ObjectiveTo evaluate visual field changes in early mild Parkinson's disease. Methods A total of 66 eyes of 33 cases with early mild Parkinson's disease and 72 eyes of 36 age-matched normal individuals were enrolled into the study. Humphrey Field Analyzer II was applied for central visual field test. The visual field indices of mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) were analyzed to evaluate the location and the characteristics of visual field defect in this study. ResultsVisual field indices MD (-3.4±2.5) dB was significantly changed in patients with PD when compared to the controls (-0.6±1.7) dB. PSD (4.3±2.6) was significantly higher in patients with PD than that in the control group (2.1±1.8) dB. Glaucoma hemifield test (GHT) assessment was within normal limits in the controls. Of the 33 patients (66 eyes) in PD, GHT showed outside normal limits in 31 eyes, borderline in 8 eyes, and within normal limits in 27 eyes. 31 eyes outside normal limits appeared glaucomatous visual field defects, in which 16 with nasal step and 5 with arcuate defect. ConclusionsVisual field indices including MD and PSD in early mild patients with PD were significantly worse than that in the controls group. GHT abnormalities could be found in early mild PD patients with visual field defects, including pericentral scotoma and nasal step, which mimicked glaucomatous changes.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the macular visual function of patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (MCNV) before and after intravitreal injection of conbercept.MethodsA prospective, uncontrolled and non-randomized study. From April 2017 to April 2018, 21 eyes of 21 patients diagnosed as MCNV in Shanxi Eye Hospital and treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept were included in this study. There were 9 males (9 eyes, 42.86%) and 12 females (12 eyes, 57.14%), with the mean age of 35.1±13.2 years. The mean diopter was −11.30±2.35 D and the mean axial length was 28.93±5.68 mm. All patients were treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept 0.05 ml (1+PRN). Regular follow-up was performed before and after treatment, and BCVA and MAIA micro-field examination were performed at each follow-up. BCVA, macular integrity index (MI), mean sensitivity (MS) and fixation status changes before and after treatment were comparatively analyzed. The fixation status was divided into three types: stable fixation, relatively unstable fixation, and unstable fixation. The paired-sample t-test was used to compare BCVA, MI and MS before and after treatment. The x2 test was used to compare the fixation status before and after treatment.ResultsDuring the observation period, the average number of injections was 3.5. The logMAR BCVA of the eyes before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment were 0.87±0.32, 0.68±0.23, 0.52±0.17, and 0.61±0.57, respectively; MI were 89.38±21.34, 88.87±17.91, 70.59±30.02, and 86.76±15.09, respectively; MS were 15.32±7.19, 21.35±8.89, 23.98±11.12, 22.32±9.04 dB, respectively. Compared with before treatment, BCVA (t=15.32, 18.65, 17.38; P＜0.01) and MS (t=4.08, 3.50, 4.26; P＜0.01) were significantly increased in the eyes 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. There was no significant difference in the MI of the eyes before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment (t=0.60, 2.42, 2.58; P＞0.05). Before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, the proportion of stable fixation were 28.57%, 38.10%, 38.10%, 33.33%;the proportion of relatively unstable fixation were 47.62%, 47.62%, 52.38%, 57.14% and the proportion of unstable fixation were 23.81%, 14.28%, 9.52%, 9.52%, respectively. The proportion of stable fixation and relatively unstable fixation at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment were higher than that before treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant (x2=1.82, 1.24, 1.69; P＞0.05).ConclusionBCVA and MS are significantly increased in patients with MCNV after intravitreal injection of conbercept.
Objective To observe the visual field loss after 577 nm krypton pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods A prospective clinical studies. Forty-six eyes of 26 patients with proliferative DR (PDR) and severe non-proliferative DR (NPDR) diagnosed by clinical examination from No. 306 Hospital of PLA during January 2014 and December 2015 were included in this study. Among them, 21 eyes of NPDR and 20 eyes of PDR; 13 eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) (DME group) and 28 eyes without DME (non-DME group). All eyes underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) examinations. The visual field index (VFI) and visual field mean defect (MD) values were recorded by Humphrey-7401 automatic visual field examination (center 30° visual field). The BCVA of DR eyes was 0.81±0.28; the VFI and MD values were (89.8±8.4)% and −7.5±3.85 dB, respectively. The BCVA of the eyes in the without DME group and DME group were 0.92±0.20 and 0.57±0.27, the VFI were (90.86±7.86)% and (87.46±9.41)%, the MD values were −6.86±3.43 and 8.87±4.48 dB. PRP was performed on eyes using 577 nm krypton laser. The changes of VFI, MD and BCVA were observed at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Results Compared with before treatment, the VFI of DR eyes decreased by 12.0%, 12.3% and 14.8% (t=7.423, 4.549, 4.79; P＜0.001); the MD values were increased by −4.55, −4.75, 6.07 dB (t=−8.221, −5.313, −5.383; P＜0.001) at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment, the differences were statistically significant. There was no difference on VFI (t=1.090, −0.486; P＞0.05) and MD value (t=−0.560, −0.337; P＞0.05) at different time points after treatment. Compared with before treatment, the BCVA was significantly decreased in DR eyes at 1 month after treatment, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.871, P＜0.05). Before and after treatment, the BCVA of the DME group was lower than that of the non-DME group, the difference were statistically significant (t=4.560, 2.848, 3.608, 5.694; P＜0.001); but there was no differences on the VFI (t=1.209, 0.449, 0.922, 0.271; P＞0.05) and MD values (t=1.582, 0.776, 0.927, 1.098; P＞0.05) between the two groups. Conclusion The range of 30° visual field loss is about 12%-14.8% after 577 nm krypton laser PRP for DR. VFI and MD can quantitatively analyze the and extent of visual field loss after PRP treatment.
Objective To investigate the correlation of microperimetric parameters, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes. Methods It is a prospective, no controlled, open study. Twenty-four consecutive patients (40 eyes) with DME were included. There were 10 males (18 eyes),14 females (22 eyes); aged from 41 to 79 years, with the mean age of (56.84±8.96) years. All the patients were type 2 diabetes, the average duration of diabetes was 8 years. BCVA was evaluated using the international Snellen E vision test chart, and then recorded as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). CRT was measured by Cirrus HD-OCT4000. MAIA microperimetric parameters were evaluated, including average threshold (AT) of retinal sensitivity, macular integrity index (MI), fixating points within a circle of 1° (P1) and 2° of radius (P2), bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) considering 63% and 95% of fixating points (A63,A95), and horizontal and vertical axes of that ellipse (H63,H95,V63,V95). Pearson correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the association between these variables. The independent factor influenced the type of fixation was analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. Results Strong correlations of logMAR BCVA with CRT (r=0.58,P=0.000), V63 (r=0.44,P=0.004), V95 (r=0.41,P=0.008), MI (r=0.36,P=0.024), AT (r=−0.61,P=0.000), P1 (r=−0.41,P=0.009), P2 (r=−0.38,P=0.015) were found. AT was correlations with P1 (r=0.53,P=0.000), P2 (r=0.51,P=0.001), A63 (r=−0.39,P=0.012), A95 (r=−0.40,P=0.012), V63 (r=−0.53,P=0.000), V95 (r=−0.46,P=0.003), MI (r=−0.50,P=0.001). There was no correlation between AT and CRT (r=−0.21,P=0.190). Forty eyes were included in this study, 8 eyes (20%) had stable fixation,14 eyes (35%) had relatively unstable fixation,18 eyes (45%) had unstable fixation. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that fixation classification was independently affected by P1. Conclusions In DME eyes, logMAR BCVA was positively correlated with CRT, negatively correlated with AT, P1 and P2. There is no correlation between AT and CRT. The fixation classification was independently affected by P1.
Objective To observe visual field outcome and refractive status of patients with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated by laser photocoagulation. Method The data of 39 ROP patients (73 eyes) who received laser photocoagulation were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 13 normal control subjects (25 eyes) whose age and sex were matched with ROP group. There were 24 males (45 eyes) and 15 females (28 eyes) in ROP group, with an average age of (7.0±1.28) years. The first laser treatment was carried out at postnatal age (PA) of (38.74±3.82) weeks, the birth weight (BW) of (1402.33±369.61) g and the number of laser burns was (517.86±277.40). The control group included 7 females (13 eyes) and 6 males (12 eyes), with an average age of (7.17±0.96) years. The age (t=0.691) and gender (χ2=1.425) were comparable between the two groups (P=0.491, 0.233). The data of patients and controls were retrospectively analyzed including best corrected visual acuity, refractive examination, automated perimetry test. The differences of the mean deviation (MD) of visual field and the spherical equivalent (SE) between these two groups were comparatively observed. ROP patients were divided into no VF loss group (MD≤2 dB) and VF loss group (MD＞2 dB), mild VF loss group (MD≤6 dB) and moderate VF loss group (MD＞6 dB) according to the results of automated perimetry test, the differences of gestational age (GA), PA, BW, number of laser burns and SE between these groups were comparatively observed. Results The MD in ROP group and control group were 4.87±5.12 dB and 1.27±3.34 dB, respectively; the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=–4.01,P＜0.001). The subgroup analysis showed that BW, number of laser burns, and SE were significantly different between no VF loss group and VF loss group (t=2.074, –1.996, –2.162;P=0.042, 0.026, 0.034); while the GA was not significantly different between these two groups (t=1.973,P=0.052). The difference of PA was not statistical significant different between mild VF loss group and moderate VF loss group (t=2.03,P=0.051) and SE was significantly different between the above two groups (t=3.283,P=0.002). For refractive outcomes, the BW and ROP stage correlated with SE significantly (r=–0.304, –0.387;P=0.015, 0.002). The mean BCVA in ROP group was 0.84±0.23, and 59 eyes (91.2%) with BCVA better than 0.5. Conclusion Laser treatment for ROP tends to have less effect on long term refractive status and VF loss, with good visual outcome.
ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation of visual sensitivity, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsA retrospectives study. Forty-five eyes of 30 patients in DME were included. There were 20 eyes of 16 males, 25 eyes of 14 females, with an average age of 54.49±7.45 years. All the patients had type 2 diabetes; the average duration of diabetes was over 10 years. The BCVA examination was performed using the international standard visual acuity chart, which was converted into logarithmic logarithm (logMAR) visual acuity. The following parameters provided by the MAIA microperimetric device were evaluated, including average threshold (AT), macular integrity index (MI), fixation indexes (P1 and P2), bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) for 63% and 95% of points, and horizontal and vertical axes of the ellipse of fixation (H63, H95, V63, V95). The CRT was measured and the integrity of the ellipsoidal band was observed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The integrity of the ellipsoid band was divided into continuous smooth (group A): fully visible; part of the light band was interrupted (B group): not completely visible; missing light band (C group): completely invisible. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the factors; non-parametric tests were used to compare the logMAR BCVA, AT, and CRT between the different ellipsoid zone integrity groups; multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to AT.ResultsPearson correlation analysis showed that the logMAR BCVA was positively correlated with MI (r=0.303, P=0.04) and CRT (r=0.342, P=0.02), negatively correlated with AT (r=−0.59, P=0.00) and P1 (r=−0.38, P=0.01). There was negative correlation between AT and MI (r=−0.55, P=0.00). The result of multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the logMAR BCVA is inversely correlated with AT (t=−3.53, P=0.001). Group A, B and C were 23, 17 and 5 eyes in the 45 eyes, respectively. There were significant differences in logMAR BCVA, AT, and CRT between the three groups of eyes (P=0.045, 0.049, 0.018).ConclusionsIn DME patients, the logMAR BCVA was positively correlated with CRT, negatively correlated with AT and P1. The logMAR BCVA is inversely correlated with AT. Microperimetry combined with OCT and visual acuity can be used to assess the visual function of patients with DME.
Objective To detect the difference of the light sensitivity in the central visual field between normal people and type Ⅱ diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy, and evaluate the effect of perimetric examination in early diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Methods The light sensitivity at the 80 locations in the central field was measured by Dicon field analyzer (model TKS-4000) in 76 normal eyes of 44 normal volunteers aged from 45 to 72 years and 75 eyes of 40 type Ⅱ diabetic patients without retinopathy aged from 46 to 71 years. Results For the diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy, the light sensitivity of locations decreased by 4-8 dB,and there were some decreased light sensitivity areas. The mean light sensitivity of three zones of the central field had significant reduction in the diabetic patients as compared with the control group(Plt;0.001). Conclusion The retinal neurosensory function of diabetic patients is damaged in some degrees before diabetic retinopathy occured, and no relationship is found between the decrease of retinal light sensitivity and localized blood-retinal barrier leakage. It is suggested that examination of central field with computerized perimetry has certain clinical significance in early diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2002, 18: 218-220)
ObjectiveTo investigate the prognosis and differences of visual function and fundus structure in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (VEGF) or laser photocoagulation treatment with long-term follow-up. MethodsRetrospective case control series. From January 2010 to December 2021, A total of 35 children (63 eyes) with ROP who were first diagnosed in Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital and followed up for as long as 5 years were included. Among them, 21 males (36 eyes) and 15 females (27 eyes) were enrolled. The average gestational age (GA) of the children at birth was 29.30±1.77 weeks. Among the included 12 aggressive ROP (A-ROP) eyes and 51 pre-threshold type 1 ROP eyes, no retinal detachment occurred. Each eye received only intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents or laser monotherapy after diagnosis, and divided into anti-VEGF group or laser group according to the treatment. Thirty-five eyes of 20 infants were included in the anti-VEGF group and 28 eyes of 15 infants were included in the laser group. GA, birth weight (BW) and postmenstrual age receiving first treatment were compared and no significant difference between the two groups was defined (P=0.844, 0.859, 0.694). The number of A-ROP, pre-threshold type 1 ROP eyes were also compared, and statistically significance can be defined (P=0.005). During the follow-up period, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive status, visual field, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA) were performed. The BCVA examination was carried out using the international standard decimal visual acuity chart, which was converted into the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity for statistics. Refractive status was calculated as spherical equivalent (SE). Comparative observation of 5-year outcomes including BW, GA, fundus examination at the initial diagnosis, and BCVA, refractive status, visual field defect, central foveal thickness (CFT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and abnormality of peripheral retina in FFA were performed between the two groups. Differences between groups were compared using t test or nonparametric test for measurement data, and χ2 test was used for comparison between groups in enumeration data. ResultsFive years after treatment, retinal avascular areas were seen around the eyes in the anti-VEGF treatment group, with a size of 2.32±1.84 optic disc diameters, and 1 eye had fluorescein leakage at the junction of the peripheral avascular areas; eyes in the laser treatment group old photocoagulation spots were seen in the peripheral retina, and no fluorescein leakage was seen. The logMAR BCVA of the eyes in the anti-VEGF treatment group and laser treatment group were 0.15 (0.00, 0.20), 0.10 (0.00, 0.16), respectively; SE were 0.50 (－1.25, 1.31), 0.38 (－4.25, 1.75) D, respectively; mean defect (MD) values of visual field were 2.70 (1.20, 4.80), 4.25 (2.83, 6.98) dB; CFT, SFCT were 225.00±29.31, 287.18±68.56 μm and 237.17±32.81, 279.79±43.61 μm. There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA, CFT and SFCT between the two groups (P=0.363, 0.147, 0.622); the lower quartile of SE and visual field MD value in the laser treatment group were significantly higher than those in the laser treatment group, but there was no significant difference in the median SE (P=0.109), and there was a statistically significant difference in the median MD value of the visual field (P=0.037). ConclusionsAnti-VEGF agents and laser therapy can achieve similar good visual prognosis for early ROP, and the peripheral visual field can be preserved to a greater extent, however, the peripheral visual field defect in the laser group is more significant than that in the anti-VEGF group. For ROP without retinal detachment, the thickness of the retina and choroid in the fovea is generally normal.
ObjectiveTo observe the changes of retinal morphology and function of macular-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) after scleral bulking. MethodsIn this prospective study, 42 eyes of 41 patients who underwent scleral bulking were enrolled. There were 26 males (27 eyes) and 15 females (15 eyes), with an average age of (33.78±11.21) years. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, indirect ophthalmoscope, visual fields, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and B scan of ocular ultrasound were measured for all patients. The average BCVA was 0.29±0.18. The retinal detachment time was (21.12±3.71) days. The mean visual field defect (MD) was (13.54±6.44) dB. The mean loss variance (LV) was (8.43±2.11) dB. All the patients were performed cryotherapy and sub-choroidal fluid drain out. The mean follow-up was 12.4 months (from 6 to 24 months). At two weeks, 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery, the changes of BCVA, visual fields, retinal morphology and subretinal fluid were observed. ResultsIndirect ophthalmoscope combined with B scan showed the time of retinal reattachment was (7.32±2.53) days. Subretinal fluid was found completely absorbed by OCT with a mean of (7.82±3.52) months. At 12 months after surgery, subretinal fluid was completely absorbed in 37 eyes (88.10%). In these 37 eyes, 15 eyes had normal retinal microstructure, 5 eyes had neuroepithelial cystoid edema; 12 eyes had disrupted inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) junction, and 5 eyes had disrupted IS/OS and external limiting membrane (ELM). BCVA at 6 months after surgery was no significant difference with that at 12 months after surgery (t=-0.636, P=0.529). At 12 months after surgery, there were 4 retinal patterns on OCT examination, including normal retinal microstructure, neuroepithelial cystoid edema, IS/OS line disruption, and IS/OS and ELM disruption. The BCVA difference among these 4 groups was significant (F=52.42, P < 0.05). The BCVA difference between eyes with or without residual subretinal fluid was significant (t=-5.747, P=0.000). At 1, 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery, the MD were (11.38±2.53), (10.14±2.19), (9.17±2.13), (6.63±1.70), (5.71±1.89), (5.14±1.69) dB respectively, with a significant difference between these time-points (F=63.528, P=0.00). However, the MD at 6 months after surgery was no significant difference with that at 12 months after surgery (t=1.442, P=0.157). At 12 months after surgery, there were 12 eyes with normal MD, 30 eyes with higher MD. There was no significant difference between surgery eyes with higher MD and fellow eyes in MD (t=-1.936, P=0.06). The MD value was positively correlated to the time of retinal detachment in patients with normal retinal microstructure (r=0.84, P=0.00). There were differences in LV during different periods after surgery (F=57.25, P=0.00). ConclusionsThe retinal microstructure, visual acuity, visual fields were gradually improved after scleral bulking. The patients had better vision with normal retinal microstructure. The time of retinal detachment positively correlated with visual fields damage.
Microperimetry is a procedure to assess retinal sensitivity while fundus is examined directly. It is a psychophysical method which is rapid, safe and non-invasive. It combines analysis of function and morphology and has an eye tracking system that can improve the fixation stability of patient with eccentric fixation and fixation instable. Microperimetry is supplement to visual function, perimetry, and other visual function parameters. As deepening of research, its clinical application value in ocular fundus diseases including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, retinitis pigmentosa, Stargardt's disease, macular hole, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and central serous chorioretinopathy needs to be further explored.