ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of robotic intersphincteric resection (ISR) for rectal cancer.MethodsA literature search was performed using the China biomedical literature database, Chinese CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library. The retrieval time was from the establishment of databases to April 1, 2019. Related interest indicators were brought into meta-analysis by Review Manager 5.2 software.ResultsA total of 510 patients were included in 5 studies, including 273 patients in the robot group and 237 patients in the laparoscopic group. As compared to the laparoscopic group, the robot group had significantly longer operative time [MD=43.27, 95%CI (16.48, 70.07), P=0.002], less blood loss [MD=–19.98.27, 95%CI (–33.14, –6.81), P=0.003], lower conversion rate [MD=0.20, 95%CI (0.04, –0.95), P=0.04], less lymph node harvest [MD=–1.71, 95%CI (–3.21, –0.21), P=0.03] and shorter hospital stay [MD=–1.61, 95%CI (–2.26, –0.97), P<0.000 01]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the first flatus [MD=–0.01, 95%CI (–0.48, 0.46), P=0.96], time to diet [MD=–0.20, 95%CI (–0.67, 0.27), P=0.41], incidence of complications [OR=0.76, 95%CI (0.50, 1.14), P=0.18], distal resection margin [MD=0.00, 95%CI (–0.17, 0.17), P=0.98] and positive rate of circumferential resection margin [OR=0.61, 95%CI (0.27, 1.37), P=0.23].ConclusionsRobotic and laparoscopic ISR for rectal cancer shows comparable perioperative outcomes. Compared with laparoscopic ISR, robotic ISR has the advantages of less blood loss, lower conversion rate, and longer operation times. These findings suggest that robotic ISR is a safe and effective technique for treating low rectal cancer.
ObjectiveTo explore the causes of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis in patients with low rectal cancer after prophylactic ileostomy under complete laparoscopy. MethodsA total of 194 patients with low rectal cancer who received complete laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer combined with preventive ileostomy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects, and were divided into non-stenosis group (n=136) and stenosis group (n=58) according to postoperative colon-anal anastomosis stenosis. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis, and stepwise regression was used to evaluate the importance of each factor. The risk prediction model of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed and evaluated. ResultsIn the stenosis group, the proportion of males, tumor diameter ＞3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, left colic artery not preserved, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection and patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were higher than those in the non-stenosis group (P<0.05). The results of univariate logistic analysis showed that female and preserving the left colonic artery were the protective factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05), and the tumor diameter >3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the risk factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, tumor diameter, NRS 2002 score, anastomotic mode, anastomotic leakage, and pelvic infection were independent influencing factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Stepwise regression analysis showed that the top three factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis were NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage. Multivariate Cox risk proportional model analysis showed that the multivariate model composed of NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage had a good consistency in the risk assessment of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis. Based on this, a risk prediction model for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed. The results of strong influence point analysis show that there are no data points in the modeling data that have a strong influence on the model parameter estimation (Cook distance <1). Receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that the model had good differentiation ability, the area under curve was 0.917, 95%CI was (0.891, 0.942). The calibration curve was approximately a diagonal line, showing that the model has good predictive power (Brier value was 0.097). The results of the clinical decision curve showed that better clinical benefits can be obtained by using the predictive model to identify the corresponding risk population and implement clinical intervention. ConclusionThe prediction model based on NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic fistula can effectively evaluate the risk of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis after preventive ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer under complete laparoscopy.
Objective To study the effect of indirect calorimetry-guided nutritional support on energy metabolism, cellular immunity and oxidative stress in patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopic surgery. Methods A total of 96 patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopic surgery in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the control group (used the formula prediction method to guide enteral nutrition support, n=48) and the observation group (used indirect calorimetry to guide enteral nutrition support, n=48). The target resting energy expenditure (REE) value and nutritional support energy intake were compared between the two groups. The cellular immune indexes (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+) and oxidative stress indexes [serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), the changes of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px)], and the changes of REE at different time points (1 day before operation and 1, 2 and 3 days after operation) of the two groups were compared. The incidence of complications in the two groups were observed. Results The target REE value of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P＜0.05), and there was no significant difference in the enteral energy intake and parenteral energy intake compared with the control group (P＞0.05). After treatment, CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the two groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and CD8+ was higher than before treatment (P<0.05). The levels of CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the observation group after treatment were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05) , while the level of CD8+ in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of SOD and GSH-Px in the two groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the levels of MDA were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05). The levels of GSH-Px and SOD in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), while the level of MDA in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the REE value between the two groups at 1 day before operation (P>0.05); compared with the 1 day before operation, the REE values of the two groups at 1, 2, and 3 days after operation were significantly increased, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups at each time point (P<0.05), but the REE value at 3 days after operation was significantly lower than that at 1 and 2 days after operation (P<0.05). The REE values in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 1, 2 and 3 days after operation (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 6.25%, which was lower than 20.83% in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Enteral nutrition support guided by indirect calorimetry in colorectal cancer patients after laparoscopic surgery can help reduce postoperative energy consumption, improve cellular immune function and oxidative stress response, and reduce the risk of postoperative complications, which is worthy of promotion.
ObjectiveTo summarized the clinical experience on laparoscopic radical surgery in patients with advanced distal gastric cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 26 patients with advanced distant gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsLaparoscopic distal gastrectomy was performed successfully in all patients. The operation time was (283.2±27.6) min (270-450 min) and the blood loss was (178.4±67.4) ml (80-350 ml). The time of gastrointestinal function recovery was (2.8±1.2) d (2-4 d), out of bed activity time was (1.5±0.4) d (1-3 d) and liquid diet feeding was (3.5±1.4) d (3-4 d). The hospital stay was (10.0±2.6) d (7-13 d). The number of harvested lymph nodes was 11 to 34 (17.8±7.3). The distance from proximal surgical margin to tumor was (7.0±2.1) cm (5-12 cm) and the distance from distal surgical margin to tumor was (5.5±1.8) cm (4-8 cm), thus surgical margins were negative in all samples. All patients were followed up for 3-48 months (mean 18.5 months), two patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma died of extensive metastasis in 13 and 18 months, respectively, and other patients survived well. ConclusionsLaparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer is safe and feasible. However, the advantage of laparoscopic technique over the conventional open surgery requires further study.
Objective This study aimed to explore the experience of secondary excision for retrorectal cystic lesions. Method We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent secondary laparoscopic excision of retrorectal cystic lesions at the Department of General Surgery at our hospital between August 2012 and August 2021. Results Twelve patients [male: 5; female: 7; age: (31.8±11.5) years old (18–60 years old)] were evaluated. The lesions ranged from 5.8 to 15.0 cm in diameter [(10.0±3.5) cm]. Seven patients had epidermoid cysts, three patients had mature teratoma, one patient had mature teratoma with low-grade mucinous neoplasm and one patient had cyst with mucinous carcinoma. Laparoscopic excision of retrorectal cystic lesions was performed in ten patients, and laparoscopy combined transsacrococcygeal approach was performed in two patients. The median operative time was 137.5 min (80–240 min), and the median blood loss was 30 mL (10–200 mL). No patient experienced complications of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲa or worse, one patient experienced complications of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅱa after operation. The mean duration of hospitalization was (5.9±1.4) d (3–7 d). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 108 months, and the median follow-up time was 43-month, and one patient recurred during the follow-up period. Conclusions Attention should be paid to the initial diagnosis and treatment of retrorectal cystic lesions, particularly in children. Routine evaluation using preoperative pelvic MRI and the adoption of an appropriate surgical approach are recommended to reduce secondary operations. Surgery should be performed by surgeons experienced in rectal andpelvic surgeries.
ObjectiveTo assess the outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted surgery for treatment of advanced gastric cancer.MethodsA total of 115 patients with advanced gastric cancer were included between January 2014 and December 2018 were analyzed retroprospectively, the patients were divided into two groups: open surgery group (OS group, n=63) and laparoscopy-assisted surgery group (LAS group, n=52). Baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters and postoperative items, and long-term efficacy were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data including gender, age and preoperative serum parameters between the two groups (P>0.05). Intraoperative blood loss in the LAS group was significantly less than that in the OS group (P<0.05). In addition, the first feeding time after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the LAS group were significantly shorter than the OS group (P<0.05). Furthermore, numbers of white blood cells and neutrophils in the LAS group were fewer than that in the OS group at postoperative 2 days (P<0.05); the level of serum albumin in the LAS group was higher than that OS group (P<0.05). The number of lymph nodes detected during operation in the LAS group was more than that in the OS group (P<0.05). Operative time and occurrence of postoperative complications were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.05). One hundred and ten of 115 patients were followed- up, the follow-up rate was 95.7%. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 48 months, with a median follow-up time of 12.4 months. The disease-free survival time of the OS group was 12.2±6.5 months, while that of the LAS group was 13.5±7.4 months. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsLaparoscopic technique in treatment of advanced gastric cancer has the minimally invasive advantage, less intraoperative blood loss, less surgical trauma, and faster postoperative recovery in comparing to the traditional open surgery. Also the lymph node dissection is superior to open surgery. The curative effect is comparable to that of open surgery.
The “Expert consensus on radical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (2023)” (following abbreviations as “this consensus”) was formulated by the Biliary Surgery Group of the Chinese Medical Association Surgery Branch and the Biliary Surgery Expert Working Group of the Surgeons Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and was first published in the Chinese Journal of Surgery in April 2024. In this consensus, relevant experts discussed and formulated relevant recommendations on the operation process of laparoscopicradical resection of gallbladder cancer (LRRGC), and elaborated on many issues. We interpreted and discussed the safety and efficacy evaluation of LRRGC, the standardized operating procedures and technical key points in this procedure, as well as the surgical principles for reoperation of delayed diagnosed gallbladder cancer in this consensus so as to enhance readers’ understanding of this consensus. We also hoped that medical centers will make more attempts and research on LRRGC in order to standardize and promote the application of LRRGC.
From December 1995 to December 1997, 1 500 patients with gallstones or together with biliary duct stones accepted laparoscopic cholesystectomy (LC) or LC+laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCDE). There were 9 had serious complications (0.6%) occured . While the mean age was 54.9 years old. The sex ratio (female∶male) was 1∶1.25. Three cases had major biliary duct disruption, 1 case had stomach perforation, 2 cases had duodenal injuries, 1 bleeding case because cystic artery fail to clip, 1 case had postoperative cystic duct leak, and 1 case with T-tube dislodgement. All complications had been discovered during or shortly after operations. The injuries on the extrahepatic biliary duct with lengths of 0.2-0.4cm, and the gastrodenal injuries sized 0.5-1.0cm. All of the injuries had been sutured laparoscopically without sequela. The one who had postoperative cystic duct leak and jaundice accepted LCDE, proved to have a common bile duct stone. The bleeding cystic artery had been clipped well, and the dislodged T-tube replaced well. The results show if the complications which may be very serious or complex had been discovered shortly after or during the operations, its can be managed with laparoscopic technique safely by experienced operators.
Objective To explore the incidence of postoperative recurrence of abdominal incisional hernia and its related risk factors. Methods The clinical data of 213 patients with abdominal incisional hernia treated in the General Surgery of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were collected retrospectively, and the incidence of postoperative recurrence of abdominal incisional hernia and its related influencing factors were analyzed. Results A total of 213 patients underwent a complete follow-up. The follow-up time was 3 to 60 months, and the median follow-up time was 46 months. A total of 24 cases (11.27%) of hernia recurred after surgery. The univariate analysis results showed that body mass index (BMI), hernia ring size, incarceration, recurrent hernia, history of multiple abdominal operations, postoperative incision complications, factors such as increased abdominal pressure, and whether the patch were used for postoperative recurrence of abdominal incisional hernia influences (P<0.05). Further logistic multi-factor analysis results showed that BMI [OR=1.14, 95%CI (1.01, 1.29), P=0.040], incarcerated hernia [OR=8.94, 95%CI (1.94, 40.98), P=0.005], recurrent hernia [OR=10.91, 95%CI (2.09, 56.84), P=0.005], and hernia ring size [OR=1.15, 95%CI (1.03, 1.28), P=0.010] were related to the recurrence of abdominal incisional hernia after surgery (P<0.05). Conclusions The risk factors for hernia recurrence after abdominal incisional hernia repair include recurrent hernia, incarcerated hernia, hernia ring size, and BMI. For patients with high-risk factors, corresponding measures should be taken to prevent hernia recurrence.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and clinical effect of laparoscopic Miles and perineal anal recon-struction operation for patients with low rectal cancer. MethodsOne hundred and two patients underwent Mile's and perineal anal reconstruction operation for rectal cancer in this hospital from April 2006 to February 2010 were analyzed retrospectively, in which 58 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (laparoscope group) and 44 patients underwent open surgery (laparotomy group).All these data such as the survival time, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, the first anal exhaust time and liquid diet recovery time after operation, postoperative hospitalization, and postoperative complications were collected and compared between the laparoscope group and laparotomy group. ResultsThe demography and clinicopathologic characteristics were similar between these two groups (P > 0.05).The operation was successfully performed in all the patients.There was no death associated with the operation.Compared with the laparotomy group, the intraoperative blood loss was less (P < 0.05), the first anal exhaust time and liquid diet recovery time after operation, postoperative hospitalization were shorter (P < 0.05), the harvested lymph node was more (P < 0.05) in the laparoscope group.There were no significant differences in the operative time, postoperative complications, and the survival curves between the two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe clinical effects of laparoscopic and open Miles and perineal anal reconstruction operation are similar for patients with low rectal cancer.But laparoscopic operation is a safe, feasible choice with quicker recover after the operation.