【摘要】随着超声心动图的普及与发展,无症状性类风湿性关节炎心脏瓣膜改变的检出率逐渐增多。临床应重视类风湿性关节炎心脏瓣膜损害以及超声心动图在这类疾病中的诊断价值,以期改善患者预后。【Abstract】 Objective More and more cardiac valve changes are detected in asymptomatic patients with rheumatoid arthritis by echocardiography. It is essential to pay attention to the clinical features of heart valves damage and the diagnostic value of echocardiography on that in order to improve the prognosis of patients.
ObjectivesTo review the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate efficacy or intolerance with conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs).MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library were electronically searched to collect pharmacoeconomic studies about rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate efficacy or intolerance with csDMARDs from inception to February 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of the included studies, then, descriptive analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 16 studies were included, where most compared the economics of different treatment methods from the perspective of the payer by cohort or individual model. The economic costs in the studies were primarily on direct cost. Sensitivity analyses were used to prove the robustness of the main analysis in each study. Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) might be more cost-effective than csDMARDs. In addition, compared with the bDMARDs, new-marketed targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) might be more cost-effective.ConclusionsIt could be considered to implement more new marketed tsDMARDs to improve patients’ condition to reduce the economic burden and optimize the allocation of health care resources.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases. It mainly involves joints, as well as extra-articular organs. The extra-articular manifestations (EAM) are more common in patients with severe active disease, and the mortality of RA patients with EAM is 2.5 times of RA patients without EAM. Renal damage is rare in EAM, which mainly includes renal damage associated with RA itself, renal amyloidosis, and drug-induced secondary renal damage. In recent years, researches on RA renal damage have gradually increased, and mainly focused on therapy and prognosis. The recent research progress of RA renal damage are summarized in this review.
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been more widely used in small molecule agents, such as immuno-suppressants, antiepileptic drugs and antibiotics, with less attention in the field of therapeutic biological agents. Monoclonal drugs represented by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors have shown a good relationship between exposure and efficacy in clinical studies. There are corresponding guidelines and consensus for the recommendations of TDM based on current research evidence. Therefore, this paper introduced the current evidence, strategies and considerations for TDM in the optimal treatment of adalimumab from the perspective of adalimumab TDM to provide references for the clinical practice of adalimumab TDM.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-α receptor Ⅱ:IgG Fc fusion protein (rhTNFR:Fc) for treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MethodsThis study included 86 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis treated between September 2011 and January 2013. They were divided into two groups randomly. Forty-three patients in the treatment group received rhTNFR:Fc (25 mg, twice a week) by subcutaneous injection and methotrexate (MTX) (10 mg, orally once a week), and the other 43 patients in the contrast group received MTX (10 mg, orally once a week), hydroxychloroquine (100 mg, orally twice daily), and leflunomide (10 mg, orally once daily). The clinical efficacy of the treatments 12 weeks later were compared between the two groups. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50, and 70 evaluation criteria were used for efficacy evaluation. ResultsThe ACR 20, 50 and 70 effective rates in 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the treatment in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The seven indicators including the duration of morning stiffness, joint tenderness index, joint swelling index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, platelets and rheumatoid factors within 12 weeks after treatment were significantly improved in both the two groups, and the improvements in the treatment group were more significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionRhTNFR:Fc is effecive and safe in treating active RA.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with impacted autologous bone grafting and a cementless cup in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with protrusio acetabuli. MethodsBetween January 2001 and April 2009, 18 cases (20 hips) of RA with protrusio acetabuli were treated, including 6 males and 12 females with an average age of 46 years (range, 36-62 years). The disease duration was 3-10 years (mean, 6 years). Preoperative Harris score was 40.25±6.68. The protrusio acetabuli was (5.70±4.26) mm. According to Sotelo-Garza and Charnley classification criterion, there were 12 hips of type 1 (protrusio acetabuli 1-5 mm), 5 hips of type 2 (6-15 mm), and 3 hips of type 3 (>15 mm). All patients received THA with impacting bone graft and cementless prosthesis for recovery of acetabular center of rotation. ResultsThe average operation time was 74 minutes (range, 48-126 minutes); the average blood loss was 350 mL (range, 150-650 mL). Deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity and poor healing of incision occurred in 3 and 2 cases respectively. Other patients achieved primary healing of incisions. The mean time of follow-up was 108 months (range, 60-156 months). According to X-ray films, bone grafting fusion was observed within 6 months after operation. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 87.20±4.21, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t=-27.68, P=0.00); the protrusio acetabuli was (-1.11±0.45) mm, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative value (t=5.66, P=0.00). No loosening of acetabular components was found. ConclusionFor RA patients with protrusio acetabuli, THA with impacted autologous bone grafting and a cementless cup has satisfactory medium term effectiveness.
Objective To explore the technique of the soft tissue balancing in the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the patients of rheumatoid arthritis with flexion contracture. Methods From November 1997 to May 2006, 38 patients with rheumatoid arthritis with flexion contracture underwent primary bilateral TKA and balancing of the soft tissues, among whomthere were 8 males and 30 females, aged 48-71 years old (58.2 on average). The course of disease was 28 months-16 years (7.6 years on average). The preoperative flexion contracture was (38.2 ± 11.3)°. The average range of motion (ROM) and HSS score were (49.1 ± 17.8)° and 23.9 ± 16.9, respectively. According to the preoperative flexion-contracture degree of the knees, these patients were divided into 3 levels: 5 patients with ≤ 20°, 26 patients with 20-60° and 7 patients with ≥ 60°. During the TKA procedure, based on the correct osteotomy, different methods of soft tissue balancing were used for different degrees of flexion contracture. The TKA soft tissue treatment was summed up as the releasing of posterior structures and the balancing between medial collateral ligaments (MCL) and lateral collateral ligaments (LCL), etc. Results The flexion contractures in 38 cases were all improved after the operation, among which 33 patients had a complete correction and only 5 patients had a residual flexion contracture of 5-10°. Eight knees suffered from complications within 1 week after operation, among which 3 had subcutaneous superficial infection and 5 had deep vein thrombus (DVT). These patients obtained good heal ing after active treatment. All the 38 patients were followedup for 10 months to 8 years with the median time of 37 months. The postoperative flexion deformity declined to (2.4 ± 5.7)°, and the ROM and HSS scores were (96.3 ± 14.6)° and 81.7 ± 10.4, respectively. There was statistical difference (P lt; 0.05). According to the HSS score, 27 patients (71.05%)were rated as excellent, 6 good (15.79%) and 5 fair (13.16%), and the choiceness rate was 86.84%. Conclusion The balancing of the soft tissue is a major treatment for correction of the flexion contracture, which can avoid bone over-resection during the surgery of TKA. The proper balancing of the soft tissue can not only achieve an obvious correction of the flexion contracture but also effectively improve the range of motion and the functional recovery of the knee joint after TKA.
Objective To evaluate the surgical treatment and effectiveness of rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and arthroplasty of lesser metatarsal heads. Methods Between January 2007 and August 2009, 7 patients with rheumatoid forefoot were treated by reconstruction with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and arthroplasty of lesser metatarsal heads. They were all females with an average age of 62 years (range, 56-71 years) and with an average disease duration of 16 years (range, 5-30 years). All patients manifested hallux valgus, hammer toe or mallet toe of 2-5 toes, 5 feet complicated by subluxation of the second metatarsophalangeal joint. The improved American Orthopaedic Foot amp; Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 36.9 ± 6.4. The hallux valgus angle was (46 ± 5)°, and the intermetarsal angle was (12 ± 2)° by measuring the load bearing X-ray films preoperatively. Results All incisions healed by first intention after operation. The X-ray films showed bone fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint at 3-4 months after operation. Seven patients were followed up 2.9 years on average (range, 2-4 years), gait was improved and pain was rel ieved. The hallux valgus angle decreased to (17 ± 4)° and the intermetarsal angle was (11 ± 2)° at 3 months postoperatively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative values (P lt; 0.05). The improved AOFAS score was 85.3 ± 5.1 at 2 years postoperatively, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t=4.501, P=0.001). One patient had recurrent metatarsalgia at 4 years after operation. Conclusion Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and arthroplasty of lesser metatarsal heads for rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction can correct hallux valgus, remodel the bearing surface of the forefoot, and rel ieve pain, so it can be considered as a procedure that provides improvement in the cl inical outcome.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Celecoxib and Naproxen for treating osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.Methods Such databases as EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), and Chinese Scientific Journal Full-text Database (CSJD) were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Celecoxib and Naproxen for treating osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. The Review Manager (version 5.0) software was used to analyze the data. Results Four RCTs involving 2 931 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses were as follows: a) There were significant differences in the dose of Celecoxib and Naproxen for treating rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis; b) There was no significant difference in gastrointestinal reaction between the Celecoxib group and the placebo group (RR=1.29, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.79); c) The were significant differences in gastrointestinal reaction between the Celecoxib group and the Naproxen group (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.64 to 0.95); d) There were significant differences in inducing the severity of Stomach and Duodenum Endoscopy Score between the Celecoxib group and the Naproxen group when treating rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis (RR=1.29, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.79). As the Intention-To-Treat (ITT) analysis showed, there were significant differences in inducing the severity of gastrointestinal reaction between the Celecoxib group and the Naproxen group when treating rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis (RR=0.84, 95%CI 0.77 to 0.92). Conclusion Compared with Naproxen, there are significant differences in efficacy for treating rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis with Celecoxib in different doses. The Celecoxib has no significant difference in gastrointestinal reaction compared with the placebo group. The Celecoxib group has fewer gastrointestinal side-effects as compared with the Naproxen group, so it can be used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis in clinic. The results still need to be confirmed by high-quality RCTs.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of iguratimod compared with methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, VIP, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the efficacy and safety of iguratimod compared with methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis from inception to June 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 970 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no statistical difference between iguratimod and methotrexate in ACR20 (RR=1.06, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.23, P=0.49), ACR50 (RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.19, P=0.55), ACR70 (RR=0.92, 95%CI 0.62 to 1.39, P=0.70), morning stiffness time (MD=0.45, 95%CI –0.26 to 1.16, P=0.22), tender joint count (MD=0.07, 95%CI –2.31 to 2.45, P=0.95), swollen joint count (MD=–0.30, 95%CI –1.44 to 0.84, P=0.61), health assessment questionnaire (MD=0.01, 95%CI –0.05 to 0.07, P=0.73) and the rate of adverse effects (RR=0.66, 95%CI 0.41 to 1.07, P=0.09). Meta-analysis of 2 RCTs using double-blind method showed that, iguratimod was superior to methotrexat in the patient (MD=4.11, 95%CI 0.11 to 8.10, P=0.04) and physician (MD=4.81, 95%CI 0.93 to 8.69, P=0.01) global assessment of disease activities.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy and safety of iguratimod in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis are similar to methotrexate. And iguratimod is superior in global assessment of disease activities by patients and doctors. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.