Telerehabilitation is a new rehabilitation technology, using internet to provide rehabilitation services for patients in remote areas or unaccessible to rehabilitation. Longshi Ability of Daily Life scale is fomulated based on Chinese living customs. The assessment content of the scale can clearly reflect the needs of the service object, and the assessment result can directly reflect the ability level of the assessment object. The scale has been put into use online on the mobile internet and amassed a certain amount of big data, which is of great significance to the adjustment of rehabilitation treatment, the continuity of nursing guidance, and the assurance of adequate social support and disability benefits for the disabled. In this paper, the application of Longshi Ability of Daily Life scale in telerehabilitation is described.
ObjectiveTo investigate the medical quality of rehabilitation departments in medical institutions at all levels in Shenzhen and analyze the problems, so as to promote the continuous improvement of rehabilitation care quality in this city.MethodsFrom September to November 2019, a field investigation was carried out in 53 rehabilitation departments in Shenzhen. Five dimensions were scored by experts, including professional capacity, rules and regulations, knowledge and skills, supervision and feedback, and hospital infection control. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to characterize the data, and one-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the difference among different level hospitals.ResultsThe average score of rehabilitation medical care quality in Shenzhen was 83.98±8.28. The average score of tertiary, secondary, and primary hospitals were 85.61±7.02, 84.54±7.83, and 77.55±10.60, respectively, and the difference among different level hospitals was statistically significant (P<0.05). According to the standard score, the highest score was in the dimension of supervision feedback (95.75±6.50), and the lowest score was in the dimension of knowledge and skills (77.27±14.64).ConclusionThe overall quality of rehabilitation care in Shenzhen needs to be improved, and the management and professional training systems need to be established.
目的 探讨腹腔镜下胆道镜联合微爆破碎石术仪治疗肝胆管结石的安全性及治疗效果。 方法 回顾分析2008年7月－2012年6月183例胆道结石患者，行腹腔镜下胆道镜联合微爆破碎石仪治疗或单纯经内镜Oddi括约肌切开取石治疗的临床资料。87例患者在术中均应用微爆破碎石仪碎石（微爆破组），96例患者行单纯经内镜Oddi括约肌切开术或经内镜乳头切开术碎石（对照组）。 结果 微爆破组碎石成功率100%，结石取净率85.06%（74/87），微爆破组的碎石时间、平均住院时间、平均住院总费用、并发症发生率均明显低于对照组（P＜0.05）。 结论 腹腔镜下胆道镜联合微爆破碎石术在治疗肝胆管结石病方面，具有微创、安全、经济有效的优点，能降低结石残留率及取石次数，值得临床推广。
ObjectiveTo compare the differences of curative effect, cosmetic effect, and shoulder-neck function protection effect between video-assisted lateral neck dissection (VALND) and traditional open thyroid surgery(OTS) in the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) with lateral cervical lymph node metastasis. MethodsFifty patients with unilateral PTC accompanied by ipsilateral cervical lymph node metastasis who underwent sternal incision approach VALND at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Pudong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University from January 2013 to December 2019 were collected. And 100 patients with unilateral PTC and ipsilateral cervical lymph node metastasis who underwent OTS during the same period were randomly selected at a ratio of 1:2 using the random number method. All patients underwent unilateral thyroid lobectomy (or total thyroid lobectomy) + isthmus resection + central area (Zone Ⅵ) and cervical lymph node dissection on the affected side (zones Ⅱ-Ⅴ). The therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups. ResultsCompare to OTS group, the operation time of VALND group was longer (218.3 min±86.6 min vs. 185.7 min±42.8 min, P=0.002), but the hospital stay was shortened (6.1±2.2 d vs. 7.3±1.6 d, P<0.001). In terms of surgical efficacy, there were no statistically significant differences between VALND group and OTS group in the number of lymph node dissections, the number of lymph node metastases, and the postoperative tumor recurrence rate (P>0.05). As for surgical safety, the two groups had similar rates of postoperative complications including recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hypoparathyroidism, postoperative hematoma and infection(P>0.05). In terms of postoperative recovery, the scar color, vascular distribution, thickness, and softness, as well as in shoulder stiffness, tightness, pain, and numbness in VALND group were significantly lower than those in OTS group (P<0.05). ConclusionsFor PTC patients with lateral cervical lymph node metastasis, there is no significant difference in surgical efficacy and safety between VALND and OTS. However, VALND group shows obvious advantages in reducing the length of cervical incisions, improving cosmetic effects, and protecting cervical and shoulder functions. Therefore, VALND through the sternal notch approach has high promotion and application value in clinical practice.