west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "laparoscopy" 38 results
  • Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterovesical Reimplantation

    摘要:目的:探讨经腹腔镜行输尿管膀胱再植手术的临床疗效。 方法:对3例先天性巨输尿管疾病患者采用经腹腔镜行输尿管下段整形膀胱移植术。结果:3例手术顺利,均获成功,术中出血量20~80 mL,术后吻合口或切口无漏尿,术后住院时间7~12 d。所有患者随访3~6个月,静脉肾盂造影(IVU)或B超均提示造影剂通过良好,肾积水均得到明显改善,输尿管不扩张,无输尿管吻合口狭窄。结论:经腹腔镜输尿管膀胱再植手术具有创伤小、出血少、术后恢复快、住院时间短等特点,疗效肯定,值得临床推广。Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterovesical reimplantation. Methods: Three patients who were diagnosed with simple congenital ureter outlet stricture,underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterovesical reimplantation. Results: All the operations were successful. The intraoperative blood loss was 2080 mL (mean 45 mL). And the postoperative hospitalization was 712 day.No complications were occurred during operation and the follow up period for 36 months in 3 cases. 〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖WTBZ〗: Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterovesical reimplantation has the advantages of minimal invasion,less blood loss and rapid postoperative rehabilitation,which is an effective and practical procedure.

    Release date:2016-08-26 03:57 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • The efficacy of 3D laparoscopy in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

    ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of 3D laparoscopic in the treatment of colorectal cancer.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched online to collect clinical trials of 3D laparoscopic in the treatment of colorectal cancer from inception to September 1st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 26 trials, including 4 randomized controlled trials and 22 cohort studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with 2D laparoscopic, 3D laparoscopic had shorter operative time (MD=–16.32, 95%CI –22.61 to –10.03, P<0.000 01), less amount of blood transfusion in operation (MD=–10.80, 95%CI –19.93 to –1.66, P=0.02), more lymph node dissection (MD=0.88, 95%CI 0.30 to 1.45, P=0.003), shorter recovery time of gastrointestinal function (MD=–0.18, 95%CI –0.31 to –0.04, P=0.01), lower incidence of postoperative complication (OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.44 to 0.89, P=0.009), and fewer days in hospital (MD=–0.84, 95%CI –1.40 to –0.28, P=0.003). Additionally, there was no significant difference in hospitalization costs (MD=–0.01, 95%CI –0.23 to 0.21, P=0.94).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that, compared with 2D laparoscopy, 3D laparoscopy assisted colorectal cancer surgery has obvious advantages such as less bleeding during operation, shorter operation time, lower incidence of complications after operation, shorter hospitalization time and no increase in hospitalization expenses. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.

    Release date:2019-07-18 10:28 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Efficacy of unconventional abdominal drainage after laparoscopic hepatectomy

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of unconventional abdominal drainage after laparoscopic hepatectomy.MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver tumors in the Mianyang Central Hospital from June to December 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively collected. Based on whether drainage tube was placed in the abdominal cavity during operation, the patients were divided into non-catheterized group (without drainage tube) and catheterized group (with drainage tube). The intraoperative data and postoperative complications (e.g. intraabdominal hemorrhage, bile leakage, abdominal infection, and liver failure) were compared between the two groups. Then, the intraoperative data and postoperative conditions of liver cancer and non-liver cancer patients with or without abdominal drainage tube were compared and analyzed.ResultsA total of 117 eligible patients were included in the study. The non-catheterized group had 59 patients and the catheterized group had 58 patients. The patients with liver cancer had 84 patients (44 non-catheterized patients and 40 catheterized patients) and the patients without liver cancer had 33 patients (15 non-catheterized patients and 18 catheterized patients). ① On the whole, the groups were comparable in the baseline data between the non-catheterized group and the catheterized group, such as gender, age, HBV infection, body mass index, hepatic function index, liver stiffness value, disease category, etc. (P>0.05). Compared with the catheterized group, the non-catheterized group had earlier off-bed activities and earlier flatus time (P<0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (P=0.030). However, no statistically significant differences were found in other indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). ② Whether the patients had liver cancer or not, the non-catheterized patients still had earlier off-bed activities and earlier flatus time as compared with the catheterized patients (P<0.001). Among the patients with liver cancer, no difference was found in postoperative hospital stay. However, among the patients without liver cancer, the non-catheterized patients had shorter postoperative hospital stay than the catheterized patients (P=0.042). No statistically significant differences were found in other indicators between the catheterized patients and non-catheterized patients (P>0.05).ConclusionFor technologically skilled laparoscopic hepatectomy center, selectively not placing peritoneal drainage tube after surgery might better promote the health of patients.

    Release date:2020-09-23 05:27 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Efficacy and safety of different operation methods for patients with cesarean scar diverticulum

    Objectives To analyze the efficacy and safety of different operation methods for patients with cesarean scar diverticulum. Methods The clinical data of patients with cesarean section scar diverticulum treated in West China Second University Hospital from July 2012 to December 2016 was collected and followed up. The data of the previous perioperative period data, recovery, the improvement of the symptoms and postoperative condition of incision healing were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software. Results A total of 125 patients were included, in which 74 cases received hysteroscopy surgery for diverticulum electro section and electric coagulation (ESEC group), and 51 cases received other surgery focused on diverticulum dissection and sewing operations (DS group). Statistical analysis showed that, compared with DS group, bleeding, operation time, time of anal exsufflation and hospitalization duration after the operation of hysteroscopy in ESEC group were significantly reduced (P<0.001). In addition, the results showed that hysteroscopy group had optimal results in hemorrhage volume, operation time, anal exhaust time and hospitalization time indicators. However, the results of laparotomy group was not significant. Conclusions For the treatment of CSD, surgical treatment of this pathology by operative hysteroscopy may represent the best choice in symptomatic women because of its minimal invasiveness and beneficial therapeutic results. Hysteroscopy isthmoplasty appears to be the most popular treatment.

    Release date:2019-01-15 09:51 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Progress in clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies for gastric stump cancer

    Objective To summarize the progress on diagnosis and treatment of gastric stump cancer. Methods Related literatures in recent 5 years were collected, and the progress on diagnosis and treatment of gastric stump cancer were reviewed. Results The diagnosis of gastric stump cancer mainly depends on endoscopy, mucosal biopsy and other imaging examinations. At present, the main treatment of gastric stump cancer is the total gastrectomy, combined with laparoscopic therapy and endoscopic therapy. On the basis of No.1-No.4 and No.7-No.13 lymph node dissection, the extent of lymph node dissection is enlarged according to the different surgical procedures. Conclusions The main treatment of gastric stump cancer is total gastrectomy, and there are many factors affecting the prognosis, which should be early diagnosis and early treatment. Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric stump caner provides a more convenient and accurate method for the treatment of gastric stump caner.

    Release date:2017-01-18 08:04 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • The application effect of laparoscopic versus open surgery in treatment of traumatic rupture of spleen: a meta-analysis

    Objective To investigate the difference of effect between laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with traumatic rupture of spleen. Methods The literatures on comparison of laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with traumatic rupture of spleen were retrieved in PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases from Jan. 2007 to Jan. 2017, and then Stata 12.0 software was applied to present meta-analysis. Results ① The condition during operation: compared with the OS group, operative time of the LS group was shorter [SMD=–0.71, 95% CI was (–1.12, –0.30), P=0.001] and intraoperative blood loss of the LS group was less [SMD=–1.53, 95% CI was (–2.28, –0.78), P<0.001]. ② The postoperative condition: compared with the OS group, the postoperative anal exhaust time [SMD=–2.47, 95% CI was (–3.24, –1.70), P<0.001], postoperative ambulation time [SMD=–2.97, 95% CI was (–4.32, –1.62), P<0.001], and hospital stay [SMD=–1.68, 95% CI was (–2.15, –1.21), P<0.001] of the LS group were all shorter. ③ The overall incidence of complications and the incidence of complications: on the one hand, compared with the OS group, patients in the LS group had a lower overall incidence of postoperative complications [OR=0.29, 95% CI was (0.19, 0.43), P<0.001]. On the other hand, compared with the OS group, patients in the LS group had lower incidences of infection [OR=0.27, 95% CI was (0.13, 0.55), P<0.001], ascites [OR=0.36, 95% CI was (0.13, 1.00), P=0.049], bleeding [OR=0.29, 95% CI was (0.10, 0.90), P=0.032], ileus [OR=0.34, 95% CI was (0.13, 0.90), P=0.030], incision fat liquefaction [OR=0.27, 95% CI was (0.08, 0.94), P=0.040], and incision rupture [OR=0.17, 95% CI was (0.03, 0.96), P=0.045]. However, there was no statistical difference on splenectomy fever [OR=0.41, 95% CI was (0.13, 1.27), P=0.123], pancreatic fistula [OR=0.40, 95% CI was (0.06, 2.63), P=0.343], liver function lesion [OR=0.36, 95% CI was (0.10, 1.34), P=0.127], and thrombosis [OR=0.33, 95% CI was (0.09, 1.22), P=0.097] between the 2 groups. Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery can not only significantly reduce the incidence of multiple complications of traumatic rupture of spleen, but also can speed up the recovery rate of postoperative recovery. Therefore, it is safe and beneficial in treatment of patients with traumatic rupture of spleen.

    Release date:2018-07-18 01:46 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Feasibility of laparoscopic radical resection and re-resection for suspicious and incidental gallbladder cancer

    ObjectiveTo evaluate feasibility of laparoscopic radical resection and re-resection for suspicious and incidental gallbladder cancer.MethodsWe searched PubMed and other databases, reviewed relevant literatures and summarized from aspects like whether efficacy comparable to laparotomy and enough lymph node dissection could be achieved through laparoscopy, timing of reoperation for incidental gallbladder cancer.ResultsLaparoscopic radical resection and re-resection were theoretically and technically feasible, but its efficacy and timing of re-resection were controversial, and its long-term efficacy needed further discussions in multi-center and large-scale cohort studies.ConclusionsLaparoscopy shows prospects of resection and re-resection for suspicious and incidental gallbladder cancer. Tentative explorations could be done in properly selected patients by well-experience medical centers and to achieve efficacy comparable to laparotomy is the fundamental principle.

    Release date:2020-08-19 12:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Experience of toatal laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a report of 14 cases

    ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility, safety and clinical effect of total laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsRetrospectively summarized the 14 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, who underwent total laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from April 2016 to June 2018. Collected the clinical data of those patients, including 7 cases of Bismuth type Ⅰ, 5 cases of Bismuth type Ⅱ, and 2 cases of Bismuth type Ⅲb.ResultsTotal laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma were performed successfully in all 14 patients. The operative time was 190–400 min (median time of 285 min) and the amount of intraoperative blood loss was 100–500 mL (median amount of 175 mL). There was no death case during the perioperative period. Postoperative pathological results showed that all cases accorded with bile duct adenocarcinoma, resection margins of them were negative, amount of lymph node was detected 6–15 per case (median amount of 8 per case), and 3 patients were inspected with peritumoral lymph node metastasis. Two patients were combined with postoperative bile leakage, one of whom was complicated with an abdominal infection, and both were cured and discharged after conservative treatment. All patients were followed-up regularly within 3–24 months (median followed-up period of 16 months). One of them recurred within 12 months after the operation. The remaining patients have survived well so far.ConclusionUnder the operation of the experienced surgeon, total laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is safe, feasible and effective in the short term.

    Release date:2019-01-16 10:05 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Safety and cost-benefit analysis of patients without gastric tube after thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy: A prospective cohort study

    ObjectiveTo compare the safety and comfort of patients with or without postoperative gastric tube placement after esophageal cancer surgery, and analyze the cost and nursing time of gastric tube placement. Methods The patients with esophageal cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery in West China Hospital of Sichuan University in 2021 were enrolled. The patients were divided into a gastric tube indwelling group and a non gastric tube indwelling group according to whether the gastric tube was indwelled after the operation. The safety and comfort indicators of the two groups were compared. Results A total of 130 patients were enrolled. There were 66 patients in the gastric tube indwelling group, including 53 males and 13 females, aged 61.80±9.05 years and 64 patients in the non gastric tube indwelling group, including 55 males and 9 females, aged 64.47±8.00 years. Six patients in the non gastric tube indwelling group needed to place gastric tube 1 to 3 days after the operation due to their condition. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The subjective comfort of patients in the gastric tube indwelling group was significantly lower than that in the non gastric tube indwelling group (P<0.001), and the incidence of foreign body sensation in the throat of patients in the gastric tube indwelling group was higher than that in the non gastric tube indwelling group (P<0.001). The average nursing time in the gastric tube indwelling group was about 59.58 minutes, and the average cost of gastric tube materials and nursing was 378.24 yuan per patient. Conclusion No gastric tube used after operation for appropriate esophageal cancer patients will not increase the incidence of postoperative complications (pulmonary infection, anastomotic leakage, chylothorax), but can increase the comfort of patients, save cost and reduce nursing workload, which is safe, feasible and economical.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Efficacy of myomectomy via transumbilical laparoendompic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopy

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of myomectomy via transumbilical laparoendompic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) and traditional multiport laparoscopy.MethodsThe study was conducted at Chengdu Western Hospital from June 2019 to June 2020. Fifty patients underwent TU-LESS myomectomy (TU-LESS group), while another 50 patients underwent traditional multiport laparoscopic myomectmy (multiport laparoscopy group). The conditions of operation, extra analgetic usage, VAS grade, and patients’ satisfaction degree were compared between two groups.ResultsPatients in both groups had similar age, BMI, fibroma volume, operative time, expelling gas day, blood loss, complication rate, and hospitalized costs (P>0.05). Compared with traditional multiport laparoscopy, the TU-LESS group resulted in significantly shorter hospitalization day, lower VAS score of the 1st/3nd/7th days after surgery, less use of analgetic after surgery, and higher satisfaction degree.ConclusionsTU-LESS is safe and feasible for myomectomy, and it is associated with less pain, shorter hospitalization day, and higher satisfaction degree.

    Release date:2021-05-25 02:52 Export PDF Favorites Scan
4 pages Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

Format

Content