ObjectiveTo investigate whether novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) patients complicated with digestive tract symptoms and its influence on digestive system related biochemical indexes.MethodsSixteen novel coronavirus pneumonia patients in our hospital were observed, and their epidemiological data, clinical manifestations and clinical laboratory indicators were analyzed statistically.ResultsThe age of the patients ranged from 5 to 75 years old, and the median age was 46.0 years old. Most of them were male (9 cases, 56.25%), the occurrence of COVID-19 appeared in family aggregation (12 cases, 75.00%). Sixt patients (37.50%) were complicated with basic diseases. The initial symptom involving digestive system accounting for 18.75% (3 cases) of all participants. The main manifestation of a diarrhea in 2 (12.5%) and melena in 1 (6.25%) patients, respectively. Five patients (31.25%) had symptoms of digestive system during the course of the disease, the main symptoms were diarrhea in 3 (18.75%), melena in 1 (6.25%) and loss of appetitein in 5 (31.25%) patients, respectively. The SARS-Cov-2 nucleic acid in the feces of the patients were negative in all patients. In 50.00% of the patients, the SARS-Cov-2 nucleic acid in the feces were negative, but the throat swab/sputum nucleic acid were still positive at the same time or later. Two patients (12.50%) had elevated ALT and 1 patient (6.25%) had elevated AST at the time of admission.ConclusionsPatients with COVID-19 will show symptoms of digestive tract.
Since the first case of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at the end of 2019, the virus has spread rapidly around the world and has become a global public health problem. In the process of this virus epidemic, compared with the general population, cancer patients are considered to be highly susceptible people, especially the lung cancer patients. Some studies have shown that angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) may be the pathway for SARS-CoV-2 to infect the host. At the same time, ACE2 is often abnormally expressed in non-small cell lung cancer. Therefore, understanding the respective mechanisms of ACE2 in COVID-19 and non-small cell lung cancer has extremely important reference value for the study of vaccines and therapeutic drugs, and also provides meaningful guidance for the protection of patients with lung cancer during the epidemic. This article reviews the possible invasive mechanism of ACE2 in SARS-CoV-2 and its abnormal expression in non-small cell lung cancer.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience in the prevention and treatment of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV, SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19) in the department of thoracic surgery of large grade A tertiary hospitals in Wuhan, and to provide feasible clinical practice strategies.MethodsThe clinical data of 41 COVID-19 patients in the department of thoracic surgery of 7 large grade A tertiary hospitals in Wuhan from December 15, 2019 to February 15, 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 20 surgical patients (10 males and 10 females at an average age of 54.35±10.80 years) and 21 medical personnel (7 males and 14 females at an average age of 30.38±6.23 years).ResultsThe main clinical manifestations of COVID-19 patients were fever (70.73%) and cough (53.66%). Normal or reduced peripheral white blood cells and reduced lymphocyte counts were found in the COVID-19 patients, and some patients may have increased C-reactive protein. COVID-19 patients showed limited ground-glass opacities in early chest CT, which was evident in the edge band of lung. The disease could further develop into multiple pulmonary infiltrations, and pulmonary consolidation was found in severe cases. At the time of confirmed diagnosis, most of the medical personnel were ground-glass shadows and unilateral lesions, and even no obvious abnormalities were found in the lungs. The diagnosed COVID-19 patients were transferred to the isolation ward immediately and treated according to the "Diagnosis and Treatment Program of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia", which was released by the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. At the end of follow-up on February 20, 2020, seven surgical patients (35.00%) were discharged and seven (35.00%) were dead, 13 (61.90%) medical personnel were discharged and no death was found.ConclusionsOf all COVID-19 patients in the department of thoracic surgery of hospitals in Wuhan, the proportion of severe degree and mortality in surgical patients are significantly higher than that of the general population, and medical personnel are prone to nosocomial infections. Early oxygen therapy and respiratory support may improve prognosis. During the epidemic period of COVID-19, elective or limited surgery is suggested to be postponed and the indications for emergency operation should be strictly controlled. Emergency operation is suggested to be treated in accordance with tertiary prevention. On the consideration of specialty in the department of thoracic surgery, all people of the ward should be carefully investigated for infection once one case is confirmed with COVID-19. Early detection, isolation, diagnosis, and treatment are the best preventive measures to improve the prognosis of COVID-19.
The Rapid Advice Guidelines (RAGs), prepared in the form of evidence-based guidelines for responding to public health emergencies in a short period, are characterized by their capability to significantly reduce the time for the development of guidelines to the maximum extent while ensuring quality. Therefore, the RAGs are primarily used to guide and respond to public health emergencies. This article will introduce the definition, characteristics, current situation, applicable situation, development methods, advantages and limitations of the RAGs. Our study proposes several suggestions for RAGs developers and researchers to improve development of RAGs in China.
Objective To summarize primary clinical data from Xiao Tang Shan Hospital (XTSH) Information System, to provide evidence for clinical data of emerging diseases. Method The primary data were extracted from XTSH information system, which related to demographic and background information, case history, prescriptions, laboratory tests, physical examination, vital sign, surgery, diagnostics and expenditures. The software for data verification was developed by Delphi language program. The information of SARS management was developed by Oracle Developer. Results XTSH information system for SARS management collected 1.09 million pieces of information covering 680 SARS cases. The database was functionally divided into inquiry window, conditional case list window and case details spread window, which provided information of SARS management and shaped a platform for further investigation. Quality control of clinical data was done by the software of SARS Information Real Control.Conclusions XTSH information system collected complete data of SARS management, which made healthcare, research and policy-making on SARS accessible, and made it possible to share resources and train the professionals.
The research background, way of thinking, research contents and methods of a united research project - "The Clinical Research on the Treatment of SARS with Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine" were reviewed. The latest research achievements on the treatment of SARS with integrated traditional and western medicine and the difficult points in the research were discussed. Furthermore, some tentative ideas were put forward to further the research. The conclusion was drawn that the principles of evidence-based medicine and the research scheme of multi-centered, prospective and randomized controlled trials, as well as the standard statistical and analyzing methods are the best way to assess the effectiveness and safety of treating SARS with integrated traditional and western medicine.
This study reports the surgical treatment of a female patient at age of 64 years with novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) latent infection complicated with esophageal foreign body perforation with no significant changes in the lung CT. The patient was confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 infection on the 4th day after surgery and then was transferred into the Department of Infectious Disease in our hospital for treatment. This case has guiding value for the operation of thoracic surgery during the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia.
Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness and adverse event of preventive medicine for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and provide clinical data for designing prospective clinical trial. Method Retrospective study on medical staffs, that were exposed to SARS patients, was conducted in two main SARS designated hospitals to obtain information such as SARS exposure risk and preventive measures (medical and others). According to the type of preventive medicine, they were assigned to earthworm’s nucleases and protease (ENP) group, interferon group and blank control group respectively. Exposure risk, suspected sub-clinical infection rate and adverse event rate were compared between the three groups. Results Non-medical preventive measures used in each group were consistent, but the exposure intensity to risk factors between groups was statistically different, which biased the evaluation of clinical effectiveness of preventive medicine. The rate of suspected sub-clinical infection in earthworm’s nucleases and protease (ENP) group, interferon group and control group were 4.5%, 4.5%, and 9.9% (Pgt;0.05), respectively; and adverse event rate were 19.6%, 13.6% (Pgt;0.05), and 0%, respectively. Conclusions Suspected sub2clinical infection rate in ENP group, interferon (INF) group were lower than that in control group, which indicated that these two medicines might be effective in preventing SARS. Adverse event rate in ENP group was similar to that of interferon group, and the symptoms were mild in both groups, which was in accordance with the result of in vitro experiments. ENP spray is a kind of biological preparation; further purification may reduce its adverse event rate. However, because there had excessive confounding factors, especially because of the unequal of exposure risk between three groups, the results of this study can only provide insights to design prospective clinical trial in the future.
Objective To provide evidence for the establishment and improvement of public health system in China by comparing national public health emergency system of some representative countries.Methods The principle and method of evidence-based science were applied to search and evaluate data from the official websites of China, United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. The performance of each country’s public health emergency response system in SARS prevention and control, as well as their organization structure and mechanism were compared. The existing problems and corresponding countermeasures were then put forward. Results Public health system showed the best performance was in US, UK and Australia. The responding mechanism of Singapore was highly admired by WHO. The organization structure of China was similar to that of developed countries, but its performance was far lagged behind because of insufficient financial support, poor management and inefficient operational mechanism. Conclusions The public health emergency response system in China needs to be reformed by giving priority to mechanism reinforcement. Different models should be taken into account regarding different regional situations in China.