Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection in treating viral hepatitis.Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CNKI from 1978 to June 2007. We identified randomized control led trials of Kai Shi injection versus other medicines or blank controlin treating viral hepatitis. The quality of included trials was evaluated independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.7 software. Results Fourteen studies involving 1 218 patients were included, one of these compared lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection versus Mai Anding injection, one compared lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection versus potassium-magnesium aspartate injection, and the other 12 compared Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection versus blank control. Allincluded studies were assessed in terms of randomization, allocation concealment and blinding; and all were graded C(poor quality). Meta-analyses showed that, the total effective rate was significantly higher in the lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection group[RR 1.45, 95%CI (1.29, 1.63)] and the mortality was lower[RR 0.66, 95%CI (0.53, 0.83)] compared with the blank control group, but the incidence of phlebitis was significantlyhigher [RR 7.70, 95%CI (2.57, 23.07)]. There was no significant di f ference between Mai Anding inject ion and lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection in the total effective rate, but Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection was more effective in improving patients’ liver functions. Compared with potassium-magnesium aspartate injection, the total effective rate was significantly higher in the lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection group[RR1.54, 95%CI (1.14, 2.08)].Conclusion The evidence currently available shows that the effectiveness and safety of lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection are not significantly different from those of Mai Anding injection for patients with viral hepatitis. Compared with potassium-magnesium aspartate injection, Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection could significantly improve the total effective rate, but since we only include 1 relevant randomized trials, the strength of this evidence is weak. When compared with the blank control, Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection significantly improved the total effective rate, decreased mortality but increased the incidence of side effects and the existing evidence is insufficiant to show whether Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection improves patients’ liver functions.
Perineal care is a classic topic for obstetrics. After thousands of years of practice, we have accumulated some experience and meanwhile, we are also taking some attempts. The effectiveness and reliability of these methods need evaluation. Nowadays, the best evidence comes from randomized controlled trials (RCT) and systematic reviews (SR). We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2007), MEDLINE (Jan. 1980 to May 2007) databases and CBM-disc (Jan. 1980 to May 2007) to obtain current best evidence for perineal care.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of mytomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil for trabeculectomy. Methods We electronically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2008), EMbase (1947 to October 2008), CMBdisk (1979 to October 2008).We also handsearched relevant conference proceedings. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently using an extraction form. The Cochrane Collaboration’ s RevMan 5.0 software was used for statistical analyses. Results Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 482 participants (495eyes) were identified. The trials enrolled three types of participants (high risk of failure, moderate risk of failure, low risk of failure). As for high risk of failure, compared with mytomycin C, 5-fluorouracil appeared to increase the rate of postoperative complications (RR –5.74, 95%CI –9.91, –1.58). No significant differences were found in postoperative mean intraocular pressure(IOP) (WMD –?2.31, 95%CI –?7.34, 2.71), success rate (RR 1.13, 95%CI 0.91, 1.39) and visual acuity ≥3-line decrease (RR 1.46, 95%CI 0.43, 4.94). As for low risk of failure, there were no significant differences in success rate (RR 1.10, 95%CI 0.99, 1.22) and postoperative complications (RR 1.00, 95%CI –6.21, 8.21). Conclusion In both groups of high risk and low risk of failure, there are no significant differences in postoperative mean IOP and success rate. However, in the group of high risk of failure, compared with 5-fluorouracil, mytomycin C appears to raise the rate of postoperative complications; the rate of reducing the eyes pressure cannot be concluded based on current evidence. However, as the number of the studied cases is rather small and the period of observation is also limited, long-term follow-up of multi-central RCTs with a larger number of cases are still needed before definite conclusions can be made. Further studies are also needed to better determine the pharmacokinetics and cost-effective analyses involving the use of the two agents for glaucoma filtering surgery.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for improving mental health and social functions in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2016), CBM and CNKI from inception to May 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCT) about CBT on mental health and social function in patients with MS. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 1 102 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the HADS scores (depression: MD=-1.28, 95%CI-2.07 to-0.48, P=0.002; anxiety: MD=-1.52, 95%CI-2.99 to-0.06, P=0.04), BDI scores (MD=-9.11, 95% CI-15.82 to-2.40, P=0.008), HRDS scores (MD=-7.23, 95% CI-13.65 to-0.82, P=0.03), Chalder scores (MD=-4.88, 95% CI-6.61 to-3.16, P < 0.000 01), MFIS scores (MD=-2.98, 95% CI-4.52 to-1.44, P=0.000 2) and GHQ-12 scores (MD=-3.61, 95%CI-5.20 to-2.02, P < 0.000 01) in the CBT group were lower than that in the control group. No significant difference was found in WSAS scores (MD=-1.98, 95%CI-4.88 to 0.93, P=0.18) between two groups. ConclusionCBT may be effective for improving the negative mental experience, fatigue and quality of life in MS. No evidence to support CBT has benefits in social functions. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be verified by more high quality studies.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy, safety and economics of digestive enzyme for dyspepsia. Methods Electronic databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CBM, VIP and CNKI were searched from establishment dates of databases to June 2010 to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of digestive enzyme for dyspepsia. Then studies were identified according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their quality was evaluated. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Eight studies involving 1 092 patients were included, 3 of which were Grade B while the rest were Grade C. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the total efficacy rate of oryz-aspergillus enzyme and pancreatin tablet, compound digestive enzymes capsule, and compound azintamide enteric-coated tablet for dyspepsia were better than either placebo or blank intervention, with the results as (OR=49.70, 95%CI 17.16 to 143.96), (OR=7.71, 95%CI 3.88 to 15.33) and (OR=16.27, 95%CI 6.85 to 38.66), respectively. The efficacy for treating loss of appetite, abdominal distension, abdominal pain, diarrhea and belching was superior to either placebo or blank intervention. Oryz-aspergillus enzyme and pancreatin tablet was inferior to compound digestive enzyme capsule in treating dyspepsia following cholecystectomy. No significant difference was observed in treating dyspepsia following chronic pancreatitis between compound azintamide enteric-coated tablet and compound digestive enzymes capsule. Drug-related adverse reactions as well as economic evaluation were not reported in included studies. Conclusion Digestive enzyme is effective for dyspepsia caused by various diseases. The OR of digestive enzyme versus the placebo/blank-control group shows that oryz-aspergillus enzyme and pancreatin tablet is better than other digestive enzyme drugs.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of different drugs for patients with methamphetamine-induced psychotic disorders by network meta-analysis.MethodsAn electronical search was conducted in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and VIP databases from inception to October 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about different drugs for methamphetamine-induced psychotic disorders. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk bias of included studies, and then RevMan 5.3, R 3.3.2 and JAGS 4.2.0 softwares were used to perform network meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 676 patients and 9 kinds of drugs were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that: compared with the placebo group, olanzapine (OR=28.00, 95%CI 8.10 to 110.00), risperidone (OR=20.00, 95%CI 7.70 to 58.00), quetiapine (OR=30.00, 95%CI 6.60 to 160.00), ziprasidone (OR=28.00, 95%CI 3.70 to 230.00), chlorpromazine (OR=29.00, 95%CI 5.00 to 200.00), aripiprazole (OR=13.00, 95%CI 1.70 to 93.00), haloperidol (OR=19.00, 95%CI 2.10 to 190.00) could significantly improve the psychotic disorders of patients with methamphetamine, respectively, in which quetiapine was the best choice. There were no significant differences between any other pairwise comparisons of these different drugs.ConclusionFor the treatment of psychotic disorders caused by methamphetamine, quetiapine should be of a priority choice, follows by ziprasidone, chlorpromazine, olanzapine, risperidone, aripiprazole or haloperidol in a descending priority. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of core training for diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) in postpartum period. MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on core training for patients with DRA postpartum from inception to December 7, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 12 RCTs were included, involving 741 patients with DRA postpartum. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that core training significantly reduced inter-recti distance (IRD) above the umbilicus (SMD=−1.37, 95%CI −2.30 to −0.44, P<0.05), below the umbilicus (SMD=−0.82, 95%CI −1.28 to −0.36, P<0.05), at the level of the umbilicus during contraction of the rectus abdominis (RA) (SMD=−0.76, 95%CI −1.24 to −0.28, P<0.05) and above the umbilicus during RA contraction (SMD=−3.41, 95%CI −5.12 to −1.69, P<0.05) in patients with DRA postpartum. Additionally, the results indicated that core training could improve visual analogue scale, abdominal circumference, waist-hip ratio, lumbopelvic control impairment, lumbopelvic proprioception, the static and dynamic overall balance stability, the static and dynamic anterior-posterior balance stability, medial-lateral static balance stability and Oswestry disability index in patients with DRA postpartum (P<0.05). However, no significant improvement was observed in inter-recti distance (IRD) below the umbilicus during RA contraction, the score of inventory of functional status after childbirth questionnaire, the score of multidimensional body-self relations questionnaire, medial-lateral dynamic balance stability or the score of pelvic floor impact questionnaire in patients with DRA postpartum (P>0.05). ConclusionCore training may improve IRD, pain intensity, total abdominal fat and fat distribution and balance in patients with DRA postpartum, but its efficacy in improving postpartum functional status, body image satisfaction or the degree of dysfunction is unclear. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To assess the efficacy, safety, and economy of Total flavones of Hippophae Rhamnoides L. (TFH) for Essential Hypertension. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE (1950 to June 2009), EMbase (1980 to June 2009), CNKI (1995 to June 2009), and VIP (1989 to June 2009). We also handsearched the relevant journals and conference proceedings. Then we screened the retrieved studies according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the quality of the included studies, and performed meta-analyses using the Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5.0 software. Results Only seven trials involving 644 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that TFH had the similar effects to calcium-channel blocker (CCB) (WMD 2.34, 95%CI –0.86 to 5.53) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) (WMD –0.01, 95%CI – 0.97 to 0.95) in decreasing diastolic blood pressure, but TFH plus CCB was superior to CCB in decreasing systolic blood pressure (Plt;0.000 01) and diastolic blood pressure (Plt;0.000 01). TFH was inferior to ACEI in improving left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) (Plt;0.000 01) and inter ventricular septum thickness (IVST) (Plt;0.000 01), but TFH plus CCB was more effective in improving LVPWT (Plt;0.000 01) and IVST (Plt;0.000 01). Moreover, TFH was similar to ACEI in regulating blood β2-microglobulin (WMD –0.57, 95%CI –1.18 to 0.04), creatinine clearance rate (P=0.19), and urinary albumin value in 24 hours (P=0.42). The incidence of adverse effects was significantly lower in the TFH group compared to the ACEI group. Conclusion The evidence available shows that TFH may decrease systolic and diastolic blood
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of triple-antiplatelet treatment based on Cilostazol for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2009), PubMed (1966 to 2009), EMbase (1974 to 2009), CNKI (1994 to 2009), CBM (1978 to Feb. 2009), VIP (1989 to Feb. 2009), and CMD Digital Periodicals (1998 to 2009). Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2 348 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that triple-antiplatelet treatment based on Cilostazol could increase minimum lumen diameter (MD=0.31, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.51) and decrease restenosis rate (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.65). In addition, it could decrease death rate (OR=0.52, 95%CI 0.31 to 0.88), but it could not change target-vessel revascularization, stroke rate, palpitation rate, and the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events and major adverse cardiac events. Conclusion Evidence shows that triple-antiplatelet treatment based on Cilostazol could increase minimum lumen diameter and decrease restenosis rate and death rate. Their clinical application is worthy to be advocated.
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of polyethersulfone highflux dialyzer for uremic patients. Methods Forty eligible uremic patients were randomized into two groups, i.e. polyethersulfone (PES) group and polysulfone(PSF) group, according to a random number table. The PES group received hemodialysis for 4 hours with polyethersulfone highflux dialyzer (Chengdu OCI Medical Device Co., Ltd), and the PSF group with polysulfone highflux dialyzers (Fresenius Polysulfones, Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany). Changes in serum creatinine, urea, β2-microglobulin, hemoglobin and albumin levels were determined for efficacy and safety evaluation. Results All the 40 patients completed the trial. The serum creatinine, urea, β2-microglobulin levels of all the patients in the two groups decreased (gt;30%) after the hemodialysis with different highflux dialyzers, and no significant difference was observed between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). Changes in solute clearance index (KT/V) value, hemoglobin and albumin levels were also comparable between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions The efficacy and safety of the PES hollow fiber membrane hemodialyzer is equivalent to that of the PSF hemodialyzer in hemodialysis for uremic patients.