ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical morphological classification feature of symptomatic spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD), basing on the relative diameter of the true lumen (TLRD) and type of lesion, and then summarize the reasonable clinical treatment strategies and timing of arterial reconstruction.MethodsRetrospectively analyzed the imaging data, treatment methods, perioperative complications, and follow-up results of 26 symptomatic SICAD patients admitted to the Department of Endovascular Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from May 2012 to May 2019, patients were divided into conservative treatment group (n=12) and endovascular intervention group (n=14) according the treatment, and then compared the clinical data of the two groups.ResultsTwelve patients in the conservative treatment group had an average of 12.6 days (5–22 days) and discharged from hospital with better condition, of which 11 patients’ TLRD≥30%. In the endovascular intervention group, 2 patients continued to aggravate the symptoms at the 3rd day of admission and received endovascular intervention, the remaining 12 patients’ symptoms were not significantly relieved or the symptoms reappeared after averaged 11.4 days, whose TLRD<30% or diameter >1.5 cm. Compared with the endovascular intervention group, the duration of symptoms was shorter (P=0.04), proportions of back pain (P=0.02) and chest pain (P=0.04) were lower, TLRD value and proportion of TLRD value>30% (subtype of a) were higher (P=0.01, P=0.02). The average follow-up duration of 26 patients was 28.2 months (12–83 months). The follow-up results of all patients in the conservative treatment group were good and no relevant symptoms had appeared since discharge. One patient in the endovascular intervention group had transient liver function damage, 1 patient had severe deformation of the proximal end of the stent at 1 year after implantation of the celiac artery stent. The remaining patients were stable with no progress.ConclusionsFor symptomatic SICAD, if the clinical symptoms are stable after hospitalization, conservative medication and close imaging follow-up are preferred, if there is no relief of symptoms, continuous organ perfusion and other manifestations based on medication, endovascular intervention can be considered for arterial reconstruction, the early and medium follow-up results were satisfactory under this treatment algorithm. In addition, there are differences in TLRD value between the conservative treatment group and the endovascular intervention group, suggesting that TLRD as the morphological characteristics of the classification has a potential guiding significance for the development of clinical treatment strategy.
ObjectiveTo summarize the diagnosis, surgical management, and outcomes of one case of complex unilateral renal artery aneurysm repaired by in situ open surgery. MethodTo retrospectively analyze the clinical data of a patient with complex renal artery aneurysm admitted to the author’s hospital department in December 2021 who underwent in situ open surgery. ResultsThe patient was a middle-aged female with a left renal artery aneurysm detected on physical examination. The renal artery three-dimensional CT imaging showed that the aneurysm was large in size and complex in anatomical structure; the aneurysm was located at the renal hilum, demonstrating multiple outflow tracts and close proximity to renal parenchyma and the ureter. Surgical management included in situ aneurysm resection combined with renal artery branch reconstruction and great saphenous vein bypass grafting. The operation duration was 5 hours with intraoperative urine output was 250 mL, and the intraoperative blood loss was about 400 mL. Four units of erythrocyte suspension, 200 mL of autologous recycled blood, and 400 mL of plasma were transfused during the operation. The results of the 36-month postoperative follow-up showed that the reconstructed renal arterial branches and the bridging vessel had satisfactory blood flow, and renal function was unaffected. ConclusionsThe results of this case suggest that in complex renal artery aneurysms involving multiple branches, in situ resection of the aneurysm followed by revascularization and main renal artery bypass grafting to restore flow is safe and feasible, and the long-term prognosis is good. However, it should be emphasized that the anatomy of renal artery aneurysms should be evaluated in detail preoperatively to determine the method of in situ revascularization. The results of the study also need to be further validated by larger samples and multicenter studies.