Objective To evaluate the applicability of Transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring in brain protection in the process of aortic dissection surgical procedure. Methods From Feburary 2007 to November 2007, six patients with type I aortic dissection underwent surgical procedure in Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University. All patients are male with their age ranged from 48 to 60 years. During the operation, right subclavian arterial cannulation technique was used to protect the brain, and TCD monitoring was adopted to guide cerebral perfusion. The function of nervous system after operation was observed, and the minimental state examination (MMSE) was used to assess the cognitive function of the patients. A twoyear followup was done to monitor patients’ aorta condition. Results The time of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was 136 to 350 minutes. The time of selected cerebral perfusion was 20 to 65 minutes. The lowest cerebral blood flow was 31% of basic level according to TCD monitoring. All patients were successfully treated without neurological complication and cognitive dysfunction when discharged from hospital. MMSE score was 28 to 30 points. During the twoyear followup after operation, all aortic false lumen were closed and there was no dissection recurrence. Conclusion Monitoring blood change with TCD monitoring technique is safe and effective in evaluating brain protection by selective cerebral perfusion in aortic dissection surgical procedure.
To valuate cerebral protection by retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) via superior vena cava,the study results for the last ten years have been reviewed.RCP is regarded as an assistant method in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest(DHCA) in that it provides partial brain blood flow,maintains a low brain temperature,optimizes cerebral metabolic function during DHCA by supplying oxygen and some nutrient and removal of catabolic products;it also reduces the incidence of cerebral embolization by flushing out air...
Abstract： Objective To evaluate the clinical safety and neurological outcomes of right axillary artery cannulation with a side graft compared with a direct approachin aortic arch replacement for patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection. Methods Between July 2008 and July 2010， 280 consecutive patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent right axillary artery cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass （CPB） in total arch replacement and stented “elephant trunk” implantation in our hospital.These 280 patients were divided into two groups according to the method of axillary artery cannulation in operation:direct arterial cannulation was used in 215 patients（direct arterial cannulationgroup， DG group， mean age of 43.1±9.5 years）， while cannulation with a side graft was used in 65 patients（ indirect cannulation group， IG group， mean age of 44.7±8.3 years）. Clinical characteristics of both groups were similar except their axillary artery cannulation method. Patient outcomes were compared as to the prevalence of clinical complications， especially neurological deficits and postoperative morbidity. Results The overall hospital mortality was 3.6% （10/280）， 3.3% （7/215） in DG group and 4.6% （3/65） in IG group respectively.Right axillary artery cannulation was successfully performed in all cases without any occurrence of malperfusion. Postoperatively， 25 patients（8.9%）developed temporaryneurological deficits， 19 cases in DG group（8.8%）， and 6 cases in IG group （9.2%）， and all these patients were cured after treatment. The incidence of postoperative complications directly related to axillary artery cannulation was significantly lower in IG group than that in DG group（1 case vs. 19 cases， P=0.045）. There were no statistical differences in arterial perfusion peak flow， peak pressure，antegrade cerebral perfusion time， deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time， and CPB time between the two groups（P ＞ 0.05）. Conclusion Right axillary artery cannulation with a side graftcan significantly reduce the postoperative complications of axillary artery cannulation. It is a safe and effective method for patients undergoing surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.
Objectives To investigate the effect of the combined treatment with probiotics and lactulose of gastrointestinal function and postoperative infection after open cardiac surgery. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 264 patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass in our hospital between August 2013 and June 2014. There were 129 males and 135 females at the mean age of 53.06±10.97 years. We divided those patients into a treatment group and a control group. In the treatment group, there were 58 males and 63 females at the mean age of 52.29±14.31 years. They took probiotics and lactulose from the first day to the seventh day after operation. In the control group, there were 71 males and 72 females at the mean age of 52.29±14.31 years. They didn’t take probiotics or lactulose after the surgery. Procalcitonin (PCT) and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) concentrations were measured before operation, at 24 hours postoperatively, at 72 hours and on the seventh day. We recorded the condition of postoperative infection, gastrointestinal disorders and relative informations. Results The PCT and LPS concentrations in the treatment group after 72 hours postoperatively were statistically lower than those of the control group (1.04±5.39 ng/ml vs. 3.51±4.28 ng/ml, P=0.04; 11.28±4.34 EU/ml vs. 21.59±7.34 EU/ml, P=0.03). The PCT and LPS concentrations in the treatment group were also statistically lower than those of the control group on the 7th day postoperatively (0.17±2.79 ng/ml vs. 1.98±4.62 ng/ml，P=0.04; 6.74±6.38 EU/ml vs. 15.96±4.61 EU/ml, P=0.01). The ICU stay time (43.25±14.36 h vs. 63.47±24.46 h, P=0.01) and postoperative hospital stay time (15.07±4.52 d vs. 21.08±6.49 d, P=0.02) were significantly less in the treatment group than those in the control group. The morbidity of infection and the morbidity of gastrointestinal disorders of the treatment group were statistically less than those of the control group (1.65% vs. 5.59%, P=0.00; 2.48% vs. 6.99%, P<0.001), and there was no statistical difference in mortality between the two groups (1.65% vs. 2.10%, P=0.12). Conclusions The combined treatment with probiotics and lactulose can improve the postoperative inflammatory reaction, gastrointestinal function, and reduce the morbidity of infection.
Objective To determine risk factors of delayed recovery of consciousness after aortic arch surgery underdeep hypothermic circulatory arrest （DHCA） and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion （ASCP）. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 113 patients who underwent aortic arch surgery under DHCA＋ASCP in the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital， Medical School of Nanjing University from October 2004 to April 2012. According to whether they regained consciousness within 24 hours after surgery， all the 113 patients were divided into normal group （73 patients including 55 males and 18 females with their average age of 48.1±10.9 years） and delayed recovery group （40 patients including 29 males and 11 females with their average age of 52.2±11.4 years）. Risk factors of delayed recovery of consciousness after surgery were evaluated by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results Nine patients （8.0%） died postoperatively， including 5 patients with multi-organ failure， 2 patients with heart failure， 1 patient with mediastinal infection， and 1 patient with pulmonary hemorrhage. There were 7 deaths （17.5%） in the delayed recovery group and 2 deaths （2.7%） in the normal group， and the in-hospital mortality of the delayed recovery group was significantly higher than that of the normal group （P=0.016）. A total of 94 patients （including 65 patients in the normal group and 29 patients in the delayed recovery group） were followed up for 4-95 months. Eight patients （including 5 patients in the normal group and 3 patients in the delayed recovery group） died during follow-up， including 2 patients with stroke， 3 patients with heart failure， 2 patients with pulmonary hemorrhage and 1 patient with unknown cause. Ten patients were lost during follow-up. Univariate analysis showed that age （P=0.042）， hypertension （P=0.017）， emergency surgery （P=0.001）， cardiopu- lmonary bypass （CPB） time （P=0.007）， aortic cross-clamp time （P=0.021）， and blood transfusion（P=0.012）were risk factors of delayed recovery of consciousness after aortic arch surgery. Multivariate logistic regression showed that emergency surgery （P=0.005） and CPB time＞240 minutes （P=0.000） were independent risk factors of delayed recovery of consciousness after aortic arch surgery. Conclusion Delayed recovery of consciousness after aortic arch surgery is attributed to a combination of many risk factors. Correct patient diagnosis， lesion site and involved scope should be made clear preoperatively in order to choose appropriate surgical strategies. During the surgery， strengthened brain protection， shortened operation time， improved surgical techniques， and perioperative stable circulation maintenance are all important measures to prevent delayed recovery of consciousness after aortic arch surgery.
ObjectiveTo compare the cerebral protective effect of unilateral and bilateral antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during total aortic arch replacement, particularly with respect to neuropsychological outcome.MethodsFrom June 2003 to March 2004, 16 patients who underwent total aortic arch replacement were randomly allocated to one of two methods of brain protection: unilateral antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (unilateral group, n =8) or bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (bilateral group, n =8). Preoperative and postoperative neurological examination, brain computed tomography(CT) scan, and cognitive function tests were performed.ResultsAll patients survived the operations and were discharged from hospital. No new brain infarction occurred. Transient neurologic dysfunction occurred in 1 patient of each group. There were no intergroup differences in the scores of preoperative and post operative cognitive function ( P gt;0.05).ConclusionBoth methods of brain protection for patients undergoing total aortic arch replacement result in favorable and similar effect of brain protection in term of cognitive function provided the circle of Willis is patent and collateral flow is adequate.
Antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) and retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) are the two major types of brain protection during aortic arch surgery. Which one is better has still been debated. By summarizing and analyzing the research progress of the comparative research of antegrade cerebral perfusion and retrograde cerebral perfusion in aortic arch surgery, we have found that there was no significant difference between ACP and RCP in terms of temporary nerve dysfunction (TND), permanent nerve dysfunction (PND), stroke, early mortality, morbidity, long-time survival, and a composite outcome of hospital death, bleeding, prolonged ventilation, need for dialysis, infection and stroke. But RCP resulted in a high incidence of prolonged mean ICU-stay and hospital-stay, longer mean extubation time as well as higher cost. And the surgeon is given more time to reconstruct the vessels of the arch since mean operative time is longer in the ACP. So we think that antegrade cerebral perfusion might be preferred as the brain protection method for complicated aortic arch procedures. If a surgeon confirms that the surgery is not very sophisticated and can be completed in a short time, it is better to choose RCP because of no catheter or cannula in the surgical field to impede the surgeon. The article aims at providing a reference to cardiac surgeries when choosing cerebral protection strategy in aortic arch surgery.
Objective To summarize treatment experience and evaluate clinical outcomes of surgical therapy for Stanford type A aortic dissection （AD）. Methods Clinical data of 48 patients with Stanford type A AD who underwent surgical treatment in General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Region from October 2006 to March 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 41 males and 7 females with their age of 26-72 （47.6±9.2） years. There were 43 patients with acute Stanford type A AD （interval between symptom onset and diagnosis＜14 days） and 5 patients with chronic AD. There were 19 patients with moderate to severe aortic insufficiency and 6 patients with Marfan symdrome but good aortic valve function，who all received Bentall procedure，total arch replacement and stented elephant trunk implantation. There were 8 patients with AD involving the aortic root but good aortic valve function who underwent modified David procedure，total arch replacement and stented elephant trunk implantation. There were 10 patients with AD involving the ascending aorta who received ascending aorta replacement，total arch replacement and stented elephant trunk implantation. There were 5 patients with AD involving partial aortic arch who underwent ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement. Patients were followed up in the 3rd，6th and 12th month after discharge then once every year. Follow-up evaluation included general patient conditions，blood pressure control，chest pain recurrence，mobility and computerized tomography arteriography （CTA）. ResultsCardiopulmonary bypass time was 121-500 （191.4±50.6） minutes，aortic cross-clamp time was 58-212 （112.3±31.7） minutes，and circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion time was 26-56 （34.8±8.7） minutes. Postoperative mechanicalventilation time was 32-250 （76.2±35.6） hours，and ICU stay was 3-20 （7.1±3.4） days. Thoracic drainage within 24 hours postoperatively was 680-1 600 （1 092.5±236.3） ml. Seven patients （14.5%） died perioperatively including 2 patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome，2 patients with low cardiac output syndrome，1 patient with renal failure，1patient with delayed refractory hemorrhage，and 1 patient with coma. Twenty patients had other postoperative complicationsand were cured or improved after treatment. A total of 38 patients ［92.7% （38/41）］ were followed up for 3-48 （13.0±8.9） months，and 3 patients were lost during follow-up. During follow-up，there were 36 patients alive and 2 patients who died of other chronic diseases. There was no AD-related death during follow-up. None of the patients required reoperation for AD or false-lumen expansion. CTA at 6th month after discharge showed no anastomotic leakage，graft distortion or obstruction.Conclusion According to aortic intimal tear locations，ascending aorta diameter and AD involving scopes，appropriate surgical strategies，timing and organ protection are the key strategies to achieve optimal surgical results for Stanford type A AD. Combined axillary and femoral artery perfusion and increased lowest intraoperative temperature are good methods for satisfactory surgical outcomes of Stanford type A AD.
Increasing evidences show that a gradual trend away from deep hypothermia toward moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest, which has been proved to be safe and effective in clinic. By summarizing and analyzing the research progress and applying status of the moderate hypothermia circulatory arrest with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, the article aims at promoting the application of this tenique as a cerebral protection strategy in aortic arch surgery for adults in China.
Objective To summarize the methods and experiences of surgical treatment of aortic arch diseases with four branches aortic graft under deep hypothermia circulatory arrest （DHCA） and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion （ASCP）. Methods In 2004 from September to December, surgical treatment of 12 patients with 7 aortic aneurysm（4 cases with ascending aorta and aortic arch aneurysm, 3 cases with aneurysm of aortic isthmus） and 5 aortic dissection（DeBakey Ⅰ 1 case, DeBakey Ⅱ 3 cases, DeBakey Ⅲ 1 case） were collected in Gunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center. All operations were carried out under DHCA and ASCP, and four branches aortic graft were used to replace the aortic arch. The Bentall procedure, total and partial arch replacement and elephant trunk technique were undertaken in different patients. Results Total 12 patients recovered from the great vessel diseases smoothly without severe cerebral and other systematic complications, the time of operation was 5.5±1.7 h, the period of DHCA was 42.2±12.9min, 4 cases with no blood transfusion, the time of hospitalization was 22.3±7.2d. Conclusion ASCP is a safe. and effective method of cerebral protection during circulation arrest, and four branches aortic graft may shorten the time of DHCA and simplify the procedure of aortic arch replacement.