Objective To determine the contents of matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3) and interleukin 1 (IL-1) in the tissues of the lumbar disc herniation and to investigate their roles in the pathogenesis. Methods The tissues of the herniated lumbar disc were obtained from 30 patients undergoing surgery for persistent radiculopathy from June 2003 to December 2004 and at the same time these samples were divided into the following three experimentalgroups: the bulge group (n=11), the protrusion group (n=9), and the prolapsus group (n=10)，14 males, 16 females, aged 33.64 years. As the control group, 9 lumbar disc specimens were harvested from 9 patients(4 males, 5 females, aged 21-58 years) suffering from bursting fracture of the lumbar spine. The specimens were analyzed by the ELISA method for the contents of MMP-3 and IL-1. Results The contents of MMP-3(14.25±1.32, 19.89±2.97,20.69±2.18 ng/ml in the bulge group, protrusion group and prolapsus group, separately) and IL-1(8.52±0.22， 11.88±0.52，11.90±0.73 pg/ml in the bulge group, protrusion group and prolapsus group, separately) in the experimental groups were significantly higher than those in the control group. The contents of MMP-3 and IL-1 in the protrusion group were not significantly higher than those in the prolapsus group, but they were significantly higher than those in the bulge group(P＜0.01). The contents of MMP-3 had a significant relationship with the contents of IL-1 in the three experimental groups and the control group(P＜0.01). Conclusion The result demonstrates that the tissues of the lumbar disc herniation can produce both MMP-3 and IL-1, which may have an unknown but important relationship with each other.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of posterior approach discectomy with and without fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1950 to June 2007), OVID (1950 to April 2007), PUBMED, the China Biological Medicine Database (1978 to June 2007) and Wanfang Database (1981 to February 2007). We also handsearched several relevant journals for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) comparing posterior approach discectomy with and without fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. The quality of the included trials was assessed. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for statistical analysis. Results Nine eligible trials involving 1911 patients were included. The meta-analyses found no statistically significant differences between the two operative procedures in the incidence of postoperative leg pain [RR 0.94, 95%CI (0.69, 1.28)], the proportion of patients requiring re-operation [RR 0.77, 95% CI (0.57, 1.04)], the incidence of post-operative lumbar canal stenosis [RR 1.23, 95%CI (0.26, 5.86)], and the relapse rate at other intervertebral spaces [RR 1.05, 95%CI (0.49, 2.26)] (Pgt;0.05).There is statistically significant differences between the two group in the incidence of peri-operative complications [RR 1.46, 95%CI (1.06, 2.00)]. Discectomy plus fusion was superior to discectomy alone in incidence of postoperative back pain [RR 0.70, 95%CI (0.53, 0.94)], relapse rate at either intervertebral space [RR 0.30, 95%CI (0.18, 0.48)] and at the same intervertebral space [RR 0.12, 95%CI (0.04, 0.37)]. Conclusions Since all the included studies were controlled trials with a great potential for biases, high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.
ObjectiveTo compare the early efficacy between Quadrant channel and traditional method in treating lumbar disc herniation. MethodBetween July 2010 and December 2012, 60 patients with lumbar disc herniation were randomly divided into two groups with 30 in each. Quadrant channel and traditional method were used respectively to do the same one single segmental pedicle screw fixation with single pieces of cage bone grafting fusion and internal fixation. Then, we compared the two groups in incision length, operative time, blood loss, incision healing time and postoperative incidence of low back pain between the two groups of patients. ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, blood loss, and recent curative effect (P>0.05), while Quadrant channel was superior in small skin incision, reduced incidence of low back pain, and shorter postoperative incision healing time (P<0.05). ConclusionsTreatment of lumbar disc herniation using Quadrant channel is minimally invasive with less complications. Mid-and long-term efficacy remains to be further analyzed.
Lumbar disc herniation is one of the most common causes of low back and leg pain in clinic. There are a lot of non-surgical therapeutic methods widely used in clinic for treating lumbar disc herniation. The author assessed the available systematic reviews of non-surgical methods in treating lumbar disc herniation which had been published in these years, and finally a total of 13 systematic reviews were retrieved including 1 about conservative treatments, 8 Chinese medicine treatments, and 4 percutaneous treatments, such as chemonucleolysis and epidural steroid injection. The results showed that the conservative treatments included injections, traction, physical therapy, bed rest, manipulation, medication, and acupuncture. But no evidence was found to show that any of the above treatments was clearly superior to others including no treatment for patients with lumbar disc herniation. The outcomes from some reviews showed that Chinese medicine treatments were safer and comprehensive treatment of traditional Chinese medicine was relatively effective compared with single treatment. Electro-acupuncture, compared with conventional therapy (bed rest, waist protection, pelvic traction, manual or physical therapy) and oral medications as well, was safe and effective in alleviating pain and improving overall function. Chinese medicinal fumigation combined with traction was more effective than single treatment. Percutaneous treatment of chemonucleolysis had much better short-term effectiveness. Percutaneous epidural steroid injection also had certain effects. To summarize, Chinese medicine and percutaneous treatments may be effective in treating lumbar disc herniation. However, more clinical trials are needed, since current evidence is of low quality.
Objective To comprehensively investigate the incidence of resorption of lumbar disc herniation, and provide reference data for clinical decision-making. Methods Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang data and Chongqing VIP database) were searched for relevant studies that might have reported morphologic changes in lumbar disc herniation when reporting the follow-up results of patients with lumbar disc herniation treated non-surgically from inception to March, 2020. Articles were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the total number of patients, number of patients with resorption, and other important data were extracted for analysis. Random effect models were used for meta-analysis, and subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression analysis, and Egger’s test were performed. Results A total of 15712 articles were identified from these databases, and 48 were eligible for analysis. A total of 2880 non-surgically treated patients with lumbar disc herniation were included in the meta-analysis, 1740 of whom presented resorption. Meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of resorption was 0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.46, 0.72)]. In subgroup analyses, studies that quantitatively measured the resorption of lumbar disc herniation yielded statistically higher pooled incidence [0.73, 95%CI (0.60, 0.85)] than those that used qualitative methods [0.51, 95%CI (0.34, 0.69)] (P=0.0252). The pooled incidence gradually increased in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [0.50, 95%CI (0.15, 0.85)], non-RCT prospective studies [0.59, 95%CI (0.48, 0.70)] and retrospective studies [0.69, 95%CI (0.36, 0.95)], but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.7523). The pooled incidence varied from 0.58 [95%CI (0.54, 0.71)] to 0.62 [95%CI (0.49, 0.74)] after the sequential omission of each single study. There was no significant change in the pooled incidence [0.62, 95%CI (0.43, 0.79)] when only low-risk RCTs and high-quality non-RCT studies were included, comparing with original meta-analysis results. Meta-regression showed that measurements partially caused heterogeneity (R2=15.34%, P=0.0858). Egger’s test suggested that there was no publication bias (P=0.4622). Conclusions According to current research, there is an overall incidence of resorption of 60% [95%CI (46%, 72%)] among non-surgically treated patients with lumbar disc herniation. The probability of resorption should be fully considered before making a decision on surgery.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of resorption of lumbar disc herniation (RLDH). Methods The literature on RLDH at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed to summarize its influencing factors, pathogenesis, imaging findings, and predictive effect, as well as its influence on the treatment selection of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). ResultsThe main mechanism of RLDH is the combined effect of inflammatory response and neovascularization. Age, smoking, body mass index, and clinical manifestations are the influencing factors. Studies have shown that the annular enhancement around the nucleus pulposus on enhanced MRI images is the characteristic imaging manifestation of RLDH, which is a predictor of whether RLDH occurs. In the treatment of LDH, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors may have a negative impact on RLDH. ConclusionThe occurrence of RLDH suggests that strict conservative treatment is the first choice for LDH treatment, but surgery is still an important treatment method when the patient’s symptoms and imaging symptoms don’t significantly improved after conservative treatment.
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most important causes of back and leg pain, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients. As the first-line treatment for LDH, non-operative treatment can relieve 80% to 90% of symptoms among the patients with LDH. This guideline followed Guidelines for the Formulation/Revision of Clinical Treatment Guidelines in China (2022 edition) and WHO handbook for guideline development (2014 edition) to set up guideline working group. This guideline identified fourteen clinical questions through the literature review and clinical experts’ consensus. We drafted the recommendations after systematically searching and evaluating the evidence; delphi method was adopted for expert consensus on the preliminary recommendations, finally, 19 recommendations were made to guide non-operative treatments for LDH. This guideline can provide guidance for the clinical practice of Chinese and western orthopedics practitioners.
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is very prevalent in clinical practice. It manifests as low back pain and pain radiating to the leg, followed by disfunction and large family and social cost. Risk factors for LDH include biomechanical stress on the lumbar spine, specifically torsion and hyperflexion, poor posture, obesity, and occupational hazards including heavy manual labor or prolonged driving. Rehabilitation therapy mainly includes bed rest, drug therapy, physical therapy, exercise, manipulation therapy, acupuncture treatment, epidural injection treatment and so on. This review summarizes the current status of epidemiology, clinical features and rehabilitation treatment of LDH so as to improve our understanding of it and to provide a reference for clinical treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibil ity and short-term effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic spine surgery for treatment of lumbar disc herniation with posterior ring apophysis separation. MethodsBetween July 2008 and January 2013, 57 patients with lumbar disc herniation and posterior ring apophysis separation were treated. There were 39 males and 18 females, aged from 13 to 46 years (mean, 26.7 years). Of 57 cases, 29 had a clear trauma history. All patients had single segmental unilateral lumbar disc herniation, and the location was at L4, 5 in 22 cases and at L5, S1 in 35 cases; there were 25 cases of lateral bone fragments and 32 cases of central cortical and cancellous fragments. While fracture located at posterior inferior edge of the vertebrae at L4 level in 9 cases and at L5 level in 8 cases, at posterior superior edge at L5 level in 13 cases and in S1 level in 27 cases. Percutaneous endoscopic surgeries were performed via interlaminar or transforaminal approach from unilaterally symptomatic side for discectomy of lumbar disc herniation and partial or complete resection of free bone fragments. ResultsAccurate positioning was obtained in all patients during operation, and no complication of nerve root injury, hematoma formation, or dural tear occurred. The operation time was 20-85 minutes; the intraoperative fluoroscopy times were 2-15 times, and the blood loss was 3-10 mL. Postoperative radiographic examination showed that bone fragment was not removed in 16 cases, was partly removed in 32 cases, and was completely removed in 9 cases. Disc was completely removed. All patients were followed up 10-64 months (median, 16 months). According to modified Macnab criteria for the evaluation of effectiveness, the results were excellent in 48 cases, good in 6 cases, and fair in 3 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 94.7%. ConclusionPercutaneous endoscopic spine surgery through unilaterally symptomatic approach has advantages of small tissue damage and lumbar structure damage, less bleeding, and shorter recovery time. It has a good short-term effectiveness, but long-term effectiveness need further follow-up.
Objective To explore the postoperative satisfaction of patients with lumbar disc herniation after enhanced recovery after surgery and its related factors. Methods A total of 102 patients with lumbar disc herniation were selected and analyzed by convenient sampling method from September 2016 to June 2017. The patients’ general information, functional status [using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to investigate the preoperative, postoperative and post-discharge ODI] and patients’ satisfaction (1 month after the discharge) were collected. Results A total of 102 patients, including 62 males and 40 females, aged from 14 to 82 years with an average of (43.8±14.4) years were included in the study.The mean length of hospital stay was (6.61±2.49) days. The total score of patients’ satisfaction was 62.43±6.37, and the satisfaction degree was at the middle and high level. Postoperative and post-discharge ODIs were associated with patients’ satisfaction (rs=0.328, 0.452; P<0.05). Conclusions The postoperative satisfaction of patients with lumbar disc herniation after enhanced recovery after surgery should be further improved. The medical staff should pay attention to the recovery of postoperative function in order to improve the patients’ satisfaction.