Objective To investigate the risk factors, diagnosis and treatment of solitary pulmonary nodule （diameter≤3cm）. Methods From Jan. 2001 to Dec. 2002, the clinical data of 297 patients with solitary pulmonary nodule were reviewed. Chi-square or t-test were used in univariate analysis of age, gender, symptom, smoking history, the size, location and radiological characteristics of nodule, and logistic regression in multivariate analysis. Results Univariate analysis revealed that malignancy was significantly associated with age （P=0. 000）, smoking history （P=0. 001）, the size （P=0. 000） and radiological characteristics （P=0. 000） of nodule. In multivariate analysis （logistic regression）, it was significantly associated with age （OR = 1. 096）, the size （OR = 2. 329） and radiological characteristics （OR=0. 167） of nodule. Conclusion Age and the size of nodule could be risk factors. Radiological findings could help distinguish from malignant nodules.
With widespread utilization of multi-slice helical computed tomography (CT) and low-dose CT in lung cancer screening, significantly greater incidence of patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) has been found. Once SPN is discovered, it is very difficult to immediately determine whether it is benign or malignant in clinical practice. In this review, SPN etiology, epidemiological characteristics of SPN patients, nodule size, morphology, location and growth rate, mathematical models for predicting malignancy of SPN, and diagnostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) are summarized to provide reference for differential diagnosis of SPN. Current management strategies for SPN are also discussed in this review. According to whether SPN diameter is greater than 8 mm, whether SPN patients are advanced aged, have smoking or malignancy history, different follow-up and treatment strategies can be chosen. The diagnostic and treatment value of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for SPN is also discussed.
ObjectiveThyroid nodules are an exceptionally common thyroid disorder. Past studies suggested a possible link between thyroid diseases and breast neoplasms. However, few studies have delved into the causal relationship between thyroid nodules and breast neoplasms. This study conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to further investigate the causal relationship between them. MethodsThis study was conducted using data sourced from genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary datasets. The study focused on thyroid nodules, benign breast tumors, and malignant breast cancers as the research objects, and relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables (IVs). The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was primarily used to assess the causal relationship between thyroid nodules and breast neoplasms. Cochran’s Q test was employed to detect heterogeneity, while MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO were used to test for pleiotropy. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method. ResultsThere was a significant causal relationship between thyroid nodules and malignant neoplasm of breast (OR=0.88, 95%CI 0.83 to 0.95, P<0.01), with no evidence of reverse causality between them (OR=1.01, 95%CI 0.99 to 1.03, P=0.16). No causal relationship was found between thyroid nodules and benign neoplasm of breast, as indicated by both forward MR analysis (OR=0.97, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.06, P=0.51) and reverse MR analysis (OR=0.97, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.04, P=0.40). Sensitivity analyses suggested that the study findings were accurate and reliable. ConclusionThe present study identifies thyroid nodules as a potential protective factor for malignant neoplasm of breast.