Objective To compare the clinical effects of early enteral and parenteral nutrition, and to study their effects on cytokine release, cellular immune function and protein metabolism in early postoperative patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Methods Thirty-six patients with gastrointestinal cancer were randomly divided into early postoperative enteral nutrition (EN) group (19 cases) and parenteral nutrition (PN) group (17 cases), and they were supported with EN or PN during postoperative period of 1-7 days, respectively. The levels of serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were measured by ELISA. The total lymphocyte count (TLC) and subgroups of lymphocyte (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8 and NK cell) were determined with flow cytometer. The urea and creatinine of the 24 h excretory urine were examined at four different phases: preoperative (pre), 1st d, 3rd d and 5th d after operation (pod). The clinical recovery indicators and the complication incidence were also observed. Results All the patients followed the project of nutritional support and relevant examinations, and there was no severe complication and no patient died during the research. The IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10, the 24 h urea and creatinine increased, while the serum TNF-α and TLC (except 3, 5 pod of EN group) decreased. There was no marked change of the proportion of lymphocyte subgroups after operation and there was no significant difference of the changes of IL-1β, IL-10 and TNF-α between the two groups as well. The levels of IL-6 (3, 5 pod), the 24 h urea (3, 5 pod) and creatinine (3, 5 pod) were significantly lower in EN group than those in PN group （P＜0.05）, whereas TLC (3, 5 pod) were significantly higher than that in EN group （P＜0.05）. In addition, the postoperative infection incidence （10.5% vs 35.3%）, fever duaration, rehabilitation time and medical cost were significantly lower in EN group than those in PN group （P＜0.05）.Conclusion The early postoperative EN has an advantage over PN in the patients with gastrointestinal cancer, which could decrease the release of cytokine and suppress protein metabolism resulting from operational stress, and could reduce the incidence of postoperative infection and inflammatory reaction time. They could also improve the cellular immune function and decrease the rebilitation duration and medical cost.
【摘要】 目的 观察慢性心力衰竭营养支持治疗的疗效。 方法 将2007年1月〖CD3/5〗2009年10月期间收治的56例慢性心力衰竭住院患者随机分为常规治疗组及强化营养支持治疗组,每组28例患者。其中,强化治疗组是在常规治疗的基础上,给与强化营养支持治疗。比较两组治疗前后6 min步行距离、NYHA心功能评级及射血分数。 结果 治疗后,患者6 min步行距离、心功能评级强化营养治疗组优于常规治疗组。左心室射血分数两组无差异。 结论 对慢性心力衰竭患者,营养支持治疗是重要的治疗手段。【Abstract】 Objective To study the efficacy of nutritional support treatment for chronic heart failure. Methods 56 patients with chronic heart failure hospitalized patients were randomly divided into conventional therapy group and enhanced nutritional support therapy group, 28 patients in each group. Where enhenced therapy group is on the basis of conventional therapy to give extra enhanced intensive nutrition support treatment. Before and after treatment were compared sixminutes walking distance, NYHA cardiac function class, ejection fraction, mortality. Results After treatment, patients with sixminutes walking distance, cardiac function class,enhanced nutritional support therapy group is better than conventional treatment group. Left ventricular ejection fraction was no difference. Conclusion Patients with chronic heart failure, nutritional support treatment is an important treatment.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of nutritional support with different proportion of fat on the prognosis of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP). Methods Ninety SCAP patients with nutritional risk treated between January 2014 and July 2015 were randomized into high, normal, and low-proportion fat groups with 30 patients in each. The patients in different groups underwent nutritional support with different fat proportion besides the same medication. Data of albumin, pre-albumin and transferrin were collected and analyzed before treatment and 10 days after treatment. The mortality rates were compared between groups. Results Albumin, pre-albumin and transferrin were similar in all groups before intervention (P>0.05); albumin, pre-albumin and transferrin increased significantly 10 days after treatment in each group (P<0.05). Patients in the normal-fat group acquired significantly more obvious improvements on each index (P<0.05). A shorter length of stay in hospital was observed in the normal-proportion fat group compared with the high and low-proportion fat groups, but there was no significant differences among groups (P>0.05). On the 10th day, the normal -proportion fat proportion group had a significantly higher cure rate and a significantly lower mortality rate than the other two groups (P<0.05). The improvement rate was similar in all groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Supportive treatment with normal fat proportion has a promising value in the improvement of albumin, pre-albumin and transferrin for SCAP patients with a shorter length of stay in hospital, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Objective To observe the effect of parenteral nutrition (PN) on the protein storage and immunofunction in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods PN regimes consisted of nonprotein calories (NPC) 20-25 kcal/(kg·d) and nitrogen 0.15-0.20 g/(kg·d), the energy ratio of the glucose and fat emulsion was 2∶1. The PN solution was infused by total nutrition admixture (TNA), 12-16 hours per day for 7 days in 21 liver cirrhosis patients. Perior to the surgery and at 1st, 4th, 7th postoperative day, serum pre-Alb, transferrin (TSF), immunofunction (IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE, CH50, C3, C4, CD3, CD4, CD8, NKC), and nitrogen balance were tested. Results Serum pre-Alb, TSF, nitrogen balance and IgG, IgE, CH50, CD3, CD4, NKC were significantly decreased (Ｐ＜0.05), but the foregoing indices were higher than those of postoperative 1, 4d as compared with postoperative 7d. Conclusion These results bly indicated that postoperative nutritional support is safe and useful, and improve the patient’s nutritional status and immunofunction.
ObjectiveTo introduce the progresses and applications of nutritional status assessment in hospitalized patients. MethodsThe related literatures of nutritional status assessment were reviewed. ResultsThe rates of malnutrition and nutritional risk were high in hospitalized patients worldwide. Traditional nutrition assessment tools were not in common use in all hospitalized patients. All clinical health care workers should use the most suitable tool when faced with different patients. ConclusionAll hospitalized patients should be screened for nutritional risk on admission in order to improve clinical outcomes and reduce overall treatment costs.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition (EN+PN) and enteral nutrition alone (EN) in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of EN+PN and EN in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy from inception to September 25th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 23 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared to EN group, EN+PN group had a shorter hospital stay (MD=−1.75, 95%CI −2.45 to −1.05, P<0.000 1) and a lower risk of postoperative complications (RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.66, P<0.000 1). However, there was no statistical difference in the first exhaust time between the two groups. ConclusionThe current evidence shows that EN+PN may contribute to reducing the incidence of postoperative complications and shortening the length of hospital stay in gastric cancer patients. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo explore the role of nutritional support in adjuvant therapy for respiratory failure. MethodsWe took 72 patients with respiratory failure who were treated in our hospital from August 2011 to January 2013 as the research objects. They were divided into two groups:control group and trial group, with 36 patients in each group. The division of the groups was in accordance with the state food and drug administration clinical trial institution ethics committee standard operating procedures. In the control group, 36 patients were provided with regular treatments according to their condition, like maintaining the respiratory tract unobstructed, oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation and anti-infection. In the trial group, we offered nutritional support in addition to the normal treatment. Consecutive 20 days was a course of treatment. After four courses, we inspected and put down two groups' respective clinical features, and made a contrast of their treatment conditions. We analyzed the treatments through observational indexes including assessment of eutrophication, treatment efficiency, pulmonary function and arterial blood gases. ResultsBoth groups had obvious therapeutic effects. The observational indexes in the trial group were better than those in the control group. The total effective rate was 91.7% in the trail group after treatment, significantly higher than that in the control group (66.7%) (χ2=8.692, P=0.003); the lung capacity, the ventilation flow ratio and arterial blood gas analysis values in the trial group was better than those in the control group. ConclusionThe effect of the nutritional support for the respiratory failure treatment is much better than the regular treatment. The total effective rate is improved while the death rate is lower than before and the patients recover quickly.
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the treatment of choice for critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability who require renal replacement therapy. This review summarizes the impact of CRRT treatment on nutritional support in critically ill patients, including: energy increase caused by citrate-based anticoagulants, energy loss caused by glucose-free replacement fluid and dialysate, a large amount of amino acids loss in the effluent, and the influences on the way of lipid emulsion administration, capacity, electrolyte, vitamins, and trace elements. It is hoped that the intensive care unit doctors, nephrologists, and nutritionists can fully cooperate to determine the CRRT prescription and the nutritional support prescription.
ObjectiveTo investigate the nutritional risk, incidence of malnutrition, and clinical application of nutrition support in hospitalized patients with gastric cancer by the nutritional risk screening (NRS) 2002 score summary table. MethodsFrom June 2009 to February 2010, nutritional risk screen and application of clinical nutritional support were carried out in the hospitalized patients with gastric cancer in this hospital. Nutritional risk was assessed case-by-case according to the severity of illness, nutritional status 〔including body mass index (BMI), recent changes in body weight and eating〕 and patients age. NRS ≥3 was accepted as nutritionally at-risk, while NRS lt;3 no nutritional risk; BMI lt;18.5 kg/m2 (or albumin lt;30 g/L) combined with clinical conditions was judged to be malnourished. Results Three hundreds and eighty-six patients were included, 329 of which completed the NRS2002 screening. One hundred and sixty-five patients (50.15%) were at nutritional risk, while another 164 (49.85%) were no nutritional risk. Malnutrition was found in 57 patients (17.33%). By gender, male malnourished patients and nutritionally at-risk patients were accounting for 16.45% (38/231) and 48.05% (111/231) respectively, while female nutritionally at-risk patients and malnourished patients were accounting for 55.1% (54/98) and 19.39% (19/98) respectively, 72.04% (237/329) of the screened patients accepted clinical nutrition support, among which, 115 patients were at nutritional risk, accounting for 69.70% in that group, and 122 patients were no nutritional risk, accounting for 74.39% in that group. ConclusionsThe incidences of malnutrition and nutritionally at-risk in hospitalized gastric cancer patients are high. And irrationality of clinical nutrition support exists. Evidence-based guidelines are required to improve the nutritional status of support.
Objective To investigate the status of nutrition, nutritional support, and postoperative nutrition-related complications in patients with spinal deformity during orthopedic perioperative period. Methods From February to August 2021, patients who underwent spinal orthopedic surgery for spinal deformity in Peking University Third Hospital were collected. A survey was conducted using self-designed questionnaire, including patient’s general information (gender, age, and type of spinal deformity), nutrition-related information (risks of malnutrition, forms of nutritional support), and postoperative nutrition-related complications. Results A total of 39 patients with spinal deformity were enrolled, and 46.2% (18 cases) were at risk of malnutrition. There were a total of 174 times of nutritional support, and 96.0% (167 times) were parenteral nutrition. The patients’ energy intake from nutritional support accounted for 34.41% of the daily goal energy intake averagely. At admission, one day after operation, and at discharge, the prealbumin was (215.51±34.69), (172.85±31.85), and (163.67±29.15) mg/L, respectively, and the hemoglobin was (138.08±15.67), (119.92±18.01), and (117.69±14.76) g/L, respectively, which were significantly lower one day after operation and at discharge than those at admission (P<0.01). The incidence of postoperative nutrition-related complications during hospitalization was 5.1% (2/39). Conclusions Patients undergoing spinal deformity orthopedics are at high risk of overall malnutrition during the perioperative period, their clinical nutritional interventions are mostly based on parenteral nutrition with a single infusion of nutritional preparations, and the nutritional status is not significantly improved. However, the incidence of postoperative nutrition-related complications is low. Standardized nutrition interventions should be strengthened in the future.