ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the potential value of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) as an indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe literatures were searched comprehensively in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, Wanfang, CNKI, and CQVIP databases from the establishment of the databases to May 20, 2021. The combined hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to evaluate the correlation between the CAR and the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or disease-free survival (DFS) in the patients with pancreatic cancer. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the non-randomized controlled studies, and the Stata SE 15.0 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 2 985 patients with pancreatic cancer were included in this meta-analysis of 15 studies. The results of meta-analysis showed that the higher CAR value, the shorter OS [effect size (ES)=0.60, 95%CI (0.50, 0.69), Z=12.04, P<0.001], DFS [ES=0.63, 95%CI (0.47, 0.78), Z=3.61, P<0.001], and PFS [ES=0.41, 95%CI (0.19, 0.63), Z=7.91, P<0.001] in the patients with pancreatic cancer. The results of subgroup analysis of OS according to different countries, sample size, mean age, follow-up time, CAR cut-off value, and NOS score showed that the higher CAR value was related to the shorter OS (P<0.05). The result of linear regression analysis showed that there was no correlation between the CAR cut-off value and lnHR of OS (r2=0.947, P=0.455). Conclusion From results of this study, CAR is closely related to OS of patients, and it is expected to be used as a new reference index for monitoring and judging prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer.
ObjectiveTo compare the the effectiveness of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), in stageⅠ lung adenocarcinoma.MethodsFrom January 2012 to December 2018, 291 patients were included. The patients were allocated into two groups including a RATS group with 125 patients and a VATS group with 166 patients. Two cohorts (RATS, VATS ) of clinical stageⅠ lung adenocarcinoma patients were matched by propensity score. Then there were 114 patients in each group (228 patients in total). There were 45 males and 69 females at age of 62±9 years in the RATS group; 44 males, 70 females at age of 62±8 years in the VATS group. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the outcomes.Results Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group got less blood loss (P<0.05) and postoperative drainage (P<0.05) with a statistical difference. There was no statistical difference in drainage time (P>0.05) or postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05) between the two groups. The RATS group harvested more stations and number of the lymph nodes with a statistical difference (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS and mean survival time (P>0.05). While there was a statistical difference in DFS between the two groups (1-year DFS: 94.1% vs. 95.6%; 3-year DFS: 92.6% vs. 75.2%; 5-year DFS: 92.6% vs. 68.4%, P<0.05; mean DFS time: 78 months vs. 63 months, P<0.05) between the two groups. The univariate analysis found that the number of the lymph nodes dissection was the prognostic factor for OS, and tumor diameter, surgical approach, stations and number of the lymph nodes dissection were the prognostic factors for DFS. However, multivariate analysis found that there was no independent risk factor for OS, but the tumor diameter and surgical approach were independently associated with DFS.ConclusionThere is no statistical difference in OS between the two groups, but the RATS group gets better DFS.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of extranodal extension of axillary lymph nodes metastasis on the prognosis of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). MethodsThe TNBC patients with axillary lymph node metastasis admitted to the Nanyang Central Hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were collected. The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of TNBC patients with or without extranodal extension were analyzed and compared, and the factors affecting prognosis were analyzed. ResultsA total of 216 patients were included, including 123 patients without extranodal extension and 93 patients with extranodal extension. Compared with the patients without extranodal extension, the proportions of the patients with histological grade Ⅲ, 10 or more metastatic lymph nodes, and 5 cm or greater tumor diameter were higher in the patients with extranodal extension (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that the 10 or more metastatic lymph nodes was the risk factor affecting the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the TNBC patients (P<0.05), and the histological grade Ⅲ and lower human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) expression were the risk factors affecting the OS of the TNBC patients (P<0.05), as well as the extranodal extension was the risk factor affecting the DFS of the TNBC patients (P<0.05). The 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rate of the patients with extranodal extension was worse than that of the patients without extranodal extension (70.2% vs. 83.3%, χ2=6.934, P=0.008). The 5-year cumulative overall survival rate had no statistically significant difference between the them (75.3% vs. 82.1%, χ2=1.969, P=0.161). ConclusionsFrom the results of this study, the prognosis of TNBC patients with extranodal extension is worse. Especially the patients with histological grade Ⅲ, 10 or more metastatic lymph nodes, and with lower HER-2 expression should be paid attention.
ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of primary tumor site on prognosis of colorectal cancer after radical resection in different stages.MethodsFour hundreds and twenty patients with colorectal cancer in our hospital from Jan. 2008 to Dec. 2016 were selected as study subjects, all patients were confirmed by pathology. According to the location of colorectal cancer, the patients were divided into rectum group (n=220), left colon group (n=105) and right colon group (n=95). The difference of clinicopathological features of patients with different group were compared. The risk factors affecting the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients were analyzed by single factor and multi factor unconditional Cox regression analysis, and the survival curve was drawn by Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference test was carried out by log-rank method.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the three groups in age, BMI, smoking history, alcohol history, family history, vascular tumor thrombus, N staging, tumor diameter, nerve invasion and cancer nodule (P>0.05). There were significant differences in sex, pathological type, anterior intestinal obstruction, TNM staging, T staging and M staging (P<0.05). The results of single factor Cox regression analysis showed that sex, pathological type, anterior intestinal obstruction, TNM staging, T staging, M staging, primary tumor site, nerve invasion and cancer nodule were the risk factors for the prognosis of the patients (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that TNM staging, location of primary tumor and nerve invasion were risk factors affecting prognosis of patients (P<0.05). The total 5-year survival rate of the rectal group was 80.45% (177/220), the total 5-year survival rate of the left hemicolon group was 67.62% (71/105), and the total 5-year survival rate of the right hemicolon group was 68.42% (65/95). The survival curves of Kaplan-Meier showed that the difference between the three groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusonsThe 5-year survival rate of patients with rectal cancer is significantly higher than that of patients with left colon cancer and right colon cancer. For patients with different stage of colorectal cancer after radical resection, the prognosis of colorectal cancer can be predicted by the location of primary tumor.
ObjectiveTo analyze the impact of neoadjuvant regimens on prognosis in patients with rectal cancer in the current version of the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA) database. MethodsPatient information was extracted from the updated version of DACCA on November 24, 2022 according to the established screening criteria, and the following items were analyzed: gender, age, body mass index (BMI), marriage, economic conditions, degree of differentiation, neoadjuvant treatment regimen, and pTNM staging. According to the neoadjuvant treatment regimen, the patients were divided into three groups: chemotherapy group, chemotherapy combined radiotherapy group, and chemotherapy combined targeted therapy group, and the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients in the three groups were analyzed, and the influencing factors of OS and DSS were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. ResultsAccording to the screening criteria, 1 716 valid data were obtained from the DACCA database, of which 954 (55.6%) were in the chemotherapy group, 332 (19.3%) in the chemotherapy combined radiotherapy group, and 430 (25.1%) in the chemotherapy combined targeted therapy group. The differences in the Kaplan-Merier survival curves of patients with different neoadjuvant regimens for OS and DSS in the three groups were statistically significant (χ2=142.142, P＜0.001; χ2=129.528, P＜0.001). There were significant differences in OS rate and DSS rate between the three groups in 3 years and 5 years (P<0.001). Further comparison of different neoadjuvant therapy groups showed that the OS of the chemotherapy combined targeted therapy group was slightly better than that of the chemotherapy group in 3 years, however, OS and DSS in 5 years were slightly worse than those the chemotherapy group, but the difference were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The OS and DSS of the chemotherapy group and the chemotherapy combined targeted therapy group were better than those of the chemotherapy combined radiotherapy group in 3 years and 5 years, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.01). The results of multivariate analysis showed that patients’ age, economic conditions, degree of tumor differentiation, new auxiliary scheme and pTNM staging were the influencing factors of OS and DSS. ConclusionNeoadjuvant treatment regimen will affect the long-term survival prognosis of rectal cancer patients.
At present, breast cancer is most common malignant tumor among female population. The treatment of breast cancer comprises surgery, radiotherapy, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, with surgical as the main treatment approach. Common surgical methods for breast cancer include breast conservation surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. This article reviews the recent researches about the survival of breast cancer patients receiving BCS, the quality of life for patients receiving BCS, the survival of young and elderly patients receiving BCS, BCS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, BCS for patients with breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation, and BCS for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, so as to provide reference for the follow-up work of medical staff.
ObjectiveTo explore the immune biomarkers for prognosis of breast cancer and to construct a risk assessment model.MethodsThe gene expression of breast cancer samples was retrieved from The Cancer Genome Map (TCGA) database and immune related genes (IRGs) were retrieved from the ImmPort database. Cox proportional hazards regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were used for prognostic analysis. Gene set enrichment analysis ( GSEA) was used to explore biological signaling pathways. ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms were used to explore the relationship between risk score and tumor immune microenvironment.ResultsNine kinds of immune-related differentially expressed genes independently related to prognosis were identified: adrenoceptor beta 1 (ADRB1), interleukin 12B (IL12B), syndecan 1 (SDC1), thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19), fatty acid binding protein 7 (FABP7), interferon epsilon (IFNE), tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 18 (TNFRSF18) and interleukin 27 (IL27). The risk assessment equation constructed by these nine kinds of genes had powerful predictive ability. The “neurotrophin signaling pathway” and “adipocyte factor signaling pathway” were activated in patients of high-risk group, and “leukocyte transendothelial migration” “WNT signaling pathway” “FcεRI signaling pathway” “valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis” and “protein export pathway” were activated in patients of low-risk group. A variety of tumor-killing immune cells were significantly enriched in the tumor-infiltrating immune cells of patients in the low-risk group. The immunosuppressive immune cells were significantly enriched in tumor infiltrating immune cells of patients in high-risk group.ConclusionIRGs prognostic signatures are an effective potential predictive classifier in breast cancer treatment.
ObjectiveTo establish an individualized nomogram model and evaluate its efficacy to provide a possible evaluation basis for the prognosis of lower third and abdominal part of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). MethodsLower third and abdominal part of EAC patients from 2010 to 2015 were chosen from the SEER Research Plus Database (17 Regs, 2022nov sub). The patients were randomly allocated to the training cohort and the internal validation cohort with a ratio of 7∶3 using bootstrap resampling. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine significant contributors to overall survival (OS) in EAC patients, which would be elected to construct the nomogram prediction model. C-index, calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were performed to evaluate its efficacy. Finally, the efficacy to evaluate the OS of EAC patients was compared between the nomogram prediction model and TNM staging system. ResultsIn total, 3945 patients with lower third and abdominal part of EAC were enrolled, including 3475 males and 470 females with a median age of 65 (57-72) years. The 2761 patients were allocated to the training cohort and the remaining 1184 patients to the internal validation cohort. In the training and the internal validation cohorts, the C-index of the nomogram model was 0.705 and 0.713, respectively. Meanwhile, the calibration curve also suggested that the nomogram model had a strong capability of predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of EAC patients. The nomogram also had a higher efficacy than the TNM staging system in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of EAC patients. ConclusionThis nomogram prediction model has a high efficiency for predicting OS in the patients with lower third and abdominal part of EAC, which is higher than that of the current TNM staging system.
Objective To evaluate the relationship of systemic immune inflammatory index (SII) with the clinical features and prognosis of osteosarcoma patients. Methods The clinical data of patients with osteosarcoma surgically treated in Fuzhou Second Hospital between January 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively collected. The preoperative SII value was calculated, which was defined as platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte count. The best critical value of SII was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the relationship between SII and clinical features of patients was analyzed by χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used to study the effect of SII on overall survival (OS). The nomogram prediction model was established according to the independent risk factors of patients’ prognosis. Results A total of 108 patients with osteosarcoma were included in this study. Preoperative high SII was significantly correlated with tumor diameter, Enneking stage, local recurrence and metastasis (P<0.05). The median follow-up time was 62 months. The 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates of the low SII group were significantly higher than those of the high SII group (100.0%, 96.4%, 85.1% vs. 95.4%, 73.7%, 30.7%), and the survival of the two groups were statistically different (P<0.05). Univariate Cox regression analyses showed that tumor diameter, Enneking stage, local recurrence, metastasis and SII were associated with OS (P<0.05). Multiple Cox regression analysis showed that Enneking stage (P=0.031), local recurrence (P=0.035) and SII (P=0.001) were independent risk factors of OS. The nomogram constructed according to the independent risk factors screened by the Cox regression model had good discrimination and consistency (C-index=0.774), and the calibration curve showed that the nomogram had a high consistency with the actual results. In addition, the ROC curve indicated that the nomogram had a good prediction efficiency (area under the curve=0.880). Conclusions The preoperative SII level is expected to become an important prognostic parameter for patients with osteosarcoma. The higher the SII level is, the worse the prognosis of patients will be. The nomogram prediction model built on preoperative SII level, Enneking stage and local recurrence has a good prediction efficiency, and can be used to guide the diagnosis and treatment of clinical osteosarcoma.
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of single and bilateral lung transplantation in the treatment of end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Chinese and English databases were searched by computer, including PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang database, VIP database and CBM. Case-control studies on single lung transplantation or bilateral lung transplantation for COPD were collected from the inception to July 31, 2022. We evaluated the quality of the literature via Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). All results were analyzed using Review Manager V5.3 and STATA 17.0. Results A total of 8 studies were included covering 14076 patients, including 8326 patients in the single lung transplantation group and 5750 patients in the bilateral lung transplantation group. NOS scores were≥6 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in the postoperative 1-year survival between the two groups (P=0.070). The 2-year survival rate (P=0.002), 3-year survival rate (P<0.001), 5-year survival rate (P<0.001), overall survival rate (P＜0.001), postoperative forced expiratory volume in one second/predicted value (P<0.001), postoperative forced vital capacity (P<0.001), and postoperative 6-minute walking distance (P=0.002) were lower or shorter than those in the bilateral lung transplantation group, the postoperative intubation time (P=0.030) was longer than that in the bilateral lung transplantation group. Bilateral lung transplantation group showed better surgical results. There was no statistical difference in the mortality, obliterative bronchiolitis, length of hospitalization, primary graft dysfunction, or postoperative adverse events (P>0.05). Conclusion Bilateral lung transplantation is associated with better long-term survival and postoperative lung function compared with single lung transplantation. In-hospital mortality and postoperative complications are similar between them.