Objective To evaluate the clinical value of ureteroscope in cholelithiasis treated by laparoscopic surgery. Methods The clinical data of 36 patients admitted because of hepatolithus with ureteroscope combination in laparoscopic surgery from February 2007 to September 2009 in Guidong People’s Hospital of Guangxi were analyzed retrospectively. Results In 33 cases, stones were removed once by ureteroscope in laparoscopic surgery with residual stones (in 3 cases residual stone were removed secondarily through T tube) and the other 3 cases were transferred to laparotomy forcedly due to bleeding of biliary duct and vessels of porta hepatis and tearing of bile duct. During operation, blood loss was 30-280 (94.51±54.70) ml; operation time was 110-260 (147.22±48.45) min; recovery time of bowel movement was 1-3 (2.03±0.76) d; postoperative hospitalization time was 6-13 (7.12±1.65) d (some discharged with T tube); the time of patients of T tubes pulled out was 28-45 (38.92±6.52) d. Bile leakage happened in 1 case and infection of biliary tract in 1 case, no complications such as biliary stricture or bile duct bleeding were found after operation. Conclusions Treatment of intrahepatic bile duct or a single extra-hepatic sand-like stones with ureteroscopy usage in laparoscopic surgery is feasible and less invasive. It is a minimally invasive treatment for intra- or extra-hepatic stones due to rapidly postoperative rehabilitation.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of doxazosin for ureterolithiasis.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of comparing doxazosin with conservative treatment or tamsulosin for ureterolithiasis from inception to October, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 15 RCTs involving 1 062 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with conservative treatment, doxazosin significantly facilitated ureteral stone expulsion (RR=1.62, 95%CI 1.45 to 1.81, P<0.000 01). No statistical significant difference was found in stone-free rate (RR=0.96, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.11, P=0.57), stone expulsion time (SMD=−0.17, 95%CI −0.52 to 0.19, P=0.35) or pain episode frequency (SMD=0.21, 95%CI −0.15 to 0.56, P=0.25) between doxazosin and tamsulosin. Treatment-associated serious side effects were rarely reported.ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that doxazosin is an efficient and safe medical expulsion agent for ureterolithiasis management. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of modified Politano-Leadbetter reimplantation for the treatment of congenital malformation of the vesicoureteral junction in children. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 53 patients with congenital malformation of the vesicoureteral junction treated with modified Politano-Leadbetter reimplantation between June 2000 and October 2014. Of 53 cases, there were 24 boys and 29 girls, aged from 8 months to 7 years (mean, 2.1 years); 23 had congenital vesicoureteral junction obstruction (14 left, 5 right, and 4 bilateral), and 30 had vesicoureteral reflux (12 unilateral, 18 bilateral), which were verified by voiding cystourethrography. The disease duration was from 1 month to 1 year (mean, 5 months). ResultsAll of the patients underwent modified Politano-Leadbetter reimplantation successfully. The mean operation time was 74 minutes (range, 65-85 minutes) for unilateral cases and 105 minutes (range, 98-130 minutes) for bilateral cases. There was no dysuria, infection of incision, or incision dehiscence after urinary catheter removal. The follow-up time was 6 months to 14 years (median, 28 months); all patients were free from complications of fistula, vesicoureteral reflux, vesicoureteral junction obstruction, or hypertension. The new ureteral orifices had good appearance at 1 month after operation. Urologic ultrasound showed that hydronephrosis relieved at 3 months after operation. Urinary tract infection rate was 13.2% (7/53) during 6 months after operation, which was cured by antibiotics. Voiding cystourethrography showed no vesicoureteral reflux in 32 cases at 6 months after operation. ConclusionThe modified Politano-Leadbetter reimplantation simplifies the operation course, which has the longitudinal ureter after operation and is similar to physiological state. It is a safe and effective option for congenital malformation of vesicoureteral junction in children with few complications, especially for patients with unilateral megaloureter.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of thermal damage in the fresh isolated kidneys of New Zealand white rabbits caused by domestic holmiumlaser. MethodsIn the operation room (constant temperature 22℃, humidity 60%), Guangdong electric (POTENT) domestic holmium laser equipment was chosen. The fresh isolated kidney of New Zealand white rabbit was put into a disposable sterilized syringe with 50 mL normal saline, then the holmium laser optical fiber (550 μm) was put into it, and the temperature of normal saline was measured by a mercury thermometer. The parameters of holmium laser were setted as frequency 20 Hz, energy 2 J, stimulating time 15 seconds, intermittent time 5 seconds, which was repeated. The temperature was measured 2, 5 and 7 minutes after stimulation. Then the kidney was dissected, phtographed, haematoxylin-eosin stained, and pathologically examined.ResultsAt the 2nd minute of stimulation, the temperature of normal saline in the syringe increased from 22℃ to 38℃; the cortex and medulla of rabbit kidney were ruddy, and the cortex, medulla and ureter were almost normal in pathological section. At the 5-minute point, the temperature increased to 57℃, and the cortex turned to be white, while the medulla remained ruddy, but the demarcation between the cortex and medulla was not very clear. At the 7th minute, the temperature was 78℃, and the cortex and medulla were both white and solidification with no clear demarcation. Pathological examination showed severe degeneration and necrosis of glomerulus and renal tubule.ConclusionCommon power of domestic holmium laser would produce increasing thermal damage, which may cause tissue damage in the human body when the temperature increases above 50℃.
Objective To assess the necessity and safety of ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of middle and distal ureteral calculi. Methods We electronically searched MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP and CNKI to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving men with or without ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy from 2000 to March 2010. The quality of included trials was assessed. Data were extracted and analyzed with RevMan5.0 software. Results Six RCTs involving 543 patients were identified. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) There was no statistical difference between two groups in stone clearance rate (RR=0.45, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.01, P=0.15), dysuria rate (RR=1.35, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.84, P=0.06), and hematuria rate (RR=2.12, 95% CI 1.00 to 4.49, P=0.05); b) There was statistical difference between two groups in frequent micturition rate (RR=2.17, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.17, P=0.02), the mean visual analog score 3 days postoperatively (WMD=0.94, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.42, P=0.000?1), and the operation time (WMD=3.57, 95% CI 1.40 to 5.72, P=0.001). Without postoperative ureteral stenting can shorten the operation time, decrease the irritation signs of bladder, and can improve quality of postoperative life without influence on stone clearance. Couclusions The routine ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy may be not necessary in order to keep patients from unsafety. More reasonable randomized double blind controlled trails with large sample are required to provide proofs with high quality because the methodology quality of included studies is lower.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones>1 cm. MethodsWe electronically searched PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, WanFang, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP database (by the end of July 2015) to collect randomized controlled trials involving PCNL vs. URL for the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones> 1 cm. The quality of those trials were assessed. Data were extracted and analyzed with RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsSix randomized controlled trials were finally obtained after screening. A total of 487 patients were included for a Meta-analysis. The results showed that, as compared with the control group (URL), the patients in the trial group (PCNL) had the following features: ① There was a remarkable improvement of stone clearance rate [RR=1.20, 95% CI (1.09, 1.33), P=0.000 3].② There was no statistical difference in postoperative fever rates, urinary tract perforation rates [RR=1.73, 95%CI (0.43, 7.00), P=0.45; RR=1.02, 95%CI (0.11, 9.37), P=0.99], but the incidence of hematuria was higher [RR=1.99, 95%CI (1.09, 3.62), P=0.03], and the mean operative duration was longer [WMD=30.03 minutes, 95%CI (10.04, 50.02) minuntes, P=0.003].③ The mean hospitalization stay was delayed by an average of 3.73 days [WMD=3.73 days, 95%CI (3.02, 4.44) days, P<0.000 01]. ConclusionPCNL is better than URL in the stone clearance rate, while patients in the PCNL group have to stay in the hospital much longer, and should bear longer mean operative duration.
ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical classification and treatment protocols of complete duplication of kidney and ureter in children. MethodsBetween March 2000 and February 2015, 106 children with complete duplication of kidney and ureter were treated, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Of them, there were 11 boys and 95 girls, aged from 1 month to 11 years (mean, 3.5 years); one side was involved in 88 cases and two sides in 18 cases. They were divided into 4 types according to image examinations and clinical presentations:14 patients who needed no special treatment were classified into the first type, 15 patients who underwent reconstruction into the second type, 74 patients who underwent segment removal of renal dysplasia and subtotal excision of abnormal duplicated ureter into the third type, and 3 patients who underwent removal of the whole affected kidney and subtotal excision of whole ureter into the forth type. ResultsThe patients were followed up 2 months to 14 years (median, 23 months). There was no deteriorating case in the first type. There was no complication such as leakage of urine, discomfort over the back and loins, ureterocele, reproductive tract infection, or hematuresis in the other types. The results of white blood cell count, renal function, and electrolyte presented no abnormality. One patient in the second type and 6 patients in the third type had ureteral stump syndrome; 1 patient in the second type and 3 patients in the third type had urinary tract infection; and 3 patients in the second type had mild hydronephrosis after operation. ConclusionIt can obtain good clinical outcome to choose individualized treatment according to clinical classification of complete duplication of kidney and ureter, which can reserve effective renal units as much as possible and improves the patients' quality of life.
Objective To investigate the diagnosis and treatment strategy of urosepsis caused by ureteral calculi in solitary kidney. Methods The clinical data of patients with urosepsis caused by ureteral calculi in solitary kidney in the Department of Urology of Chengdu 363 Hospital Affiliated to Southwest Medical University from March 2015 to March 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Results A total of 23 patients were included. One patient received ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy, after which urosepsis and renal function deteriorated, then got better after anti-infection and hemodialysis treatment in intensive care unit; 17 patients received implantation of ureteral stent by cystoscopy, and 5 patients received percutaneous nephrostomy by ultrasound guiding, the 22 patients received ureteroscopic lithotripsy or flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy electively. One patients had subcapsular renal hematoma postoperatively and worse renal insufficiency, the rest 22 patients had improved renal function. All patients were cured clinically. Conclusions For solitary kidney patients who have urosepsis caused by ureteral calculi, emergency treatment is necessary. The relief of urinary obstruction must be based on effective anti-infection. Choosing cystoscopic ureteral stent implantation or percutaneous nephrostomy depends on patients’ individualization. Ureterscopic lithotripsy simultaneously is not recommended. Ureteral intubation before cystoscopic ureteral stent implantation is important, which can increase the success rate of ureteral stent implantation.
Objective To assess the radiation dose and image quality with low-dose multi-detector row CT urography （CTU） for the evaluation of children patients with ureteropelvic junction stenosis （UJS）. Methods In this prospective study， 30 children patients with UJS underwent CTU were classified half-randomly through exam numbers into 3 groups （115 mA， 100 mA， and 75 mA）. Consecutive acquisitions including CT dose index weighted （CTDIw） and dose long product （DLP） were obtained in each patient and compared for each group. Three experienced chest radio-logists were unaware of the CT technique reviewed CT images for overall image quality using a 3-grade scale （excellent， good， and worst）. The data were analyzed using a parametric analysis of variance test and Wilcoxon’s signed rank test. Results The CTDIws of 115 mA group， 100 mA group， and 75 mA group were （7.63±0.83） mGy， （6.29±0.51） mGy， and （4.72±0.18） mGy， respectively， the difference was significant among three groups （F=36.445， P=0.000）. The mean CTDIw reduction was 38.2% in the 75 mA group as compared with 115 mA group （P＜0.001）. The DLPs of 115 mA group， 100 mA group， and 75 mA group were （173.89±29.88） mGy•cm， （145.96±26.21） mGy•cm， and （102.78±12.72） mGy•cm， respectively， the difference was significant among three groups （F=13.955， P=0.000）. The mean radiation dose reduction was 40.9% （75 mA group versus 115 mA group， P＜0.001）. The assessment of image quality was no significant difference with the same protocol and post-processing technique （Wilcoxon’s signed rank test， P＞0.05）. There was a good agreement for image quality scoring among the three reviewers （Kappa=0.736）. Conclusion Low-dose multi-detector row CTU should be considered as a promising technique for the evaluation of children patients with UJS because it could decrease radiation dose and obtain acceptable image quality.
Objective To evaluate the value of Ureteral Stent Placement before Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 4, 2010), MEDLINE (OVID 1950 to April 2010), EMbase (1979 to April 2010), CBM (1978 to April 2010), CNKI (1979 to April 2010), and VIP (1989 to April 2010), and manually searched journals as well. All the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of treating ureteral stone with ESWL after stent placement were included. We evaluated the risk of the bias of the included RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 5.0 was used for meta-analysis. Results Three RCTs with C-level evidence involving 319 ureteral stone patients were identified. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) Effect of treatment: The ureteral stent placement before ESWL did not take better effects in aspects of the complete clearance rate (WMD= 1.10, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.38), the quantity of lithotripsy (WMD= 0.43, 95%CI – 1.05 to 0.19), the frequency of shock wave (WMD= 0.00, 95%CI – 0.25 to 0.25), and the power of shock wave (WMD= 0.20, 95%CI – 0.05 to 0.46); and b) Postoperative complications: The ureteral stent placement were prone to cause dysuria (RR= 2.30, 95%CI 1.62 to 3.26), microscopic hematuria (RR= 2.66, 95%CI 1.97 to 3.58), gross hematuria (RR= 6.50, 95%CI 1.50 to 28.15), pyuria (RR= 1.78, 95%CI 1.44 to 2.21), positive urine culture (RR= 2.13, 95%CI 1.71 to 2.64), and suprapubic pain (RR= 3.10, 95%CI 1.59 to 6.04). Conclusions Ureteral stent placement before ESWL is inadvisable. Multi-factors which lead to bias affected the authenticity of our review, such as low-quality and small amount of RCTs. Further large-scale trials are required.