of valgus stress test and varus stress test were positive in 13 cases and 11 cases respectively. The preoperative knee range of motion was (58.2±28.4) °, Lysholm score was 39.7±4.6. All patients had anterior cruciate ligament rupture and posterior cruciate ligament rupture; combined injuries included medial collateral ligament rupture in 11 cases, lateral collateral ligament rupture in 9 cases, both medial and lateral collateral ligament rupture in 2 cases, femoral condylar avulsion fracture in 2 cases, and meniscus injury in 7 cases. No nerve or blood vessel injury was observed. ResultsAll cases obtained primary healing of incision without infection. All the patients were followed up 12-48 months (mean, 27.8 months). At 12 months after operation, the results of the anterior drawer test, posterior drawer test, Lachman test, valgus stress test, and varus stress test were all negative; the knee range of motion increased was significantly to (121.3±7.9) °(t=30.061, P=0.000) ; Lysholm score was 87.2±6.1, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t=24.642, P=0.000) . ConclusionsA combination of arthroscopic one-stage reconstruction and strict immobilization for treatment of knee dislocation is a safe and effective method, good stability and joint function can be achieved.
Objective To study the effectiveness of anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) reconstruction using autologous periosteum wrapping tendon allograft by comparing with using simple tendon allograft. Methods Between March 2008 and November 2008, 68 patients with ACL injury were treated, who were in accordance with the inclusion criteria. They were divided into 2 groups randomly according to different treatment methods: ACL was reconstructed with autologous periosteum wrapping tendon allograft in 31 patients (test group) and with simple tendon allograft (control group) in 37 patients. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, the cause of injury, and functional score preoperatively between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed in 2 groups. Results Little exudation at tibial tunnel incision was found in 1 case respectively in both groups at 2 weeks after operation and was cured by dressing change and antibiotics. The other incisions healed by first intention. The patients were followed up 24-29 months (mean, 26 months) in the test group and 24-32 months (mean, 27 months) in the control group. CT showed bone tunnel enlargement in both groups at 2 years after operation, but the rate of the tunnel enlargement was less inthe test group (5/31, 16.1%) than in the control group (14/37, 37.8%), showing significant difference (χ2=3.948, P=0.047). At 2 years after operation, the results of Lachman test and pivot shift test were negative in 23 cases (74.2%) and 25 cases (80.6%) of the test group, and in 26 cases (70.3%) and 30 cases (81.1%) of the control group, respectively. KT-1000 examination showed the displacement of the test group [(1.74 ± 0.88) mm] was less than that of the control group [(2.36 ± 0.83) mm], showing significant difference (t= —2.979, P=0.004). There was no significant difference in Lysholm score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Tegner score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between 2 groups at 2 years after operation (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with simple tendon allograft, ACL reconstruction with autologous periosteum wrapping tendon allograft can improve tendon-bone heal ing, and decrease the rate of bone tunnel enlargement, so it has good short-term outcome.
Objective To explore the best flexion angle of the transplantation tendon for fixing joint in simultaneously reconstructing of the anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) and posterior cruciate l igament (PCL) using semitendinosus tendon as autologous graft. Methods Twenty-four clean level New Zealand White rabbits [(aged 6-8 months, male or female, and weighing (2.5 ± 0.2) kg] were selected and divided randomly into 3 groups (n=8) according to fixation angle of the reconstructed l igaments. The bilateral semitendinosus tendons of hind legs were used to reconstruct the PCL and ACL of right hind leg, and the reconstructed l igaments were fixed at knee flexion angles of 90° (group A), 60° (group B), and 30° (group A). The rabbit general situation was observed after operation, and the specimens of the knee joints (including 10 cmdistal end and 10 cm proximal end) were harvested for testing extension and flexion, displacement, and internal and external rotation at 3 months after operation. Results All the rabbits survived to the end of experiment. There was no significant difference in maximal displacements of ACL and PCL among 3 groups (P gt; 0.05). The anterior and posterior displacements of shift in 3 groups were less than 1 mm, suggesting good stabil ity. The anterior displacement and the posterior displacement at 30° flexion and 90° flexion in group A were significantly larger than those in group C (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences in internal rotation angle and external rotation angle between group A and group C (P lt; 0.05), and there was no significant difference among other groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion When simultaneously reconstructing ACL and PCL, the knee flexion angle of 60° for fixing the reconstructed l igaments can achieve the best effect.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with 6 strands of hamstring tendons enveloped by periosteum. Methods Between April 2008 and April 2009, 34 patients with ACL injury were treated, ACL of whom was reconstructed with 6 strands of hamstring tendons enveloping of periosteum and double Rigidfix fixation. There were 30 males and 4 females, aged 19-54 years with an average of 29.4 years. The causes of injury included sport in 19 cases, traffic accident in 8 cases, falling from height in 5 cases, and other in 2 cases. The locations were left knee in 19 cases and right knee in 15 cases. The disease duration was 3 weeks to 18 months (median, 9.4 months). The results of Lachman test and anterior drawer test were positive. The Lysholm knee score was 61.5 ± 3.6. MRI examination revealed ACL rupture in 26 cases and ACL injury in 8 cases. Results All incisions healed by first intention, and no early complication occurred. Twenty-eight cases were followed up 12-32 months (mean, 16.1 months). The result of Lachman test was negative at 12 months after operation; in all patients, knee extension reached 0°, and flexion reached 120-150° (mean, 132.5°). The AP and lateral X-ray films and MRI showed no bone tunnel expansion. At last follow-up the therapeutic effect evaluation was excellent in 25 cases, good in 1 case, and fair in 2 cases; the excellent and good rate was 92.9%. The postoperative Lysholm score was 91.0 ± 3.2, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t=32.78, P=0.00). Conclusion Six strands of hamstring tendons can ensure sufficient tensile strength, and use of the double Rigidfix absorbable screw makes fixation more reliable. Facing outside suture of periosteal flap can promote tendon-bone healing, so it is a good method of ACL reconstruction.
Objective To investigate the surgical technique and short-term effectiveness of anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) reconstruction with LARS artificial l igament. Methods Between November 2008 and April 2010, eighty patients withACL injury were treated with LARS artificial l igament under arthroscope and successfully followed up. There were 51 males and 29 females, aged from 17 to 43 years with an average of 29.2 years. The injuries were caused by sport in 63 cases, traffic accident in 14 cases, and bruise in 3 cases. There were 43 left knees and 37 right knees. The disease duration ranged from 10 days to 11 months. The anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shift test for all cases were rated as positive. The preoperative Lysholm score was 55.4 ± 5.7, Irgang score was 48.3 ± 6.2, and Larson score was 54.8 ± 7.4; and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was lower than normal level in all cases. Obl ique coronal MRI showed ACL injury in all cases. Residual ACL and synovium were preserved during surgery. Results All incisions healed by first intention without compl ication of infection or deep venous thrombosis. All patients were followed up 7 to 24 months with an average of 16.8 months. There were 3 cases of screws exposure toward femoral cortical bone, 2 cases of loosening tibial screw, and 1 case of knee extension l imitation, and they were cured after symptomatic treatment. No LARS artificial l igament rupture and joint fibrosis occurred during followup. At last follow-up, the results of anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shift test were positive in 2, 3, and 3 patients,respectively. There were significant differences in Lysholm, Irgang, and Larson scores of affected knees between preoperation and 6 weeks postoperatively, last follow-up, respectively (P lt; 0.05). The normal rate of IKDC score were 43.75% (35/80) and 97.50% (78/80) at 6 weeks postoperatively and last follow-up, respectively. Conclusion The viscoelastic properties of LARS artificial l igament is different from that of biological materials. The graft should be fixed at a relatively extension position to avoid knee extension l imitation and sl ight loosening of graft tension is permitted at flexion position. Good cl inical result could be achieved if the technique is well appl ied.
Objective The anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) is the important stable structure of the knee. To evaluate the method and outcome of bone-ACL-bone (B-ACL-B) allograft under arthroscope in reconstruction of ACL. Methods Between October 2007 and February 2010, arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with deep-freezing B-ACL-B allograft was performed on 22 patients with ACL ruptures. There were 15 males and 7 females with an average age of 27.6 years (range, 19-55 years). The causes of ACL rupture were sport trauma in 12 cases, fall ing injury in 1 case, heavy crush in 2 cases, and traffic accident in 7 cases. The locations were the left knee in 14 cases and the right knee in 8 cases. The disease durationwas 7 days to 12 months (median, 65 days). Nineteen patients showed the positive results of anterior drawer test and pivot shift test, and 21 patients showed the positive results of Lachman test. According to International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) criteria, there were 5 abnormal and 17 severely abnormal. The subjective IKDC score was 49.6 ± 6.9. The Lysholm score was 48.5 ± 5.3. The Tegner scale scores were 6.8 ± 1.2 before injury and 2.1 ± 0.5 before operation. The MRI showed the ACL injuries in 18 of 20 patients. Results The mean operative time was 75 minutes (range, 65-85 minutes); the mean blood loss was 110 mL (range, 80-150 mL). All incisions healed by first intention. No immunologic rejection and deep vein thrombosis of lower l imbs occurred. All patients were followed up 7-34 months (mean, 18 months). At last follow-up, the flexion of the knee ranged from 125 to 135° (mean, 130.5°). Two patients showed the positive results of anterior drawer test, 1 patient showed the positive result of pivot shift test, and 3 patients showed the positive results of Lachman test. According to the IKDC criteria, 10 patients rated as normal, 11 patients as nearly normal, 1 patient as abnormal. The subjective IKDC score was 90.0 ± 5.8, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative one (t=4.653, P=0.021). The Lysholm score was 91.6 ± 7.1, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative one (t=4.231, P=0.028). The Tegner scale score was 6.1 ± 1.5, showing no significant difference when compared with one before injury (t=1.321, P=0.070) and showing significant difference when compared preoperative one (t=3.815, P=0.033). The arthroscopic examination showed no rupture of grafts in 19 patients, 17 grafts showed normal tension, and 2 showed sl ight relaxation at 6 months after operation. Conclusion Reconstruction of the ACL with B-ACL-B allograft under arthroscope is a safe and effective method, which can anatomically reconstruct ACL and obtain a good recovery of the knee function after operation.
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of ligament remnant preservation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by observing the integrity, the tension, the synovial membrane covering, and the color of the reconstructed ligament under arthroscopy. MethodsBetween January 2011 and December 2013, 122 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and arthroscopic internal fixation removal at 1 year after reconstruction were included in this study. Of these cases, 61 cases underwent ACL reconstruction using the remnant-preserved technique (preservation group);the other 61 cases underwent ACL reconstruction using non remnant-preserved technique (non preservation group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury side, body mass index, type of injury, the time from injury to reconstruction, and the result of KT-2000 examination between 2 groups (P<0.05). The reconstructed ACL were observed under arthroscopy when internal fixation was removed, and the effectiveness was evaluated according to the criteria of AO Yingfang. ResultsIn preservation group, the results were excellent in 34 cases, good in 22 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 1 case;and in non preservation group, the results were excellent in 29 cases, good in 20 cases, fair in 10 cases, and poor in 2 cases;and there was no significant difference between 2 groups (Z=-1.320, P=0.187). ConclusionIn ACL reconstruction, the remnant-preserved technique is not obviously better than non remnant-preserved technique in the integrity, tension, membrane covering, and color.
ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical result of extrinsic radioulnar tether combined with anchoring nail fixation for treating chronic dorsal instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). MethodsBetween July 2011 and December 2012, 6 patients with chronic dorsal instability of the DRUJ were treated with extrinsic radioulnar tether combined with anchoring nail fixation. There were 1 male and 5 females with the average age of 27.3 years (range, 22-35 years). All of 6 patients had a wrist trauma history. The average disease duration was 4.8 years (range, 6 months to 15 years). Radiographs were taken postoperatively to observe the anchoring nail loosening. The stress test and forearm rotation test were used to evaluate the function of DRUJ. The complications, the grip power, range of motion, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded at last follow-up. And the joint function was evaluated by disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. ResultsPrimary healing of incision was obtained in all cases, without any complications such as infection and ulnar neck fracture. All 6 patients were followed up 6-24 months (mean, 13.7 months). Stability was achieved in all patients. Radiographs showed that the joint space was widened and dislocation of the ulnar head was improved at 3 and 6 months after operation. The results of the stress test and forearm rotation test were negative. At last follow-up, the grip power, DASH score, VAS score, and range of motion of the wrist were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). ConclusionExtrinsic radioulnar tether combined with anchoring nail fixation is an easy method of surgical revision to treat chronic dorsal instability of DRUJ, which can maintain the stability and protect the blood supply of triangular fibrocartilage complex.