ObjectiveTo observe the changes of body composition in patients with obesity after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and know the factors affecting the effective weight loss. MethodsThe obese patients who received SG treatment at the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from October 2019 to October 2022 were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The anthropometric parameters, lipid metabolism indexes, and body composition data were collected before surgery (1 d) and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month after surgery. The risk factors affecting the effective weight loss were analyzed. ResultsA total of 170 patients were included in the study. ① The anthropometric parameters such as body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio at different time points after surgery as compared with the baseline (1 day before surgery) values were decreased (P<0.05) and showed continuous downward trends after surgery (P<0.05), meanwhile the percentage total weight loss and percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) indicators showed continuous upward trends (P<0.05). ② The lipid metabolic indexes such as triglyceride, total cholesterol, and uric acid, except for the total cholesterol indexes at the 6th and 12th month had no statistical differences as compared with the baseline value (P>0.05) and the uric acid was increased at the 1st month after surgery (P<0.05), the other indexes at different time points after surgery showed continuous downward trends as compared with the baseline values (P<0.05). ③ All the body composition parameters except percentage fat-free mass of the left and right lower limbs (P>0.05) at different time points after surgery as compared with the baseline values were decreased (P<0.05), and some body composition indicators, such as fat mass, percentage fat mass, visceral fat area, and obesity degree continued to decrease within 1 year after surgery (P<0.05). ④ There were 93 patients with reaching the standard of effective weight loss (%EWL was 50% or more). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the lower fat mass of right lower limb, the higher probability of effective weight loss [OR (95%CI)=0.452 (0.290, 0.703), P<0.001]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the fat mass of the right lower limb was 0.782 [95%CI=(0.672, 0.893), P<0.001], its sensitivity and specificity were 0.679 and 0.792, respectively, and the cut-off value was 7.35 kg. ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that SG can markedly improve the anthropometric and lipid metabolism indicators of patients with obesity, and achieve effective weight loss in a short-time. The body composition from the whole body to limbs and trunk might be changed. The fat mass of the right lower limb is closely related to the short-term effective weight loss after surgery and it has a moderate ability to distinguish achieving effective weight loss.
Metabolic and bariatric surgery has continued to evolve under the dual imperatives of efficacy and safety. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with transit bipartition (SG-TB), derived from SG, reconstructs a “dual-channel” pathway that preserves the pylorus and proximal small-bowel function, while aiming to achieve metabolic effects comparable to biliopancreatic diversion with fewer severe nutritional complications. In 2025, the first Chinese expert consensus on SG-TB was released, and the inaugural international SG-TB consensus meeting was convened in Europe, reaching preliminary alignment on procedure classification, key technical parameters, and indications/contraindications. Emerging clinical evidence indicates that SG-TB confers advantages in weight reduction, remission of type 2 diabetes, and prevention of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and also demonstrates feasibility in revisional surgeries and complex cases. Nevertheless, current studies are predominantly observational, with limited evidence quality and considerable heterogeneity. Stratification of surgical parameters and establishment of reproducible training systems remain unmet needs. Building upon a synthesis of national and international consensus statements and recent clinical advances, this commentary further analyzes the challenges that SG-TB faces in procedural heterogeneity, evidence accumulation, individualized practice, and mechanistic research. This commentary seeks to offer practical reference and research directions for the bariatric community, ultimately supporting the advancement of SG-TB from a promising technique toward standardized and mainstream adoption.
This review systematically traces the two-decade evolution of bariatric and metabolic surgery. The high recidivism rate associated with conventional obesity treatments have driven rapid innovation in therapeutic strategies and simultaneously accelerated progress in the surgical management of metabolic diseases. The application of laparoscopic and robotic technologies has not only improved cosmetic outcomes through smaller incisions but also significantly enhanced operational precision, further promoting the adoption and dissemination of surgical interventions. Over time, sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass have become the mainstream procedures. Recent research has demonstrated that metabolic surgery mediates its benefits through reprogramming of the neuroendocrine axis, restructuring of the gut microbiota ecosystem, and activation of bile acid signaling pathways. Future efforts should focus on refining long-term complication management protocols and developing individualized prediction models. By utilizing precise phenotyping to optimize procedure selection and implement stratified technical approaches, the field aims to achieve sustained metabolic health.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety of the incision along the upper umbilical margin (referred to as the “upper incision”) versus the transverse umbilical incision (referred to as the “transverse incision”) for single-port bariatric surgery, and to assess their effects on postoperative scar appearance and patient’s psychological adaptation. MethodsThis study was designed as a multi-center retrospective analysis. The patients who underwent bariatric surgery via the upper incision and transverse incision at the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu, Plastic Surgery Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University from December 2024 to April 2025. The incidence of postoperative complications and the pionts of scar appearance (evaluated using the POSAS 3.0 scale) and psychological adaptation (measured with the BODY-Q scale) between the two incision methods were compared. Furthermore, multiple linear regression model was employed to evaluate the impact of different incision methods on points of scar appearance and psychological adaptation. ResultsA total of 194 patients who underwent single-port bariatric surgery were included, with 134 in the transverse incision group and 60 in the upper incision group. There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of incision complications between the transverse and upper incision groups [11.9% (16/134) vs. 18.3% (11/60), χ2=0.930, P=0.335]. The transverse incision group showed significantly better outcomes than the upper incision group in the overall points of BODY-Q scale [(39.86±1.02) points vs. (37.63±4.70) points, t=–6.090, P<0.001] and POSAS scale [(17.60±2.35) points vs. (21.25±6.00) points, t=5.239, P<0.001]. After adjusting for potential confounding factors such as history of diabetes mellitus, education level, smoking status, alcohol consumption status, keloid tendency, and use of scar improvement products in the multiple linear regression model, the advantage of the transverse incision remained significant [β(95%CI)=–1.81 (–2.84, –0.78), P<0.001]. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the transverse incision significantly improves the overall appearance of the postoperative scar and enhances patient’s psychological adaptation compared to the upper incision in single-port bariatric surgery. This advantage persists independently after adjusting for multiple confounding factors. Therefore, the transverse incision could be considered a more favorable approach in terms of cosmetic outcomes and patient’s psychological adaptation.
Obesity is a disease state characterized by the accumulation of abnormal or excessive fat that threatens human health. With the rapid development of the economy and society and the change in lifestyle, obesity is highly prevalent in our country and has become an important disease that threatens the health of the population. Different from traditional non-surgical treatments, metabolic and bariatric surgery has a definite curative effect, is not easy to rebound, has good safety, and has sufficient evidence of clinical benefit, which can make many obese patients, especially those with moderate to severe obesity, fully recover. The treatment of obesity has become an important means in the comprehensive treatment of obesity. This article intends to describe the application of bariatric metabolic surgery in the comprehensive treatment of obesity from three aspects: bariatric surgery indications, surgical method selection, and perioperative multidisciplinary intervention.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effects of weight-loss interventions on hormone levels and sexual function in patients with obesity. MethodsThis review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and other databases was performed for studies published within the past decade that investigated the effects of bariatric surgery, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and lifestyle interventions on sex hormones and sexual function. ResultsBariatric surgery (e.g., sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass) demonstrated the most pronounced improvements in hormonal balance and sexual function. In males, total testosterone levels doubled postoperatively, with marked increase in erectile function score. In females with polycystic ovary syndrome, androgen levels were reduced by 50%, with significant amelioration in the female sexual function index. GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide, liraglutide) partially improved sperm quality and testosterone levels, but were also associated with a higher risk of erectile dysfunction (with a hazard ratio of approximately 4.5). Lifestyle interventions (e.g., low-calorie diet, exercise) could increase sex hormone-binding globulin levels and improve sexual function score, although their efficacy remained inferior to that of surgery. ConclusionsWeight-loss interventions can alleviate hormonal imbalances and sexual dysfunction in obesity, with bariatric surgery demonstrating the most significant effects. Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions have shown variable efficacy. Future research should further investigate mechanisms underlying effects of different weight-loss modalities on sexual health.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery in metabolic surgery for weight loss.MethodThe literatures about stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery were reviewed by searching domestic and foreign literatures.ResultsIn recent years, stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery had been gradually applied in clinical practice. Compared with other weight-loss surgeries, it had better clinical effects in weight reduction and blood glucose control. It not only provided a new surgical treatment for patients with severe obesity, but also promoted the development of weight-loss metabolic surgery.ConclusionAs a new metabolic surgery, stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery is safe and feasible for weight loss.
Objective To review the changes of gut microbiota after bariatric surgery and the related mechanisms of improving metabolism. Method Domestic and international literatures in recent ten years on the changes of gut microbiota in bariatric surgery and the mechanisms of improving metabolism were collated and summarized. Result The common bariatric procedures performed to date were vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The changes of gut microbiota vary in different surgical procedures, which were related to the changes of diet habits, gastrointestinal anatomy, gastrointestinal hormone levels and metabolic complications. The gut microbiota might improve the body metabolism by regulating the levels of short chain fatty acids, branched chain amino acids and bacterial endotoxin in the intestinal lumen. Conclusions Significant changes are found in gut microbiota after bariatric surgery, which may be involved in the improvement of body metabolism by regulating the level of bacterial endotoxin and microbial metabolite. However, more in-depth mechanisms need to be further clarified.
ObjectiveTo summarize the progress of research on the interaction between bariatric surgery and intestinal flora at home and abroad in recent years, in order to provide new ideas for promoting recovery after bariatric surgery. MethodThe domestic and international literature of intestinal flora changes after bariatric surgery was searched and reviewed. ResultsThe main changes of the intestinal flora after bariatric surgery showed that the abundance of thick-walled bacteria was decreased and the numbers of Bacteroides and Aspergillus were increased. Some common complications after bariatric surgery such as anastomotic fistula, nutritional deficiencies, and inflammation were related to the intestinal flora imbalance. Supplementation with probiotics, prebiotics, dietary interventions, or fecal microbial transplantation were expected to reduce the incidence of complications after bariatric surgery. ConclusionsBariatric surgery is a durable and effective method for treating obesity and its comorbidities. Changes in individual intestinal flora after bariatric surgery have an impact on both weight loss outcomes and postoperative complications, and it is important to find ways to reduce postoperative complications after bariatric surgery by improving intestinal flora.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS+1) for patients with obesity. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on obese patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) from January 2023 to November 2024 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Patients were stratified into two groups: SILS+1 group and conventional multi-port LSG (MPLSG) group. Comparative parameters included operative time, postoperative hospital stay, complications rate, weight loss outcomes, and improvement in metabolic indicators [including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)]. ResultsA total of 95 patients with obesity were enrolled, including 40 in the SILS+1 group and 55 in the MPLSG group. The SILS+1 group had significantly lower preoperative body mass index (BMI), HbA1c, and TC level compared to the MPLSG group (P<0.05), and a significantly higher proportion of female patients (P<0.05). Other baseline characteristics, such as age, TG and HDL-C levels, showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). Operative time was significantly longer in the SILS+1 group than in the MPLSG group [(100.16±17.53) min vs. (93.82±20.83) min, P<0.001]. The proportion of patients requiring drainage tube placement was significantly lower in the SILS+1 group as compared with the MPLSG group [55.0% (22/40) vs. 76.4% (42/55), P=0.049]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the need for additional trocar sites, change in hemoglobin level from preoperative to postoperative day 1, postoperative hospital stay, or incidence of postoperative (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ) complications (P>0.05). No 30-day readmissions occurred in either group. One patient in the SILS+1 group required an additional trocar site. Gastrointestinal patency was normal in all patients, with no signs of contrast agent leakage or stricture observed. Both SILS+1 and MPLSG procedures demonstrated equivalent efficacy in weight loss outcomes (P>0.05) and in their effects on HbA1c, TG, and TC levels (P>0.05). The SILS+1 procedure showed a significant advantage in improving HDL-C level (F=6.221, P=0.015), with significantly higher postoperative HDL-C level observed at 6 months postoperatively compared to the MPLSG group (F=2.500, P=0.027). ConclusionsFor selected obese populations, SILS+1 represents a feasible and safe alternative to MPLSG. This technique demonstrates equivalent efficacy to MPLSG in early-stage weight loss and metabolic improvement, serving as a transitional approach toward pure single-incision LSG.