ObjectiveTo compare the short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD).MethodsClinical data of 29 patients receiving LPD and 27 patients receiving OPD in the department of hepatobiliary surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from March 2016 to December 2018 were collected. Note that both LPD and OPD were performed by the same chief surgeon. Effectiveness and safety of LPD were compared with those of OPD.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, total bilirubin level, direct bilirubin level, preoperative morbidities, focus size, TNM stage and ASA grade between the LPD group and the OPD group (P>0.05). The operative time of the LPD group was significantly longer than that of the OPD group ［(482±86 ) min vs. (349±73) min, P<0.01］. Patients in the LPD group had shorter postoperative anal exhaust time than that in the OPD group ［(3.3±0.8) d vs. (5.3±1.0) d , P<0.05］. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay after operation, blood loss in operation, transfusion, second operation, death and postoperative complications between the LPD group and the OPD group (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe preliminary results of this study suggest that compared with OPD, LPD can shorten the postoperative anal exhaust time but not increase the incidence of postoperative complications and blood loss in operation. Nevertheless, this conclusion is needed to be validated by clinical studies with large sample size.
Objective To investigate effects of fast track surgery (FTS) combined with laparoscopy on perioperative inflammatory mediators, immune indices, and clinical short-term recovery effect in patient with colorectal cancer. Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. The patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu from July 2014 to March 2017 were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into FTS group and traditional group by the random digital table. The FTS mode and the traditional method were adopted during the perioperative period in the FTS group and the traditional group respectively. The inflammatory mediators such asC reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) and cellular immune indexes such as CD4, CD8 and CD4/CD8 on the preoperative 1 d, postoperative 1 d, 3 d and 7 d, as well as the index of clinical short-term rehabilitation were compared between these 2 groups. Results ① Eighty-four patients were included in this study, there were 43 patients in the FTS group and 41 patients in the traditional group. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics and the surgical-related indicators between the two groups (P>0.050). ② There were no significant difference in the levels of CRP and IL-6 between the two groups at different time points (P>0.050). The change trend of CRP and IL-6 levels in FTS group and traditional group before and after operation were the same, the CRP and IL-6 levels at the first day after operation were significantly higher than those on 1 d before operation (P<0.001), but on the 7th day after operation decreased significantly. ③ There were no significant difference of CD4, CD 8 and CD4/CD8 levels between the two groups at different time points (P>0.050). The CD4 decreased significantly in 2 groups at the first day after operation (P<0.050), it began to rise on the 3rd day after operation and was close to the preoperative level on the 7th day after operation, but the increase in the traditional group was smaller. The changes of CD8 level at different time points before and after operation were not significant in two groups (P>0.050). The changes of CD4/CD8 ratio at different time points before and after operation were not significant in two groups (P>0.050), only the first day after operation of FTS group was significantly lower than that in preoperative 1 d (P<0.001), and on the third day after operation, it increased significantly and was close to the level of 1 day before operation. ④ The time of the first postoperative anal exhaustion or defecation in the FTS group was significantly shorter than that in the traditional group (P<0.001). The overall incidence of postoperative complications and the incidence of hypoproteinemia in the FTS group were significantly lower than those in the traditional group (P<0.050). Conclusion Compared with traditional perioperative management in combination with laparoscopic surgery, FTS combined with laparoscopic surgery has no effects on postoperative inflammatory mediators and immune parameters in patient with colorectal cancer, and it could reduce complications, reduce traumatic stress, and accelerate postoperative recovery for patient with colorectal cancer.
Objective To observe the clinical effect of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in the treatment of mesh infection following inguinal hernia repair. Methods A total of 24 patients who suffered form mesh infection following inguinal hernia repair and got treatment in our hospital from February 2012 to December 2015 were collected and divided into 2 groups according to the type of treatment, 12 patients (13 sides) of VSD group received treatment of VSD, and 12 patients (13 sides) of conventional group received conventional treatment. Comparison between the 2 groups in mesh retention rate, the wound healing time, hospitalization cost, and hospital stay was performed. Results There was significant difference in mesh retention rate〔76.9% (10/13)vs. 30.8% (4/13)〕, the wound healing time〔(20.5±4.4) dvs. (29.7± 6.7) d〕, hospitalization cost〔(18 430.1±7 180.2) RMBvs. (12 201.1±6 453.2) RMB〕, and hospital stay〔(23.5±4.1) dvs. (30.7±6.5) d〕between the VSD group and conventional group (P<0.050). Compared with conventional group, the mesh retention rate and hospitalization cost were higher, the wound healing time and hospital stay were shorter in VSD group. Conclusions VSD can effectively control the mesh infection following hernia repair, improve the mesh retention rate. The VSD can also promote growth of granulation tissue in cavity, shorten the wound healing time and hospital stay, but has a high hospitalization cost than conventional treatment.
Objective To analyze the surgical effect of total aortic arch replacement and stented elephant trunk (Sun’s procedure) for acute or chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection, and to investigate the optimal surgical timing for Stanford type A aortic dissection involving aortic arch. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 327 patients with acute or chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection treated by Sun's procedure from June 2010 to June 2014 in Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the time from onset to operation was longer than 2 weeks: an acute group with 229 patients (≤2 weeks, the average time of onset to operation 5.70±3.50 d) and a chronic group with 98 patients (>2 weeks, the average time of onset to operation 21.60±15.70 d). There were 186 males and 43 females with a mean age of 47.47±11.19 years in the acute group, and 76 males and 22 females with a mean age of 45.62±12.92 years in the chronic group. The patients discharged from hospital were followed up for one year. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in preoperative data. The rate of coronary artery bypass grafting, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamping time, intraoperative and postoperative 24 h red blood cell intake were higher or more in the acute group than those in the chronic group (P<0.05). The in-hospital morality, ICU stay, mechanical ventilation time, the incidence of neurological dysfunction, low cardiac output syndrome, acute renal failure with continuous renal replacement therapy, hepatic insufficiency, poor wound healing were higher or more in the acute group than those in the chronic group (P<0.05). During one year follow-up, the survival rate of the acute and chronic groups was 97.0% and 97.6% respectively (P>0.05). No new complications were found in the two groups. The irreversible neurological dysfunction, paraplegia and renal failure showed no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion The short-term mortality and complications of acute Stanford A aortic dissection involving aortic arch treated by Sun’s procedure are significantly higher or more than those of chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection. The risk of surgical treatment in acute phase is high.
ObjectiveTo evaluate and analyze the clinical effect of ambulatory surgery applied to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).MethodsThe patients who underwent LC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2017 to February 2019 were collected, then were assigned to ambulatory surgery applied to LC group (ALC group) and conventional LC group (CLC group) according to the admission process mode. The patients in the ALC group received LC in the ambulatory ward and the patients in the CLC group received LC in the conventional ward. The preoperative waiting time, postoperative gastrointestinal recovery time, postoperative 6 h pain score, total hospitalization time, total hospitalization cost, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 433 patients underwent LC were included in this study, including 176 patients in the ALC group and 257 patients in the CLC group. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, type of gallbladder diseases, etc. between the two groups (P>0.05) except body mass index (P<0.05). There was no perioperative death in the two groups. One patient converted to laparotomy in the CLC group. Compared with the CLC group, the preoperative waiting time, postoperative gastrointestinal recovery time, and the total hospitalization time were shorter, the postoperative pain score was lower, the total hospitalization cost was less, and the satisfaction rate of patients was higher in the ALC group (P<0.05). There was 1 case of incision infection and 1 case of ascites in the operation area in the ALC group and CLC group, 1 case of fever in the ALC group and 3 cases of fever in the CLC group, respectively. There was no difference in the overall incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). During the follow-up of 6 to 26 months, there was no readmission in both groups.ConclusionPatients who undergone LC based on ambulatory surgery mode recover quickly, and hospitalization cost is less, satisfaction rate is higher.
ObjectiveTo investigate the curative effect of C-shaped mucosal resection and anastomosis above the dentate line in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids and its effect on anal function. MethodsA total of 78 patients with degree Ⅳ mixed hemorrhoids treated in Nanjing Liuhe District People’s Hospital from June 2015 to February 2018 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into control group (n=39) and observation group (n=39) according to treatment methods. Patients of the control group received traditional procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids operation, while patients of the observation group received C-shaped mucosal resection and anastomosis above the dentate line. The perioperative indexes (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, etc.), subjective function evaluation indexes (Wexner constipation score, Kirwan grade, etc.), clinical efficacy and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. The random walking model was used to evaluate the clinical curative effect. ResultsThe intraoperative blood loss [(27.9±3.4) mL vs. (43.2±5.2) mL, P<0.001], 24 h visual analogue scale score [(4.2±1.5) points vs. (5.6±1.5) points, P<0.001], duration of first defecation pain [(22.1±3.2) min vs. (34.2±5.0) min, P<0.001], the time of carrying blood [(4.1±0.4) d vs. (5.7±0.6) d, P<0.001], and the time of edema [(3.2±0.6) d vs. (4.7±0.9) d, P<0.001] in the observation group were shorter (lower) than those in the control group. The difference between pre-and post-operation of Wexner constipation score [(13.2±2.4) points vs. (11.7±2.1) points, P=0.004], resting pressure [(23.1±4.9) mmHg vs. (17.8±3.4) mmHg, P<0.001] and maximum squeeze pressure [(33.5±7.3) mmHg vs. (23.1±5.6) mmHg, P<0.001] in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group. There was a long-term correlation between changes in random fluctuating power rate values of Wexner constipation score, Kirwan grade, rectoanal inhibitory reflex positive rate, resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure and the surgical procedure received by the patient of the two groups. The total effective rate [97.4% (38/39) vs. 66.7% (26/39)] and non-recurrence rate [92.3% (36/39) vs. 76.9% (29/39)] in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, while there was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications between the two groups [5.1% (2/39) vs. 12.8% (5/39), P=0.235)]. ConclusionCompared with PPH, C-shaped mucosal resection and anastomosis above the dentate line for the treatment of degree Ⅳ mixed hemorrhoids can improve the therapeutic effect, reduce postoperative recurrence, maintain anal function and facilitate the recovery of patients.
ObjectiveTo compare short- and medium-term effects of Leonardo da Vinci robot-assisted and traditional mitral valvuloplasty.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 74 patients who underwent mitral valvuloplasty in our hospital from January 2015 to March 2017. The patients were divided into two groups according to the mode of operation: a da Vinci group (n=29, 13 males, 16 females at an average age of 52 years) and a routine group (n=45, 18 males, 27 females at an average age of 53 years). The perioperative data of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in sex, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), cardiac function (NYHA), hypertension, diabetes, postoperative blood transfusion and postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The tracheal intubation time, ICU retention time, hospital stay time, blood loss and postoperative drainage in the da Vinci group were shorter or less than those in the routine group (P<0.05). The operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic clamping time in the da Vinci group were longer than those in the routine group (P<0.05). Different surgical procedures had no significant effect on left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mitral regurgitation (MR) 3 years after operation. There was no interaction between the mode of operation and the time of follow-up. There was no significant difference in echocardiographic evaluation in the same period (P>0.05).ConclusionDa Vinci operation shortens the rehabilitation process of patients compared with traditional surgery. For short- and medium-term follow-up results, there is no difference between Leonardo da Vinci and traditional mitral valve surgeries, and the clinical effect of da Vinci robot-assisted mitral valvuloplasty is satisfactory, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical effect of biliary metallic stent implantation via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) approaches in treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice. MethodsOne hundred and thirty-six patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who received the biliary metallic stent implantation from June 2010 to June 2015 in this hospital were selected. There were 53 cases via ERCP approach (ERCP group), in which 44 patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice, 9 patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice. There were 83 cases via PTCD approach (PTCD group), in which 24 patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice, 59 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. The surgical success rate, effective rate, incidence of postoperative complications, hospital stay, and hospitalization expenses were compared in these two groups. Results① The total surgical success rate had no significant difference between the ERCP group and the PTCD group (P > 0.05). The surgical success rate of the patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice had no significant difference between the ERCP group and PTCD group (P > 0.05), which of the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). ② The total effective rate had no significant difference between the ERCP group and PTCD group (P > 0.05), which of the patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05), which of the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). ③ The hospital stay of the ERCP group was significantly shorter than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). The hospitalization expenses had no significant difference between the ERCP group and PTCD group (P > 0.05). ④ The total incidence of complications in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05), which of the patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05), which of the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). ConclusionsThe biliary metallic stent implantation via ERCP and PTCD approaches in treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice could all obtain a better clinical efficacy. It has more advantages in patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice via ERCP approach and in the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice via PTCD approach.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of jejunostomy tube versus nasojejunal tube for enteral nutrition after radical resection of esophageal cancer. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM databases were searched to collect the clinical effects of jejunostomy tube versus nasojejunal nutrition tube after radical resection of esophageal cancer from inception to October 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsTwenty-six articles were included, including 17 randomized controlled studies and 9 cohort studies, with a total of 35 808 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that: in the jejunostomy tube group, the postoperative exhaust time (MD=–4.27, 95%CI –5.87 to –2.66, P=0.001), the incidence of pulmonary infection (OR=1.39, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.82, P=0.02), incidence of tube removal (OR=0.11, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.30, P=0.001), incidence of tube blockage (OR=0.47, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.97, P=0.04), incidence of nasopharyngeal discomfort (OR=0.04, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.13, P=0.001), the incidence of nasopharyngeal mucosal damage (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.42, P=0.008), the incidence of nausea and vomiting (OR=0.20, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.47, P=0.003) were significantly shorter or lower than those of the nasojejunal tube group. The postoperative serum albumin level (MD=5.75, 95%CI 5.34 to 6.16, P=0.001) was significantly better than that of the nasojejunal tube group. However, the intraoperative operation time of the jejunostomy tube group (MD=13.65, 95%CI 2.32 to 24.98, P=0.02) and the indent time of the postoperative nutrition tube (MD=17.81, 95%CI 12.71 to 22.91, P=0.001) were longer than those of the nasojejunal nutrition tube. At the same time, the incidence of postoperative intestinal obstruction (OR=6.08, 95%CI 2.55 to 14.50, P=0.001) was significantly higher than that of the nasojejunal tube group. There were no statistical differences in the length of postoperative hospital stay or the occurrence of anastomotic fistula between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionIn the process of enteral nutrition after radical resection of esophageal cancer, jejunostomy tube has better clinical treatment effect and is more comfortable during catheterization, but the incidence of intestinal obstruction is higher than that of traditional nasojejunal tube.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of suturesuspension single hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy and traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the treatment of gallbladder disease. Methods A total of 86 cases who got treatment in our hospital from February 2014 to July 2015 were collected prospectively, and then 86 cases were divided into 2 groups: 43 cases of control group underwent LC and 43 cases of experimental group underwent suturesuspension single hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Clinical efficacy and safety of the two groups were compared. Results ① Complication. No one suffered from bile duct injury, bile leakage, bile duct stricture, and umbilical hernia; but there were 2 cases suffered from complications in control group, including 1 case of abdominal pain and 1 case of bloating, and the morbidity was 4.65% (2/43). The morbidity of experimental group was 0, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the morbidity (P>0.05). During the follow-up period, 1 case suffered from long-term compilation in experimental group, and 2 cases in normal group, there was no significant difference in the long-term complication between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ② Operation and hospitalization. The blood loss and operation time in the experimental group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the hospital stay and hospitalization cost between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ③ Postoperative electrolytes, liver and kidney function. The levels of Na+ and K+ in the experimental group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05), and the levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were lower than those of control group (P<0.01), but there was no significant difference in the blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ④ The recovery of gastrointestinal function after surgery. The anal exhaust time and bowel sounds recovery time in experimental group were shorter than those of the control group (P<0.01). Conclusion Suturesus-pension single hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of gallbladder disease is safe, effective, and minimally invasive, and it has little disturbance on gastrointestinal function and liver function, which is worthy of clinical application.