ObjectiveTo systematically review the methods, characteristics, and indications of technique for retraction of liver and evaluate their application effects during the laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, so as to provide reference for clinicians to choose the most suitable liver retraction method. MethodThe relevant research literature on the application of liver retraction method both domestically and internationally during the laparoscopic radical gastrectomy was reviewed and compared. ResultsThe main liver retraction methods that were used both domestically and internationally included V-shaped retraction, W-shaped retraction, medical adhesive retraction, and liver dilator retraction. Among them, the V-shaped, W-shaped, and liver dilator retraction techniques had been improved according to the situation, but these retraction techniques had their own advantages and disadvantages and could not be completely replaced by each other. ConclusionsCurrently, there is no absolutely ideal retraction method that is simple, safe, and effective. The specific choice of liver retraction technology needs to be selected based on the patient’s specific physical conditions, considering the safety, effectiveness, and rationality of this method.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current common clinical laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgical localization methods, and to provide reference for clinicians to choose reasonable localization methods. MethodThe domestic and foreign literatures related to laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgical localization methods were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe common localization methods for laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgery were imaging localization, preoperative endoscopic localization, intraoperative endoscopic localization and intraoperative fluorescence localization, among which abdominal enhanced CT and endoscopic-related localization methods were the most commonly used localization methods in clinical practice at present. ConclusionA variety of methods are available for surgeons to choose from, and the precise localization of tumors is better facilitated by combining multiple methods.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in hiatus hernia repair. MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Web of Science, VIP, and Wanfang databases were searched to collect literature comparing the efficacy and safety of RAS and CLS for hiatus hernia repair published from their inception to November 7, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and RevMan 5.4.1 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 15 retrospective cohort studies with 18239 patients were finally included. The NOS scores of the included literature were all≥7 points. Meta-analysis results showed that RAS was superior to CLS in terms of postoperative complications as the primary outcome [OR=0.56, 95%CI (0.42, 0.77), P<0.01]. There was no statistical difference between the two methods in terms of average operation time [MD=−0.74, 95%CI (−12.99, 11.51), P=0.91], average intraoperative blood loss [MD=−24.47, 95%CI (−54.80, 5.87), P=0.11], intraoperative complications [OR=0.76, 95%CI (0.29, 2.01), P=0.58], average postoperative hospital stay [MD=−0.24, 95%CI (−0.75, 0.27), P=0.36], postoperative GERD score [MD=−0.04, 95%CI (−0.41, 0.33), P=0.81], and 30-day readmission rate [OR=0.60, 95%CI (0.30, 1.20), P=0.15]. The cost of CLS surgery was less than that of RAS [SMD=1.59, 95%CI (1.16, 2.01), P<0.01]. ConclusionRAS has comparable efficacy and safety to CLS in hiatus hernia repair.
ObjectiveTo explore the causes of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis in patients with low rectal cancer after prophylactic ileostomy under complete laparoscopy. MethodsA total of 194 patients with low rectal cancer who received complete laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer combined with preventive ileostomy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects, and were divided into non-stenosis group (n=136) and stenosis group (n=58) according to postoperative colon-anal anastomosis stenosis. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis, and stepwise regression was used to evaluate the importance of each factor. The risk prediction model of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed and evaluated. ResultsIn the stenosis group, the proportion of males, tumor diameter ＞3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, left colic artery not preserved, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection and patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were higher than those in the non-stenosis group (P<0.05). The results of univariate logistic analysis showed that female and preserving the left colonic artery were the protective factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05), and the tumor diameter >3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the risk factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, tumor diameter, NRS 2002 score, anastomotic mode, anastomotic leakage, and pelvic infection were independent influencing factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Stepwise regression analysis showed that the top three factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis were NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage. Multivariate Cox risk proportional model analysis showed that the multivariate model composed of NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage had a good consistency in the risk assessment of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis. Based on this, a risk prediction model for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed. The results of strong influence point analysis show that there are no data points in the modeling data that have a strong influence on the model parameter estimation (Cook distance <1). Receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that the model had good differentiation ability, the area under curve was 0.917, 95%CI was (0.891, 0.942). The calibration curve was approximately a diagonal line, showing that the model has good predictive power (Brier value was 0.097). The results of the clinical decision curve showed that better clinical benefits can be obtained by using the predictive model to identify the corresponding risk population and implement clinical intervention. ConclusionThe prediction model based on NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic fistula can effectively evaluate the risk of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis after preventive ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer under complete laparoscopy.
ObjectiveTo assess the outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted surgery for treatment of advanced gastric cancer.MethodsA total of 115 patients with advanced gastric cancer were included between January 2014 and December 2018 were analyzed retroprospectively, the patients were divided into two groups: open surgery group (OS group, n=63) and laparoscopy-assisted surgery group (LAS group, n=52). Baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters and postoperative items, and long-term efficacy were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data including gender, age and preoperative serum parameters between the two groups (P>0.05). Intraoperative blood loss in the LAS group was significantly less than that in the OS group (P<0.05). In addition, the first feeding time after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the LAS group were significantly shorter than the OS group (P<0.05). Furthermore, numbers of white blood cells and neutrophils in the LAS group were fewer than that in the OS group at postoperative 2 days (P<0.05); the level of serum albumin in the LAS group was higher than that OS group (P<0.05). The number of lymph nodes detected during operation in the LAS group was more than that in the OS group (P<0.05). Operative time and occurrence of postoperative complications were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.05). One hundred and ten of 115 patients were followed- up, the follow-up rate was 95.7%. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 48 months, with a median follow-up time of 12.4 months. The disease-free survival time of the OS group was 12.2±6.5 months, while that of the LAS group was 13.5±7.4 months. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsLaparoscopic technique in treatment of advanced gastric cancer has the minimally invasive advantage, less intraoperative blood loss, less surgical trauma, and faster postoperative recovery in comparing to the traditional open surgery. Also the lymph node dissection is superior to open surgery. The curative effect is comparable to that of open surgery.
Objective This study aimed to explore the experience of secondary excision for retrorectal cystic lesions. Method We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent secondary laparoscopic excision of retrorectal cystic lesions at the Department of General Surgery at our hospital between August 2012 and August 2021. Results Twelve patients [male: 5; female: 7; age: (31.8±11.5) years old (18–60 years old)] were evaluated. The lesions ranged from 5.8 to 15.0 cm in diameter [(10.0±3.5) cm]. Seven patients had epidermoid cysts, three patients had mature teratoma, one patient had mature teratoma with low-grade mucinous neoplasm and one patient had cyst with mucinous carcinoma. Laparoscopic excision of retrorectal cystic lesions was performed in ten patients, and laparoscopy combined transsacrococcygeal approach was performed in two patients. The median operative time was 137.5 min (80–240 min), and the median blood loss was 30 mL (10–200 mL). No patient experienced complications of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲa or worse, one patient experienced complications of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅱa after operation. The mean duration of hospitalization was (5.9±1.4) d (3–7 d). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 108 months, and the median follow-up time was 43-month, and one patient recurred during the follow-up period. Conclusions Attention should be paid to the initial diagnosis and treatment of retrorectal cystic lesions, particularly in children. Routine evaluation using preoperative pelvic MRI and the adoption of an appropriate surgical approach are recommended to reduce secondary operations. Surgery should be performed by surgeons experienced in rectal andpelvic surgeries.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) from a societal perspective. MethodsA decision-tree model was constructed to conduct cost-utility analysis, simulating the short-term intraoperative to postoperative clinical progression of patients. Primary evaluation metrics included cumulative costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at three times the 2024 per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of China. The sensitivity analyses were performed to assess robustness of the model. ResultsThe base-case analysis revealed that patients in the RALS group gained 0.09 more QALYs at an additional cost of ¥39 079.52 compared to CLS group, the derived ICER was ¥437 157.36/QALYs, exceeding the predefined WTP threshold. The results suggested that RALS does not demonstrate superior cost-effectiveness compared to CLS in the management of early-stage EC. Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated that, when the annual surgical volume per robotic device reaches 809 cases, or the cost of Endowrist consumables per robotic surgery drops below ¥6 568.46, RALS will emerge as a more cost-effective surgical strategy. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that that RALS becomes more cost-effective when the WTP threshold exceeds ¥402 145.80. Conclusion From a Chinese societal perspective, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer is not cost-effective compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery at the current WTP threshold of three times per capita GDP.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcome between single-incision laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (SILSG) versus laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy (LASG) in treatment of benign gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. MethodsClinical data of 37 patients with benign gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer who underwent laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy between Jan. 2008 and Feb. 2015 at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University was collected retrospectively. Among them, 15 patients underwent SILSG and 22 patients underwent LASG. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data was analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe operative time of SILSG group was significantly longer than that of LASG group (P < 0.050). However, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (P < 0.050), and the total patient scar assesment scale (PSAS) score was significantly lower (P < 0.050) in the SILSG group than those of LASG group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to other variables (P > 0.050), such as conversion rate, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, incidence of complication, and visual analog scale score of pain. All patients received postoperative follow up, and the period ranged from 6 months to 25 months, with a median of 11 months. During the follow up period, no one suffered from incision hernia and recurrence of ulcer. ConclusionCompared with LASG, SILSG is a technically feasible procedure with better cosmesis and equivalent curability.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of preoperative gum chewing on the postoperative rehabilitation of patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.MethodsA total of 160 patients undergoing elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery between January and May 2013 were selected to participate in the study. Each patient was randomly assigned to one of the two groups: the trial group (n=80) or the control group (n=80). Thirty to sixty minutes before the surgery, the patients in the trial group chewed one piece of sugarless gum for at least 30 minutes, and then removed the gum before being taken to the operating room; while the patients in the control group chewed nothing. The time to first passage of flatus and the time to first defecation after surgery, length of hospital stay, the degrees of pain at 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 24-, 48-hour after surgery, the incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distension, postoperative analgesic and antiemetic drug requirement were recorded.ResultsThe mean time to first passage of flatus was significantly earlier in the trial group than that in the control group [(16.49±7.64) vs. (20.25±7.94) hours, P=0.003]. The mean time to first defecation was significantly earlier in the trial group than that in the control group [(48.16±15.25) vs. (55.80±18.97) hours, P=0.006]. The degree of pain at 2-hour after surgery was significantly lighter in the trial group than that in the control group (P<0.05). Fewer participants in the trial group than in the control group experienced postoperative nausea (43.75% vs. 61.25%, P=0.027). There were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay, the degrees of pain at 4-, 6-, 8-, 24- and 48-hour after surgery, incidences of postoperative vomiting and abdominal distension, postoperative analgesic, or antiemetic drug requirement between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsGum chewing before surgery can promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function, reduce postoperative short-term pain, and promote postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Gum chewing before surgery can be used clinically as an easy, inexpensive, safe, and effective procedure.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. MethodsThe data of two cases undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, including operative time, operation related complications, intraoperative bleeding volumes, number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative complications, time to restoration of bowel function, and length of postoperative hospital stay, etc, were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsTwo patients had undergone the successful hand-assisted laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy and distal gastrectomy without operation related complications. The operative time was 310 min and 220 min, respectively. While, the intraoperative bleeding volume was 120 ml and 80 ml with the number of harvested lymph node being 38 and 52, respectively. There were no postoperative bleeding, intestinal fistula, and anastomotic leakage， etc. The patients were discharged with smooth and fully recovery. ConclusionThe application of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer is feasible and safe. However, the effectiveness needs further exploring.