Hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) of the pancreas is a rare, highly malignant tumor with poor prognosis. This article presents the CT and MR features of HAC of the pancreas, while also reviewing the relevant literatures to succinctly summarize the underlying pathophysiological mechanism, imaging diagnosis, and differential diagnosis. The objective is to enhance the understanding of HAC of the pancreas among clinicians and radiologists.
ObjectiveTo understand the research progress of treatment of hyperkalemia after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK), and to provide the basis for the prevention and treatment of hyperkalemia after SPK.MethodThe relevant literatures about hyperkalemia after SPK in recent years were reviewed.ResultsThe pancreas and kidney that maintained the stability of serum potassium in different ways had been confirmed in current studies. The newly transplanted organ dysfunction after SPK and the use of drugs after SPK both caused hyperkalemia. The treatment principle of hyperkalemia after SPK was to take corresponding prevention and treatment measures according to different reasons.ConclusionsSPK is the best treatment for diabetic renal failure. Postoperative hyperkalemia is one of the most common complications, and timely and correct management is of great significance to the survival and prognosis of patients.
ObjectiveTo compare surgical safety and postoperative efficacy of total mesopancreas excision (TMpE) with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and standard PD (Whipple).MethodsA total of 123 patients underwent PD in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from August 2013 to December 2017 were included, including 47 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma and 76 patients with periampullary carcinoma, then were divided into a TMpE group and a Whipple group respectively. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal function, postoperative complications, and postoperative survival of patients with the same site between the Whipple group and the TMpE group were retrospectively compared.Results① There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the TMpE group and the Whipple group in the pancreatic head carcinoma and periampullary carcinoma (P>0.05). ② For the patients with pancreatic head carcinoma, there were no significant differences in the operative time, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time between the TMpE group and the Whipple group (P>0.05), but the intraoperative blood loss in the TMpE group was significantly higher than that in the Whipple group (P=0.038); For the patients with periampullary carcinoma, the above indexes had no significant differences between the TMpE group and the Whipple group (P>0.05). ③ The total incidence of complications in the TMpE group was significantly higher than that in the Whipple group for the patients with pancreatic head carcinoma (χ2=6.595, P=0.010), which had no significant difference between the TMpE group and the Whipple group for the patients with periampullary carcinoma (P>0.05). ④ The cumulative survival curve in the TMpE group was better than that in the Whipple group for the patients with pancreatic head carcinoma (χ2=9.597, P=0.002), which had no significant difference between the TMpE group and the Whipple group for the patients with periampullary carcinoma (χ2=0.844, P=0.358).ConclusionsFor patients with pancreatic head cancer, comparing with standard Whipple, although TMpE PD increases intraoperative blood loss and overall incidence of complications, it could significantly improve long-term survival and there are no significant differences in postoperative recovery time and operative safety between Whipple and TMpE; For patients with periampullary carcinoma, there are no significant differences in surgical safety, long-term survival rate, and survival time between TMpE and Whipple.
Objective To summarize the imaging manifestation and identification of ectopic pancreas (EP), so as to improve clinicians and radiologists’ knowledge of EP and aid in accurate preoperative diagnosis, thereby reducing the misdiagnosis rate and avoiding unnecessary surgery. Methods Combined with clinical experience and relevant literatures in recent years, the histopathology, common imaging manifestations and main differential diagnosis of ectopic pancreas were summarized. Results EP is a rare congenital developmental anomaly of pancreas, the most common location is the upper digestive system. At present, the commonly used imaging technology is computed tomography. The imaging findings of ectopic pancreas were similar to those of normal pancreas, and its density and enhancement characteristics were related to its histopathological composition. The specific signs of ectopic pancreas include “central umbilical sign” “ductal structure” and “flat/adherent sign”. Heterotopic pancreas should be differentiated from submucosal tumor of gastrointestinal tract. Conclusions The imaging findings of EP have certain characteristics. For some cases with atypical imaging findings, imaging diagnosis is difficult.
ObjectiveTo summarize the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function.MethodIn this paper, we reviewed and summarized the related literatures about the application of MRI in the field of pancreatic exocrine function evaluation in recent years.ResultsA variety of MRI techniques could be used to detect the pancreatic exocrine function. In addition to conventional MRI techniques, there were also MRI stimulated by pancreatic secretions, cine (dynamic) cholangiopancreatography based on space selective reverse recovery pulse, and so on.ConclusionThe new MRI techniques have potential for semi-quantitative and quantitative evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function.
ObjectiveTo summarize recent research advancement on radically surgical therapy of carcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas． MethodsRelevant literatures about radically surgical therapy of carcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas were collected and reviewed． ResultsRecent experimental researches indicated that distal pancreatectomy was the common used surgical way to treat carcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas. Besides， spleenpreserving distal pancreatectomy, distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection, and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were also the choices to the treatment of carcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas. ConclusionThe surgical way to treat carcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas has advanced for these years, but furthermore development requires more great efforts.
Objective To summarize the current diagnostic and therapeutic advancement of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. Methods Relevant literatures about the diagnosis and treatment of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas, which were published recently domestic and abroad were collected and reviewed. Results Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas is now considered to be a low-grade malignancy with characteristic clinical, imaging and pathological features. Resection is considered to be the optimal choice with favourable prognosis. Conclusion An awareness of the features may guide us to a correct diagnosis and treatment of this rare neoplasm, but the deep understanding of the disease needs the accumulation of more cases and fundamental research.
Objective To study the clinical significance of central pancreatectomy in treatment of benign tumor of neck and body of pancreas. Methods The clinical data of 29 patients with benign tumor of pancreas were reviewed retrospectively in our hospital during the past 5 years. Results There was no perioperative death. Mean of operative time was （165±45） min （125-270min）， mean of blood loss was （173±88） mL （50-450mL）. The pathological diagnosis of all the patients were benign. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 10 patients. One patient with bleeding after operation was treated with another two operations. Twenty-one patients were followed-up with the time ranged from 3 months to 4 years （average 16 months）. There were no complications related to diabetes. Conclusion Central pancreatectomy is reasonable for patients with benign tumor of pancreas， it could well preserve the endocrine and exocrine function of pancreas， and improve the quality of life of patients.
Objective To evaluate the long-term efficacy of extended and standard surgery for carcinoma of head of pancreas by using meta-analysis. Methods Related articls （1990-2012） were searched in Pubmed， WOS， Embase， WanFang， SinoMed， and CNKI. Study on quality of these literatures were evaluated by using the Jadad score. The patients with pancreatic head carcinoma underwent extended radical resection and standard radical resection were classified to treatment group and control group， respectively. The mortality， morbidity， and survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year after operation in the two groups were evaluated by using meta-analysis. Results A total of 11 studies fitted the selection crit-eria， including 744 patients. Among them 357 cases were in standard radical resection group and 387 cases in the extended radical resection group. The results of meta-analysis showed that： ①The morbidity after operation did not significantly differed between the extended radical resection group and standard radical resection group （OR=1.360， 95% CI=0.990-1.870， P=0.050）. ②The mortality of the two groups did not significantly differed （OR=0.870， 95% CI=0.430-1.760，P=0.700）. ③There were no significant differences in survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year between the two groups （OR=0.880， 95% CI=0.450-1.720， P=0.710；OR=0.940， 95% CI=0.590-1.480，P=0.710；OR=1.000， 95% CI=0.600-1.67， P=1.000）. Conclusion Compared with standard radical resection， extended radical resection can not improve the survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year after operation， and can’t reduce the mortality and morbidity after operation
ObjectiveTo analyze and conclude CT and MRI imaging features of ectopic pancreas in gastrointestinal tract so as to improve the understanding of the features.MethodsThe clinical, imaging, and pathological data of 12 patients with ectopic pancreas in the gastrointestinal tract confirmed by the pathology in the Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital from November 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The characteristics of image presentation were summarized.Results① The anatomical distribution: all patients had a single lesion. Of the 12 cases, 6 cases located in the gastric body lesser curvature, 3 cases located in the gastric angle, 1 case located in the posterior wall of gastric antrum, 1 case occurred in the upper jejunum, and 1 case occurred in the terminal ileum; 8 cases located in the submucosa, 2 cases located in the submucosa and muscular layer simultaneously, 1 case located in the submucosa, muscular and serous layer simultaneously, and 1 case located in the muscular layer. ② Size of the lesions: the maxium dimensions of the lesions were all 3 cm or less, and the long axes of the lesions were parallel to the gastrointestinal tract wall in 10 cases. ③ The internal characteristics: the results of 9 of 11 cases showed the isodensity compared to main pancreas on the plain CT scan. The results of 8 patients with enhanced CT showed the moderate to obvious enhancement, with 2 cases showed the slightly enhanced flaky or tube-like foci. In the arterial phase and portal venous phase, 6 cases showed the isodensity compared to main pancreas respectively. The result of MRI in 1 patient showed the isointensity compared to main pancreas on the plain scan and obviously heterogeneous enhancement.ConclusionCT and MRI could provide some information about location, size, and internal density or intensity of ectopic pancreas, and could be helpful for diagnosis.