ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of all kinds of hemocoagulase on operative incisions. MethodsDatabases including Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMbase, EBSCO, PubMed, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about hemocoagulase on operative incisions from the inception to June 20th, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 867 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, the hemostatic time (MD=-37.84, 95%CI -52.72 to -22.96, P<0.000 01), blood loss volume per unit area (MD=-0.09, 95%CI -0.10 to -0.07, P<0.000 01), PT of the first postoperative day (MD=-0.37, 95%CI -0.65 to -0.09, P=0.009) were significantly shorter in the hemocoagulase group. However, no significant differences were found in APTT, TT and FIB between two groups. ConclusionHemocoagulase can reduce hemostatic time and blood loss volume in surgical incisions. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be further verified by more high quality studies.
Objective To analyze the relationship between helicobacter pylori (HP) and gastric cancer. Methods We searched CNKI (Jan.1995-Dec.2005) and Wangfandatabase (Jan.1995-Dec.2005). Case-control studies on relationship of helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer were collected. Meta-analysis method was used to sum up the odds ratio (OR) and 95%CI of these studies.Results We identified 14 case-control studies with 11 studies of healthy adults versus gastric cancer patients and 4 studies of gastritis versus gastric cancer patients. The results of subgroup analyses based on patients resource showed: statistical difference was founded between healthy adults and gastric cancer patients with pooled OR 2.00 and 95%CI 1.25 to 3.20; no statistical difference was founded between gastritis patients and gastric cancer patients with pooled OR 1.54 and 95%CI 0.68 to 3.50. The results of subgroup analyses based on locations of gastric cancer showed: statistical difference was founded between the non-cardiac gastric cancer patients and the control with pooled OR 3.60 and 95%CI 1.25 to 10.36; no statistical difference was found between cardiac gastric cancer patients and control with pooled OR 0.88 and 95%CI 0.56 to 1.39.Conclusion HP infection can be associated with gastric cancer, and the different conclusions of the 14 reports may be attributed to the locations of gastric cancer and the selection of controls.
ObjectivesUsing systematic literature review to analyze the effects of levetiracetam (LEV) on neonatal safety during early pregnancy.MethodsThe scope of the literature must be English literature, published from 1997 to 2018. Meta-analysis was performed by random effects models.ResultsSeven literatures were included. A total of 672 cases exposed to LEV in treatment group and 772 234 cases in control groups were selected for meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in neonatal malignancy between treatment group and control group［OR=1.05, 95% CI (0.54, 2.02), P=0.37］. Further, we evaluated the effect of LEV monotherapy and polytherapy on neonatal safety, a total of 464 monotherapy cases and 632 polytherapy cases respectively were selected for meta-analysis. The results showed that there was no significant difference between these two therapies in neonatal malignancy ［OR=0.54, 95% CI(0.31, 0.96), P=0.32］.ConclusionsAs the papers we included, levetiracetam in the treatment of epilepsy during pregnancy is relatively safe for newborn.
Objective To evaluate systematically the effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin ( PCT) -guided therapy in comparison with standard therapy in patients with suspected or confirmed severe bacterial infections in intensive care unit ( ICU) . Methods Five randomized controlled trials ( 927 patients) were included for statistical analysis by the cochrane collaboration′s RevMan5. 0 software. Results PCT-guided therapy was associated with a significant reduction in duration of antibiotic therapy [ MD =- 2. 01, 95% CI ( - 2. 37, - 1. 64) , P lt;0. 00001] , but the mortality [ OR =1. 11, 95% CI ( 0. 83, 1. 49) ,P =0. 47] and length of ICU stay[ MD = 0. 49, 95% CI( - 1. 44, 2. 42) , P = 0. 62] were not significantly different. Conclusions An algorithmbased on serial PCT measurements would allow a more judicious use of antibiotics than currently traditional treatment of patients with severe infections in ICU. It can reduce the use of antibiotics and appears to be safe.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Methods Literatures relating to randomized controlled trials in English and Chinese on the comparison of clinical effectiveness after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in appendicitis from PubMed，Wiley Online Library，Medline，Embase，Cochrane，CNKI，VIP，CBM databases were extracted，and methodological quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently with designed extraction form. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.2 software was used for data analysis. The wound infection，hospitalization time，operation time，hospitalization expenses，and peritoneal abscess were compared between laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Results Eight published reports of eligible studies were extracted. Compared with the open appendectomy， laparoscopic appendectomy had significant differences in lower wound infection rate 〔OR=0.19，95%CI （0.09，0.38），P＜0.000 01〕， longer operation time 〔WMD=3.66，95%CI （0.50，6.82），P=0.02〕，and more hospitalization expenses〔WMD=503.96，95%CI （337.23，670.70），P＜0.000 01〕.But there were no significant differences in hospitalization time〔WMD=-0.11，95%CI （-3.64，3.43），P=0.95〕 and incidence rate of peritoneal abscess 〔OR=1.40，95%CI （0.23，8.64），P=0.71〕 between laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Conclusions The wound infection rate is lower，but the operation time is longer，the hospitalization expenses is more in laparoscopic appendectomy as compared with open appendectomy. There are no statistically significant differences of hospitalization time and incidence rate of abdominal abscess between laparoscopic and open appendectomy.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib and TACE only treating the intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Chinese people. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data for randomized controlled trials (RCT) on TACE combined with sorafenib (TACE combined with sorafenib group) and TACE (TACE alone group) from inception to December 2014 were searched. The literatures and data were screened and extracted. The meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsSix RCTs involving 498 patients with HCC were included. The results of meta analysis showed that the objective response rate[OR=2.28, 95% CI (1.52-3.42), P < 0.000 1] and the disease control rate[OR=6.62, 95% CI (4.12-10.65), P < 0.000 01] were higher, the 1-year survival rate[OR=3.27, 95% CI (2.06-5.22), P < 0.000 01] and 2-year survival rate[OR=4.55, 95% CI (2.28-9.07), P < 0.000 1] were longer, the safety and tolerability of adverse reactions were better in the TACE combined with sorafenib group as compared with the TACE alone group. ConclusionsIn Chinese people, compared with TACE alone group, TACE combined with sorafenib group have higher objective response rate, disease control rate, 1-year survival rate, and 2-year survival rate. However, due to the lower quality of included literatures, these conclusions should be treated cautiously.
Objective To provide a comprehensive overview of model performance and predictive efficacy of machine learning techniques to predict septic shock in children, in order to target and improve the quality and predictive power of models for future studies. MethodsTo systematically review all studies in four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, CNKI, WanFang Data) on machine learning prediction of septic shock in children before April 1, 2024. Two investigators independently conducted literature screening, literature data extraction and bias assessment, and conducted a systematic review of basic information, research data, study design and prediction models. Model discrimination, which area under the curve (AUC), was pooled using a random-effects model and meta-analysis was performed. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample sizes, machine learning models, types of predictors, number of predictors, etc. And publication bias and sensitivity analyses were performed for the included literature. Results A total of 11 studies were included, of which 2 were at low risk of bias, 7 were at unknown risk of bias, and 2 were at high risk of bias. The data used in the included studies included both public and non-public electronic medical record databases, and the machine learning models used included logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and XGBoost, etc. The predictive models constructed based on different databases appeared to have different results in terms of the characteristic variables, so identifying the key variables of the predictive models requires further validation on other datasets. Meta-analysis showed the pooled AUC of 0.812 (95%CI 0.763 to 0.860, P<0.001), and further subgroup analyses showed that larger sample sizes (≥1 000) and predictor variable types significantly improved the predictive effect of the model, and the difference in AUC was statistically significant (95%CI not overlapping). The funnel plot showed that there was publication bias in the study, and when the extreme AUC values were excluded, the meta-analysis yielded a total AUC of 0.815 (95%CI 0.769 to 0.861, P<0.001), indicating that the extreme AUC values were insensitive. ConclusionMachine learning technology has shown some potential in predicting septic shock in children, but the quality of existing research needs to be strengthened, and future research work should improve the quality of research and improve the prediction effect of the model by expanding the sample size.
Objective To determine the effectiveness and safety of weekly versus three weekly regimens of taxanes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2008), PubMed (1966 to May 2008), EMbase (1974 to May 2008), and CBM (1978 to May 2008) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared weekly and three weekly regimens of taxanes for NSCLC. Data collection was undertaken by two reviewers independently; the methodological quality was assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook 4.2.6; and the meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Nine RCTs involving 1 438 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed: (1) There were no significant differences in the efficacy between weekly and three weekly regimens of taxanes regarding the one-year survival rate (paclitaxel: RR=1.24, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.86; docetaxel: RR=0.80, 95%CI 0.51 to 1.23) and the overall response rate (paclitaxel: RR=1.03, 95%CI 0.72 to 1.49; docetaxel: RR=0.98 95%CI 0.64 to 1.49). (2) The incidence of neutropenia was less serious in the weekly group (paclitaxel: RR=0.74, 95%CI 0.56 to 0.97; docetaxel: RR=0.22, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.30), while no significant differences existed in other adverse effects such as anemia and nausea/vomiting. Conclusion The efficacy of weekly and three weekly regimens of taxanes for the treatment of NSCLC is similar. The incidence of neutropenia is lower in the weekly group while other toxicities show no differences.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of totally thorascopic (TT) and median sternotomy (MS) approaches for atrial septal defect repair (ASDR). MethodsDatabases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2016), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched from inception to June 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials or cohort studies about TT vs. MS approaches for ASDR. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 11 cohort studies involving 687 patients were included with 305 patients in the TT group, and 382 patients in the MS group. The results of meta-analysis showed that: The TT group had shorter postoperative ventilation time (MD=-1.49, 95%CI -2.27 to -0.71, P=0.000 2), postoperative ICU stay time (MD=-7.30, 95%CI -12.07 to -2.53, P=0.003), hospital stay time (MD=-2.06, 95%CI -2.80 to -1.32, P<0.000 01) and less postoperative drainage (MD=-199.83, 95%CI -325.96 to -73.70, P=0.002) than the MS group. But the bypass time (MD=9.42, 95%CI 1.55 to 17.30, P=0.02) and aortic clamping time (MD 6.78, 95%CI 3.48 to 10.07, P<0.000 1) of the TT group were significantly longer than those of the MS group. ConclusionCompared with MS, TT can significantly reduce the length of postoperative ventilation, postoperative ICU stay, hospital stay and postoperative drainage. But there are risks of prolonged bypass time and aortic clamping time in the TT group. Due to the quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions still needs to be verified by carrying out more studies.
Objective To compare the effects of high and low positive end-expiratory pressure( PEEP) levels on mortality and risk of barotrauma in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ( ARDS) . Methods Randomized controlled trials ( RCTs) were recruited from PubMed( 1966-2008. 9) ,EMBASE( 1980-2008. 9) , Cochrane Database ( Issue 2, 2008) , Chinese Cochrane Centre Database and CBMdisc ( 1978-2008. 9) . Related published and unpublished data and attached references were hand searched. All RCTs about ventilation with PEEP for patients with ARDS were included, then a systematic review were performed. Results Five eligible trials were enrolled in the systematic review. According to ventilation strategy, all trials were divided into subgroup A( low tidal volumes + high PEEP vs traditional tidal volumes + low PEEP) and subgroup B( low tidal volumes + high PEEP vs low tidal volumes + low PEEP) . In subgroup A, high PEEP was associated with a lower mortality[ RR 0. 59, 95%CI( 0. 43, 0. 82) ] and a lower prevalence of barotraumas [ RR 0. 24, 95% CI( 0. 09, 0. 70) ] in patients with ARDS. In subgroup B, the difference in mortality[ RR 0. 97, 95%CI( 0. 83, 1. 13) ] and barotraumas[ RR 1. 13, 95% CI( 0. 78, 1. 63) ]were not significant. Conclusions As compared with conventional ventilation, low tidal volumes and high PEEP ventilation strategy is associated with improved survival and a lower prevalence of barotraumas in patients with ARDS. It is necessary to further confirm the role of sole high PEEP in the ventilation strategy.