ObjectiveTo explore the methods of breast reconstruction surgery with laparoscopically harvested pedicled omental flap (LHPOF), and analyze the patient’ evaluation, operation process and postoperative follow-up. MethodsPatients with pathologically proven breast cancer or plasma cell mastitis who underwent LHPOF breast reconstructive surgery were retrospectively collected from the Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from February 2022 to December 2023. ResultsA total of 16 patients were collected. The mean age of patients was 43.3 (ranging from 27 to 68) years old, the mean body mass index of patients was 23.0 kg/m2 (ranging from 18.3 to 28.6 kg/m2). One patient underwent transplant omental flat removal surgery due to postoperative flap thrombosis, and one patient choose to give up breast reconstruction due to insufficient flap volume. The single-stage surgery was performed successfully in the rest patients with no requirement of laparotomy. All patients made an uneventful recovery after surgery. During the follow-up period, which averaged 13 months and ranged from 9 to 17 months, the major symptoms were mild epigastric bulge (2 patients) and flap atrophy (1 patient), no serious flap-related or donor site-related complications such as flap loss, bowel dysfunction and abdominal incisional hernia. In general, the aesthetic results were satisfactory. ConclusionsUsing LHPOF in immediate breast reconstruction surgery can achieve satisfied aesthetic result, for the soft and natural appearance of the reconstructed breast. In the mean time, compared with other autologous tissue reconstruction approaches, LHPOF has lower incidences of complications of donor-site and flap-site.
Laparoscopic hepatectomy is routinely used in the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, and has formed a standardized operating procedure. Tumors located in the segments Ⅶ and Ⅷ of liver as well as the paracaval subsegment of caudate lobe are considered to be difficult sites for laparoscopic hepatectomy due to the deep anatomical location, proximity to important vascular structures, difficulty in exposing the visual field under laparoscopy, and limited operating space. Based on the experience of our team and related research reports, the authors analyzed and summarized countermeasures for the difficulties of laparoscopic hepatectomy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in difficult sites. Adhering to the tumor-centered and margin-based principles, accurate preoperative assessment, selection of the correct surgical approach, designing liver resection plane guided by hepatic vena while taking into account portal vein territory, and giving preference to ananatomical hepatectomy while preserving functional liver parenchyma as much as possible are the prerequisites for ensuring minimally invasive and oncology benefits for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in difficult sites.
ObjectivesTo summarize the latest advances about definition, classification, and TNM stage of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG).MethodThe available guidelines, consensuses, international conference proceedings, and clinical studies were reviewed and summarized.ResultsThe AEG trended to be an independent entity of malignant tumor at the special location. The previous misunderstanding of AEG definitions from the WHO needed to be corrected and unified in China. The Siewert classification was still a practical clinical approach to guiding treatment strategy, while the new draft of JGCA classification needed to be evaluated and verified in the clinical practice. By contrast, the 8th edition AJCC/UICC classification was relatively controversial in the guiding treatment strategies, mainly due to the staging system, surgical approach, and extent of lymphadenectomy of Siewert Ⅱ type AEG. Based on the available research results, the TNM staging system of the 8th edition of gastric cancer tended to be more reasonable for the Siewert Ⅱ and Ⅲ types AEG.ConclusionWith increasing incidence of AEG, more experimental and clinical studies on AEG are ongoing, and it is expected to have more optimized classification and exclusive staging system for AEG in future.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical value and experience of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) of “LEER” model with “less pain” “early move” “early eat” and “reassuring” as its ultimate goal in perioperative period of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy of patients with primary liver cancer.MethodsThe basic clinical data of 98 patients treated in our department from May 2017 to March 2020 who were diagnosed as primary liver cancer and underwent laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative recovery and patients’ satisfaction were compared between 40 patients managed with traditional model (traditional group) and 58 patients managed with measures of ERAS of “LEER” model (“LEER”-ERAS group).ResultsCompared with the traditional group, the “LEER”-ERAS group had lower postoperative pain scores (t=2.925, P=0.004), earlier postoperative anal exhaustion, bowel movement and normal diet (t=3.071, t=3.770, t=3.232, all P<0.005) , shorter time to postoperative off-bed activity (t=5.025, P<0.001) and earlier postoperative removal time of drainage tube (t=3.232, P=0.001). Postoperative hospital stay was shorter (t=4.831, P<0.001), the cost of hospitalization was lower (t=3.062, P=0.003), and the patient’s satisfaction with medical treatment was higher (χ2=9.267, P=0.002). There were no statistical difference in the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, rate of conversion to laparotomy, blocking time of porta hepatis, postoperative complications and postoperative adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsCompared with the traditional model, the measures of ERAS of “LEER” model that applied to laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy of patients with primary liver cancer, is safe and effective, and can relieve postoperative pain, accelerate postoperative rehabilitation, improve satisfaction of patients, shorten hospital stay, and reduce medical costs. It has further promotion and research value.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of 3D laparoscopic in the treatment of colorectal cancer.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched online to collect clinical trials of 3D laparoscopic in the treatment of colorectal cancer from inception to September 1st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 26 trials, including 4 randomized controlled trials and 22 cohort studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with 2D laparoscopic, 3D laparoscopic had shorter operative time (MD=–16.32, 95%CI –22.61 to –10.03, P<0.000 01), less amount of blood transfusion in operation (MD=–10.80, 95%CI –19.93 to –1.66, P=0.02), more lymph node dissection (MD=0.88, 95%CI 0.30 to 1.45, P=0.003), shorter recovery time of gastrointestinal function (MD=–0.18, 95%CI –0.31 to –0.04, P=0.01), lower incidence of postoperative complication (OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.44 to 0.89, P=0.009), and fewer days in hospital (MD=–0.84, 95%CI –1.40 to –0.28, P=0.003). Additionally, there was no significant difference in hospitalization costs (MD=–0.01, 95%CI –0.23 to 0.21, P=0.94).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that, compared with 2D laparoscopy, 3D laparoscopy assisted colorectal cancer surgery has obvious advantages such as less bleeding during operation, shorter operation time, lower incidence of complications after operation, shorter hospitalization time and no increase in hospitalization expenses. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective To retrospectively analyze the analgesic effect and cost-effectiveness of combined analgesia versus intermittent analgesia for patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. Methods We retrospectively collected clinical parameters and outcomes of analgesic effect from patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. Included patients were divided into two groups: local injection of ropivacaine combined with intermittent administration with analgesic via intravenous injection and intermittent administration with analgesic via intravenous injection only. Visual analogue scale (VAS) at different time points (2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h), usage of postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), adverse events, costs and other information were collected and assessed for further analysis of analgesic effect and cost-effectiveness. Results A total of 80 patients were enrolled in this study, each group consists of 40 patients. The results of this study found that VAS scores at 2 h and 4 h after operation in the combined analgesic group were significantly lower than that in the intermittent intravenous analgesia group (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences between the two groups in VAS scores at 6, 12 and 24 h after operation. The usage of NSAIDs were significantly lower in the combined group than intermittent group (P<0.05). The effective rate in the combined group was significantly higher than that in the intermittent group (P<0.05). The average cost of postoperative hospitalization and postoperative analgesic of the two groups were similar (allP values >0.05), and cost-effectiveness evaluation of the combined analgesia group was better than that of intermittent group. Conclusion Compared to intermittent administration with analgesic via intravenous injection, subcutaneous injection of ropivacaine hydrochloride combined with intermittent intravenous injection of parecoxib in patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery significantly could alleviate patients' painful complaints and reduce the postoperative usage of NSAIDs without increasing adverse events. Furthermore, the combination strategy has a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than intermittent group, which represents economic advantages.
Objectives To analyze the efficacy and safety of different operation methods for patients with cesarean scar diverticulum. Methods The clinical data of patients with cesarean section scar diverticulum treated in West China Second University Hospital from July 2012 to December 2016 was collected and followed up. The data of the previous perioperative period data, recovery, the improvement of the symptoms and postoperative condition of incision healing were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software. Results A total of 125 patients were included, in which 74 cases received hysteroscopy surgery for diverticulum electro section and electric coagulation (ESEC group), and 51 cases received other surgery focused on diverticulum dissection and sewing operations (DS group). Statistical analysis showed that, compared with DS group, bleeding, operation time, time of anal exsufflation and hospitalization duration after the operation of hysteroscopy in ESEC group were significantly reduced (P<0.001). In addition, the results showed that hysteroscopy group had optimal results in hemorrhage volume, operation time, anal exhaust time and hospitalization time indicators. However, the results of laparotomy group was not significant. Conclusions For the treatment of CSD, surgical treatment of this pathology by operative hysteroscopy may represent the best choice in symptomatic women because of its minimal invasiveness and beneficial therapeutic results. Hysteroscopy isthmoplasty appears to be the most popular treatment.
Objective To investigate the clinical value of laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac with constructed veress needle in the treatment of indirect inguinal hernia in children. Methods Ninety-one cases of pediatric indirect inguinal hernia who received treatment in Suqian People’s Hospital of Nanjing Drum-Tower Hospital Group from October 2014 to December 2015 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, cases of laparoscopy group (n=41) were treated by laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac with constructed veress needle, and cases of tradition group (n=50) were treated with traditional open high ligation of hernia sac. Comparison of clinical effect between the 2 groups was performed. Results All the operations were successfully carried out, and there was no conversion to open surgery in laparoscopy group. Three cases were diagnosed as two-side inguinal hernia in laparoscopy group, who were diagnosed as one-side inguinal hernia before operation. The operation time, length of surgical incision, blood loss, and hospital stay of the laparoscopy group were all significantly less than those of the tradition group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications such as scrotal edema and scrotal hydrocele, incidence of testicular dysplasia, and the recurrence rate in the laparoscopy group were all significantly lower than those of the tradition group (P<0.05). Conclusions Laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac with constructed veress needle in the treatment of indirect inguinal hernia in children has good application value, which has advantages of small surgical trauma, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, and less postope-rative complications, and we can find out contralateral recessive hernia during operation and avoid the second surgery.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and comfort of patients with or without postoperative gastric tube placement after esophageal cancer surgery, and analyze the cost and nursing time of gastric tube placement. Methods The patients with esophageal cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery in West China Hospital of Sichuan University in 2021 were enrolled. The patients were divided into a gastric tube indwelling group and a non gastric tube indwelling group according to whether the gastric tube was indwelled after the operation. The safety and comfort indicators of the two groups were compared. Results A total of 130 patients were enrolled. There were 66 patients in the gastric tube indwelling group, including 53 males and 13 females, aged 61.80±9.05 years and 64 patients in the non gastric tube indwelling group, including 55 males and 9 females, aged 64.47±8.00 years. Six patients in the non gastric tube indwelling group needed to place gastric tube 1 to 3 days after the operation due to their condition. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The subjective comfort of patients in the gastric tube indwelling group was significantly lower than that in the non gastric tube indwelling group (P<0.001), and the incidence of foreign body sensation in the throat of patients in the gastric tube indwelling group was higher than that in the non gastric tube indwelling group (P<0.001). The average nursing time in the gastric tube indwelling group was about 59.58 minutes, and the average cost of gastric tube materials and nursing was 378.24 yuan per patient. Conclusion No gastric tube used after operation for appropriate esophageal cancer patients will not increase the incidence of postoperative complications (pulmonary infection, anastomotic leakage, chylothorax), but can increase the comfort of patients, save cost and reduce nursing workload, which is safe, feasible and economical.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of unconventional abdominal drainage after laparoscopic hepatectomy.MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver tumors in the Mianyang Central Hospital from June to December 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively collected. Based on whether drainage tube was placed in the abdominal cavity during operation, the patients were divided into non-catheterized group (without drainage tube) and catheterized group (with drainage tube). The intraoperative data and postoperative complications (e.g. intraabdominal hemorrhage, bile leakage, abdominal infection, and liver failure) were compared between the two groups. Then, the intraoperative data and postoperative conditions of liver cancer and non-liver cancer patients with or without abdominal drainage tube were compared and analyzed.ResultsA total of 117 eligible patients were included in the study. The non-catheterized group had 59 patients and the catheterized group had 58 patients. The patients with liver cancer had 84 patients (44 non-catheterized patients and 40 catheterized patients) and the patients without liver cancer had 33 patients (15 non-catheterized patients and 18 catheterized patients). ① On the whole, the groups were comparable in the baseline data between the non-catheterized group and the catheterized group, such as gender, age, HBV infection, body mass index, hepatic function index, liver stiffness value, disease category, etc. (P>0.05). Compared with the catheterized group, the non-catheterized group had earlier off-bed activities and earlier flatus time (P<0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (P=0.030). However, no statistically significant differences were found in other indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). ② Whether the patients had liver cancer or not, the non-catheterized patients still had earlier off-bed activities and earlier flatus time as compared with the catheterized patients (P<0.001). Among the patients with liver cancer, no difference was found in postoperative hospital stay. However, among the patients without liver cancer, the non-catheterized patients had shorter postoperative hospital stay than the catheterized patients (P=0.042). No statistically significant differences were found in other indicators between the catheterized patients and non-catheterized patients (P>0.05).ConclusionFor technologically skilled laparoscopic hepatectomy center, selectively not placing peritoneal drainage tube after surgery might better promote the health of patients.