ObjectiveTo study the research hot spots of ophthalmology-related coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MethodsPubMed database as the data source, the literatures of ophthalmology-related COVID-19 published on January 1, 2020 to February 22, 2022 were collected, limited to Medline included, the language type was limited to English and Chinese, and 1 592 literatures were included. By reading the titles and abstracts, the literatures of meeting notice, editor's note, etc. and the literature that was not quite relevant with ophthalmology-related COVID-19 were removed, and finally 1 547 literatures were included. Bibliographic Items Co-occurrence Matrix Builder (BICOMB 2.02 software) was used to collect the frequency of major Mesh terms/subheadings and the frequency of major Mesh terms after removing the subheadings, and the number of included articles published in the top 10 journals by the number of ophthalmology-related COVID-19 articles was recorded. VosViewer 1.6.18 software was used for cluster analysis of collaborator network and major Mesh terms, and the publication status and country or region distribution of active authors of ophthalmology-related COVID-19 were recorded. ResultsOf the 1 547 literatures, the active authors were mainly from India, Italy, Singapore, Spain, and Hong Kong, China, and so on; the top 10 journals published 617 articles in total (39.88%, 617/1 547). The high frequency major Mesh terms/subheadings included COVID-19, viral pneumonia, coronavirus infection, eye diseases/epidemiology, complications, prevention & control, diagnosis, virology, and Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, betacoronavirus/isolation & purification, ophthalmology/education, organization & administration, telemedicine, delivery of health care/organization & administration, and mucormycosis/diagnosis, etc. After taking out the subheadings, the high frequency of major Mesh terms also included conjunctivitis, orbital disease, retinal diseases, neuromyelitis optica, retinal vein occlusion, myopia and other eye diseases, eye diseases-related systemic diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and Miller Fisher syndrome, therapy and prevention-related drugs, such as hydroxyl chloroquine, angiogenesis inhibitors, and vaccination. ConclusionsOphthalmology-related COVID-19 researches have received extensive attention worldwide, COVID-19 is associated with multiple ocular diseases of anterior and posterior segments. COVID-19-related mucormycosis, hydroxychloroquine and possible retinal toxicity, and possible ocular adverse effects associated with vaccination are also noteworthy.
ObjectiveTo compare the quantitative measurements of the retinal capillary nonperfusion areas in a cohort of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients with fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA) and swept source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA), and to determine the intrapersonal variability between examiners.MethodsA cross-sectional study. Eighteen eyes of eleven PDR patients diagnosed in Department of ophthalmology of Henan Provincial People's Hospital from September 2019 to January 2020 were included in this study. FFA was performed using Spectralis HRA+OCT (Germany Heidelberg Company) from and SS-OCTA was performed using VG200D (China Vision Micro Image Corporation). SS-OCTA was used to collect images of retinal layer, superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP). The same observation area was 80°×60° for SS-OCTA and 55° for FFA with both setting centered on the fovea. The forty-nine retinal capillary nonperfusion areas were observed. The area measurement was completed independently by three examiners. Paired sample t test or paired sample Wilcoxon test were used to compare the measured values of retinal capillary nonperfusion areas between the two examination methods and among the three examiners.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the retinal layer, SCP and DCP nonperfusion area measured by FFA and SS-OCTA among the three examiners (P＞0.05), and the consistency is good (consistency correlation coefficient＞0.9, P＜0.05). The nonperfusion area measured by FFA was 0.786 mm2. The median nonperfusion area of retinal layer and SCP measured by SS-OCTA were 0.787 mm2 and 0.791 mm2, respectively, and the average nonperfusion area of DCP was 0.878±0.366 mm2. The nonperfusion area of retinal layer and SCP measured by FFA and SS-OCTA showed no statistically significant difference (P=0.054, 0.198). The nonperfusion area of DCP measured by SS-OCTA was significantly larger than that of FFA, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.001). The results of repeatability analysis showed that 93.88% (46/49) of the DCP nonperfusion area data measured by SS-OCTA were greater than those measured by FFA.ConclusionThe retinal nonperfusion area of DCP in PDR patients measured by SS-OCTA is larger than that of FFA.