Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine (PPC) for chronic hepatitis. Methods We searched EMBASE (1980May,2003), MEDLINE(1966May,2003), CBM (1979May,2003), The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003 and handsearched 8 related Chinese journals. Randomized controlled trials(RCT) comparing PPC versus placebo/no treatment for chronic hepatitis were included with no restrictions of blinding, language and publication. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and assessed the quality . Data were entered and analyzed by RevMan 4.2 software supplied by the Cochrane Collaboration .Results Six high quality trials involving 568 patients were included. Four studies involving 451 patients showed the clinical effective rate of PPC for chronic hepatitis was 52.5% while the control group was 37.5% with statistical difference [RR1.81,95%CI(1.41,2.33),Z=4.69, Plt;0.00001].A meta-analysis involving three studies with 100 patients showed the PPC can statically improve histopathology of chronic hepatitis comparing with control group [RR 2.58,95%CI (1.61,4.15),Z=3.91,Plt;0.0001].No serious adverse events were reported.Conclusions PPC is a safe medicine used for treating chronic viral hepatitis and may relieve clinical symptoms and signs.At the same time ,it has positive effect on hepatic histopathology for patients .However ,more high quality clinical trials are required.
Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy(RT) for endometrial cancer compared to other treatmen. Method The following electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBAS, CancerLit, CBMdisc, CNKI. The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2007). Correlative websites, such as ‘google’, were searched by hand. The studies included in the references of eligible studies were additionally searched RCTs of adjuvant radiotherapy before March, 2007 comparing adjuvant radiotherapy with other treatment for endometrial cancer were included. Eligible RCTs were assessed for quality by two reviewers independently: criteria of concealment of treatment, blinding, standard validity and reliability of outcome measures, withdraw rate, intention-to-treat analysis and homogeneity between centers were analyzed for each study. All data were performed by a meta-analysis. Result Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria/ Methodological quality was level B. Five RCTs were compared adjuvant radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and /or intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT) with other treatment, Two RCTs including one RCT was compared two different fractionation schedules for postoperative vagina high-dose-rate(HDR) irradiation in endometrial carcinoma the other RCT was compared two different radiotherapy method (pelvic radiotherapy and vagina radiotherapy vs vagina radiotherapy) for endometrial carcinoma. No survival different were identified; none of the studies was powered enough to show a survival benefit. But who received RT had fewer local (pelvic and/or vagina) recurrences compared to women not receiving RT. Adverse effects is found more often in RT than in not RT, there is less localrecurrences in combined radiotherapy (pelvic radiotherapy and vagina radiotherapy) than in vagina radiotherapy. lowdose vagina radiotherapy had few vagina shortening than high-dose radiotherapy, there are the same 5-overall surviva, local recurrences and distant recurrences. Conclusions Adjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial can cer can better control local recurrences than observation for postoperative endometrial cancer. Effects about overall survival, distant recurrences and disease-free survival are similar; low-dose vagina radiotherapy has few vagina shortening than high-dose radiotherapy, there are the same 5-years overall survival, local recurrences and distant recurrences for endometrial cancer, there is less local recurrences in combined radiotherapy (pelvic radiotherapy plus vagina radiotherapy) than in vagina radiotherapy for endometrial cancer; postoperative high-dose brachytherapy can get good cost-effectiveness; Effect of adjuvant radiotherapy for overall survival and disease-free survival of endometrial carcinoma are needed to further assessed by rigorously designs, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials adjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial carcinoma.
Objective To determine the effect of non-reamed versus reamed intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures in adults on the rates of nonunion, the rates of implant failure, the rates of infection, the incidence of compartment syndrome, the rates of malunion, and the time of union. Methods We searched MEDLINE （1966 -July, 2005）, EMBASE （1974 -July, 2005 ）, The Cochrane Library （Issue 2, 2005 ）and CBMdisc （1979 -July, 2005 ）, and handsearched the relevant Chinese and English orthopedic journals. Randomized controlled trials and Clinical controlled trials of nonreamed versus reamed intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures in adults were included. The quality of trials was critically assessed. RevMan 4.2.7 software was used for data analysis. Results Four RCTs and one CCT of non-reamed versus reamed intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures in adults were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that nonreamed intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures in adult increased the rates of nonunion （RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.20 to 2. 91, P =0. 006）, implant failure （RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.34, P〈0. 000 1 ） and the time to union （WMD 9.00, 95% CI 3.19 to 14.81, P =0. 002）. Conclusions Compared with reamed intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures in adults, non-reamed intramedullary nailing increases the rates of nonunion and implant failure is common. There is no statistical difference in the rates of post operative infection, the rates of malunited fracture and the incidence of compartment syndrome between the two groups. However, further studies are needed to determine the effects of reamed and non-reamed intramedullary nailing on these outcomes, expecially when patient has severe open fractures （Gustilo Grade Ⅲ C）and multiple injuries.
Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of additional bedtime H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in suppressing nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough (NAB). Methods We identified eligible trials by searching The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMbase and CINAHL. We handsearched the data from the proceedings of correlated conferences, eight kinds of important Chinese journals and references of all included trials. All randomized controlled trials evaluating H2RAs for the control of NAB were eligible for inclusion. The systematic review was conducted using methods recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration. Results Only two randomized crossover studies including 32 participants met the inclusion criteria. Because the design, dosage and duration of the treatment were different between the studies, it was impossible to conduct Meta-analysis. There was no consistent conclusion between the two included studies in evaluating H2RAs for the control of NAB. Conclusion We can not conclude any implications for practice at this stage. Appropriately designed large-scale randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to decide the effects of additional bedtime H2RAs in suppressing NAB.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of itopride vs. mosapride in patients with functional dyspepsia, so as to provide references for clinical practice. Methods According to strict inclusive and exclusive criteria, relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on itopride vs. mosapride for functional dyspepsia were searched in CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, ISI, OVID, CBM, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI from the date of their establishment to November 2011. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated methodological quality. Meta-analyses were conducted using Revman 5.1 software. Results A total of 4 trials involving 363 patients were included and data were coped with meta-analysis. a) About the improvement of overall symptoms: itopride was not superior to mosapride, with no significant difference (OR=1.62, 95%CI 0.53 to 4.93, P=0.4); b) About the improvement of single symptom: itopride was not superior to mosapride in improving single symptom as follows: postprandial fullness, upper abdominal distention, poor appetite, and upper abdominal pain, with no significant difference; and c) About the incidence of adverse events: itopride was similar to mosapride (OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.31 to 1.29, P=0.21). Conclusion Current evidence shows that itopride is similar to mosapride in effectively improving overall symptoms and single symptom, and it has fewer side effects than mosapride does. Due to the low quality of most included studies, more strictly-designed and large-scale RCTs are needed to provide reasonable proofs for clinic.
Objective To evaluate the short and long term effectiveness and safety of rapamycin-based immunosuppression regimes with CsA preserving versus CsA withdrawal. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CNKI from Jan. 1995 to Dec. 2005. We identified randomized controlled trials of rapamycin-hased immunosuppression regimes with CsA preserving versus CsA withdrawal for renal transplantation patients. The quality of included trials was evaluated by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted on homogeneous studies. Results Ten studies （1 121 patients） undergoing renal transplantation were included. All included studies were graded in term of randomization, allocation concealment and bhnding. Six studies were graded A and the other 4 were graded B. Meta-analysis results showed CsA withdrawal in sirolimus-based therapy in renal transplantation patients survival rate OR.（95% CI ） values were 0,77（0.17, 3.52）, 1.24（0.48, 3.16）, 1.32（0.57, 3.08）, 1.21（0.60, 2.41） at the end of 6, 12, 24, 36 months respectively; renal allografts survival rate OR. （95% CI） values were 1.79 （0.63, 5.06）, 1.15 （ 0.56, 2.36） , 1.39 （0.68, 2.85）, 1.80（0.99, 3.29）, 2. 13（1.16, 3.89）, 2.01（1.15, 3.51） at the end of 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 54 months respectively; and acute rejection OP,（95% CI） values were 0.92（0.48, 1.78）, 1.90（1.25, 2.89）, 2. 01 （0.94,4.27）, 1.93（0.93, 4.00）, 1.52（0.77, 3.02） at the end of6, 12, 24, 36, 48 months respectively. Conclusions Available evidence shows that compared with CsA preserving, CsA withdrawal in rapamycin-based immunosuppression regimes can lead to higher incidence rates of acute rejection at the end of one year while there is no statistical difference to survival rate of patients/renal allograft in cases with stabilized renal function post-transplantation. And CsA withdrawal is of benefit to allografts for long term survival rate and is helpful to recovery of renal function. Owing to high possibility of selection bias and measurement bias in included studies, there must be a negative impact on evidence intensity of our results. We expect best evidence from with high quality double blind randomized control trials.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of Zhiling decoction for vascular dementia. Methods The Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group was searched in Feb. 2004 using the term Zhiling. In addition, we handsearched 83 traditional Chinese medicine journals （1993 to 2004 ）. We included all randomized controlled trials（RCTs）of Zhiling decoction treating people with vascular dementia. We also evaluated the internal validity of the RCTs . If all included RCTs were of high quality and homogeneity, then the meta-analysis was conducted. Results Only one RCT was identified. The outcomes were listed as the followings ： ① The Hasegawa＇ s dementia scale scoring （ HDS ） scores of the patients in Zhiling decoction group were improved significantly from baseline after 8 weeks course of treatment and there was no significant difference in the control group. The HDS scores improvement was greater than control group（P 〈0.01 ）o ② The latency of P3 was shorter in both groups after treatment, and there was a significant treatment effect in Zhiling group （t = -52. 09, 95% CI -69.79 to -34.39, P 〈0. 000 01 ）. The amplitude of 173 increased in both groups after treatment, and there was a non-sigmficant treatment effect in Zhiling group for change from baseline （t =1.40, 95% CI -0.02 to 2.82, P =0.05）. ③ Brain electrical activity monitoring （BEAM） showed that benefits in those treated by Zhiling decoction were higher than those treated by Naofukang with OR9.90 （ 95% CI 3.34 to 29.38）. ④In the Zhiling group serum cholesterol （P 〈0.01 ） , serum triglyceride （P 〈0.01 ） and LPO（P 〉0. 01 ） decreased after treatment. There was an increase in the level of high density lipoprotein （HDL） and superoxide dismutase （SOD） in red blood cells compared with baseline for Zhiling groups （P 〈0.01 ）. ⑤ The cerebral blood flow decreased in both groups after treatment, and there was a significant treatment effect in favour of Zhiling （treatment effect t = -1.03, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.80, P 〈0. 00001 ）.⑥ No side effects on heart, liver or renal function were reported in Zhiling decoction group. Conclusions The currendy available evidence is insufficient to assess the potential efficacy for Zhiling decoction in the treatment of vascular dementia. Just one RCT concerning the management of Zhifing decoction versus Naofukang suggests that Zhiling decoction may be effective in treating vascular dementia. Further randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are urgendy needed .
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating epilepsy.MethodsThe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS for epilepsy and related diseases were collected from PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases by computer. The retrieval time was from establishment to June 2019. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data and evaluated the deviation risks of the included studies. RevMan5.3 software was used for Meta analysis.ResultsA total of 21 RCTs were included, including 1 587 patients. The results showed that rTMS assisted antiepileptics drugs (AEDs) could improve the effective rate of epilepsy treatment [RR=1.28, 95% CI (1.19, 1.37)], significantly reduced HAMA, HAMD and NFDS scores in the treatment of patients with epilepsy combined with anxiety and depression [MD=−3.94, 95% CI (−4.25, −3.63)], and improve DQ and GMFM-88 scores in children with cerebral palsy combined with epilepsy [MD=7.95, 95% CI (7.00, 8.90)]. In addition, using rTMS will not cause additional adverse reaction [peto OR=0.52, 95% CI (0.31, 0.84)].ConclusionsThe current evidence showed that rTMS combined AEDs can improve the efficient of AEDs therapy. When treat anxiety depression comorbidity, it can significantly reduce the anxiety depression score. In addition in children with cerebral palsy merger, it can improve muscle strength and development. And rTMS will not cause additional adverse reactions. Limited by the quantity and quality of the selected studies, the conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies.
Objective To evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on breast conserving surgery and the outcomes of treatment for women with operable breast cancer. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2007), CENTRAL (1970 to 2007), PUBMED (1978 to March 2007), CBM (1978 to 2006), CNKI (1994 to 2007), CMCC (1994 to May 2007) and other relevant databases and journals. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NAC plus breast conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy versus BCT or mastectomy plus postoperative chemotherapy in women with operable breast cancer. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed for homogenous studies by using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10. Results Three eligible studies involving 2 391 women were included. The median follow-up in the studies ranged from 17 to 137 months. The methodological quality of the three RCTs was high. Meta-analyses showed that NAC had no significant effect on overall survival (OS) (RR 0.99, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.07), disease-free survival (RR 1.04, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.15) and ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (RR 1.34, 95%CI 0.84 to 2.13). Two RCTs revealed that NAC significantly increased the rate of BCT in operable breast cancer patients, but the other RCT reported similar rates of BCT in both groups. One RCT indicated that NAC did not increase the incidence of surgery-related local complications. Conclusions NAC is safe for the treatment of women with operable breast cancer, which may increase the rate of BCT and help to evaluate chemosensitivity. There is insufficient evidence to assess the effect of NAC on conserving surgery procedure and survival rate in operable BCT patients. More large-scale RCTs are needed to define further the role of NAC in the treatment of operable breast cancer patients.
目的 评价不同复苏方法和不同药物、氧疗、物理疗法等对新生儿窒息复苏和复苏后的预防措施的有效性和安全性.方法 计算机检索Cochrane Library(2004年第3期),MEDLINE(1966～2002年) 关于新生儿窒息复苏时不同复苏方法、氧气的应用、以及不同药物、剂量、给药途径治疗和预防新生儿窒息的系统评价、随机和半随机对照试验.结果 正压通气时使用100%氧气和应用室内空气的复苏效果并无差异.胎粪污染羊水(MSAF)与较高的新生儿缺血缺氧性脑病(HIE)的发生率有关,而气管内有胎粪者无论稀稠均与胎粪吸入综合征发生率无关.窒息复苏后预防性给予亚低温疗法、抗惊厥药、纳洛酮、多巴胺等在降低新生儿病死率,继发HIE的严重程度等方面与对照组相比无显著差异.应用肺表面活性物质(PS)预防和治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS),可减少死亡率和并发症.结论 应用PS预防和治疗RDS可明显减少新生儿死亡率,且胎龄lt;32周的早产儿预防用药比治疗用药效果更好;目前尚无充分证据证明窒息复苏后预防性给予亚低温疗法、抗惊厥药、纳洛酮、多巴胺等治疗的有效性.